On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Thiago Rondon wrote:
At 2.4 too, but the status of file is o+r. Do see any
problem about this?
-Thiago Rondon
Yes. /proc/pid/environ is now unreadable by the owner; similarly for
/proc/pid/fd/ . It makes debugging harder.
It is also a major change in a supposedly
Sandy Harris wrote:
jamal wrote:
What problem does this fix?
If you are mucking with the ifindex, you may be affecting many places
in the rest of the kernel, as well as user-space programs which use
ifindex to bind to raw devices.
I am talking about 2.5 possibilities now
I'll take a look at the ramfs one. I may have broken something else when fixing
everything else with ramfs (like unlink) crashing
Ehh.. Plain 2.4.0 ramfs is fine, assuming you add a "UnlockPage()" to
ramfs_writepage(). So what do you mean by "fixing everything else"?
-ac has the rather
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:21:31PM +, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
Can you tell me about any ready-to-use test suites, for any software
package that should run under Linux, that I can build and run to test
the new kernel?
The Linux Test Project (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ltp/) was set up
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
I'll take a look at the ramfs one. I may have broken something else when fixing
everything else with ramfs (like unlink) crashing
Ehh.. Plain 2.4.0 ramfs is fine, assuming you add a "UnlockPage()" to
ramfs_writepage(). So what do you mean by
I've noticed that my Linux boxes take quite a hit in terms of
packets per second rate when I define ipchains rules with
2.2.X kernels. Does the netfilter replacement found in 2.4
kernels improve this performance?
11101101 (Ed)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
jamal wrote:
erm, this is a MUST. You MUST factor the hardware VLANs and be totaly
802.1q compliant. Also of interest is 802.1P and D. We must have full
compliance, not some toy emulation.
I have seen neither hardware nor spec sheets on how these
Could XFree86 4.0.2 fix this? I had been waiting until the binary packages were
available from ftp.slackware.com because Patrick Volkerding lays out the
directories in a slightly different manner that he argues pretty convincingly is
preferable, but it would be a drag for me to reproduce by
Alan Cox wrote:
-ac has the rather extended ramfs with resource limits and stuff. That one
also has rather more extended bugs 8). AFAIK none of those are in the vanilla
ramfs code
Nifty stuff, too; it's nice for a ramfs mount to show up in 'df' with
useful figures. Shame I can't put anything
The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the mm
proc code.
Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
if ((rw == WRITE) atomic_read(nr_async_pages)
pager_daemon.swap_cluster * (1 page_cluster))
In that (swapout logic) it effectively
Hi,
recently I was on the internet with kernel 2.4.0-prerelease.
Suddenly Netscape hung and I couldn't help hard rebooting.
Fsck discovered an error it wasn't able to fix. This error never
appeared before and my Seagate HD actually should be alright.
The following error message appears
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
I would like to determine the banwidth the card is getting from
the network.
/proc/net/dev exports counters; you can monitor those -- I'm sure
there are perfomance program that do exactly this.
I have this little script for monitoring
Fsck discovered an error it wasn't able to fix. This error never
appeared before and my Seagate HD actually should be alright.
Umm the error says not
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekCompleteError }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError } LBAsect = 2421754, sector
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the mm
proc code.
Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
if ((rw == WRITE) atomic_read(nr_async_pages)
pager_daemon.swap_cluster * (1
I'm trying to get more familiar with the MM code in 2.4.0, as can be
seen from lots of questions I have on the subject. I discovered nasty
mm behaviour under even moderate load (2.2 didn't have troubles).
Things go berzerk if you have one big process whose working set is
around your physical
Hi,
I have an old ISA-PNP soundcard whose driver doesn't currently use the
ISA-PNP services. I have therefore been activating this card by
writing to the /proc/isapnp interface. And in an idle moment, I tried
an "auto" instruction:
cat /proc/isapnp EOF
card 0 ENS3081
dev 0 ENS
auto
EOF
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:55:15PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
+ return -EPERM;
To stop a case where the fs gets corrupted otherwise. You can change that to
return 0 which is more correct but most not remove it.
