Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 -- mostly fails to build

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:41:46 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > Will investigate the NUMA-Q explosion and report on that separatly. > > Ok, I've been looking at the NUMA-Q boot panic below: > > BUG: unable to

Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Nick Piggin
Andrew Morton wrote: All this would end up needing runtime configurability and tweakability and customisability. All standard fare for userspace stuff - much easier than patching the kernel. So. We can a) provide a way for userspace to reload pagecache and b) merge maps2 (once it's

[PATCH] fix 'dynreloc miscount' link error on Powerpc

2007-07-25 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Nathan Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reported: 2.6.23-rc1 breaks the build for 64-bit powerpc for me (using maple_defconfig): LD vmlinux.o powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: dynreloc miscount for kernel/built-in.o, section .opd powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: can not edit opd Bad value make: ***

Re: What's does KPROBE_ENTRY mean?

2007-07-25 Thread jidong xiao
Anyone can help this? On 6/21/07, jidong xiao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I searched in linux kernel 2.6.10, didn't find it, then I tried > 2.6.20, it is there. But I am not familiar with assembly language, so > can anybody kindly explain it, I don't know the difference between > KPROBE_ENTRY

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - drivers/char/nozomi.c overflow in implicit constant conversion , warnings

2007-07-25 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:42:07PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > > ... > > drivers/char/nozomi.c: In function 'interrupt_handler': > drivers/char/nozomi.c:1298: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion > drivers/char/nozomi.c: In function 'nozomi_card_init': > drivers/char/nozomi.c:1568:

[-mm patch] DMA engine kconfig improvements

2007-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:03:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1: >... > +dma-arch-fix.patch > > Fix git-dma.patch >... This results in an ARM-only driver in an X86-only menu... What about the patch below instead that also improves a few other things? <--

Re: [PATCH 3/4] include asm-mips add missing edac h file

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:55:01 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ linux-2.6.23-rc1/include/asm-mips/edac.h > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +#ifndef ASM_EDAC_H > +#define ASM_EDAC_H > + > +/* ECC atomic, DMA, SMP and interrupt safe scrub function */ > + > +static __inline__ void

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers edac fix reset edac_mc pollmsec

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:54:21 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(int value) > { > - /* cancel the current workq request */ > - edac_mc_workq_teardown(mci); > + struct mem_ctl_info *mci; > + struct list_head *item; > + > + mutex_lock(_ctls_mutex);

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Char: moxa, fix and optimise empty timer

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:43:29 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > moxa, fix and optimise empty timer > > don't wait and delete empty timer in empty timer function. Also fire next > empty timer at rounded jiffies to save power. > What is actually being "fixed" here? > > --- >

Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-25 Thread Al Boldi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 16:40, Al Boldi wrote: > >> Linus Torvalds wrote: > >>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git > release > >

Re: [PATCH] fix ppc kernels after build-id addition

2007-07-25 Thread Paul Mackerras
Meelis Roos writes: > This patch fixes arch/ppc kernels, at least for prep subarch, after > build-id addition. Without the patch, kernels were 3 times the size and > bootloader refused to load them. Now they are back to normal again. I just built an ARCH=ppc kernel for the prep subarch and the

Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-25 Thread david
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP. Not trivial for a user to select it when it doesn't even appear on the menu. It doesn't appear because CONFIG_SUSPEND_SMP isn't enabled, but that doesn't appear either -- because CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU isn't selected. so have something

Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:09:01 -0700 "Ray Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, there's a third case which I find the most annoying. I have > multiple working sets, the sum of which won't fit into RAM. When I > finish one, the kernel had time to preemptively swap back in the > other, and yet it

Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-25 Thread Len Brown
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 22:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: > > > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:48, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >> ... ACPI now seems to select CPU hotplug. Why? > > > > ACPI=y SMP=y systems require SUSPEND_SMP=y for system sleep support, > >

