Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in D state)

2001-01-08 Thread Stefan Traby
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:33:50PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Stefan Traby wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:22:49PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: Here's another one: suppose that /foo is a mountpoint and you have no read permissions on it. Try to open the

Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in D state)

2001-01-08 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:33:50PM -0500, Alexander Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And prefix would be what? "/"? Besides, I said that you don't have read permissions on /foo, not search ones. You do not need read permissions on /foo to make pathconf on it. This makes sense: you are not reading

blinking vga card

2001-01-08 Thread Michal Medvecky
Hi folks, I have following problem: when I make big load on my PC, my monitor starts blinking in XFree 4.0.2 (precompiled binaries from xfree86.org), and does not stop until reboot. It has been blinking on 4.0.0, so I upgraded to 4.0.1 and then to 4.0.2, and problem persists. I have first

Re: The advantage of modules?

2001-01-08 Thread Michael Meissner
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:26:01PM +0100, Ookhoi wrote: 3) Having drivers as modules means that you can remove them and reload them. When I was working in an office, I had one scsi controller that was a different brand (Adaptec) than the main scsi controller (TekRam),

Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in D state)

2001-01-08 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Marc Lehmann wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:33:50PM -0500, Alexander Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And prefix would be what? "/"? Besides, I said that you don't have read permissions on /foo, not search ones. You do not need read permissions on /foo to make

Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in D state)

2001-01-08 Thread Andreas Dilger
Al Viro writes: No, it doesn't. s/$/while(bh != head);/, indeed. Sorry about that - cut-and-waste when I did rediff to 2.4.0. Corrected patch follows: diff -urN S0-AC4/fs/ext2/super.c S0-AC4-fixes/fs/ext2/super.c --- S0-AC4/fs/ext2/super.cMon Jan 8 08:46:18 2001 +++

Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0?

2001-01-08 Thread Steven_Snyder
For some reason shared memory is not being enabled on my system running kernel v2.4.0 (on RedHat v6.2, with all updates applied). Per the documentation I have this line in my /etc/fstab: none /dev/shm shm defaults 0 0 Yes, I have created this subdirectory: # ls -l /dev | grep

Modules Question

2001-01-08 Thread Christopher Harrer
Hello, I've built a module I'm trying to run on various (2.2.x) levels of the kernel. I compiled the module against a 2.2.18 Source Tree. I strip out the __module_kernel_version symbol and re-link the module on the target system to get the __module_kernel_version symbol in it. My problem is

APM, virtual console problem in 2.4.0

2001-01-08 Thread Joseph Pingenot
Greetings. When suspending my laptop (Toshiba Satellite 1605CDS; BIOS set to suspend to disk) with Debian 2.2r2's 'apm -s', the screen blanks and then the system locks up hard (not even the power button works). In 2.2.17, 'apm -s' works properly, first blanking the screen (maybe twice),

Re: lvm 0.8 to 0.9 conversion?

2001-01-08 Thread Todd M. Roy
I've been on vacation Nope, no snapshots. Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk, created a new volume group that was visible under both, dded all the logical volumes over to it, updated fstab

xircom_tulip_cb

2001-01-08 Thread Oliver Paukstadt
HY HY I have a Xircom R2BE-100, RealPort2 CardBus Ethernet 10/100. With RH6.2, 2.2.17 and pcmcia-cs-3.1.19 everything was fine. With RH7, 2.2.18 and pcmcia-cs-3.1.23 the Card did not work. With ifconfig -a it was displayed, but it doesn't work. With 2.4.0-ac2 and Kernel-PCMCIA the same

Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0?

2001-01-08 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For some reason shared memory is not being enabled on my system running kernel v2.4.0 (on RedHat v6.2, with all updates applied). Per the documentation I have this line in my /etc/fstab: none /dev/shm shm defaults 0 0 Yes, I

Re: lvm 0.8 to 0.9 conversion?

2001-01-08 Thread Todd M. Roy
I've been on vacation Nope, no snapshots. Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk, created a new volume group that was visible under both, dded all the logical volumes over to it, updated fstab

[PATCH] pritk.c oneliner

2001-01-08 Thread Pavel Rabel
error is initialised twice Pavel Rabel --- kernel/printk.c.old Mon Jan 8 19:16:12 2001 +++ kernel/printk.c Mon Jan 8 19:17:54 2001 @@ -125,9 +125,8 @@ unsigned long i, j, limit, count; int do_clear = 0; char c; - int error = -EPERM; + int error = 0;

Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0?