While I suppose "0" is covered under "the result is
Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the mm
proc code.
Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
if ((rw == WRITE) atomic_read(nr_async_pages)
Nate Straz of the Linux Test Project at SGI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
The Linux Test Project (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ltp/) was set up to
create a set of automated tests for Linux.
Nate,
This is most excellent news!
I'd like you to look at http://linuxquality.sunsite.dk/
The
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
-ac has the rather extended ramfs with resource limits and stuff. That one
also has rather more extended bugs 8). AFAIK none of those are in the vanilla
ramfs code
This is actually where I agree with whoever
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the
mm proc code.
Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
if ((rw == WRITE) atomic_read(nr_async_pages)
pager_daemon.swap_cluster * (1
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
OK, maybe I was too fast in concluding with that change. I'm
still trying to find out why is MM working bad in some
circumstances (see my other email to the list).
Anyway, I would than suggest to introduce another /proc entry
and call it appropriately:
Sounds like a job for ... drum roll ... tmpfs!!
(and yes, I share your opinion that ramfs is nice _because_
it's an easy example for filesystem code teaching)
The resource tracking ramfs isnt that much uglier to be honest. One that went
off using backing store would be, but ramfs with
This patch should fix the rest of the warnings about #endif
statements when using the 20001225 gcc snapshot. Thanks to
Keith Owens for providing a script to automate this process. It got
the job done sooner and found warnings to fix for non x86 platforms.
Rich
diff -urN -X dontdiff
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
Anyway, I would than suggest to introduce another /proc entry and call
it appropriately: max_async_pages. Because that is what we care about,
anyway. I'll send another patch.
Anton Blanchard already did a patch for this. Sent to the list
on Thu, 7 Dec
I get, with XFree86 4.0.1 and an ATI Rage Millenium card:
(EE) r128(0): R128DRIScreenInit failed (DRM version = 2.1.2, expected 1.0.x).
Disabling DRI.
Jeff Hartmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) says:
XFree 4.0.2 will fix this
OK, so I'll give a try at building 4.0.2 the Slackware way. While
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
Things go berzerk if you have one big process whose working set
is around your physical memory size.
"go berzerk" in what way? Does the system cause lots of extra
swap IO and does it make the system thrash where 2.2 didn't
even touch the disk ?
Final
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
3DNOW extensions for Cyrix III via rdmsr from 0x8001. This
fails with an exception, that is not handled and thus we oops
on boot.
Interesting. Ok. We can set the bit
(Could this code have been written by someone who was confused between
MSR 0x8001 and CPUID 0x8001?)
It looks like thats what happened. The docs say it has 3dnow and mmx but
I think your diagnosis is correct
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
What does this message mean in my dmesg output?
__alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
__alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
__alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
__alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
__alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
reset_xmit_timer sk=c5b3a680 1
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:34:11AM +0200, Eric Lammerts wrote:
I had the same problem with my 80Gb Maxtor. (Asus P2L97, works with
60Gb but hangswith 80Gb :-/) After clipping the drive with ibmsetmax
(http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0012.1/0249.html)
and removing the
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, John O'Donnell wrote:
What does this message mean in my dmesg output?
__alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
It means something in the kernel is trying to allocate an
area of 8 physically contiguous pages, but that wasn't
available so the allocation failed...
This
for what it's worth:
this afternoon i conducted an experiment: i copied everything that
was newer from
[xfree-4.02-sourcedir]/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel
to my [linux-2.4.0-sourcedir]/drivers/char/drm and then built a
monolithic kernel containing agpgart, dri,
Hi,
I just got this bounce message when sending my response
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] his question. John, could you set
your spam filters to something more reasonable and make
sure you don't include whole countries ???
[or ... why are you asking questions here if you don't
want an answer?]
(my
Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
The following patch cleans up some obsolete structures from the
mm proc code.
Beside that it also fixes what I think is a bug:
if ((rw == WRITE) atomic_read(nr_async_pages)
Rich Baum wrote:-
This patch should fix the rest of the warnings about #endif
statements when using the 20001225 gcc snapshot. Thanks to
Keith Owens for providing a script to automate this process. It got
the job done sooner and found warnings to fix for non x86 platforms.
Alan Cox wrote:
(Could this code have been written by someone who was confused between
MSR 0x8001 and CPUID 0x8001?)
It looks like thats what happened. The docs say it has 3dnow and mmx but
I think your diagnosis is correct
Especially since it's bit 31 in EDX. I don't think
Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
OK, maybe I was too fast in concluding with that change. I'm
still trying to find out why is MM working bad in some
circumstances (see my other email to the list).
Anyway, I would than suggest to introduce
Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
Things go berzerk if you have one big process whose working set
is around your physical memory size.
"go berzerk" in what way? Does the system cause lots of extra
swap IO and does it make the system thrash
On 7 Jan, Alan Cox wrote:
Um, what about people running their box as just a VLAN router/firewall?
That seems to be one of the principle uses so far. Actually, in that case
both VLAN and IP traffic would come through, so it would be a tie if VLAN
came first, but non-vlan traffic would suffer
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
[snip]
None of the named compilers gripe? Where, prey tell, do I get the source-
code of a compiler that works? The only source provided in the site
listed in the Documentation does not.
It's not the only source there..
Only on my company's e-mail server. My company typically gets "zero"
emails from outside the US. If I get a piece of spam (sorry they are
typically from outside the US), I just block the entire .com.br domain.
I get far less SPAM now! I cannot express how much I loathe SPAM!
I have taken this
Lucky b*st*rd! ;-) My spam is mostly from USA. Just deleted 78
of those, and only 7 seemed to be from abroad. I wish i could block
.com ... ;-)
Pedro
On 7 Jan 2001, at 17:53, John O'Donnell wrote:
Only on my company's e-mail server. My company typically gets "zero"
emails from
hi,
On Jan 5, 3:51pm, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Subject: Re: More better in mount(2)
Nathan Scott wrote:
On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote:
...
This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses
strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do man strtok and
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:57:08PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 04:32:25 -0800,
A Guy Called Tyketto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/acpi'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:03:19AM +0100, Pedro M. Rodrigues wrote:
Lucky b*st*rd! ;-) My spam is mostly from USA. Just deleted 78
of those, and only 7 seemed to be from abroad. I wish i could block
.com ... ;-)
99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/
Release 0.9.1: Sun Jan 7 18:05:36 EST 2001
* Synchronized with 2.4.0 final.
* Fixed bugs in handling of -W and -D flags.
* "source" pathnames are now evaluated relative relative to the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
It seems that for one reason or another, ip_conntrack totally locks (not
removeable) after about 10 hours of continued use. All i found were
these messages in my dmesg output
What was the contents of /proc/net/ip_conntrack?
Being unremovable can
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Philip Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In supplement to Evan Thompson's emails with the subject "Additional
info. for PCI VIA IDE crazyness. Please read." I've noticed the
following message with recent 2.4.0 test + release kernels:
IRQ routing conflict in pirq
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
this looks like a typo and fixes a compile error in
2.4.0-ac3.
(replacing temp_sze with temp_size in drivers/video/vesafb.c)
I had this problem too.
For some reason this patch kept getting rejected by the patch program when I
tried to apply it, but editing the
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
numbering .com or .net. The .org is frowned upon in China - the TLD of
protestors and disidents). Half of what's left comes from either .kr
or .br. I'm fully in favor of an
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Matti Aarnio wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:10:52PM -0500, jamal wrote:
OK. I suppose an skb-vlan_tag is passed to the driver and it will know
what to do with it (pass it on a descriptor etc).