Re: [PATCH]gx-suspmod.c use boot_cpu_data instead of current_cpu_data

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:20:10 + "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 7/25/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:19:05 + Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > in preemptible kernel will report BUG: using smp_processor_id() in >

Re: [PATCH]gx-suspmod.c use boot_cpu_data instead of current_cpu_data

2007-07-25 Thread Dave Young
>On 7/25/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:19:05 + Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > in preemptible kernel will report BUG: using smp_processor_id() in > > preemptible, so use boot_cpu_data instead of current_cpu_data. > > > >

Re: i386-show-unhandled-signals-v3

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:40:06 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Masoud Asgharifard Sharbiani) wrote: > This patch makes the i386 behave the same way that x86_64 does when a > segfault happens. A line gets printed to the kernel log so that tools > that need to check for failures can behave more uniformly

Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-25 Thread david
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: On Wednesday 25 July 2007 16:40, Al Boldi wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release Fixes regressions -- a build failure, an oops, some dmesg spam.

Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: you dont _have to_ cooperative with the maintainer, but it's certainly useful to work with good maintainers, if your goal is to improve Linux. Or if for some reason communication is not working out fine then grow

Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-25 Thread Len Brown
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 16:40, Al Boldi wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git > > > release > > > > > > Fixes regressions -- a build failure, an oops, some dmesg spam. > > > Also fixes

updatedb

2007-07-25 Thread Rene Herman
On 07/25/2007 07:15 PM, Robert Deaton wrote: On 7/25/07, Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And there we go again -- off into blabber-land. Why does swap-prefetch help updatedb? Or doesn't it? And if it doesn't, why should anyone trust anything else someone who said it does says? I

Re: [DRIVER SUBMISSION] DRBD wants to go mainline

2007-07-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Jul 25, 2007, at 22:03:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote: On 7/25/07, Lars Ellenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:41:53AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: [...] But where does the "send" come into the picture over here -- a send

[PATCH]MTD:Fix ctrl-alt-del cann't reboot for intel flash bug

2007-07-25 Thread Kevin Hao
hi, When we press ctrl-alt-del,kernel_restart_prepare will revoke cfi_intelext_reboot which will set flash to read array mode,but later when device_shutdown is invoked which may put current work queue to sleep and other process may be sheduled to running and programming flash in not FL_READY

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:03:14 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > > It built and booted on the first try for my Dell Latitude D820 laptop, Core2 >

Re: [PATCH 1/7] lguest: documentation pt I: Preparation

2007-07-25 Thread Rusty Russell
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 18:22 -0400, Rob Landley wrote: > On Monday 23 July 2007 9:01:48 pm Rusty Russell wrote: > > > IOW, I'd be interested in hearing Rob and Randy's opinions on it all, > > > please. > > > > So they can see what we're talking about, here's an example of the > > output: > > > >

Re: commit 7e92b4fc34 - x86, serial: convert legacy COM ports to platform devices - broke my serial console

2007-07-25 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 08:21:06 pm Shaohua Li wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:37 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On 7/25/07, Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yinghai, you mentioned the same issue on boxes with multiple root > > > bridges. Any chance you could try this out there as

Minor errors in 2.6.23-rc1-rt2 series

2007-07-25 Thread Peter Williams
I've just been reviewing these patches and have spotted a couple of errors that look like they were caused by fuzz during the patch process. A patch that corrects the errors is attached. Cheers Peter -- Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Learning, n. The kind

Re: i386-show-unhandled-signals-v3

2007-07-25 Thread Masoud Sharbiani
On 7/25/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:40:06 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Masoud Asgharifard Sharbiani) wrote: > > Look: if there's a way in which an unprivileged user can trigger a printk > > we fix it, end of story. I don't know why this even slightly > >

Re: [PATCH] config_zone_movable [1/2] clean up zone config by renumbering

2007-07-25 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:10:16 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:50:20 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I refreshed config_zone_movable patch set against 2.6.23-rc1. > > Reflected comments on previous version. > > Tested on ia64/NUMA

Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Matthew Hawkins
On 7/26/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I know about inotify, but it doesn't scale. Yeah, the nonrecursive behaviour is a bugger. Also I found it helped to queue operations in userspace and execute periodically rather than trying to execute on every single notification. Worked

Re: [PATCH] config_zone_movable [1/2] clean up zone config by renumbering

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:50:20 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I refreshed config_zone_movable patch set against 2.6.23-rc1. > Reflected comments on previous version. > Tested on ia64/NUMA system and my small i386 desktop. > > Andrew, I like this patch but know that there are

[PATCH][resend] sysfs/file.c - use mutex instead of semaphore

2007-07-25 Thread Dave Young
Use mutex instead of semaphore in sysfs/file.c : sys_buffer. Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/sysfs/file.c | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff -upr linux/fs/sysfs/file.c linux.new/fs/sysfs/file.c --- linux/fs/sysfs/file.c

[PATCH] config_zone_movable [2/2] config_zone_movable

2007-07-25 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Makes ZONE_MOVABLE as configurable Based on "zone_ifdef_cleanup_by_renumbering.patch" Signed-Off-By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/gfp.h|3 ++- include/linux/mmzone.h | 15 +++ include/linux/vmstat.h | 13 +++-- mm/Kconfig

[PATCH] config_zone_movable [1/2] clean up zone config by renumbering

2007-07-25 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
I refreshed config_zone_movable patch set against 2.6.23-rc1. Reflected comments on previous version. Tested on ia64/NUMA system and my small i386 desktop. Andrew, I like this patch but know that there are many types of memory layout. Could you test this set in -mm ? I'll refresh this against

Re: Question about core file generation

2007-07-25 Thread Carlo Florendo
Ravinandan Arakali (rarakali) wrote: Hi, When a process dumps core, the do_coredump() initiates the core file generation. Is this operation synchronous(does the kernel wait for core to be completely written to disk) ? The operations whereby (1) a process is in the process of exiting while;

Re: [PATCH RFC] extent mapped page cache

2007-07-25 Thread Nick Piggin
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:10:07PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:37:28 +0200 > Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > One advantage to the state tree is that it separates the state from > > > the memory being described, allowing a simple kmap style interface > >

Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, Some general thoughts about submitter/maintainer responsibilities, not necessarily connected with the recents events (I hasn't been following them closely - some people don't have that much free time to burn at their hands ;)... On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Satyam

sub.

2007-07-25 Thread Ying Chu
help - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: commit 7e92b4fc34 - x86, serial: convert legacy COM ports to platform devices - broke my serial console

2007-07-25 Thread Shaohua Li
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:37 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On 7/25/07, Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 07:32:53 am Sébastien Dugué wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:16:44 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The _DDN is a "DOS

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:55:03 + "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xc649): In function `acpi_pci_choose_state': > : undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' > drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x3fe08): In function `pnpacpi_suspend': > : undefined

Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-25 Thread david
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:48, Linus Torvalds wrote: ... ACPI now seems to select CPU hotplug. Why? ACPI=y SMP=y systems require SUSPEND_SMP=y for system sleep support, and that requires HOTPLUG_CPU=y. Note that ACPI=y SMP=n systems do not need it,

serial flow control appears broken

2007-07-25 Thread Lee Howard
Hello. I have fax modems that will, in their proper behavior with certain features, send up to 64 kilobytes of data to the host DTE all at once. (So, the fax modem handles an incoming fax and periodically will send between 256 bytes and 64 kilobytes of data in bursts.) When the DCE-DTE

Re: [PATCH RFC] extent mapped page cache

2007-07-25 Thread Chris Mason
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:37:28 +0200 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One advantage to the state tree is that it separates the state from > > the memory being described, allowing a simple kmap style interface > > that covers subpages, highmem and superpages. > > I suppose so,

Re: [patch] agp: don't lock pages

2007-07-25 Thread Nick Piggin
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:44:22AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > >Yeah I had a bit of a look around, and it seems OK (but would > >appreciate an ack from someone who knows the code). > > > >These pages will never get seen by page reclaim, so we're OK > >there. There is a get_page before the

Re: [DRIVER SUBMISSION] DRBD wants to go mainline

2007-07-25 Thread david
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote: On 7/25/07, Lars Ellenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:41:53AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > [...] > > But where does the "send" come into the picture over here -- a send > won't block forever, so I don't foresee any

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Dave Young
Hi, drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xc649): In function `acpi_pci_choose_state': : undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x3fe08): In function `pnpacpi_suspend': : undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 The

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: git-kgdb breaks sh compilation

2007-07-25 Thread Paul Mundt
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:17:41PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:03:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >... > > Changes since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1: > >... > > git-kgdb.patch > > > > git trees > >... > > This causes the following compile error on sh: > > <-- snip --> > >

Re: [patch] agp: don't lock pages

2007-07-25 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:26:53AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:19 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does this patch solve the X problem? Does anyone see anything wrong > > with it or know why agp was locking the pages? > > We need to do a little bit of

Re: [PATCH RFC] extent mapped page cache

2007-07-25 Thread Nick Piggin
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:18:53AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:32:17 +0200 > Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Having another tree to store block state I think is a good idea as I > > said in the fsblock thread with Dave, but I haven't clicked as to why > > it is

Re: commit 7e92b4fc34 - x86, serial: convert legacy COM ports to platform devices - broke my serial console

2007-07-25 Thread Yinghai Lu
On 7/25/07, Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/25/07, Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 07:32:53 am Sébastien Dugué wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:16:44 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The _DDN is a "DOS device name", and the

Re: [PATCH RFC] e1000: clear ICR before requesting an IRQ line

2007-07-25 Thread Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 08:27 -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: > Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: > > I made an interesting finding while testing the two patches below. > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/19/685 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/19/687 > > > > These patches modify the traditional

Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Ray Lee
On 7/25/07, Matthew Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/26/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd just like updatedb to amortize its work better. If we had some way > to track all filesystem events, updatedb could keep a live and > accurate index on the filesystem. And this isn't just

Re: [PATCH 6/8] i386: bitops: Don't mark memory as clobbered unnecessarily

2007-07-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Hmm. I really think you should take this up with the gcc people. That > looks like a gcc bug - because there really is nothing that guarantees > that the asm doesn't change the array that "x" points to, and the asm > clearly talks about

Re: [PATCH 6/8] i386: bitops: Don't mark memory as clobbered unnecessarily

2007-07-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Trent Piepho wrote: > > Specifically, check test6_memasm.s. The C code looks like this: > > extern int a; /* keep asm from being elided for having no used output */ > static inline void bar(void) { asm("call bar" : "=m"(a) : : "memory"); } > /* float x can't alias asm's

Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Matthew Hawkins
On 7/26/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd just like updatedb to amortize its work better. If we had some way to track all filesystem events, updatedb could keep a live and accurate index on the filesystem. And this isn't just updatedb that wants that, beagle and tracker et al also want

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses

2007-07-25 Thread Dave Johnson
David Miller writes: > Contrarily, there may be ipv6_addr_type() call sites that really > do want to reject rfc4193 addresses. A quick look through the callers and only these functions should be effected, they check either RESERVED or UNICAST from ipv6_addr_type(): net/ipv6/addrconf.c:

Re: [PATCH 6/8] i386: bitops: Don't mark memory as clobbered unnecessarily

2007-07-25 Thread Trent Piepho
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > > Speaking of that, why are all the asm functions in arch/i386/lib/string.c > > defined as having a memory clobber, even those which don't modify memory > > like strcmp, strchr, strlen and so on? > > That's

Re: [patch] agp: don't lock pages

2007-07-25 Thread Nick Piggin
[one more try] On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:41:14AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > [forgot to cc Dave Jones...] > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:26:53AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:19 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does this patch solve the X

Re: [GIT PULL try#2] Blackfin update

2007-07-25 Thread Bryan Wu
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:26 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Bryan Wu wrote: > > > > Please pull from 'for-linus' branch of > > This really is too big for post-rc1. > > I realize that this is all blackfin-only, and that it doesn't matter from > a practical standpoint, but

Re: [patch] agp: don't lock pages

2007-07-25 Thread Nick Piggin
[forgot to cc Dave Jones...] On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:26:53AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:19 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does this patch solve the X problem? Does anyone see anything wrong > > with it or know why agp was locking the pages? >

Re: commit 7e92b4fc34 - x86, serial: convert legacy COM ports to platform devices - broke my serial console

2007-07-25 Thread Yinghai Lu
On 7/25/07, Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 25 July 2007 07:32:53 am Sébastien Dugué wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:16:44 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The _DDN is a "DOS device name", and the _UID is a "logical device ID > > that does not change

Re: 2.6.22 x86_64 : kernel initial decompression hangs on vmware

2007-07-25 Thread Zachary Amsden
Gabriel Barazer wrote: Hi, After upgrading kernel to 2.6.22 on a Vmware workstation guest version 5.5 and 6 , the kernel decompression stage ("Decompressing Linux...") is hanging for a very long time (~5 minutes) before finally succeeding (displaying "done.\nBooting the kernel.\n"). During

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:07:05 -0700 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guessing is this patch ? > > > > gregkh-driver-warn-when-statically-allocated-kobjects-are-used.patch: > > __tracedata_end = .; > > gregkh-driver-warn-when-statically-allocated-kobjects-are-used.patch:+ > >

Re: [RFC 0/1] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic

2007-07-25 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:17:54 -0400 > I've ported myri10ge to use the new LRO interface. I have attached a > preliminary patch to myri10ge. I'm very pleased to note that the > performance is on-par with my own LRO used by our out-of-tree driver. >

[PATCH] SCTP: IPv4 mapped addr not returned in SCTPv6 accept()

2007-07-25 Thread Dave Johnson
An accept() call on a SCTPv6 socket that returns due to connection of a IPv4 mapped peer will fill out the 'struct sockaddr' with a zero IPv6 address instead of the IPv4 mapped address of the peer. This is due to the v4mapped flag not getting copied into the new socket on accept() as well as a

[PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses

2007-07-25 Thread Dave Johnson
ipv6_addr_type() doesn't check for 'Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses' (RFC4193) and returns IPV6_ADDR_RESERVED for that range. SCTP uses this function and will fail bind() and connect() calls that use RFC4193 addresses, SCTP will also ignore inbound connections from RFC4193 addresses if

Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE

2007-07-25 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 18:30 -0500, Dave McCracken wrote: > On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Depends... if you have CONFIG_HIGHMEM and not CONFIG_HIGHPTE, you are > > wasting time going through kmap_atomic unnecessarily no ? it will probably > > not do anything because

Re: sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?)

2007-07-25 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:11 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 09:58:08AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:19:18 +0200, > > "Kay Sievers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >> Removing the dev->parent->bus check fixes it: > > > > > > Yes, let's remove the

2.6.22 x86_64 : kernel initial decompression hangs on vmware

2007-07-25 Thread Gabriel Barazer
Hi, After upgrading kernel to 2.6.22 on a Vmware workstation guest version 5.5 and 6 , the kernel decompression stage ("Decompressing Linux...") is hanging for a very long time (~5 minutes) before finally succeeding (displaying "done.\nBooting the kernel.\n"). During this time, the VM

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses

2007-07-25 Thread David Miller
From: Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:49:09 -0400 > > ipv6_addr_type() doesn't check for 'Unique Local IPv6 Unicast > Addresses' (RFC4193) and returns IPV6_ADDR_RESERVED for that range. > > SCTP uses this function and will fail bind() and connect() calls that > use

Re: sysfs/udev broken in 2.6.23-rc1 [input, i2c, ...] (Was: sysfs/udev broken in latest git?)

2007-07-25 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 09:58:08AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:19:18 +0200, > "Kay Sievers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> Removing the dev->parent->bus check fixes it: > > > > Yes, let's remove the check, I will check now if we possibly need to > > fix more than

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:05:22PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > Gabriel C wrote: > > H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:48:50PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 25/07/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: i386-show-unhandled-signals-v3

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:40:06 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Masoud Asgharifard Sharbiani) wrote: > > Look: if there's a way in which an unprivileged user can trigger a printk > > we fix it, end of story. I don't know why this even slightly > > controversial. > > > > Fair enough. Here it is: My

Re: 2.6.23-rc1: i386 section mismatch warnings

2007-07-25 Thread Gabriel C
Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:48:48AM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: >> Al Viro wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:18:38PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: make allmodconfig on i386: WARNING: vmlinux(.text+0xc0101183): Section mismatch: reference to >>> Ignore. vmlinux.o

RE: [PATCH -mm] dma: INTEL_IOATDMA build fix

2007-07-25 Thread Nelson, Shannon
Satyam Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Make CONFIG_INTEL_IOATDMA select CONFIG_DCA because it uses code >exported from said dependency: > ># CONFIG_DCA is not set >CONFIG_INTEL_IOATDMA=m > >ERROR: "alloc_dca_provider" [drivers/dma/ioatdma.ko] undefined! >ERROR: "register_dca_provider"

[ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.13

2007-07-25 Thread Catalin Marinas
Stacked GIT 0.13 release is available from http://www.procode.org/stgit/. StGIT is a Python application providing similar functionality to Quilt (i.e. pushing/popping patches to/from a stack) on top of GIT. These operations are performed using GIT commands and the patches are stored as GIT commit

Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread André Goddard Rosa
Question: Could those who have found this prefetch helps them alot say how many disks they have? In particular, is their swap on the same disk spindle as their root and user files? Answer - for me: On my system where updatedb is a big problem, I have one, slow, disk. On both desktop

Re: i386-show-unhandled-signals-v3

2007-07-25 Thread Masoud Asgharifard Sharbiani
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:25:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:07:56 -0700 > "Masoud Sharbiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 7/25/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:57:43 +0200 > > > Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: [GIT PATCH] more USB patches for 2.6.22

2007-07-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Greg KH wrote: > > Here are some more USB patches and fixes against your 2.6.22 git tree. > > They add a new usb gadget driver, more urb->status cleanups, a new sysfs > attribute to get the raw config of the usb device, and some bugfixes and > documentation updates. I have

Re: Problems with framebuffer in 2.6.22-git17

2007-07-25 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:45 +0100, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > On 23/07/07, Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 19:41 +0100, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > > > I ma having problems with the pvr2 fb on the Dreamcast in 2.6.22-git17 > > > - when the code is executed it

Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE

2007-07-25 Thread Dave McCracken
On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Depends... if you have CONFIG_HIGHMEM and not CONFIG_HIGHPTE, you are > wasting time going through kmap_atomic unnecessarily no ? it will probably > not do anything because the PTE page is in lowmem but still... Probably not much time.

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Len Brown
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:23:04 -0400 > Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andrew, you want to re-pull the acpi tree, or do you want me to send > > you some patches on top of the current mm? > > I'd appreciate a fix for this one,

Re: i386-show-unhandled-signals-v3

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:07:56 -0700 "Masoud Sharbiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/25/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:57:43 +0200 > > Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 16:45, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > > > plz

Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE

2007-07-25 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 01:18 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > hello, > > The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are > > kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of > > pte_offset_map() as follows

Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE

2007-07-25 Thread Andreas Schwab
Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hello, > The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are > kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of > pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h): > > #define pte_offset_map(dir, addr) \

Re: Time Problems with 2.6.23-rc1-gf695baf2

2007-07-25 Thread Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte
* Len Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > [ 13.506890] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084): > > > > > AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [20070126] > > > > > [ 13.507101] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0147): > > > > > AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _TSS [20070126] > > Note that

Re: very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16)

2007-07-25 Thread Robert Hancock
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Hello, What does "very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16)" mean for user? Is this advice for driver developer or for user (if for user then what does it mean exactly) ? It isn't really advice at all, just indicates that the sd driver needed to use the

Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE

2007-07-25 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:16 -0500, Satya wrote: > hello, > The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are > kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of > pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h): > > #define pte_offset_map(dir, addr)

very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16)

2007-07-25 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
Hello, What does "very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16)" mean for user? Is this advice for driver developer or for user (if for user then what does it mean exactly) ? sdc : very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16). SCSI device sdc: 4823210240 512-byte hdwr sectors (2469484 MB)

Re: [PATCH 4/7] eCryptfs: Comments for some structs

2007-07-25 Thread Satyam Sharma
Trivial nits ... On 7/26/07, Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] +/** + * ecryptfs_global_auth_tok structs refer to authentication token keys + * in the user keyring that apply to newly created files. A list of + * these objects hangs off of the mount_crypt_stat struct for any + *

Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-25 Thread Len Brown
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:48, Linus Torvalds wrote: > ... ACPI now seems to select CPU hotplug. Why? ACPI=y SMP=y systems require SUSPEND_SMP=y for system sleep support, and that requires HOTPLUG_CPU=y. Note that ACPI=y SMP=n systems do not need it, and thus will not select HOTPLUG_CPU=y >

Re: MMC/SD Root filesystem suspend/resume problems

2007-07-25 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2007-07-25 20:20:42, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 19:01 +, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I enabled the MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME option and the problems I was seeing was > > > "fixed". I think having this option is a bad idea (in its current form) > > > as it doesn't actually stop

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: chipsfb_pci_suspend problem

2007-07-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > > > > > > from pm-move-definition-of-struct-pm_ops-to-suspendh.patch : > > > > > > drivers/video/chipsfb.c: In function 'chipsfb_pci_suspend': > > > drivers/video/chipsfb.c:461: error:

Re: commit 7e92b4fc34 - x86, serial: convert legacy COM ports to platform devices - broke my serial console

2007-07-25 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 07:32:53 am Sébastien Dugué wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:16:44 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The _DDN is a "DOS device name", and the _UID is a "logical device ID > > that does not change across reboots." Both are optional, and PNPACPI > >

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 -- mostly fails to build

2007-07-25 Thread Andy Whitcroft
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Will investigate the NUMA-Q explosion and report on that separatly. Ok, I've been looking at the NUMA-Q boot panic below: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address printing eip: c111689f

Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Michael Chang
On 7/25/07, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Question: Could those who have found this prefetch helps them alot say how many disks they have? In particular, is their swap on the same disk spindle as their root and user files? I have found that swap prefetch helped on all of the

Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 26/07/07, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and the fact is: updatedb discards a considerable portion of the cache > completely unnecessarily: on a reasonably complex box no way do all the I'm wondering how much of this updatedb problem is due to poor layout of swap and other file

Re: [RFC] scheduler: improve SMP fairness in CFS

2007-07-25 Thread Chris Snook
Li, Tong N wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:55 -0400, Chris Snook wrote: Chris Friesen wrote: Ingo Molnar wrote: the 3s is the problem: change that to 60s! We no way want to over-migrate for SMP fairness, the change i did gives us reasonable long-term SMP fairness without the need for

Re: [PATCH 1/7] lguest: documentation pt I: Preparation

2007-07-25 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 23 July 2007 9:01:48 pm Rusty Russell wrote: > > IOW, I'd be interested in hearing Rob and Randy's opinions on it all, > > please. > > So they can see what we're talking about, here's an example of the > output: > > http://lguest.ozlabs.org/lguest-journey.c.bz2 Er, so you read the

Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-25 Thread Zan Lynx
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:05 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: [snip] > Question: > Could those who have found this prefetch helps them alot say how > many disks they have? In particular, is their swap on the same > disk spindle as their root and user files? > > Answer - for me: > On my system

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >