Hi!
> >>We'd have to audit and figure out what udelays are for hardware and
> >>which are not, but the evidence is that the vast majority of them are
> >>for hardware and not needed for virtualization.
> >>
> >
> >Which is irrelevant since the hardware drivers won't be used in a
>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:02:11 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add clockevent drivers for i386: lapic (local) and PIT (global). Update
> the timer IRQ to call into the PIT driver's event handler and the
> lapic-timer IRQ to call into the lapic clockevent driver. The
>
> > Strangely enough after continuing in gdb, UML is back to normal, and I
> > can't make it hang any more. It must be something timing related.
>
> Can you see if the patch below fixes it?
Yay! Got my nice fast UML back instead of ugly slow QEmu ;)
Seems to work perfectly now.
Thanks,
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 23:28 -0800, v j wrote:
> Open = 3rd party Linux drivers can be loaded. Closed = No third party
> Linux drivers can be loaded.
Then go ahead and use Windows CE or VxWorks. By your silly definition
they are pretty open.
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
> It's always seemed broken (though perhaps this was a distro bug?) in
> module form, so I've been compiling it in to get it to work.
Must have been a distro bug. It should have worked before as long
as the config was enabled.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Thursday 15 February 2007 08:32, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> please ack if O.K.
Ok for me
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:59:55AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Basically, this series adds support for a bunch of newer cards and newer
> drivers, do some relevant cleanups on cx88 (improving source code
> readability and reducing binary code size), adds FM radio support on
> pvrusb2
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 22:27 -0800, v j wrote:
> You are right. I have not contributed anything to Linux. Except one
> small patch to the MTD code. However, I don't think that is the point
> here. I am perfectly willing to live with the way Linux is today. I am
> telling you as a user that if Linux
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:46:13PM -0800, v j wrote:
> Using our source code would not benefit anybody but
> our competitors.
This excuse has been given time and time again, and repeatedly been
proven false. And as soon as one of your competitors makes their
drivers open,
On Thu 15-02-07 00:33:31, Frank Hartmann wrote:
> Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes I see some correlation. Again it seems there is a problem with buffers
> > attached to a page which got truncated but Private flag of the page stayed.
> > It's probably not important but just out of
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=62cc49396e593dd71c6595302bb10b085aefbfa5
Commit: 62cc49396e593dd71c6595302bb10b085aefbfa5
Parent: 40d22c1b5675e428b3f3f9a945d0bd62e94ca2f1
Author: Andi Kleen
Ken Chen wrote
> It might shut up kernel
> panic by eliminate double calls to aio_complete(), but it will
> silently introduce data corruption.
I had got kernel panic after an hour of aiostress running.
After patching I have not got aiostress massage
"verify error, file %s offset %Lu contents
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:24:27AM +, Ramy M. Hassan wrote:
> Hello,
> We got the following xfs internal error on one of our production servers:
>
> Feb 14 08:28:52 info6 kernel: [238186.676483] Filesystem "sdd8": XFS
> internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1138 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.
Andi,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:20:56AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
> >
> > Can we
On 2/15/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good morning all,
Now, when I boot up, I miss two drives, exactly the two connected to
this promise card.
I have another onboard Promise controller which works just fine, so
the driver gets loaded properly, and since i see all my other disks
Good morning all,
Yesterday I replaced a Sil680 PCI add-on card for a Promise 2027x PCI
add-on card.
Now, when I boot up, I miss two drives, exactly the two connected to
this promise card.
I have another onboard Promise controller which works just fine, so
the driver gets loaded properly, and
Oh, I am sorry. Seems like the German courts have spoken. I am not
sure about what, but they have spoken. Sorry for the confusion.
On 2/15/07, Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
v j wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v
Hi Andrew,
> > +#define get_unaligned(ptr) \
> > +({ \
> > + const struct { \
> > + union {
On 2/15/07, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And as I understand it, an important principle in out community is
freedom. If vj wants to take a particular moral/ethical stance, then
he should be free to do that. Of course he will have to live with any
consequences, as do we all.
