On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 12:32 +0200, Michal Malý wrote:
On Wednesday 23 of April 2014 15:41:03 Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:59 +0200, Michal Malý wrote:
static int drff_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
-struct ff_effect *effect)
On Wednesday 23 of April 2014 15:41:03 Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:59 +0200, Michal Malý wrote:
static int drff_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
-struct ff_effect *effect)
+ const struct mlnx_effect_command
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:59 +0200, Michal Malý wrote:
static int drff_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
-struct ff_effect *effect)
+ const struct mlnx_effect_command *command)
{
struct hid_device *hid =
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:14:44PM +, madcatxs...@devoid-pointer.net
wrote:
This is another case where even the old code was flawed, right? Should
I try to stuff the fixes into these patches or would a few extra
patches addressing these problems be an easier to review solution? I
can
On Wednesday 23 of April 2014 11:47:05 si...@mungewell.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:14:44PM +, madcatxs...@devoid-pointer.net
wrote:
This is another case where even the old code was flawed, right? Should
I try to stuff the fixes into these patches or would a few extra
Port hid-dr to ff-memless-next
Signed-off-by: Michal Malý madcatxs...@devoid-pointer.net
---
drivers/hid/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/hid/hid-dr.c | 59
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