Sure, nice. WHY SHOULD THERE BE MORE LAYER-2 STUFF ADDED TO
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 05:53:16PM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote:
Only on my company's e-mail server. My company typically gets "zero"
emails from outside the US. If I get a piece of spam (sorry they are
typically from outside the US), I just block the entire .com.br domain.
I get far less
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 06:43:14 -0800,
David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Juchem wrote:
My script is intended for the one who likes to provide bug reports but is
too lazy to look up all the information or simply is not sure about what
to include.
Why can't it be done in sh?
In the
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:16:15PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
numbering .com or .net. The .org is frowned upon in China - the TLD of
protestors and disidents). Half of what's left comes from either .kr
or .br. I'm
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
Hrm, what if they just made each IP-SEC interface a net_device? If they
are a routable entity, with it's own IP address, it starts to look a lot
like an interface/net_device.
As in my response to Matti, i thing a netdevice is a generalized link
layer
Hello,
I would like to use IP-Aliasing to create a private network
between a few machines without buying more hardware. That's
easy, but ifconfig tells me:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
inet addr:x.x.x.x Bcast:x.x.x.x Mask:x.x.x.x
UP BROADCAST
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:02:40 -0800,
A Guy Called Tyketto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still seeing
#include linuxpi.h
at line 25 of acpi_ksyms.c. This is also the same line, in
patch-2.4.0-ac2 (counted the lines of each). Neither patches compile from this.
Not happening here. -ac2
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 16:19:50 -0500,
"Rich Baum" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch should fix the rest of the warnings about #endif
statements when using the 20001225 gcc snapshot. Thanks to
Keith Owens for providing a script to automate this process. It got
the job done sooner and found
Hi,
Apoligies in advance if this is not the right place to send this
report.
When displaying a screen-wide icon in the frame buffer for the
graphics console:
Linux version 2.4.0
Console Drivers
Video mode selection support
Support for frame buffer devices (EXPERMENTAL)
VESA VGA
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:27:45PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:16:15PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
numbering .com or .net. The .org is frowned upon in China - the TLD of
protestors and
Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
5)
# glibc versions. Take the last symbolic link,
# extract the version number from the file it points to.
if [ `expr "X$1" : 'Xl'` -eq 2 ]
then
On Sunday 07 January 2001 18:22, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:27:45PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:16:15PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
numbering .com or .net.
On 7 Jan 2001, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
Why don't you, as the other script suggested, execute libc.so.6?
Symlinks can be missing or can be wrong.
I'll have a look at this shell script and take the best out of both to
make a new one.
BTW, lots of version dependencies found in older Changes
Could anybody with a VIA chip who has the energy please do something for
me:
- enable DEBUG in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h
- do a "/sbin/lspci -xxvvv" on the interrupt routing chip (it's the
"ISA bridge" chip - the VIA numbers are 82c586, 82c596, the PCI
numbers for them are
Hi Chris,
Comparing the Changes document for 2.4.0 against the one from 2.3.11 one
can see that many requirements were removed. Nine out of 22 are still
there.
Have the removed ones been unnecessary or only less important than the
remaining ones?
Regards,
Matthias
-
To unsubscribe from this
Matthias Juchem wrote:
BTW, lots of version dependencies found in older Changes document (i.e.
for 2.3.11) were removed now (2.4.0 shows only 9 where the old one had
22). Have the removed ones been completely unnecessary?
Quoting from 2.4.0's Changes file:
[snip]
trying life on the Bleeding
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:31:11PM -0700, Matt Beland wrote:
Thereby killing how many hundreds of innocent people? China doesn't much
believe in fining minor offenders, remember.
You don't like Spam? Join the club. Blacklisting any domain - ANY domain -
for spamming, unless you can
Pure 2.4.0 on sparc32 with RedHat 6.2:
root@etest:/usr/src/6,0# modprobe fore200e
/lib/modules/2.4.0lt/kernel/drivers/atm/fore200e_sba_fw.o: couldn't find the kernel
version the module was compiled for
/lib/modules/2.4.0lt/kernel/drivers/atm/fore200e_sba_fw.o: insmod
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Could anybody with a VIA chip who has the energy please do something for
me:
- enable DEBUG in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h
- do a "/sbin/lspci -xxvvv" on the interrupt routing chip (it's the
"ISA bridge" chip - the VIA numbers are 82c586, 82c596, the PCI
I've put a patch up for testing on the kernel.org mirrors:
/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.0-1.diff.gz
It provides a framework for zerocopy transmits and delayed
receive fragment coalescing. TUX-1.01 uses this framework.
Zerocopy transmit requires some driver support, things run
This fixes a comment at the end of an #endif. This should fix all of
the warnings about tokens at the end of #endifs. Please disregard
the parts of my earlier patch which made changes to comments
and .S files. I should have reviewed the patch the script made
more closely.
diff -urN -X
Handle with care. I think the fs updates are right but I don't guarantee it.
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.0-ac4
o Fix dereference of freed skbuff in iphase (Hans Grobler)
o Fix dereference of freed skbuff in isdn_ppp (Hans Grobler)
o
On 7 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Philip Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In supplement to Evan Thompson's emails with the subject "Additional
info. for PCI VIA IDE crazyness. Please read." I've noticed the
following message with recent 2.4.0 test +
Patrick Mau wrote:
[...]
And here's the question:
I would like to collect statistics for eth0:0 but obviously the
pakets are only counted for the real interface. If I had enough time
and knowledge, how should I implement paket counters for aliased
interfaces ?
PS: Am I right that it isn't
Hi, all,
I am new to this maillist. I want to boot my system
from a single floppy. If I use 1.44MB, the space
is too small. So I format my floppy to 1.6MB.
I do the following things,
#fdformat /dev/fd0H1600
#cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/zImage /dev/fd0
#rdev /dev/fd0 /dev/fd0
#rdev -r
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Matthias Juchem wrote:
Hi Chris,
Comparing the Changes document for 2.4.0 against the one from 2.3.11 one
can see that many requirements were removed. Nine out of 22 are still
there.
Have the removed ones been unnecessary or only less important than the
remaining ones?
when you use SMP there's suppOsed to be one icon that shows up for
every CPU you have. 2 cpu = 2 icons, 4 cpu = 4 icon. That's what the for
loop in fbcon_show_logo().
So this really isnt a bug, depending on how you look at it. It's
definitely something the lpp author needs to account for.
On
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:42:12AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:02:40 -0800,
A Guy Called Tyketto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still seeing
#include linuxpi.h
at line 25 of acpi_ksyms.c. This is also the same line, in
patch-2.4.0-ac2 (counted the lines of
Ok.. I'm going bananas. It could be a 4am braindeath or a rh7.0 bungholio
but this is annoying:
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int fd;
setfsuid(atoi(argv[1]));
fd = open("/etc/passwd", O_RDONLY);
printf("got fd %d\n", fd);
}
[root@wizball /root]# ./setfstest 0
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Albert Cranford wrote:
Could anybody with a VIA chip who has the energy please do something for
me:
- enable DEBUG in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h
- do a "/sbin/lspci -xxvvv" on the interrupt routing chip (it's the
"ISA bridge" chip - the VIA numbers are
Alan Cox wrote:
Um, what about people running their box as just a VLAN router/firewall?
That seems to be one of the principle uses so far. Actually, in that case
both VLAN and IP traffic would come through, so it would be a tie if VLAN
came first, but non-vlan traffic would suffer
Hello, this is my first post to Linux-Kernel so I hope I get this right.
On my Pentium 200 system with Intel i430VX chipset and PIIX3, my Maxtor
3.5GB IDE HD would always have DMA enabled even in 2.4.0-test10, but then
sometime between 2.4.0-test12 and 2.4.0 (final), DMA was not being enabled
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:22:28PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
I already run several sugarplum sites with teergrubes. I also use
various blackhole lists and take other action against spammers, including
blocking entire rogue domains. If that rogue domain happens to be a two
hi,
i tried 2.4.0 kernel with rmk and np patches in my brutus board. (Brutus
is a StrongArm based development environment)
my patched kernel is 2.4.0-rmk1-np1
the kernel uncompresses fine. but uncompressing the ramdisk fails. In
this instance my uncompressed ramdisk is about 3.5mb.
i looked
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:30:14PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:22:28PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
I already run several sugarplum sites with teergrubes. I also use
various blackhole lists and take other action against spammers, including
blocking
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Adam J. Richter wrote:
This sounds like a bug that I posted a fix for a long time ago.
cramfs calls bforget on the superblock area, destroying that block of
the ramdisk, even when the ramdisk does not contain a cramfs file system.
Normally, bforget is called on
This is very easily repeated... happens a few minutes after boot. After it
happens one CPU gets stuck on a spin lock owned by the other.
This kernel was built from code pulled down from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/vger on Jan
5th. Looked like the first merge of the 2.4.0 released code... but the Ooops
Anyone get this working? If so please tell me the version of you APM utilities
and what Power Management options you have on in the kernel.
Ever since I started trying 2.3.x, as soon as the box gets a change in it's
power status (even just an update of the % battery) Linux locks solid. It's 100%
On Sun, Jan 07 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
__alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
This debugging check should probably be removed around
2.4.5, in the mean time it is much too useful to track
down badly behaving device drivers ;)
It need not be a badly written driver, it could be a fine
jamal wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
Hrm, what if they just made each IP-SEC interface a net_device? If they
are a routable entity, with it's own IP address, it starts to look a lot
like an interface/net_device.
As in my response to Matti, i thing a netdevice is a
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
You are suggesting that it is acceptable to implement technological
barriers to a minority expressing speech that is unacceptable to the
majority. This is not acceptable.
See Rowan v. United States Post Office.
*Your* right to free speech stops at
Even not specifically disagreeing, but
Dan Hollis wrote:
See Rowan v. United States Post Office.
Why necessarily should I care about United States Post Office
or United States in general ?
*Your* right to free speech stops at *my* property.
Under no circumstances does your right to
Ingo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:43:54AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2000, Mike Sklar wrote:
If I wanted to adjust the rlim_cur value of a running
processes, is there any sort of interface for that?
Hmmm, I don't think there is an interface to adjust the
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:11:40PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
this issue was discussed on the netdev mailing list a few weeks
back.
It's very unfortunate that the web archives of netdev
stopped working several months ago and there now appears
to be no web archive of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dag Wieers caught all the double word's in Configure.help (from the
looks of the patch we're quite a bunch of stutterers), here's another
patch that catches mainly some combined words, a '2.3' - '2.4', and
inproper capitalizations.
Also, two of the translation's for Configure.help have stale
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:24:16PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
You are suggesting that it is acceptable to implement technological
barriers to a minority expressing speech that is unacceptable to the
majority. This is not acceptable.
See Rowan v.
On Sunday 07 January 2001 21:24, Dan Hollis wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
You are suggesting that it is acceptable to implement technological
barriers to a minority expressing speech that is
As per usual, when sending a mail with an attachment, I forgot to
attach it after I :wq'd.
--
Jeremy M. Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP key = http://turbogeek.org/openpgp-key
OpenPGP fingerprint = 494C 7A6E 19FB 026A 1F52 E0D5 5C5D 6228 DC43 3DEE
diff -rub 2.4.0/Documentation/Configure.help
Gentlemen,
I was looking through some of the memory management code today and
came across something that may provide a minor performance boost. I have
included a patch below for the 2.4.0 source.
In the find_vma function a cached vma is checked and if that is
not the requested
401 - 500 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