2001-01-08 Thread Brian Gerst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # cat /proc/meminfo total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 130293760 123133952 71598080 30371840 15179776 This is not SysV/POSIX shared memory. This used to mean the memory that was shared between processes (from

Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0?

2001-01-08 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:11:19PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] No complaints are seen at startup, yet I still have no shared memory: # cat /proc/meminfo total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 130293760 123133952 71598080 30371840

Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0?

2001-01-08 Thread J . A . Magallon
Try 'ipcs' and you'll see your shared mem segments info... On 2001.01.08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For some reason shared memory is not being enabled on my system running kernel v2.4.0 (on RedHat v6.2, with all updates applied). Per the documentation I have this line in my /etc/fstab:

[patch] 2.4.0: defxx oopses upon insmod if short on memory

2001-01-08 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
Hi, Is there anyone maintaining defxx these days? The defxx driver does a null pointer derefence if a system is short on memory. This happens repeatably on a 32MB machine if fsck is run just befor loading the driver (not an unusual event upon startup and a quite nasty one). The driver

test - please ignore

2001-01-08 Thread Timur Tabi
-- Timur Tabi - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com When replying to a mailing-list message, please direct the reply to the mailing list only. Don't send another copy to me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

2.2/2.4 on MSI 694D Pro-AIR (MS-6321)

2001-01-08 Thread Paul Flinders
Has anyone got either 2.2.x or 2.4.0 booted on the above motherboard? This board has an integrated Promise Fasttrack ATA/100 controller - I know that to support the hardware RAID I need the binary only drivers from Promise but I'd rather not use these if software RAID works as there's no

Re: Confirmation request about new 2.4.x. kernel limits

2001-01-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Hi, I would like to know whether following limits are right for kernel 2.4.x: Max. N. of CPU: 32 (SMP) Max. CPU speed:2 Ghz (up to ?) Max. RAM size:64 GB (any slowness accessing RAM over 4 GB

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

2001-01-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Being able to shut down by hitting the power switch is a little luxury for which I've been willing to invest more than a year of my life to attain. Clueless newbies don't know why it should be any other way, and it's essential for embedded devices. Clueless newbies (and

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

2001-01-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! 1. setup the power switch so it doesn't actually turn things off (it issues the shutdown command instead) Evil. Devices that are powered off should stay powered off, and there should be big mechanical switch to do that, so that no EMI or power glitch can make them power up. Also thing

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-08 Thread John Heffner
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Tim Sailer wrote: What is the round-trip time on the WAN? Packet loss? 101 packets transmitted, 101 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 109.6/110.3/112.2 ms Packet loss and RTT can be greatly affected by how much data you're sending through a

Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0

2001-01-08 Thread Erik Mouw
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 09:40:51PM -0500, Rich Baum wrote: Here's a patch that fixes more of the compile warnings with gcc 2.97. -case FORE200E_STATE_BLANK: +case FORE200E_STATE_BLANK:; Is this really a kernel bug? This is common idiom in C, so gcc shouldn't warn about it. If it

Re: typo in linux-2.2.18/Documentation/usb/usb-serial.txt

2001-01-08 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:24:07AM +0900, Hisaaki Shibata wrote: Hi! I tried to use USB-SERIAL converter shown in http://www.century.co.jp/products/usb_serial1a.html that uses Prolific chip. Prolific USB2SERIAL is not supported yet, so I tried to "generic". Then I found typo in the

Re: Bug in 2.2 kernels (mysterious hangs after freeing unused memory)

2001-01-08 Thread Erik Mouw
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:21:08PM +0100, Blizbor wrote: I have found something weird in kernel 2.2.17. After installation on the Pentium PRO equipped machine, I have moved hard disk to another one, but equipped with AMD-K5 and after encountering problems I moved again this disk to machine

Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in D state)

2001-01-08 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: Actually, this is wrong. The ext2 inode limit is 2^32 512-byte sectors, not 2^32 blocksize blocks. Yes this is a wart and Ted wants to fix it, as ??? Where? Oh, wait... -i_blocks? I'ld rather refuse to grow past 2^32 - sparse files can

Re: [patch] 2.4.0: defxx oopses upon insmod if short on memory

2001-01-08 Thread Alan Cox
@@ -2709,7 +2709,10 @@ static void dfx_rcv_init(DFX_board_t *bp struct sk_buff *newskb; bp-descr_block_virt-rcv_data[i+j].long_0 = (u32) (PI_RCV_DESCR_M_SOP | ((PI_RCV_DATA_K_SIZE_MAX / PI_ALIGN_K_RCV_DATA_BUFF)

Re: [PATCH] More compile warning fixes for 2.4.0

2001-01-08 Thread Alan Cox
-case FORE200E_STATE_BLANK: +case FORE200E_STATE_BLANK:; Is this really a kernel bug? This is common idiom in C, so gcc shouldn't warn about it. If it does, it is a bug in gcc IMHO. It's not valid in current ISO C. So gcc warns about it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: setfsuid on ext2 weirdness (2.4)

2001-01-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bjorn Wesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in fact, 0 and 500 are the ONLY ones who let a filesystem op through after the setfsuid call. all other cause an EACCESS error on the open (or any other fs op). and yes, the actual filepermissions on /etc and /etc/passwd are

real talk cards in 2.2.18.

2001-01-08 Thread Timothy A. DeWees
Hello, I am trying to compile the rtl8139 driver for my SMC 10/100 NIC. I have turned on all 10/100 devices (i.e. 3Com cards -n- such); however, I can not get the rtl driver to show up as an option in my menuconfig. What to I need to do to compile this driver as a module. Am I missing

Re: MM/VM todo list

2001-01-08 Thread Rasmus Andersen
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:36:23PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: I have not taken^Whad the time to check the kernel tree and see if the RSS counting has indeed been made safe everywhere. I have posted the one below a couple of times without it making it in. If you like ot please fold it into

Re: Subtle MM bug

2001-01-08 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 09:29:29PM -0800, Wayne Whitney wrote: package called MAGMA; at times this requires very large matrices. The RSS can get up to 870MB; for some reason a MAGMA process under linux thinks it has run out of memory at 870MB,

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:58:20PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: It's a hell of a pain wrt locking. You need to lock the parent, but it can This is a no-brainer and bad implementation, but shows it's obviously right wrt locking. (pseudocode, I ignored the uaccess details and all the other not

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:04:24PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: Racy. Nonportable. Has portable and simple equivalent. Again, don't bother with chdir at all - if you know the name of directory even ../name will work. It's not about the current directory. It's about the invalid last component

Re: Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy

2001-01-08 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:37:47PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: Once we are sure 2.4 is stable for just about anybody I will submit some of the really trivial enhancements for inclusion; all non-trivial patches I will maintain in a VM bigpatch, which will be submitted for inclusion around

Re: [patch] 2.4.0: defxx oopses upon insmod if short on memory

2001-01-08 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote: @@ -2709,7 +2709,10 @@ static void dfx_rcv_init(DFX_board_t *bp struct sk_buff *newskb; bp-descr_block_virt-rcv_data[i+j].long_0 = (u32) (PI_RCV_DESCR_M_SOP | ((PI_RCV_DATA_K_SIZE_MAX

Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in D state)

2001-01-08 Thread Andreas Dilger
Al Viro writes: Andreas Dilger wrote: Actually, this is wrong. The ext2 inode limit is 2^32 512-byte sectors, not 2^32 blocksize blocks. Yes this is a wart and Ted wants to fix it, as ??? Where? Oh, wait... -i_blocks? I'ld rather refuse to grow past 2^32 - sparse files can legitimately

Re: Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy

2001-01-08 Thread Rik van Riel
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote: On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:37:47PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: Once we are sure 2.4 is stable for just about anybody I will submit some of the really trivial enhancements for inclusion; all non-trivial patches I will maintain in a VM bigpatch, which

Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18.

2001-01-08 Thread Richard Torkar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Timothy A. DeWees wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile the rtl8139 driver for my SMC 10/100 NIC. I have turned on all 10/100 devices (i.e. 3Com cards -n- such); however, I can not get the rtl driver to show up as an option in my

Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18.

2001-01-08 Thread Ward Vandewege
At 15:22 08/01/2001 -0500, Timothy A. DeWees wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile the rtl8139 driver for my SMC 10/100 NIC. I have turned on all 10/100 devices (i.e. 3Com cards -n- such); however, I can not get the rtl driver to show up as an option in my menuconfig. What to I need to do

Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18.

2001-01-08 Thread Timothy A. DeWees
Yes I have. Have you turned on: [EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers] in [Ethernet (10 or 100Mbit) ---] which is in [Network device support ---] ??? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the

Re: real talk cards in 2.2.18.

2001-01-08 Thread Timothy A. DeWees
This was done. Just enable 'Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers' in 'Code maturity level options', the first item in the setup menu... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the

Re: Ext2 (dma ?) error

2001-01-08 Thread Michael Duelli
Hi kernel hackers, okay possibly my HD is the problem and I will try to check the disc with a Seagate tool (damned, i.e. reinstalling Windows) or even reformating I everything else goes wrong. Nevertheless I checked the partition with my old SuSE 2.2.16 kernel and it gave a different error

Re: Ext2 (dma ?) error

2001-01-08 Thread Alan Cox
Nevertheless I checked the partition with my old SuSE 2.2.16 kernel and it gave a different error message: hda: read_intr: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error } hda: read_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError } LBAsect = 2421754, sector 210048 end_request: I/O error,

Re: Delay in authentication.

2001-01-08 Thread Scott Laird
Is syslog running correctly? When syslog screws up, it very frequently results in this sort of problem. Scott On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Chris Meadors wrote: On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: check /etc/pam.d/login No pam. Could be kerberos that is biting you, althrough that

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Andries . Brouwer
why `rmdir .` is been deprecated in 2.4.x? `rmdir .` makes perfect sense, the cwd dentry remains pinned You think that it fails with EBUSY. That would be allowed but not required: [EBUSY]: The directory to be removed is currently in use by the system or some process and the

Re: [PATCH,serious] Fix raid5 crashes in 2.4.0

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:16:25PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: Hallo Linus, The following patch fixes an oops in 2.4.0 RAID5 initialisation when the kernel was configured without CONFIG_X86_FXSR but is booted on a CPU supporting SSE. The problem is that without the FXSR config the OSFXSR

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:04:24PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: Racy. Nonportable. Has portable and simple equivalent. Again, don't bother with chdir at all - if you know the name of directory even ../name will work. It's not about the current

Re: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0?

2001-01-08 Thread Ernesto Hernandez-Novich
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For some reason shared memory is not being enabled on my system running kernel v2.4.0 (on RedHat v6.2, with all updates applied). Per the documentation I have this line in my /etc/fstab: none /dev/shm shm defaults 0 0 Yes, I have

Re: Bug in 2.2 kernels (mysterious hangs after freeing unused memory)

2001-01-08 Thread Blizbor
At 01-01-08 21:09, you wrote: On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:21:08PM +0100, Blizbor wrote: I have found something weird in kernel 2.2.17. After installation on the Pentium PRO equipped machine, I have moved hard disk to another one, but equipped with AMD-K5 and after encountering problems I moved

Re: 2.4.0 APM w/ Compaq 16xx laptop...

2001-01-08 Thread Erik Mouw
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:57:42PM -0800, Brian Macy wrote: Anyone get this working? If so please tell me the version of you APM utilities and what Power Management options you have on in the kernel. Ever since I started trying 2.3.x, as soon as the box gets a change in it's power status

Re: Subtle MM bug

2001-01-08 Thread Wayne Whitney
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: How does 2.4 perform when you add an extra GB of swap ? OK, some more data: First, I tried booting 2.4.0 with "nosmp" to see if the behavior I observe is SMP related. It isn't, there was no difference under 2.4.0 between 512MB/512MB/1CPU and

Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron?

2001-01-08 Thread Erik Mouw
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:09:00AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: Thus the older Celerons should be compiled with CONFIG_M686 (Pentium Pro), but the Celeron Coppermine can be compiled with CONFIG_M686FXSR (Pentium III), right? Yes. In this case we should update the files Configure.help

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:56:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You think that it fails with EBUSY. That would be allowed but not required: [EBUSY]: The directory to be removed is currently in use by the system or some process and the implementation considers this to be

Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in D state)

2001-01-08 Thread Andries . Brouwer
Calling pathconf with a symlink is not defined. The Austin draft requires pathconf to follow symlinks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

prerelease-to-final braindamage

2001-01-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Very clever. Invent new naming scheme of patches every couple of weeks, so that as many people as possible damage their trees. All other patches are called patch-VERSION. This one has to be called prerelease-to-final. And applying it over test12 if you missed the fact -prerelease exists

2.2.19pre6aa1 degraded performance for me...

2001-01-08 Thread Sasi Peter
...compared to 2.2.18pre19. I use the IDE patch for my CMD648 card, and also 0.90 RAID. What I have now (2.2.19pre6aa1+ide-1221): [root@iq /root]# hdparm /dev/hd[aceg] /dev/hda: multcount= 16 (on) I/O support = 1 (32-bit) unmaskirq= 1 (on) using_dma= 1 (on) keepsettings =

[PATCH] partition endianness fixes

2001-01-08 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
Hi, The following patch fixes in 2.4(-ac*) : - endiannes problems with BSD/SOLARIS disklabel (in msdos a partition) and OSF partition support on big-endian mashines, - SOLARIS disklabel support on 64-bit machines (it was silently assumed in the on-disk structures that "long" is 32 bit...)

Announce: updated USB hotplug support

2001-01-08 Thread David Brownell
Matching Keith's modutils update, here's a a package of hotplug scripts ... not yet as neatly packaged! And also, not (yet) handling with the older file format for the "modules.usbmap" files associated with 2.4.0 test (and prerelease) kernels. It "ought" to behave with the usb hotplug support

Re: The advantage of modules?

2001-01-08 Thread Russell King
Michael Meissner writes: Quoting from drivers/scsi/scsi.c: /* * Usage: echo "scsi add-single-device 0 1 2 3" /proc/scsi/scsi * with "0 1 2 3" replaced by your "Host Channel Id Lun". * Consider this feature BETA. * CAUTION: This is not for hotplugging

Re: setfsuid on ext2 weirdness (2.4)

2001-01-08 Thread Bjorn Wesen
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: Please show them, anyway. What does "ls -ld / /etc /etc/passwd" say? Heh... /etc and /etc/passwd were allright... but / was fscked (or not, maybe :) drwx- 500 0 both locked from other users and 500 as owner.. 99% says that one of the

Re: [PATCH,serious] Fix raid5 crashes in 2.4.0

2001-01-08 Thread Richard Henderson
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:16:25PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: This patch just makes the SSE2 code conditional on ... Pedanticly, this is SSE1 code. r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at

Re: Subtle MM bug

2001-01-08 Thread Wayne Whitney
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: AFAIK newer glibc = CVS glibc but the malloc() tune parameters work via environment variables for the current stable ones as well, Hmm, this must have been introduced in libc6? Unfortunately, I don't have the source code to MAGMA, and the binary

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Stefan Traby
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:58:20PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: Shell equivalent is rmdir `pwd`. Also portable. Very portable - not. rmdir "`pwd`" !!! -- ciao - Stefan " ( cd /lib ; ln -s libBrokenLocale-2.2.so libNiedersachsen.so ) " Stefan Traby

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:08:58PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: Andrea, fix your code. Linux-only stuff is OK when there is no BTW, "rmdir `pwd`" is not portable either. portable way to achieve the same result. In your situation such way indeed exists and is prefectly doable in

2.2.18 and EMU10K1 problems...

2001-01-08 Thread Taner Halicioglu
(please cc me if you reply - thanks :) I probably missed a message or note or something about this, but when I went from 2.2.17 to 2.2.18, my sound card (SB Live!) stopped working. It seems that in 2.2.18, it gets detected TWICE: kernel: Linux version 2.2.18

Re: Subtle MM bug

2001-01-08 Thread Wayne Whitney
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: AFAIK newer glibc = CVS glibc but the malloc() tune parameters work via environment variables for the current stable ones as well, e.g. to overcome the above "out of memory" one could do, % export MALLOC_MMAP_MAX_=100 % export

Re: 2.2.18 and EMU10K1 problems...

2001-01-08 Thread Taner Halicioglu
Err, I should have mentioned that the configs I used for .17 and .18 are identical, too. Machine is a dual celeron 450 on a asus p2b-ds (Adaptec aic78xx SCSI), via-rhine ethernet, and nvidia tnt2 ultra. Thanks, again -Taner On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:56:29PM -0800, Taner Halicioglu

Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread Michael D. Crawford
OK, I built XFree86 4.0.2 and DRI seems to be working for me now under 2.4.0-ac4. (Starting with 2.4.0, it wouldn't, this is with an ATI XPert 2000 AGP). BUT - although /var/log/XFree86.0.log documents the startup of DRI, DRM and AGP, and states the info about their initialization and stuff so

Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread Bill Nottingham
Michael D. Crawford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: This makes me suspect it's not really working, or else my build of the Mesa-3.4 library wasn't configured right - but note that if I disable DRI, one of the Mesa demos will comment that it's not available. It sounds as if you're using a Mesa lib

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Benson Chow
Not very portable at all... hpux = HP/UX 10.2 hpux:~$ mkdir foo hpux:~$ cd foo hpux:~/foo$ rmdir "`pwd`" rmdir: /home/blc/foo: Cannot remove mountable directory hpux:~/foo$ rmdir . rmdir: cannot remove .. or . hpux:~/foo$ rmdir /home/blc/foo rmdir: /home/blc/foo: Cannot remove mountable

Re: The advantage of modules?

2001-01-08 Thread Dan Hollis
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Russell King wrote: so my take is unless you explicitly use hotplug devices (I wasn't), that it is much safer to unload the driver, unattach/attach scsi devices, and then reload the driver (which will scan the scsi bus for devices), which you need modules for. I don't

Re: Subtle MM bug

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:00:19PM -0800, Wayne Whitney wrote: I'd ask if this jives with your theory: if I configure the linux kernel to be able to use 2GB of RAM, then the 870MB limit becomes much lower, to 230MB. It's because the virtual address space for userspace tasks gets reduced from

Re: The advantage of modules?

2001-01-08 Thread Russell King
Dan Hollis writes: On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Russell King wrote: I don't believe that is what it's trying to say. There have been instances in the past where unplugging a SCSI device from a powered on SCSI bus can result in blown terminator power fuses and the like. Whether this still

bigmem (2GB in this case) patches for the 2.0.x kernel.

2001-01-08 Thread Adam Scislowicz
I have had no luck finding a bigmem patch for the 2.0.x kernel. I am in the situation where I would rather not update the kernel, do I have any options? -Adam Scislowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

PCI IRQ routing on buggy BIOSes

2001-01-08 Thread Petr Vandrovec
Hi, following happened on my well-known SMP VIA based GA6VXD7 motherboard. Last week on Thursday I decided to connect printer to the box. To do that I had to switch parallel port mode from ECP to Normal (because of I had problems with that printer). Today I found, that since that time (Thu

Re: msg : cannot create ksymoops/nnnnn.ksyms

2001-01-08 Thread f5ibh
Hi Keith, NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0. insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.19pre6/misc/unix.o: cannot create /var/log/ksymoops/20010106112242.ksyms Read-only file system man insmod, look for /var/log/ksymoops. If you define this directory then it is expected to be writable when

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:11:08PM -0700, Benson Chow wrote: Not very portable at all... hpux = HP/UX 10.2 hpux:~$ mkdir foo hpux:~$ cd foo hpux:~/foo$ rmdir "`pwd`" rmdir: /home/blc/foo: Cannot remove mountable directory hpux:~/foo$ rmdir . rmdir: cannot remove .. or . hpux:~/foo$

Re: The advantage of modules?

2001-01-08 Thread Dan Hollis
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Russell King wrote: Seriously though, you can't depreciate a term for referring to a type of bus without providing some other term to describe said bus. You need to distinguish between SCSI-the-protocol and SCSI-the-physical-layer. The term "SCSI" alone is simply too

Re: lvm 0.8 to 0.9 conversion?

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:18:53PM +, Todd M. Roy wrote: I've been on vacation Nope, no snapshots. Well, I couldn't get my orginal volume group visible under both lvm 0.8 and 0.9. I don't know why. So I grabbed a big empty hard disk, created a new volume group that was

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Andries . Brouwer
From: Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] But in fact it fails with EINVAL, and [EINVAL]: The path argument contains a last component that is dot. I can't confirm. The specs I'm checking are here: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/rmdir.html That

Re: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread khromy
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:35:43PM +, Michael D. Crawford wrote: OK, I built XFree86 4.0.2 and DRI seems to be working for me now under 2.4.0-ac4. (Starting with 2.4.0, it wouldn't, this is with an ATI XPert 2000 AGP). BUT - although /var/log/XFree86.0.log documents the startup of DRI,

[OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread J Sloan
This is a little OT for linux-kernel, but I'll take a swing at it since I'm running 2.4 and Xfree 4 with a voodoo 3. After upgrading to Red Hat 7.0, I noticed 3D screensavers and Quake 3 Arena were dog slow - in the end, I basically had to make sure the mesa libs didn't get found before the real

Re: msg : cannot create ksymoops/nnnnn.ksyms

2001-01-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001 23:30:12 +0100, f5ibh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I knew that, the problem is why unix.o is loaded so early ? I've not found where it is requested / loaded (I've kmod enabled). Probably syslog(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Unified power management userspace policy

2001-01-08 Thread John Fremlin
Hi all! At the moment there are two power management drivers in the linux kernel (AFAIK). They each have different userspace interfaces -- /proc/apm and /dev/apmctl and /proc/sys/acpi/events or something. This is not altogether bad, but as they do the same thing, it might be nice to unify

Re: The advantage of modules?

2001-01-08 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Dan Hollis wrote: On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Russell King wrote: Seriously though, you can't depreciate a term for referring to a type of bus without providing some other term to describe said bus. You need to distinguish between SCSI-the-protocol and

Re: ipchains vs netfilter performance

2001-01-08 Thread Rusty Russell
In message 3A585D9F.21907.1452FA04@localhost you write: I've noticed that my Linux boxes take quite a hit in terms of packets per second rate when I define ipchains rules with 2.2.X kernels. Does the netfilter replacement found in 2.4 kernels improve this performance? Not really. What are

Re: [reiserfs-list] BUG at inode.c:371

2001-01-08 Thread Geoff Hoff
I have gotten this semi-reproducable bug three times already under the same circumstances. The bug happens at approximately the same time as I kill xterms after user-mode linux has crashed and I am cleaning up what it has left behind. User mode linux is using a 1 gig file on a 6 gig

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

2001-01-08 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Also thing about cases where powerplant fails, or when electricity in the house fails. I've seen places where electricity failed 5 times a day, because someone put 10A fuse and we were using just about 2kW... Especially evil is a power failure, and then

RE: Shared memory not enabled in 2.4.0?

2001-01-08 Thread David Schwartz
For some reason shared memory is not being enabled on my system running kernel v2.4.0 (on RedHat v6.2, with all updates applied). You are confusing System V shared memory (IPC) with VM shared memory. The '0' for shared in /proc/meminfo means the system can't easily tell you how much

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:50:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] But in fact it fails with EINVAL, and [EINVAL]: The path argument contains a last component that is dot. I can't confirm. The specs I'm checking are here:

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:04:24PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: Racy. Nonportable. Has portable and simple equivalent. Again, don't bother with chdir at all - if you know the name of directory even ../name will work. It's

Re: Subtle MM bug

2001-01-08 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:22:44PM -0800, Wayne Whitney wrote: I guess I conclude that either (1) MAGMA does not use libc's malloc (checking on this, I doubt it) or (2) glibc-2.1.92 knows of these variables but has not yet implemented the tuning (I'll try glibc-2.2) or (3) this is not the

Oops in stock 2.2.18

2001-01-08 Thread Mike Frisch
Can anybody shed some light on this? Thanks, --- cut here --- Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e6d94ba1 current-tss.cr3 = 07211000, %cr3 = 07211000 *pde = Oops: CPU:0 EIP:0010:[c016faa5] Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 EFLAGS:

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:08:58PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: Andrea, fix your code. Linux-only stuff is OK when there is no BTW, "rmdir `pwd`" is not portable either. Indeed. Avoid it if you can. But at least

Re: The advantage of modules?

2001-01-08 Thread Alan Cox
Although I haven't been involved for over 8 years, it us unlikely that the word "SCSI" has been given up as some generic aspirin. SCSI still means the stuff specified in the 519 Page document copyrighted by ANSI, called "SMALL COMPUTER SYSTEM INTERFACE - 2", Dated May 20, 1991, and the first

[PATCH] bmac.c: restore_flags on failure

2001-01-08 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Alan, I haven't found Randy Gobbel's e-mail, please apply. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.0-ac3/drivers/net/bmac.c Tue Dec 19 11:24:51 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-ac3.acme/drivers/net/bmac.c Mon Jan 8 19:55:30 2001 @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ * * May 1999, Al Viro: proper release of /proc/net/bmac

Re: HomePNA 2.0 flamage

2001-01-08 Thread Alan Cox
This doesn't seem to be the case with HomePNA 2.0 which makes me suspect that Broadcom has a patent on some critical piece of technology. I Quite possible. Search for 'broadcom intel patent lawsuit' on google - there are other outstanding things. can't think of any other reason how they

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >