On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:40 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Ben Nizette wrote:
[...]
Question to the world here: Distros make, as a matter of course, a
series of modifications to the Linux Kernel so that their modules or
features work. What stops VJ making a patchset which effectively
Advanced Mathematics, lesson 1:
101 != 105
;-)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.20-mm1/drivers/isdn/gigaset/Makefile.old 2007-02-15
17:38:23.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-mm1/drivers/isdn/gigaset/Makefile 2007-02-15
17:38:41.0 +0100
@@ -5,4 +5,4
This patch fixes the following compile error:
-- snip --
...
LD drivers/isdn/gigaset/built-in.o
drivers/isdn/gigaset/ser_gigaset.o: In function `gigaset_m10x_send_skb':
(.text+0xe50): multiple definition of `gigaset_m10x_send_skb'
drivers/isdn/gigaset/usb_gigaset.o:(.text+0x0): first
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:34:41 +
Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:39:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Can someone please tell us how this magic works? (And it does appear to
work).
It seems to assuming that the compiler will assume that members of
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:37:20 +0100
Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton napisa__(a):
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:06:23 +0100 (CET)
Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add missing #include linux/irq.h, which caused
| init/main.c: In function ‘do_basic_setup’:
| init/main.c:705: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘init_irq_proc’
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Linus,
Could you please pull from:
git://git.o-hand.com/linux-rpurdie-leds for-linus
This adds two new LED drivers (in my capacity as LEDs maintainer).
Thanks,
Richard
drivers/leds/Kconfig | 12 +++
drivers/leds/Makefile |2
drivers/leds/leds-cobalt.c | 43 +++
There appears to be a inconsistenancy with reference
counts on pages allocated with alloc_pages when order
is greater than zero. In buffered_rmqueue when order
!= 0 then __rmqueue is called. This returns a page
pointer that is really a pointer to the first page in
a group of pages. Subsequently
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:53:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
The whole union thing was only needed to get rid of a warning but Marcel's
solution does the same thing by attaching the packed keyword to the entire
structure instead, so this patch is now using his macros but using __packed
On 15 Feb 2007 10:28:57 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote:
akpm wrote:
[...] And what can I do with these markers? And once I've done it,
are there any userspace applications I can use to get the data out
in human-usable form? [...]
The LTTng user-space programs
v j wrote:
So far I have heard nothing but, if you don't contribute, screw you.
All this is fine. Just say so. Make it black and white. Make it
It is black and white in copyright law and the GPL.
The /whole point/ of the GPL is to funnel contributions back.
We happen to think there are solid
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:49:15 -0600
Corey Minyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I see the following options besides what's already there:
1) add asm/kdebug.h and DIE_NMI_POST to everything that might have an
IPMI implementation.
2) use CONFIG_X86 to tell if NMI will work, since that's the
I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it.
Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are we ready to do this?
I'd love for Tony to return, but he's been missing for awhile now.
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
clues?
thanks,
-Len
Bringing up loopback interface: [ OK ]
Bringing up interface eth0: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address
printing eip:
*pde = 3747c001
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 15 Feb 2007 10:28:57 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote:
akpm wrote:
[...] And what can I do with these markers? And once I've done it,
are there any userspace applications I can use to get the data out
in
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 07:57:05AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I agree that it's unnecessary code, and in many ways exactly the same
thing. I just happen to believe that casts tend to be a lot more dangerous
than extraneous initializations. Casts have this nasty tendency of hiding
*other*
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:18:52PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either
be just a menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set I
want it so you can only
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, David Howells wrote:
This is really the weak point - it offers no advantage over an equivalent
implementation in user space (e.g. in the module tools). So why has to be
done in the kernel?
Because the init_module() system call is the common point of module
Seventh attempt at the serial driver patch for the PMC-Sierra
MSP71xx devices.
There are three different fixes:
1. Fix for DesignWare APB THRE errata:
In brief, this is a non-standard 16550 in that the THRE interrupt
will not re-assert itself simply by disabling and re-enabling the
THRI bit in
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Roman Zippel wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, David Howells wrote:
It is possible to protect /dev/mem and /dev/kmem or make them unavailable and
it is possible to protect the kernel's memory whilst it is running (provided
you don't have nommu or broken hardware and you don't
Hello.
