On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> Rik van Riel writes:
> > Anyway, since linux-kernel has chosen to not receive email from me
>
> Funny how this posting went through then...
>
> If it is specifically when you are sending mail from some other place,
> state so, don't make blanket
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Frank Jacobberger wrote:
>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> I noticed the following on boot with 2.4.4-pre1:
>>
>> kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, IntrStatus=0x0001.
>>
>> What is this saying to me :)
>
>
> How often does this occur? A lot, or just once or twice?
>
Every
In article <000201c0c0a4$eb5c7b10$321ea8c0@saturn> you wrote:
>rename("/usr/hybrid/cfg/data","/usr/mytemp/data1"); /*for process 1*/
> rename("/usr/mytemp/data1","/usr/test");/* for process 2*/
Rename syscall is expected to be atomic on unixoid systems. And I dont know of
a case where a
Rik van Riel writes:
> Anyway, since linux-kernel has chosen to not receive email from me
Funny how this posting went through then...
If it is specifically when you are sending mail from some other place,
state so, don't make blanket statements which obviously are not wholly
true.
Later,
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, warren wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I had post a simillar message before.
> Thanks for the replay from Albert D. Cahalan. But i found some results
> confusing me.
> For example, process 1 and process 2 run concurrently and execute the
> following system calls.
>
>
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> The incentive behind the DUL is to force users not to post
> straight out to the world, but to use their ISP's servers
> for outbound email --- normal M$ users do that, after all.
> Only spammers - and UNIX powerusers - want to
Hello All,
I have a blue tooth stack and a BT device and the device connects on the
serial port, over that I have to run tcpip.
Can u tell me which driver I have to need or Is there no need to write any
driver.
Should I have to write any character driver or network driver, can u pls
suggeste
The "down_writer_failed()" case was wrong:
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> __down_write_failed(sem)
> {
>
> /*
>* Ignore other pending writers: but if there is
>* are pending readers or a
You may already have this information, but in case this info will be useful
to someone, the data sheets for the successor (pin compatible) chip to the
SYMBIOS LOGIC 53C825A is here:
http://www.lsilogic.com/techlib/techdocs/storage_stand_prod/PCISCSICont/Chip
s/825A.BK.pdf
LSI Logic bought
Hi... I was going through kernel traffic and read the article on the
Maestro Driver problems.. I'm having very similar problems on my
Dell i5000e laptop.
The symtoms are:
When I play MP3's, on an otherwise unloaded system, I notice progressive
noisiness.. The longer it plays, (5-60 minutes),
Hi,
I had post a simillar message before.
Thanks for the replay from Albert D. Cahalan. But i found some results
confusing me.
For example, process 1 and process 2 run concurrently and execute the
following system calls.
rename("/usr/hybrid/cfg/data","/usr/mytemp/data1");
The user-mode port of 2.4.3 is available.
Added --help and --version, which do the obvious things
UML now creates a /tmp/uml/ pid file. The name can be set with the
'-umid=' switch. This is intended to make it easier for a UI to control
a number of virtual machines. There is a more general
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> One issue with the current implementation is the (necessary)
> design where one reader (or writer) is sleeping in
> down_x_failed_biased(), with its bias in place, whereas
> all other sleepers are sleeping in down_x_failed(), with
> their bias not in
Frank Jacobberger wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
> I noticed the following on boot with 2.4.4-pre1:
>
> kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, IntrStatus=0x0001.
>
> What is this saying to me :)
How often does this occur? A lot, or just once or twice?
--
Jeff Garzik | Sam: "Mind if I drive?"
Jeff,
I noticed the following on boot with 2.4.4-pre1:
kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, IntrStatus=0x0001.
What is this saying to me :)
Thanks,
Frank
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
I have a 3c595 CardBus card and a Lucent Orinoco card
under pcmcia-cs I used the following drivers:
pcmcia_core, ds, and (I think) cs for low level stuff,
i82365 for the controller,
cb_enabler and 3c595_cb for the 3c595,
and wvlan_cs for the Orinoco
under the kernel pcmcia support, I use:
depmod version 2.4.5
Compiled 2.4.4-pre1 but running "depmod" generates a lot of these ...
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.4-pre1/kernel/drivers/char/ltmodem.o
depmod: strstr
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.4-pre1/kernel/drivers/char/serial.o
"Alex Q Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to find a way to pin down user space
> memory from kernel, so that these user space buffer
> can be used for direct IO transfer or otherwise
> known as "zero copying IO". Searching through the
> Internet and reading comments on various
This is a new implementation. After ~20 hours effort I couldn't get
the current x86 rwsem code to work.
This patch breaks all architechtures, but it's a good break and trivial
to fix. It removes the `RW_LOCK_BIAS' arg in include/linux/sched.h:INIT_MM().
This code is architecture-independent.
I found that the SuSE 7.1 install didn't put "usbdevfs" in /etc/fstab
on the Athlon, the PIII has broken USB port hardware.
Regards
--
Sid Boyce ... hamradio G3VBV ... Cessna/Warrior Pilot
Linux only shop.. Tel. 44-121 422 0375
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 11:46:21PM +0100, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote:
> The following patch fixes eepro100.c - others can be
> patched similarly.
Problem is that it allows someone with sniffer access to your network to
make a pretty good estimate of your random pool. If you search the
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 04:31:27PM -0700, Alex Q Chen wrote:
> I am trying to find a way to pin down user space memory from kernel, so
> that these user space buffer can be used for direct IO transfer or
> otherwise known as "zero copying IO". Searching through the Internet and
> reading
Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote:
> The machine in question is locked in a data center (can't be
> the only one) and thus sees none of the former two. IDE Entropy
> comes from executed IDE commands. The disk is physically largely
> inactive due to caching. But there's plenty of network traffic
>
I am trying to find a way to pin down user space memory from kernel, so
that these user space buffer can be used for direct IO transfer or
otherwise known as "zero copying IO". Searching through the Internet and
reading comments on various news groups, it would appear that most
developers
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> .. but there should be a cleaner way to get at the CFLAGS used
> to compile the kernel.
There is a way though I'd not call it clean. Here is an extract from
the Makefile I am using for separately-distributed modules. It should
work with kernels 2.0 to 2.4, all
In debugging why my (unloaded) IMAP server takes many seconds
to open folders, I discovered what looks like a problem
in 2.4's feeding of entropy into /dev/random. When there
is insufficient entropy in the random number generator,
reading from /dev/random blocks for several seconds. /dev/random
Your email address seems to be broken ;)
I tried from different networks.
rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
550 Relay denied
-d
The original message was received at Sun, 8 Apr 2001 14:48:51 -0700
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [208.179.59.198]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> SMTP receivers should have the option of inserting a header line
> instead of blocking "bad" Emails. Then other layers can decide what to
> do with this Email.
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-3.20/doc/html/spec_46.html#SEC810
rbl_domains =
Afaics cpu bindings could allow a thread to run with an "unlimited"
timeslice.
cpu0: one thread running with 'nice==19'.
NICE_TO_TICKS==1.
cpu1: lots of other threads with 'nice==0' (NICE_TO_TICKS==6)
cpu0 will enter schedule() every tick.
can_schedule() returns '0' for all
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Marvin Stodolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for responding. But I would still like to understand what the
>functionality is of the build --> /usr/src/linuc. Is it dispensable,
>once the module tree has been installed?
It's needed for modules that are
I've attached a new patch:
* cpu_is_idle() moved to
* function uninlined due to header dependencies
* cpu_is_idle() doesn't call do_softirq directly, instead the caller
returns to schedule()
* cpu_is_idle() exported for modules.
* docu updated.
I'd prefer to inline cpu_is_idle(), but
Althought I was unable to do any debugging, I found the same thing earlier
today. Syslog showed everything normal (uptimed reports, MARK, etc) and
ctrl-sysrq worked, but it had frozen hard. I was using xlock, and it was
stopped in the middle of an opengl saver. I had suspected it was related
Hi Jeff!
> Is Martin still alive? He hasn't been active in PCI development well
> over six months, maybe a year now. Ivan (alpha hacker) appeared on the
> scene to fix serious PCI bridge bugs, DaveM has added some PCI DMA
> stuff, and I've added a couple driver-related things. I haven't seen
[1.] kernel oops in reiserfs under 2.4.2-ac28 and 2.4.3-ac3 when rming files
[2.] when removing a directory on my harddrive with rm -rf, i get this oops.
it occurs every time i try, and only on this one folder (so far). its
actually in a subdirectory of the folder, im guessing at one file, but
Original Problem: PS/2 mouse pointer goes upper right corner and stays there.
Diagnosis: one byte was lost and this is fatal for the mouse driver.
Various people wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:19:33PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
> > > > > > > I am experiencing debilitating
john slee wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:07:20PM -0700, Colonel wrote:
>
>> Some ISPs rely on crap software & OS to process email, and have other
>
>
> so you don't use those ISPs
Some people don't have a choice of ISPs. Some people are lucky if they
can even *get* dial-up.
-b
-
Earlier today, I tried to unlock xscreensaver on my desktop. After
typing in the password, it said "Checking..." and then hung. In
response, I hit Ctrl+Alt+Bksp, which killed X. However, gdm did not
restart X. I tried logging in on the console, but none of them were
responsive; characters
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff -ru textutils-2.0/src/cat.c textutils-new/src/cat.c
> --- textutils-2.0/src/cat.c Sun Apr 8 22:55:10 2001
> +++ textutils-new/src/cat.c Sun Apr 8 23:23:54 2001
> @@ -790,6 +790,9 @@
>if (options == 0)
> {
>
Cross-compiles need to use the target linker here.
p.
--- linux/drivers/net/Makefile~ Sun Apr 8 17:48:31 2001
+++ linux/drivers/net/Makefile Sun Apr 8 19:31:29 2001
@@ -1445,7 +1445,7 @@
rm -f core *.o *.a *.s
wanpipe.o: $(WANPIPE_OBJS)
- ld -r -o $@ $(WANPIPE_OBJS)
+
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Manfred Spraul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: softirq buggy [Re: Serial port latency]
> Hello!
>
> > But with a huge overhead. I'd prefer to call it directly from within
the
> > idle functions, the
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 07:13:21PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> You do. PCI-space registers are volatile and they may change depending
> on what was written (or read) previously. A memory barrier before a PCI
> read will ensure you get a value that is relevant to previous code
> actions.
Hello!
> But with a huge overhead. I'd prefer to call it directly from within the
> idle functions, the overhead of schedule is IMHO too high.
+ if (current->need_resched) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (softirq_active(smp_processor_id()) &
On 08-Apr-2001 Rogier Wolff wrote:
> Matti Aarnio wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:10:52PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > How about creating an additional ML,
>> > the new ML (say LKML-DUL) is used to send mails from DUL to LKML, but
>> > such mails are not sent to LMKL.
>>
>>
"David St.Clair" wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get my hard drive to use UDMA/66. I'm thinking the cable
> is not being detected. When the HPT366 bios is set to UDMA 4; using
I think that should be UDMA 5 for 66? As far as I can remember UDMA4 is 33MHz with
S.M.A.R.T. which
add some reporting
Russell
Thanks for responding. But I would still like to understand what the
functionality is of the build --> /usr/src/linuc. Is it dispensable,
once the module tree has been installed?
Incidentally, per below, my own modutils is current, though some of the
folks using our ltmodem.o
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello!
>
> > + if (softirq_active(smp_processor_id()) &
softirq_mask(smp_processor_id())) {
> > + do_softirq();
> > + return 0;
>
> BTW you may delete do_softirq()... schedule() will call this.
>
But with a huge overhead. I'd prefer to call it directly from within the
Hello!
> empty, except for occasional ACKs. The utilization of the channel is about 4%.
1. tcpdump is required.
2. exact vesion of used kernel is required too.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Hello!
> packet in the queue. No other conditions i found. But i need repeatedly test
> the top packet in the queue.
>
> How to accomplish it?
Look into sch_tbf.c for example. Hint: timer.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Hello!
> + if (softirq_active(smp_processor_id()) & softirq_mask(smp_processor_id())) {
> + do_softirq();
> + return 0;
BTW you may delete do_softirq()... schedule() will call this.
> + *
> + * Isn't this identical to default_idle with the 'no-hlt' boot
> + *
Hi,
OOPS! I sent a wrong mail earlier under the same subject.
Linux kernel source level debugger, kgdb for linux kernel 2.4.3
is available from http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/
This version has following improvements over kgdb for 2.4.2 kernels:
1. Changed #ifdef __SMP__ statements to #ifdef
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 06:07:55PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Could you add more details and post them to linux-kernel?
>
> * which kernel version
2.2.18
> * both sides linux, or one side linux, the other one something else
both sides 2.2.18 linux
> * a tcpdump that shows the problem,
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:22:49PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > ORBS ... well, they called one of my old ISPs' mail an open relay when
> > it wasn't and took 3 months to decide to rectify the situation and
> > remove us from their list. That doesn't instill much confidence.
>
> I've heard
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 09:47:06AM -0500, Marvin Stodolsky wrote:
> It's presence has required some gymnastics, per below, during module
> installation for the Winmodem driver, ltmodem.o requiring a subsequent
> "depmod -a"
You need to update your modutils package - there have been a number of
MODULE SUPPORT [GENERAL], KMOD
P: Keith Owens
M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Though I've done some rational searching through the Documetation,
an explanation hasn't manifested, as to why there has appeared in the
2.4.nn
The TCP stack in the linux kernel behaves this way:
I have got a FULL-DUPLEX 28.800kbps channel with BER <= 1*10-9
a) I start a long TCP connection in one direction
b) After 5 minutes I start another connection in the opposite direction
The second connection rusn for about half a minute, then
Hi
i woke up to these this morning :(
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.2.19. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (specified)
-L (specified)
-o /lib/modules/2.2.19/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map (specified)
No modules in ksyms, skipping objects
Unable to handle kernel
Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:10:52PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > How about creating an additional ML,
> > the new ML (say LKML-DUL) is used to send mails from DUL to LKML, but
> > such mails are not sent to LMKL.
>
> Layering and technology problem.
>
>
When you stat() the files under /dev the st_blksize is returned as 1024
bytes. Currently cat will look at the input block size and the output block
size and use the maximum of them as it's buffer size. I believe that
programs such as cat should never use a buffer size smaller than a page of
Hi!
I found it works if I disable "save/restore of hw state".
I still need to restart driver of my psaux mouse.
Pavel
PS: BTW you should talk to acpi maintainers: acpi requires _os_ to do
this kind of stuff.
PPS: You should warn
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:
> ORBS ... well, they called one of my old ISPs' mail an open relay when
> it wasn't and took 3 months to decide to rectify the situation and
> remove us from their list. That doesn't instill much confidence.
I've heard that accusation many times, and
john slee wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:07:20PM -0700, Colonel wrote:
> > Some ISPs rely on crap software & OS to process email, and have other
>
> so you don't use those ISPs
Out here I have choice between
dialup (lots to chose from): $200/month(*), not always online.
cable (one
Also sprach Joseph Carter
>Even in those cases where broadband users are given a choice of providers,
>they have to know to ask for that choice since it is never offered and by
>exercising that choice you will usually find the price to be at least
>double if not triple - often through no fault of
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> So for solutions (That I know of):
>
> With recent kernels with modules_install a:
> /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
> directory is created, that effectively points to the kernel source
> tree the modules were built with. With the 2.4.x currently this is a
> symlink so
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, François Dupoux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange bug when trying to boot a kernel-2.4.3 (official release)
> from an 1.44 MB floppy disk. Just after the "Loading...", there is an
> infinite loop, and this message is printed:
> 0200
> AX: 0212
> BX: BC00
> CX: 5101
>
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:05:36PM +0200, Michael Reinelt wrote:
> The simple solution: Gunters 'multifunction quirks'
> clean solution #1: a new module according to Jeffs sample code
> clean solution #2: 'invisible PCI bridge' from Linus
[...]
> Suggestion: multifunction quirks for 2.4, one of
Patrick Shirkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am having trouble installing modules. The command hangs at the
> following point in the install...
>
> ---
> Finished dependencies of target file `_modinst_post'.
> Must remake target `_modinst_post'.
> if [ -r System.map ];
Tim Waugh wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:40:13PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Who said you have to have a separate driver for every single multi-IO
> > card? A single driver could support all serial+parallel multi-IO cards,
> > for example.
>
> Okay, I misunderstood. I'll take a
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Another (design) question: How will such a driver/module deal with
> > autodetection and/or devfs? I don't like to specify 'alias /dev/tts/4
> > netmos', because thats pure junk to me. What about pci hotplugging?
>
> pci hotplugging happens pretty much transparently.
> It scares me that peoples' messages would be denied based on what
> degree of connection they choose to mail via. I sincerely hope that
> the DUL lists only list netblocks that are actively being used for
> spam. This would be sort of like the Usenet Death Penalty, instating
> bans on providers
Hi Miles,
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Miles Lane wrote:
> I have mounted:
>
> none on /var/shm type shm (rw)
Not necessary any more.
> tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
Also not necessary, but recommended for POSIX shm. BTW it will not
work with Linus' kernel. Type "shm" is supported by
Hi,
Here is another way of allowing sane access to file system specific
information, statistics and configuration. It involves using the translation
filesystem (http://trfs.sourceforge.net/). An example of filesystem
configuration: configurable forcing data flush for all writes to files in a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Waugh) wrote on 07.04.01 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 01:23:27PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > You asked in your last message to show you code, here is a short
> > example. Note that I would love to rip out the SUPERIO code in parport
> > and make
hi all
regently I see weird things with X.
XFree86 Version 4.0.2 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 18 December 2000
(II) NV: driver for NVIDIA chipsets: RIVA128, RIVATNT, RIVATNT2,
RIVATNT2 (Ultra), RIVATNT2 (Vanta), RIVATNT2 M64,
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:10:52PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about creating an additional ML,
> the new ML (say LKML-DUL) is used to send mails from DUL to LKML, but
> such mails are not sent to LMKL.
Layering and technology problem.
SMTP receiver does those
Hi,
I am developing new queuing disciline. The purpose of this queue is to delay
outgoing packets. I wrote module sch_delay.o. This module implements delay_e
nqueue() and delay_dequeue() functions. I also modify tc to comunicate throu
gh netlink with my module. Because i want to dequeue only when
I am having trouble installing modules. The command hangs at the
following point in the install...
---
Finished dependencies of target file `_modinst_post'.
Must remake target `_modinst_post'.
if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.3; fi
Putting child
Just a guess:
Perhaps one bios is older and contains an older microcode patch?
Have you tried the microcode driver?
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Ok. I was missing the fact it is checked on going userspace.
>
What about the attached patch?
--
Manfred
// $Header$
// Kernel Version:
// VERSION = 2
// PATCHLEVEL = 4
// SUBLEVEL = 3
// EXTRAVERSION = -ac3
--- 2.4/include/linux/interrupt.h Thu Feb
The Intel documentation recommends that spinlocks should use
loop:
rep;nop;
cmp $0,lock_var
jne loop
ftp://download.intel.com/design/perftool/cbts/appnotes/sse2/w_spinlock.pdf
but the linux spinlock implementation uses
loop:
cmp $0, lock_var
rep; nop;
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:32:28AM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> The incentive behind the DUL is to force users not to post
> straight out to the world, but to use their ISP's servers
> for outbound email --- normal M$ users do that, after all.
> Only spammers - and UNIX
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:32:28AM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
The incentive behind the DUL is to force users not to post
straight out to the world, but to use their ISP's servers
for outbound email --- normal M$ users do that, after all.
Only spammers - and UNIX
Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok. I was missing the fact it is checked on going userspace.
What about the attached patch?
--
Manfred
// $Header$
// Kernel Version:
// VERSION = 2
// PATCHLEVEL = 4
// SUBLEVEL = 3
// EXTRAVERSION = -ac3
--- 2.4/include/linux/interrupt.h Thu Feb 22
The Intel documentation recommends that spinlocks should use
loop:
rep;nop;
cmp $0,lock_var
jne loop
ftp://download.intel.com/design/perftool/cbts/appnotes/sse2/w_spinlock.pdf
but the linux spinlock implementation uses
loop:
cmp $0, lock_var
rep; nop;
Just a guess:
Perhaps one bios is older and contains an older microcode patch?
Have you tried the microcode driver?
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
I am having trouble installing modules. The command hangs at the
following point in the install...
---
Finished dependencies of target file `_modinst_post'.
Must remake target `_modinst_post'.
if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.3; fi
Putting child
Hi,
I am developing new queuing disciline. The purpose of this queue is to delay
outgoing packets. I wrote module sch_delay.o. This module implements delay_e
nqueue() and delay_dequeue() functions. I also modify tc to comunicate throu
gh netlink with my module. Because i want to dequeue only when
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:10:52PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about creating an additional ML,
the new ML (say LKML-DUL) is used to send mails from DUL to LKML, but
such mails are not sent to LMKL.
Layering and technology problem.
SMTP receiver does those
hi all
regently I see weird things with X.
XFree86 Version 4.0.2 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 18 December 2000
(II) NV: driver for NVIDIA chipsets: RIVA128, RIVATNT, RIVATNT2,
RIVATNT2 (Ultra), RIVATNT2 (Vanta), RIVATNT2 M64,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Waugh) wrote on 07.04.01 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 01:23:27PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
You asked in your last message to show you code, here is a short
example. Note that I would love to rip out the SUPERIO code in parport
and make it a
Hi,
Here is another way of allowing sane access to file system specific
information, statistics and configuration. It involves using the translation
filesystem (http://trfs.sourceforge.net/). An example of filesystem
configuration: configurable forcing data flush for all writes to files in a
Hi Miles,
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Miles Lane wrote:
I have mounted:
none on /var/shm type shm (rw)
Not necessary any more.
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
Also not necessary, but recommended for POSIX shm. BTW it will not
work with Linus' kernel. Type "shm" is supported by
It scares me that peoples' messages would be denied based on what
degree of connection they choose to mail via. I sincerely hope that
the DUL lists only list netblocks that are actively being used for
spam. This would be sort of like the Usenet Death Penalty, instating
bans on providers who
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Another (design) question: How will such a driver/module deal with
autodetection and/or devfs? I don't like to specify 'alias /dev/tts/4
netmos', because thats pure junk to me. What about pci hotplugging?
pci hotplugging happens pretty much transparently. When a new
Tim Waugh wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:40:13PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Who said you have to have a separate driver for every single multi-IO
card? A single driver could support all serial+parallel multi-IO cards,
for example.
Okay, I misunderstood. I'll take a look at doing
Patrick Shirkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am having trouble installing modules. The command hangs at the
following point in the install...
---
Finished dependencies of target file `_modinst_post'.
Must remake target `_modinst_post'.
if [ -r System.map ]; then
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:05:36PM +0200, Michael Reinelt wrote:
The simple solution: Gunters 'multifunction quirks'
clean solution #1: a new module according to Jeffs sample code
clean solution #2: 'invisible PCI bridge' from Linus
[...]
Suggestion: multifunction quirks for 2.4, one of the
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
So for solutions (That I know of):
With recent kernels with modules_install a:
/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
directory is created, that effectively points to the kernel source
tree the modules were built with. With the 2.4.x currently this is a
symlink so but it
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Franois Dupoux wrote:
Hi,
I have a strange bug when trying to boot a kernel-2.4.3 (official release)
from an 1.44 MB floppy disk. Just after the "Loading...", there is an
infinite loop, and this message is printed:
0200
AX: 0212
BX: BC00
CX: 5101
DX:
Also sprach Joseph Carter
Even in those cases where broadband users are given a choice of providers,
they have to know to ask for that choice since it is never offered and by
exercising that choice you will usually find the price to be at least
double if not triple - often through no fault of
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:
ORBS ... well, they called one of my old ISPs' mail an open relay when
it wasn't and took 3 months to decide to rectify the situation and
remove us from their list. That doesn't instill much confidence.
I've heard that accusation many times, and on
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