Yes, and
v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If your mindset is "how much can I take take take without giving back
back back" then personally I think you're sort of acting like a parasite
in this context
Ok so are thousands of others who are using Linux as their
Joy Latten wrote:
i upgraded to vanilla kernel 2.6.20 and while i was using strongswan
2.8.2 to setup an IPSEC VPN i got the following kernel Ooops.
I had successfully established the same tunnel a few times, but key
renegotiation caused a problem ( both ends did not renegotiate at the
same
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Nadia Derbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But, what do you do with Oracle that's asking maxfiles to be set to 0x1,
while the default value might be enough for a system that's not running Oracle.
I'm afraid that giving boot time values to the max_* tunables we will
v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j wrote:
> This is in reference to the following thread:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
>
> I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but linux is _very_
> popular in the
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 07:34, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:43:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:40, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > > Hello Everybody,
> > >
> > > This is an experiment towards process_freezer based
v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At least one of us is confused about that an embedded User is.
It seems to me that you are an embedded developer, not User.
I doubt that most Embedded Users care what their OS is,
or even know what an OS is.
I am not sure what
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 00:04 -0800, v j wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j wrote:
> > > This is in reference to the following thread:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
> > >
> > > I am not sure if this is ever
On Thursday February 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [..] then it is less clear what people believe
>
> Another area where it is less clear what people believe is if you are
> distributing the module separately to the kernel, but, as I
Sumant Patro wrote:
Checks added in megasas_queue_command to know if FW is able to process
commands within the timeout period. If number of retries is 2 or more,
the driver stops sending cmd to FW. IO is resumed when pending cmd count
reduces to 16 or 10 seconds has elapsed from the time cmds
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j wrote:
> This is in reference to the following thread:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
>
> I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but linux is _very_
> popular in the embedded space.
The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed
non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the
values reported by the kernel and those readable from PCI config space
aren't consistent anymore. Therefore, this patch arranges for the
respective BARs to also get
>>> Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14.02.07 18:51 >>>
>On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:52:54AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Actually, after a second round of thinking I believe there's still more to do
>> - your second patch missed fixing i386's do_trap() similarly to x86-64's
>> and, vice versa,
Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14.02.07 18:51
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:52:54AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
Actually, after a second round of thinking I believe there's still more to do
- your second patch missed fixing i386's do_trap() similarly to x86-64's
and, vice versa, x86-64's
The change to force legacy mode IDE channels' resources to fixed
non-zero values confuses (at least some versions of) X, because the
values reported by the kernel and those readable from PCI config space
aren't consistent anymore. Therefore, this patch arranges for the
respective BARs to also get
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j wrote:
This is in reference to the following thread:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but linux is _very_
popular in the embedded space. We (an
On Thursday February 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/15/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..] then it is less clear what people believe
Another area where it is less clear what people believe is if you are
distributing the module separately to the kernel, but, as I understand
it,
v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least one of us is confused about that an embedded User is.
It seems to me that you are an embedded developer, not User.
I doubt that most Embedded Users care what their OS is,
or even know what an OS is.
I am not sure what the
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 00:04 -0800, v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j wrote:
This is in reference to the following thread:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 07:34, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:43:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:40, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
Hello Everybody,
This is an experiment towards process_freezer based implementation
v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j wrote:
This is in reference to the following thread:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but linux is _very_
popular in the embedded
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Nadia Derbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, what do you do with Oracle that's asking maxfiles to be set to 0x1,
while the default value might be enough for a system that's not running Oracle.
I'm afraid that giving boot time values to the max_* tunables we will
v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your mindset is how much can I take take take without giving back
back back then personally I think you're sort of acting like a parasite
in this context
Ok so are thousands of others who are using Linux as their OS of
On 2/15/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I understand it, an important principle in out community is
freedom. If vj wants to take a particular moral/ethical stance, then
he should be free to do that. Of course he will have to live with any
consequences, as do we all.
Yes, and
Hi Andrew,
+#define get_unaligned(ptr) \
+({ \
+ const struct { \
+ union {
Oh, I am sorry. Seems like the German courts have spoken. I am not
sure about what, but they have spoken. Sorry for the confusion.
On 2/15/07, Richard Knutsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j
Good morning all,
Yesterday I replaced a Sil680 PCI add-on card for a Promise 2027x PCI
add-on card.
Now, when I boot up, I miss two drives, exactly the two connected to
this promise card.
I have another onboard Promise controller which works just fine, so
the driver gets loaded properly, and
On 2/15/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning all,
Now, when I boot up, I miss two drives, exactly the two connected to
this promise card.
I have another onboard Promise controller which works just fine, so
the driver gets loaded properly, and since i see all my other disks
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:24:27AM +, Ramy M. Hassan wrote:
Hello,
We got the following xfs internal error on one of our production servers:
Feb 14 08:28:52 info6 kernel: [238186.676483] Filesystem sdd8: XFS
internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1138 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.
Ken Chen wrote
It might shut up kernel
panic by eliminate double calls to aio_complete(), but it will
silently introduce data corruption.
I had got kernel panic after an hour of aiostress running.
After patching I have not got aiostress massage
verify error, file %s offset %Lu contents
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=62cc49396e593dd71c6595302bb10b085aefbfa5
Commit: 62cc49396e593dd71c6595302bb10b085aefbfa5
Parent: 40d22c1b5675e428b3f3f9a945d0bd62e94ca2f1
Author: Andi Kleen
On Thu 15-02-07 00:33:31, Frank Hartmann wrote:
Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes I see some correlation. Again it seems there is a problem with buffers
attached to a page which got truncated but Private flag of the page stayed.
It's probably not important but just out of curiosity
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:46:13PM -0800, v j wrote:
Using our source code would not benefit anybody but
our competitors.
This excuse has been given time and time again, and repeatedly been
proven false. And as soon as one of your competitors makes their
drivers open,
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 22:27 -0800, v j wrote:
You are right. I have not contributed anything to Linux. Except one
small patch to the MTD code. However, I don't think that is the point
here. I am perfectly willing to live with the way Linux is today. I am
telling you as a user that if Linux
It's always seemed broken (though perhaps this was a distro bug?) in
module form, so I've been compiling it in to get it to work.
Must have been a distro bug. It should have worked before as long
as the config was enabled.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thursday 15 February 2007 08:32, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
please ack if O.K.
Ok for me
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 23:28 -0800, v j wrote:
Open = 3rd party Linux drivers can be loaded. Closed = No third party
Linux drivers can be loaded.
Then go ahead and use Windows CE or VxWorks. By your silly definition
they are pretty open.
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:02:11 +0100 Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add clockevent drivers for i386: lapic (local) and PIT (global). Update
the timer IRQ to call into the PIT driver's event handler and the
lapic-timer IRQ to call into the lapic clockevent driver. The
assignement of
Hi!
We'd have to audit and figure out what udelays are for hardware and
which are not, but the evidence is that the vast majority of them are
for hardware and not needed for virtualization.
Which is irrelevant since the hardware drivers won't be used in a
virtualised environment with
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:06:24 -0600 Corey Minyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add pci_remove handling to the driver, so it will clean up if
the device is hot-removed.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.19/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
Allow ALPS, LOGIPS2PP, LIFEBOOK, and TRACKPOINT protocol extensions (in
the psmouse driver) to be disabled during compilation. The synaptics
stuff is left alone for now, since it needs special handling for
synaptic pass-through ports.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git
Initial framework for disabling PS/2 protocol extensions. The current
protocols can only be disabled if CONFIG_EMBEDDED is selected. No
source files are changed, merely build stuff.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/Kconfig
Allow disabling of synaptics via CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_SYNAPTICS;
we leave synaptic_detect and synaptic_reset (for synaptics hardware
that emulates other protocols), but get rid of synaptic_init.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
Hi!
With 2.6.20, resuming from disk sometimes cannot returns on vt7 where X runs
but everything seems working, so just changing to vt1 and returning to vt7
solves the problem. But dmesg shows some BUG() output like [1] whenever this
problem occurs
I'm using 20070207 snapshot of suspend,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:01:37PM +0530, Maximus wrote:
Im trying to port some drivers between 2.6.14 and 2.6.19
I find that irqdesc has changed completely. how do i port
the drivers between 2.6.14 and 2.6.19?
is there a porting guide available to port the drivers
which use irqdesc?.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 07:33:47PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:01:37PM +0530, Maximus wrote:
Im trying to port some drivers between 2.6.14 and 2.6.19
I find that irqdesc has changed completely. how do i port
the drivers between 2.6.14 and 2.6.19?
is there a
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:39:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this is the most bastardized sucker I've ever seen. . . I have had
no end of trouble with it (couldn't even get a boot loader to work with
it - had to write my own). And, as luck would have it, the serial port
is no
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 04:44:51AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:46:13PM -0800, v j wrote:
Using our source code would not benefit anybody but
our competitors.
This excuse has been given time and time again, and repeatedly been
I am still a kernel newbie, and I am still not very much aware about
the GPL vs. Non-GPL drivers debate. I personally think it'd be better
that all drivers should be GPL'd but if that's the case, what would be
the legal position of such vendors as ATI or NVIDIA who supply closed
source drivers?
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:40:32 +0100 Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Contact fbcon people...
There aren't any, basically. Since Tony disappeared James has been helping out
but doesn't have a lot of time. So we're pretty much on our own with problems
in
this area.
-
To unsubscribe from
Andi,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:20:56AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package.
Can we have a bug push to
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:59:55AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Basically, this series adds support for a bunch of newer cards and newer
drivers, do some relevant cleanups on cx88 (improving source code
readability and reducing binary code size), adds FM radio support on
pvrusb2 and do
Sumant Patro wrote:
Checks added in megasas_queue_command to know if FW is able to process
commands within the timeout period. If number of retries is 2 or more,
the driver stops sending cmd to FW. IO is resumed when pending cmd count
reduces to 16 or 10 seconds has elapsed from the time cmds
Hi!
I own an older Sony Vaio SRX51P, European Model, P3 based. s2ram
identifies it with
sys_vendor = Sony Corporation
sys_product = PCG-SRX51P(DE)
sys_version = 01
bios_version = R0232U2
Suspend to RAM by using s2ram -v -m -f actually
Strangely enough after continuing in gdb, UML is back to normal, and I
can't make it hang any more. It must be something timing related.
Can you see if the patch below fixes it?
Yay! Got my nice fast UML back instead of ugly slow QEmu ;)
Seems to work perfectly now.
Thanks,
Miklos
-
To
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I own an older Sony Vaio SRX51P, European Model, P3 based. s2ram
identifies it with
sys_vendor = Sony Corporation
sys_product = PCG-SRX51P(DE)
sys_version = 01
bios_version = R0232U2
Suspend to RAM by using s2ram
Hi!
I own an older Sony Vaio SRX51P, European Model, P3 based. s2ram
identifies it with
sys_vendor = Sony Corporation
sys_product = PCG-SRX51P(DE)
sys_version = 01
bios_version = R0232U2
Suspend to RAM by using s2ram -v -m -f
Incorrect direct io error handling (v4)
Changes from v3:
- Patch preparead gainst 2.6.20-rc6-mm3. It seems now it's not conflict
with Nick's stuff.
- fix generic segment check function.
LOG:
If generic_file_direct_write() has fail (ENOSPC condition) inside
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I own an older Sony Vaio SRX51P, European Model, P3 based. s2ram
identifies it with
sys_vendor = Sony Corporation
sys_product = PCG-SRX51P(DE)
sys_version = 01
bios_version = R0232U2
Suspend to RAM by using s2ram
15 Şub 2007 Per tarihinde, Andrew Morton şunları yazmıştı:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:40:32 +0100 Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Contact fbcon people...
There aren't any, basically. Since Tony disappeared James has been helping
out but doesn't have a lot of time. So we're pretty much
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 12:51 +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
I am still a kernel newbie, and I am still not very much aware about
the GPL vs. Non-GPL drivers debate. I personally think it'd be better
that all drivers should be GPL'd but if that's the case, what would be
the legal position of such
On 2/15/07, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that's not the case with VJ's drivers, which are apparently solely
for linux, so should be distributed under the GPL.
In any case, you're free to use any driver, regardless of license..
copyright does not cover use, only copying and most,
Our source code is meaningless to the Open
Source community at large. It is only useful to our tiny set
of competitors that have nothing to do with Linux. The Embedded
space is very specific. We are only _using_ Linux. Just as we
could have used VxWorks or OSE. Using our source code would
not
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:00:56PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 12:51 +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
I am still a kernel newbie, and I am still not very much aware about
the GPL vs. Non-GPL drivers debate. I personally think it'd be better
that all drivers should be
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:05:11PM +1000, Trent Waddington wrote:
On 2/15/07, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that's not the case with VJ's drivers, which are apparently solely
for linux, so should be distributed under the GPL.
In any case, you're free to use any driver,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:49:57AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
It's always seemed broken (though perhaps this was a distro bug?) in
module form, so I've been compiling it in to get it to work.
Must have been a distro bug. It should have worked before as long
as the config was
Update:
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 00:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
I've got this in the resume-during-suspend phase of suspend to disk with
2.6.20-git10 on HPC nx6325:
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
sata_sil :00:12.0: resuming
BUG: at
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:49:57AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
It's always seemed broken (though perhaps this was a distro bug?) in
module form, so I've been compiling it in to get it to work.
Must have been a distro bug. It should have worked before as long
as
On 2/15/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume ATI's lawyers think its legal, as it's been a year and
a half since I first brought this questionable act to their
attention.
Lawyers don't think X is legal.. that's not how lawyers think. If
ATI's lawyers have advised ATI on this at
unsubscribe linux-kernel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
v j [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/14/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 21:16 -0800, v j wrote:
This is in reference to the following thread:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but linux is _very_
Hello!
I think you have a bit of a misunderstanding... Linux is not royalty
free. Just the royalty is not in the form of cash, but in the form of
having to give your improvements back to the open source world.
Sure. But this is not legally binding.
Maybe it's not, but it certainly doesn't
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:30:33PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
On Wednesday February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am well aware of what Greg KHs position is, in fact he is the reason
I started the whole rant. This is only a plea to the higher
authorities. Linus, please save Linux!
Linus
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:08:06 +1100 Nigel Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch add x86_64 support for PM_TRACE, and shifts per-arch code to
the appropriate subdirectories.
ia64 allmodconfig:
include/linux/resume-trace.h:4:30: asm/resume-trace.h: No such file or directory
On 2/15/07, Pierre Ossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eugene Ilkov wrote:
I have I/O errors with Transcend SD highspeed card 2GB/150x when it's
mounted in r/w mode (cardreader on sharp sl-c1000)
It works well if I reverse mmcv4 patch commited to 2.6.19-git2
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/4/27)
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now if it's better to set up a empty node or use a nearby node
for a memory less cpu can be further discussed. I still think
I lean towards the later.
Worst case: Only slot 0 is used. Plug your memoryless CPU card into the last
slot before your plug the
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:09:51AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Why should we make sure that PF_NOFREEZE tasks are also frozen for
cpu hotplug? Instead, we can create an infrastructure which allows threads
to
specify for the scenarios they would want to be excempted from freeze.
hi vj,
On Thursday 15 February 2007, v j wrote:
This is in reference to the following thread:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but linux is _very_
popular in the embedded space. We (an embedded vendor) chose Linux 3
years back because of
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:16:44PM -0800, v j wrote:
On 2/14/07, v j [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has nothing to do with politics. I am not a Linux contributor. I
realize that people who have contributed to the Linux Kernel have very
valid points. It is their sweat and blood. They have a
On 2/15/07, Mws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi vj,
On Thursday 15 February 2007, v j wrote:
This is in reference to the following thread:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/63
I am not sure if this is ever addressed in LKML, but linux is _very_
popular in the embedded space. We (an embedded
Hi,
My drivers in 2.6.14 use statements like
desc-triggered = 1;
And desc also points to some members of irqdesc which arent in
2.6.19 but in 2.6.14.
Im a newbie, What changes am i supposed to make to make it work in 2.6.19.
Im not sure what changes are exactly needed.
On Feb 15 2007 18:43, Neil Brown wrote:
We seem to have different definitions of open and closed.
Open = 3rd party Linux drivers can be loaded. Closed = No third party
Linux drivers can be loaded.
Loading a driver is not at issue. Anyone may load a driver.
And, after all, because
501 - 600 of 1060 matches
Mail list logo