Marc St-Jean wrote:
There are three different fixes:
1. Fix for DesignWare APB THRE errata:
In brief, this is a non-standard 16550 in that the THRE interrupt
will not re-assert itself simply by disabling and re-enabling the
THRI bit in the IER, it is only re-enabled if a character is
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:14:53 PST, Andreas Gruenbacher said:
I agree, that's really what should happen. We solve this by marking modules as
supported, partner supported, or unsupported, but in an insecure way, so
partners and users could try to fake the support status of a module and/or
remove
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:13:45 EST, Dave Jones said:
One argument in its favour is aparently Red Hat isn't the only vendor
with something like this. I've not investigated it, but I hear rumours
that suse has something similar. Having everyone using the same code
would be a win for obvious
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, David Lang wrote:
this issue, and these holes keep comeing up in discussions, why can't these
holes be closed? I seem to remember seeing patches that would remove /dev/kmem
being sent to the list, but they weren't accepted into the kernel (and I seem
to remember
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:09:38PM +, David Howells wrote:
...
There are several reasons why these patches are useful, amongst which are:
...
(4) to allow other support providers to do likewise, or at least to _detect_
the fact that unsupported modules are loaded;
(5) to allow the
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:51:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Whatever happens, please ensure that the final fix makes it into -stable
as well. Jeff's version of this patch wasn't cc'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paolo's patch was sent to -stable. His should be used everywhere, and mine
should be
A previous cleanup misused need_poll, which had a fairly broken
interface. It implemented a growable array, changing the used
elements count itself, but leaving it up to the caller to fill in the
actual elements, including the entire array if the array had to be
reallocated. This worked because
Hello,
On Wed, February 14, 2007 20:40, David Howells wrote:
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) A cut-down MPI library derived from GPG with error handling added.
Do we really need to add this?
I presume you mean the MPI library specifically? If so, then yes. It's
necessary
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:55:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:13:45 EST, Dave Jones said:
One argument in its favour is aparently Red Hat isn't the only vendor
with something like this. I've not investigated it, but I hear rumours
that suse has something
On Thursday 15 February 2007 12:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:14:53 PST, Andreas Gruenbacher said:
I agree, that's really what should happen. We solve this by marking
modules as supported, partner supported, or unsupported, but in an
insecure way, so partners and users
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:32:40 +0100, Adrian Bunk said:
There are different opinions whether the complete source code of the
GPLv2 includes in such cases public keys, making it questionable whether
your example will survive at court in all jurisdictions.
It's no less shaky than the whole
Hi,
On Feb 14 2007 14:57, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
[2]
pipe: pipe:[439336] (or pipe/[439336])
[3] Always make disconnected paths double-slashed:
--
pipe: //pipe/[439336]
lazily
On Thursday 15 February 2007 04:53, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
What's the point in changing pipefs... you can *never*
reach it *anyway*, even if it was a /-style path, since
pipefs is a NOMNT filesystem.
The point is that we could then get rid of the special case for MS_NOUSER
filesystems like
On 2/15/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it make the interface less cool? Yeah. Would it limit it to just a
few linked system calls (to avoid memory allocation issues in the kernel)?
Yes again. But it would simplify a lot of the interface issues.
Only in toy applications.
Chris Snook wrote:
Collaborating with the competition (coopetition) on a common
technology platform reduces costs for anyone who chooses to get
involved, giving them a collective competitive edge against anyone who
doesn't. This is why there is so much industry interest in F/OSS, and
mortal
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:29:49 -0800 (PST) Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
VBE1.2 doesn't support function 15h (DDC) resulting in a 'hang' whilst
uncompressing kernel with some video cards. Make sure we check VBE version
before fiddling around with DDC.
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's shm-make-sysv-ipc-shared-memory-use-stacked-files.patch, brought to
us by Eric-who-hasnt-read-Documentation/SubmitChecklist.
Sorry I thought I had all of the interesting debugging enabled in my
kernel build. It must of fallen out someplace. I
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
I don't immediately see why that code isn't racy: the page can remain
in the pagevec for arbitrary amounts of time and someone can come along
and mlock it again. But given the ease with which you're hitting this,
it may not be a race.
As long as the
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:40 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Rhetorical question: what stops me from taking somebody's copyrighted
work, stripping the copyrights or falsely claiming to have a license
to redistribute it, then selling it?
No one.
Well, that's not quite true,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:01:27 +0100
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to build 2.6.20-mm1 on i386 with C=1, sparse 0.2 chokes
on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c:
CHECK arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
linux/marker.h: No such file or directory
include/linux/jiffies.h:18:5: warning:
On Thursday 15 February 2007, v j wrote:
So far I have heard nothing but, if you don't contribute, screw you.
All this is fine. Just say so. Make it black and white. Make it
perfectly clear what is and isn't legal. If we can't load proprietary
modules, then so be it. It will help everybody if this
On 2/15/07, Pierre Ossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Ossman wrote:
Eugene Ilkov wrote:
PXAMCI: irq 0004 stat 2140
Hang on. PXAMCI is a MMC controller, right?
yes, pxa2xx-mci driver
Hmm... depending on where you look, you get different timing schematics. The
MMCA 4.2
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:19:12PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
No need to use -traditional for processing asm in i386/kernel/
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any possibility that you could 'fix' the three remaining
uses of -traditional in i386?
Sam
-
To
On Thursday 15 February 2007 14:14, Andrew Morton wrote:
- The IDE tree got dropped due to various linkage problems
Doh, I guess this is what one gets for not testing modular
IDE driver support properly. :(
All linkage problems should be fixed now, sorry for that.
Bart
-
To unsubscribe from
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:01:27 +0100
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to build 2.6.20-mm1 on i386 with C=1, sparse 0.2 chokes
on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c:
CHECK arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
linux/marker.h: No such file or
The current driver is not setting the dev
field in the private data structure, which
can lead to an OOPS if the driver tries to
report an error.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.20/drivers/video/s3c2410fb.c 2007-02-04 18:44:54.0
+
+++
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
e1000 faults in 2.6.20-git, while 2.6.20 worked fine.
System is a D875PBZ with LOM.
clues?
I'm guessing this is an old bug found by the following bit of
debug coded added into since v2.6.20
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
+ if (irqflags IRQF_SHARED) {
Hi Jörn,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, [utf-8] Jörn Engel wrote:
On Thu, 15 February 2007 19:38:14 +0100, Juan Piernas Canovas wrote:
The patch for 2.6.11 is not still stable enough to be released. Be patient
;-)
While I don't want to discourage you, this is about the point in
development where
Ralf Baechle wrote:
Gcc info page says:
[...]
`packed'
The `packed' attribute specifies that a variable or structure field
should have the smallest possible alignment--one byte for a
variable, and one bit for a field, unless you specify a larger
value with the `aligned'
Hi!
Apart from that I did the following changes:
- implemented suspend/resume support (not tested very much)
- named the registers
- fixed a bug that caused a major slowdown when modprobed without debug=1
- added writting support (disabled by default, modprobe with write=1)
Before you enable
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:26:10 + (GMT) James Simmons wrote:
I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it.
Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer.
So would you like to leave it as Maintained or change it to
Odd Fixes? (Maintained = a maintainer) From the
Andrew Morton wrote:
On 15 Feb 2007 10:28:57 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote:
akpm wrote:
[...] And what can I do with these markers? And once I've done it,
are there any userspace applications I can use to get the data out
in human-usable form? [...]
The
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 17:41 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:40 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Rhetorical question: what stops me from taking somebody's copyrighted
work, stripping the copyrights or falsely claiming to have a license
to redistribute
Andrew Morton napisał(a):
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:37:20 +0100
Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton napisa__(a):
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/
Will appear later at
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:25:49 -0800
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are we ready to do this?
I'd love for Tony to return, but he's been missing for awhile now.
So this give us the following major areas that are marked as Orphan:
Firmware loader
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 01:38 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:32:04PM -0500, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 07:09 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Hi,
Just tinkering around with this and got something working, so I'll see
if anyone else wants to try it.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:30:17 +0100
J.A. Magall__n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/
Will appear later at
If EIOCBRETRY then generic_file_aio_write() will be recalled for the
same iocb.
Only if kick_iocb() is called. It won't be called if i_i_p2_r() was
the only thing to return -EIOCBRETRY.
It is not need to call kick_iocb()
for generic_file_aio_write() calling.
It is recalled without any
linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
There are a lot of device drivers that will never make it into the
mainline kernel because they are for one-of-a-kind devices or boards
that companies embed into their products. Nobody would even want a
copy of the software to interface with something that they
On Thursday February 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my ide driver and the md stuff all built into the kernel, my software
raid drives and associated /dev/md? devices are detected and created by the
kernel.
Yep.
With the md stuff built in but the ide driver modular and loaded later
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:31:42 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:30:17 +0100
J.A. Magall__n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Temporarily at
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:18:39 +
Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:53:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
The whole union thing was only needed to get rid of a warning but Marcel's
solution does the same thing by attaching the packed keyword to the entire
Pavel Machek wrote:
You know it is ugly. Alan demonstrated it even hurts performance, but
being ugly is the main problem.
No argument with that. Well, we're ok with dropping it. Actually,
reverting the entire set of udelay changes now seems wise. The same bug
that happened with i8042
v j [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far I have heard nothing but, if you don't contribute, screw you.
That's exactly what you tell to the linux community: If they don't contribute
to your project *FOR*NOTHING*IN*RETURN*, you'll punish them by - stamping
your feet, crying out loud and *paying* for
On Feb 15, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:18:52PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu either
be just a menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or
not.
What I'm trying to accomplish is if
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:46:56 -0500
Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me too. It's due to the linux-kernel-markers patches. Mathieu, can you
take a look please?
I will give a deeper look in sparse, but I should say up front that I
add this to the root build tree Makefile :
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:19:12PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
No need to use -traditional for processing asm in i386/kernel/
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any possibility that you could 'fix' the three remaining
uses of
Hi;
15 Şub 2007 Per tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
Location:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bunk/linux-2.6.16.y/testing/
git tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git
Changes since 2.6.16.40:
What about CVE-2006-6333, CVE-2006-5753 and
Hi!
You know it is ugly. Alan demonstrated it even hurts performance, but
being ugly is the main problem.
No argument with that. Well, we're ok with dropping it. Actually,
reverting the entire set of udelay changes now seems wise. The same
bug
Good, thanks.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:41:59 +
Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/
Hi,
It appears that the pcim_iomap_regions() function doesn't get the error
Zachary Amsden wrote:
So Rusty, Chris, Jeremy, any objections to killing udelay() and
friends in paravirt-ops? It would simplify things a bit. The only
thing we lose is a slightly faster boot time in the 100% emulated
device case. I'm ok with losing that. Even the PIT fast paths don't
use
Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/
[...]
+unify-queue_delayed_work-and-queue_delayed_work_on.patch
I'm getting oops in delayed_work_timer_fn, since cwq-wq is NULL and accessed
there. The patch below fixes the problem for me.
--
unify
Also many storage subsystems have some internal parallelism
in writing (e.g. a RAID can write on different disks in parallel for
a single partition) so i'm not sure your distinction is that useful.
But we are talking about a different case. What I have said is that if you
use two devices,
On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Ananiev, Leonid I wrote:
If EIOCBRETRY then generic_file_aio_write() will be recalled for the
same iocb.
Only if kick_iocb() is called. It won't be called if i_i_p2_r() was
the only thing to return -EIOCBRETRY.
It is not need to call kick_iocb()
for
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 01:49:45AM +0200, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
Hi;
15 Şub 2007 Per tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
Location:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bunk/linux-2.6.16.y/testing/
git tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git
Am 15.02.2007 22:56 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Advanced Mathematics, lesson 1:
101 != 105
Ouch. Sorry. Thanks for catching that one.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.20-mm1/drivers/isdn/gigaset/Makefile.old
On 2/15/07, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
v j wrote:
So far I have heard nothing but, if you don't contribute, screw you.
All this is fine. Just say so. Make it black and white. Make it
It is black and white in copyright law and the GPL.
The /whole point/ of the GPL is to funnel
When enhancing do_shmat I forgot to take into account that shm_lock
is a spinlock, and was allocating memory with the lock held.
This patch fixes that by grabbing a reference to the dentry and
mounts of shm_file before we drop the shm_lock and then performing
the memory allocations.
This is
Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
[...]
unify queue_delayed_work and queue_delayed_work_on fix
Oh sorry, the name should be
make queue_delayed_work() friendly to flush_fork() fix
Since cwq-wq is unset for other than singlethread_cpu when singlethread
workqueue was created, an oops occurs during bootup.
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:27:10PM -0800, v j wrote:
You are right. I have not contributed anything to Linux. Except one
small patch to the MTD code. However, I don't think that is the point
here. I am perfectly willing to live with the way Linux is today. I am
telling you
Andrew Morton wrote:
hm. So if I have
struct bar {
unsigned long b;
} __attribute__((packed));
struct foo {
unsigned long u;
struct bar b;
};
then the compiler can see that foo.b.b is well-aligned, regardless of the
Am 15.02.2007 22:56 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
This patch fixes the following compile error:
-- snip --
...
LD drivers/isdn/gigaset/built-in.o
drivers/isdn/gigaset/ser_gigaset.o: In function `gigaset_m10x_send_skb':
(.text+0xe50): multiple definition of `gigaset_m10x_send_skb'
Eric W. Biederman napisał(a):
When enhancing do_shmat I forgot to take into account that shm_lock
is a spinlock, and was allocating memory with the lock held.
This patch fixes that by grabbing a reference to the dentry and
mounts of shm_file before we drop the shm_lock and then performing
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:24:35 +0100
Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton napisa__(a):
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:37:20 +0100
Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton napisa__(a):
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/
Will
On 2/15/07, Greg Trounson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:27:10PM -0800, v j wrote:
You are right. I have not contributed anything to Linux. Except one
small patch to the MTD code. However, I don't think that is the point
here. I am perfectly willing
Eric W. Biederman napisał(a):
When enhancing do_shmat I forgot to take into account that shm_lock
is a spinlock, and was allocating memory with the lock held.
This patch fixes that by grabbing a reference to the dentry and
mounts of shm_file before we drop the shm_lock and then performing
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:49:15 -0600
Corey Minyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I see the following options besides what's already there:
1) add asm/kdebug.h and DIE_NMI_POST to everything that might have an
IPMI implementation.
2) use CONFIG_X86 to tell if NMI will
sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
Here is a marker fix that puts the correct -i include/linux/marker.h in
the top level Makefile so sparse works correctly. The tricky part is to
keep the kernel compiling correctly with a kernel build directory
different from the kernel source tree too.
On Thursday 15 February 2007 22:50, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Is this 1.5ms with interrupts disabled? This time period is problematic
from a realtime perspective if so -- need to be able to preempt.
No, interrupts should be enabled here. Still, 1.5ms is probably a little
too long without a
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 15 February 2007 00:52, Carl Love wrote:
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/oprofile/Kconfig 2007-01-18
16:43:14.0 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/oprofile/Kconfig 2007-02-13
19:04:46.271028904 -0600
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
config
On 2/15/07, Stuart MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linus does allow for one exception; drivers written for other OSes
that happen to compile for Linux as well. I believe this is the POSIX
exception mentioned elsethread. However, from your description of
requiring GPL-only symbols, I'm pretty
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On 2/15/07, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
v j wrote:
So far I have heard nothing but, if you don't contribute, screw you.
All this is fine. Just say so. Make it black and white. Make it
It is black and white in copyright law and the GPL.
The /whole point/ of
Lee Revell wrote:
On 2/15/07, Greg Trounson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:27:10PM -0800, v j wrote:
You are right. I have not contributed anything to Linux. Except one
small patch to the MTD code. However, I don't think that is the point
here. I am
I must have missed something, who is trying to coerce people into not
exercising the rights the GPL gave them?
Anyone who claims that it is unlawful to circumvent the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
stuff. Anyone who adds copyright or license enforcement mechansims to GPL'd
code and distributes the result.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:23:47 -0500
Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
Here is a marker fix that puts the correct -i include/linux/marker.h in
the top level Makefile so sparse works correctly. The tricky part is to
keep the kernel compiling
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:46:56 -0500
Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me too. It's due to the linux-kernel-markers patches. Mathieu, can you
take a look please?
I will give a deeper look in sparse, but I should say up front that I
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:38:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
hm. So if I have
struct bar {
unsigned long b;
} __attribute__((packed));
struct foo {
unsigned long u;
struct bar b;
};
then the compiler can see that
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:08:21 -0500
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Initial framework for disabling PS/2 protocol extensions. The current
protocols can only be disabled if CONFIG_EMBEDDED is selected. No
source files are changed, merely build stuff.
ugleee. What benefit do we get
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:08:21 -0500
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Initial framework for disabling PS/2 protocol extensions. The current
protocols can only be disabled if CONFIG_EMBEDDED is selected. No
source files are changed, merely build stuff.
ugleee.
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:23:47 -0500
Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sparse chokes on arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c
Here is a marker fix that puts the correct -i include/linux/marker.h in
the top level Makefile so sparse works correctly.
801 - 900 of 1060 matches
Mail list logo
