Re: numa/core regressions fixed - more testers wanted

2012-11-21 Thread Andrew Theurer
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 20:10 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On 11/20/2012 08:54 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote: > > > > > I can confirm single JVM JBB is working well for me. I see a 30% > > > improvement over autoNUMA. What I can't make sense of is some perf

Re: Linux 3.7-rc6

2012-11-21 Thread Henrik Rydberg
Hi Daniel, > > As advertised, this patch breaks the Macbook Pro Retina, which seems > > unfair. The patch below is certainly not the best remedy, but it does > > work. Tested on a MacbookPro10,1. > > My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up > different bugreports and

Re: Tagging of -stable patches

2012-11-21 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:44:45PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question regarding tagging of patches targetted in -stable > kernels. We have this 'CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org # something' tag. Now > inconvenient thing is that when I create a patch and have such tag in it,

Re: pi futex oops in __lock_acquire

2012-11-21 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:37:40AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > I've sent a patch to address this. It has now been running "trinity -c > futex" for about 12 hours. I haven't seen any more futex failures Looks good here too. > but I > have seen a few OOMs. Is that expected from trinity? Yeah,

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Latest numa/core release, v16

2012-11-21 Thread Rik van Riel
On 11/21/2012 12:02 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: The same is true of all your arguments about Mel's numbers wrt THP etc. Your arguments are misleading - either intentionally, of because you yourself didn't think things through. For schednuma, it's not enough to be par with mainline with THP off -

Re: [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather than device_add

2012-11-21 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:51:04PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:24:48 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe > wrote: > > This allows platform_device_add a chance to call insert_resource > > on all of the resources from OF. At a minimum this fills in proc/iomem > > and presumably makes

Tagging of -stable patches

2012-11-21 Thread Jan Kara
Hello, I have a question regarding tagging of patches targetted in -stable kernels. We have this 'CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org # something' tag. Now inconvenient thing is that when I create a patch and have such tag in it, then git-send-email will mangle the address because of the #. Now even

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Latest numa/core release, v16

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar wrote: > So because I did not have an old-glibc system like David's, I > did not know the actual page fault rate. If it is high enough > then nonlinear effects might cause such effects. > > This is an entirely valid line of inquiry IMO. Btw., when comparing against 'mainline'

Re: pi futex oops in __lock_acquire

2012-11-21 Thread Darren Hart
On 11/20/2012 04:30 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On 11/20/2012 03:10 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2012 08:46 AM, Dave Jones wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:44:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >>> >>> > > I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so. >>> > >

RE: [PATCH resend] TPM: Issue TPM_STARTUP at driver load if the TPM has not been started

2012-11-21 Thread Peter.Huewe
Hi Jason, >Great, I'll send an updated version, thanks! ;) You're welcome. >> >+struct tpm_startup_in { >> >+ __be16 startup_type; >> >+} __packed; >> >> >> All the other user >> __attribute__((packed)); >> Care to change to be consistent? > I used to __packed to avoid a checkpatch

[GIT] Networking

2012-11-21 Thread David Miller
1) inet6_csk_update_pmtu() must return NULL or non-NULL, so translate ERR_PTR to NULL, as needed. Fix from Eric Dumazet. 2) Fix copy error in IRDA sir_dev ->set_speed method invocation, it was testing the NULL'ness of a different method to guard the call. Fix from Alexander Shiyan. 3)

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > > > shortly in the

Re: [PATCH] arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace: fix the range check

2012-11-21 Thread Amnon Shiloh
Hi Oleg, Yes, I can see that "arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c" has changed dramatically since I last looked at it. Since this is the case, I no longer need to trap the vsyscall page. Now however, that "vsyscall" was effectively replaced by vdso, it creates a new problem for me and probably for

Re: [PATCH resend] TPM: Issue TPM_STARTUP at driver load if the TPM has not been started

2012-11-21 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:59:24AM +, peter.hu...@infineon.com wrote: > I just gave the new version a run on my beagleboard with our Infineon SLB9635 > TT 1.2 Soft I2C TPM > and it seems to work as expected. (Tested with and without previous startup). > > Tested-by: Peter Huewe Great,

Re: net, bluetooth: object debug warning in bt_host_release()

2012-11-21 Thread Gustavo Padovan
* Sasha Levin [2012-11-13 11:18:47 -0500]: > Hi all, > > While fuzzing with trinity on a KVM tools (lkvm) guest running latest -next > kernel I've > stumbled on the following: > > [ 1434.201149] [ cut here ] > [ 1434.204998] WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:261 >

Re: [V2 PATCH 1/3] staging: ozwpan: Remove redundant null check before kfree in ozpd.c

2012-11-21 Thread Rupesh Gujare
On 21/11/12 16:19, Dan Carpenter wrote: When someone sends a patch there are a several possible responses: 1) Ack the patch. 2) Request that the submitter redo it. The downside is that no one likes redoing patches. 3) Reject the patch. 4) Redo it yourself and say "Based on a patch from

Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] x86, boot: move verify_cpu.S after 0x200

2012-11-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 11/20/2012 11:15 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: We are short of space before 0x200 that is entry for startup_64. And we can not change startup_64 to other value --- ABI ? Here you are saying "I don't understand how this works." It is YOUR responsibility to find out and write a definite statement

Re: [PATCH v3 08/12] x86, boot: Don't check if cmd_line_ptr is accessible in misc/decompressor()

2012-11-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 11/20/2012 11:16 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: At that stage, it is already in 32bit protected mode or 64bit mode. so we do not need to check if ptr less 1M. When go from other boot loader (kexec) instead of boot/ code path. Move out accessible checking out __cmdline_find_option So misc.c will

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Latest numa/core release, v16

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar wrote: > This is an entirely valid line of inquiry IMO. Btw., what I did was to simply look at David's profile on the regressing system and I compared it to the profile I got on a pretty similar (but unfortunately not identical and not regressing) system. I saw 3 differences:

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread

Re: [PATCH v3 11/12] x86, boot: add fields to support load bzImage and ramdisk high

2012-11-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 11/20/2012 11:16 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.txt b/Documentation/x86/boot.txt index 9efceff..a8263f7 100644 --- a/Documentation/x86/boot.txt +++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.txt @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ Protocol 2.10:(Kernel 2.6.31) Added a protocol for relaxed

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Latest numa/core release, v16

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Oh, finally a clue: you seem to have vsyscall emulation > > overhead! > > Ingo, stop it already! > > This is *exactly* the kind of "blame everybody else than > yourself" behavior that I was talking about

Re: The bug of iput() removal from flusher thread?

2012-11-21 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 21-11-12 13:44:05, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:48:51AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c > > index 51ea267..3e3422f 100644 > > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c > > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c > > @@ -228,6 +228,8 @@ static void

Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: QFQ Plus: fair-queueing service at DRR cost

2012-11-21 Thread David Miller
From: Paolo Valente Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:45:14 +0100 > Got it. Actually, if the first qfq_peek_skb returns NULL, then the > example version that you are proposing apparently may behave in a > different way than the original one: in your proposal the scheduler > tries to switch to a new

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > > schednuma figures I have available. > > > >

Re: [3.7-rc5/rc6 regression] "drm/nvc0/disp: fix regression in vblank semaphore release" broke nouveau driver and mplayer

2012-11-21 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 11/17/2012 05:03 PM, Marcin Slusarz wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 08:35:18PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote: mplayer worked fine on my Dell Latitude E6510 (nVidia GT218 [NVS 3100M] graphics) up to and including kernel 3.7-rc4. However, with 3.7-rc5 or -rc6, any attempt to run mplayer just

Re: [PATCH 00/27] Latest numa/core release, v16

2012-11-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Oh, finally a clue: you seem to have vsyscall emulation > overhead! Ingo, stop it already! This is *exactly* the kind of "blame everybody else than yourself" behavior that I was talking about earlier. There have been an absolute

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/7] MFD: ti_am335x_tscadc: DT support and TSC features addition

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Rachna, On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:33:00AM +, Patil, Rachna wrote: > Hi, > > This is just a gentle reminder of the patch set I had posted earlier viz. > "[PATCH RESEND 0/7] MFD: ti_am335x_tscadc: DT support and TSC features > addition" > Can this patch set be pulled in if there are no

[PATCH v2] ARM: exynos: add UART3 to DEBUG_LL ports

2012-11-21 Thread Doug Anderson
From: Olof Johansson Add support for using UART3 for DEBUG_LL on exynos. [dianders: added depend on ARCH_EXYNOS.] Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson --- Changes in v2: - Matched Olof's commit message. - Added ARCH_EXYNOS to depend list. arch/arm/Kconfig.debug

Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: add UART3 to DEBUG_LL ports

2012-11-21 Thread Doug Anderson
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:48:58PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > > From: Olof Johansson > > > > UART3 is used for debugging on exynos5250-snow. > > > > [dianders: cleaned commit message.] > > > > Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson > >

Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Moyer
Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:41:23PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >> Provide VFS helpers for handling O_SYNC AIO DIO writes. Filesystems wanting >> to >> use the helpers have to pass DIO_SYNC_WRITES to __blockdev_direct_IO. If the >> filesystem doesn't provide its

Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: vt: Remove redundant null check before kfree.

2012-11-21 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:59:08PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > On 21 November 2012 20:46, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:21:40PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> On 21 November 2012 20:16, Greg KH wrote: > >> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:49:07AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> >>

Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: honor the O_SYNC flag for aysnchronous direct I/O requests

2012-11-21 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 21-11-12 09:09:41, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Jan Kara writes: > > >> Just to be clear, are you saying you would like me to remove the > >> mutex_lock/unlock pair from ext4_sync_file? (I had already factored out > >> the common code between this new code path and the fsync path in my tree.) > >

Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > schednuma figures I have available. > Report is linked here

Re: [PATCH] MFD: SEC: Fix reg_offset for interrupt registers

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Inderpal, On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:48:55AM +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: > reg_offset is offset of the status/mask registers. Now, since status_base > and mask_base are pointing to corresponding first registers, reg_offset > should start from 0 otheriwse regmap_add_irq_chip will fail during

Re: pull request: wireless 2012-11-21

2012-11-21 Thread David Miller
From: "John W. Linville" Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:24:06 -0500 > Included are two pulls. Regarding the mac80211 tree, Johannes says: > > "Please pull my mac80211.git tree (see below) to get two more fixes for > 3.7. Both fix regressions introduced *before* this cycle that weren't > noticed

[PATCH] vfio-pci: Enable device before attempting reset

2012-11-21 Thread Alex Williamson
Devices making use of PM reset are getting incorrectly identified as not supporting reset because pci_pm_reset() fails unless the device is in D0 power state. When first attached to vfio_pci devices are typically in an unknown power state. We can fix this by explicitly setting the power state or

Re: [PATCHv9 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:31:34 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:54:29PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:55:45 +0900, Alexandre Courbot > > wrote: > > > > With the advent of the device tree and of ARM kernels that are not > > > board-tied, we cannot

Re: SDVO on E6xx

2012-11-21 Thread roman
Hi Alan, > There is an Intel driver with open kernel code and proprietary userspace for > the Imagination 3D engine (EMGD) although only for an out of maintenance > Fedora and for Meego and in both cases for ancient kernels. I knew about EMGD, but not that there's code available for parts of it.

Re: [PATCH] boot_delay should only affect output

2012-11-21 Thread Andrew Cooks
Hi Joe On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:50 +0800, Andrew Cooks wrote: >> The boot_delay parameter affects all printk(), even if the log level >> prevents visible output from the call. It results in delays greater >> than the user intended without

Re: [PATCH] mfd: lpc_ich: one uninitialized cell is no error

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Paul, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:04:11PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > At every boot of an (outdated) laptop lpc_ich prints an error: > lpc_ich :00:1f.0: I/O space for GPIO uninitialized > > But if one looks at lpc_ich's probe function one notices that the code > only cares if both

Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: lpc_ich: Fix resource request for [mem 0x00000000]

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Peter, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:28:53PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: > On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 18:46 +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:55:29AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: > > > The older southbridges supported by the lpc_ich driver do not > > > provide

Re: [PATCH v3] pwm: Device tree support for PWM polarity.

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:10:44 +0530, "Philip, Avinash" wrote: > Add support for encoding PWM properties in bit encoded form with > of_pwm_xlate_with_flags() function support. Platforms require platform > specific PWM properties has to populate in 3rd cell of the pwm-specifier > and PWM driver

pull request: wireless 2012-11-21

2012-11-21 Thread John W. Linville
commit 57a0c44fca179c27808a5f2fae718e7eab9d6243 Dave, This is a batch of fixes intended for 3.7... Included are two pulls. Regarding the mac80211 tree, Johannes says: "Please pull my mac80211.git tree (see below) to get two more fixes for 3.7. Both fix regressions introduced *before* this

[PATCH 1/2] x86: memtest: checkpatch and emergency warning if memtest fails

2012-11-21 Thread Alexander Holler
I've used the source of memtest.c for a 32bit version (to use with ARM) and checkpatch had some warnings. This patch removes them. It also changes the message if bad memory was found from warning to emergency. Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler --- arch/x86/mm/memtest.c | 10 ++ 1 files

[PATCH 2/2] x86: memtest: remove unnecessary round to leave memtest with zeroed mem

2012-11-21 Thread Alexander Holler
By just reversing the order memtest is using the test patterns, an additional round to zero the memory is not necessary. This makes it a bit faster. Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler --- arch/x86/mm/memtest.c | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [V2 PATCH 1/3] staging: ozwpan: Remove redundant null check before kfree in ozpd.c

2012-11-21 Thread Dan Carpenter
When someone sends a patch there are a several possible responses: 1) Ack the patch. 2) Request that the submitter redo it. The downside is that no one likes redoing patches. 3) Reject the patch. 4) Redo it yourself and say "Based on a patch from Sachin Kamat". This isn't nice because

Re: [PATCH] x86: memtest: make it a bit faster

2012-11-21 Thread Alexander Holler
Hello, Am 09.11.2012 15:27, schrieb Alexander Holler: > Am 09.11.2012 15:21, schrieb richard -rw- weinberger: >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Alexander Holler >> wrote: >>> While implementing the same functionality for arm, I've noticed that >>> memtest does an unnecessary round to zero the

Re: [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather than device_add

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:24:48 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe > wrote: >> This allows platform_device_add a chance to call insert_resource >> on all of the resources from OF. At a minimum this fills in proc/iomem >> and presumably makes resource

[PATCH v5] linux,stdout-path helper

2012-11-21 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
The following adds a helper for matching the linux,stdout-path property in the chosen node and makes use of it in the i.MX serial and Atmel serial driver. changes since v4: - add option support and check stdout-path too changes since v3: - move code from separate files to drivers/of/base.c

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: tmem: selfballooning should be enabled when xen tmem is enabled

2012-11-21 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 21.11.12 at 16:42, Dan Magenheimer wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:21 AM >> To: Dan Magenheimer >> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xen.org; Konrad Wilk; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: tmem:

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Dove pinctrl fixes and DT enabling

2012-11-21 Thread Jason Cooper
Linus, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:45:42PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth > wrote: > > On 11/21/2012 10:59 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth > >> wrote: > >>> This patch relies on a

[GIT PULL] arm-soc: Xilinx zynq multiplatform changes for v3.8

2012-11-21 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Olof and Arnd, based on my chat with Olof today I have created new branch with 4 patches which move zynq to multiplatform. This branch depends on arm-soc devel/debug_ll_init branch because we needed Rob's "ARM: implement debug_ll_io_init()" (sha1: afaee03511ba8002b26a9c6b1fe7d6baf33eac86)

Re: [PATCH] of: Have of_device_add call platform_device_add rather than device_add

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:24:48 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > This allows platform_device_add a chance to call insert_resource > on all of the resources from OF. At a minimum this fills in proc/iomem > and presumably makes resource tracking and conflict detection work > better. > >

Re: [PATCH] mm: cma: allocate pages from CMA if NR_FREE_PAGES approaches low water mark

2012-11-21 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 11/21/2012 2:05 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:49:35PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > On 11/20/2012 1:01 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >Hi Marek, > > > >On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >> It has been observed that system

Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Add clk_ops for gating clocks of System MMU

2012-11-21 Thread Kukjin Kim
On 11/21/12 14:03, Cho KyongHo wrote: Touching some System MMU needs its master devices' clock to be enabled before. This commit adds clk_ops.set_parent of gating clocks of System MMU to ensure gating clocks of System MMU's mater devices are enabled when enabling gating clocks of System MMU.

Re: Device tree node to major/minor?

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:48:24 -0800, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Grant Likely > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I hope this is a stupid question with an easy answer, but I cannot find it. > >> > >> I

[PATCH] UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/rdma

2012-11-21 Thread David Howells
Signed-off-by: David Howells Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Dave Jones --- include/rdma/Kbuild |6 -- include/rdma/rdma_netlink.h | 36 +---

Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: add double empty line check

2012-11-21 Thread Eilon Greenstein
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 07:01 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > checkpatch isn't a perfect tool. Given how it's constructed, > I doubt it ever could be. Joe - I completely agree, this is why I'm not to concern about the potential miss in the version I suggested. Thanks, Eilon -- To unsubscribe from

Re: Recent kernel "mount" slow

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Chua
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > I haven't heard about such problem so far. What filesystem are you using? I've tried ext2/ext3/ext4/reiserfs/btrfs ... all seems to be slower than before. Seems to be fs independent. > Can you quantify 'is slower'? Bisecting would be welcome

Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: EXYNOS: remove system mmu initialization from exynos tree

2012-11-21 Thread Kukjin Kim
On 11/21/12 14:02, Cho KyongHo wrote: This removes System MMU initialization from arch/arm/mach-exynos/ Basically, looks OK to me, but I think, this removing change should be done after 03/12 patch :-) to move them to DT and the exynos-iommu driver except gating clock definitions.

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: tmem: selfballooning should be enabled when xen tmem is enabled

2012-11-21 Thread Dan Magenheimer
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:21 AM > To: Dan Magenheimer > Cc: xen-de...@lists.xen.org; Konrad Wilk; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: tmem: selfballooning should be enabled > when xen tmem is enabled > >

[PATCH] UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/scsi/fc

2012-11-21 Thread David Howells
Signed-off-by: David Howells Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Dave Jones --- include/scsi/fc/Kbuild|4 include/uapi/scsi/fc/Kbuild |4 include/uapi/scsi/fc/fc_els.h |0

[PATCH] mm: vmscan: Check for fatal signals iff the process was throttled

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
commit 5515061d22f0 ("mm: throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage") introduced a check for fatal signals after a process gets throttled for network storage. The intention was that if a process was throttled and got killed that it should not

Re: [linux-keystone] Re: [linux-keystone] [PATCH] spi: davinci: add OF support for the spi controller

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:32:46 -0500, Murali Karicheri wrote: > On 11/15/2012 11:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:28:22 -0500, Murali Karicheri > > wrote: > >> This adds OF support to DaVinci SPI controller to configure platform > >> data through device bindings. > >> > >>

[PATCH] UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/scsi

2012-11-21 Thread David Howells
Signed-off-by: David Howells Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Dave Jones --- include/scsi/Kbuild |3 --- include/uapi/scsi/Kbuild|3 +++ include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h |

Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: vt: Remove redundant null check before kfree.

2012-11-21 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 21 November 2012 20:46, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:21:40PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> On 21 November 2012 20:16, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:49:07AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> kfree on a NULL pointer is a no-op. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin

[GIT PULL] final pinctrl patch for v3.7

2012-11-21 Thread Linus Walleij
Hi Linus, Here a final (hopefully) oneliner for the pinctrl subsystem targeted at v3.7. Please pull it in! Yours, Linus Walleij The following changes since commit 77b67063bb6bce6d475e910d3b886a606d0d91f7: Linux 3.7-rc5 (2012-11-11 13:44:33 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

Re: Question about idle time in /proc/stat

2012-11-21 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 19-11-12 21:15:50, Ronny Meeus wrote: > Hello Hi, > I have an created an application that measures the cpuload consumed by > the tasks within a process. > For this I use the file /proc/stat and /proc//tasks//stat > > The cpuload monitor is a very simple application that just executes in

[PATCH v6 2/2] KVM-INTEL: add a notifier and a bitmap to support VMCLEAR in kdump

2012-11-21 Thread Zhang Yanfei
The notifier will be registered in vmclear_notifier_list when loading kvm-intel module. And the bitmap indicates whether we should do VMCLEAR operation in kdump. The bits in the bitmap are set/unset according to different conditions. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 77

RE: [PATCH] xen: tmem: selfballooning should be enabled when xen tmem is enabled

2012-11-21 Thread Dan Magenheimer
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 7:48 PM > To: Dan Magenheimer > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; xen-de...@lists.xen.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: tmem: selfballooning should be enabled when xen > tmem is enabled > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:42:18PM -0800,

[PATCH v6 1/2] x86/kexec: VMCLEAR vmcss on all cpus if necessary

2012-11-21 Thread Zhang Yanfei
This patch adds an atomic notifier list named vmclear_notifier_list. When loading kvm-intel module, a notifier will be registered in the list to enable vmcss loaded on all cpus to be VMCLEAR'd if needed. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei --- arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h |2 ++

[PATCH v6 0/2] x86: vmclear vmcss on all cpus when doing kdump if necessary

2012-11-21 Thread Zhang Yanfei
Currently, kdump just makes all the logical processors leave VMX operation by executing VMXOFF instruction, so any VMCSs active on the logical processors may be corrupted. But, sometimes, we need the VMCSs to debug guest images contained in the host vmcore. To prevent the corruption, we should

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Move common leds properties description to separate file.

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:36:34 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/15/2012 02:51 PM, Marek Belisko wrote: > > A commit description might be nice. Aside from that, Indeed. I've applied the patch and written a commit description, but please take pity on a poor maintainer and write propper commit

Re: [PATCH 1/2] wait: add wait_event_lock_irq() interface

2012-11-21 Thread Lukáš Czerner
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:14:14 -0800 > From: Andrew Morton > To: Lukas Czerner > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-r...@vger.kernel.org, ax...@kernel.dk, > jmo...@redhat.com, Neil Brown , > David Howells , Ingo Molnar , > Peter

Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: vt: Remove redundant null check before kfree.

2012-11-21 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:21:40PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > On 21 November 2012 20:16, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:49:07AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> kfree on a NULL pointer is a no-op. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat > >> --- > >> drivers/tty/vt/consolemap.c |

您好!

2012-11-21 Thread Mr. Paul Fletch.
您好!

Re: [PATCHv9 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-11-21 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:02:47AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Mmmm so maybe I am misinterpreting things, but it looks like we > have just buried the power sequences here, haven't we? I don't think so. In fact I was just starting to think that maybe for Tegra we could have a generic panel

[RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of pages occupied by memmap

2012-11-21 Thread Jiang Liu
If SPARSEMEM is enabled, it won't build page structures for non-existing pages (holes) within a zone, so provide a more accurate estimation of pages occupied by memmap if there are bigger holes within the zone. And pages for highmem zones' memmap will be allocated from lowmem, so charge

Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD"

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:38:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:14:47PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >> > With "mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by

[RFT PATCH v2 1/5] mm: introduce new field "managed_pages" to struct zone

2012-11-21 Thread Jiang Liu
Currently a zone's present_pages is calcuated as below, which is inaccurate and may cause trouble to memory hotplug. spanned_pages - absent_pages - memmap_pages - dma_reserve. During fixing bugs caused by inaccurate zone->present_pages, we found zone->present_pages has been abused. The

Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] gpio/tegra: convert to use linear irqdomain

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:54:12 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The Tegra driver tries to do the work of irq_domain_add_linear() > by reserving a bunch of descriptors somewhere and keeping track > of the base offset, then calling irq_domain_add_legacy(). Let's > stop doing that and simply use the

Re: [PATCH] MTD: use SQUASHFS_MAGIC from uapi/linux/magic.h

2012-11-21 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 20:32 +0100, Luka Perkov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov > --- Pushed to l2-mtd.git, thanks! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[PATCH] nfsd4: remove state lock from nfs4_state_shutdown

2012-11-21 Thread Stanislav Kinsbursky
Protection of __nfs4_state_shutdown() with nfs4_lock_state() looks redundant. This function is called by the last NFSd thread on it's exit and state lock protects actually two functions (del_recall_lru is protected by recall_lock): 1) nfsd4_client_tracking_exit 2) __nfs4_state_shutdown_net

Re: [PATCH 3/9] xfs: factor out everything but the filemap_write_and_wait from xfs_file_fsync

2012-11-21 Thread Jeff Moyer
Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:41:38PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Fsyncing is tricky business, so factor out the bits of the xfs_file_fsync >> function that can be used from the I/O post-processing path. > > Why would we need to skip the

Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] gpio/mvebu: convert to use irq_domain_add_simple()

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:54:02 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple > domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be, > especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment. > > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Grant Likely > Cc: Thomas

Re: [PATCHv9 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-11-21 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Mmmm so maybe I am misinterpreting things, but it looks like we have just buried the power sequences here, haven't we? Alex. On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2012-11-21 15:00, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:04:17PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

Re: [RFC/PATCH] mtd_blkdevs: Replace request handler kthread with a workqueue

2012-11-21 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 13:08 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > By replacing a kthread with a workqueue, the code is now a bit clearer. > There's also a slight reduction of code size (numbers apply for x86): > Before: >text data bss dec hex filename >324836

Re: [RFC 3/3] man-pages: Add man page for vmpressure_fd(2)

2012-11-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:12:28AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > We try to make userland freeing resources when the system becomes low on > > memory. Once we're short on memory, sometimes it's better to discard > > (free) data, rather than let

Re: [PATCH] mtd_blkdev: Use a different name for block_device_operations variable

2012-11-21 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 12:36 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > struct mtd_blktrans_ops is a type, and mtd_blktrans_ops is a variable. > To improve code clarity it's better to not use the same names, > so we just change the latter. > > Cc: David Woodhouse > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia Pushed to

Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: add double empty line check

2012-11-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 11:42 +0200, Eilon Greenstein wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 15:41 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 23:19 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 01:58:48PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > > > +# check for multiple blank lines, warn

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] gpio/tc3589x: convert to use the simple irqdomain

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:53:45 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The special checks for whether we have a base IRQ offset or not > is surplus if we use the simple IRQ domain. The IRQ offset > zero will be interpreted as a linear domain case. > > Plus this makes sure we allocate descriptors where need

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Dove pinctrl fixes and DT enabling

2012-11-21 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Linus, On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:45:42 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > I am referring to patches for a pinctrl/mvebu subfolder. IIRC Thomas > > posted that patch a while ago. Jason is currently sorting things out > > for mvebu pull requests. I guess both can comment on your question, > > as I don't

Re: [PATCH 2/7] gpio/em: convert to linear IRQ domain

2012-11-21 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:22:20 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The code in the em driver seems to want to try to do the job of > the linear IRQ domain (allocate descriptors and grab a virtual > range). So why not just use the linear IRQ domain? > > Also fixed the FIXME to remove the domain after

Re: [PATCH 00/13] MFD: twl drivers: Convert to regmap IO and cleanups

2012-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Peter, On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:28:41AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hello, > > This series converts the twl-core to use regmap for IO towards the chip. > With the conversion to regmap IO we no longer need to allocate bigger buffer > for > writes. > I have appended patches to this series

Re: [RFT PATCH v1 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of pages occupied by memmap

2012-11-21 Thread Jiang Liu
On 11/21/2012 03:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:18:34 +0800 > Jiang Liu wrote: > +static unsigned long calc_memmap_size(unsigned long spanned_pages, +unsigned long present_pages) +{ + unsigned long pages = spanned_pages;

Re: [PATCH 00/42] SH pin control and GPIO rework

2012-11-21 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > The idea behind these patches is to move SoC-specific pin control code from > arch/ to drivers/pinctrl/ and use the Linux device model to instantiate the > pin control device. This is required to add device tree support for the pin >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: vt: Remove redundant null check before kfree.

2012-11-21 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 21 November 2012 20:16, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:49:07AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> kfree on a NULL pointer is a no-op. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat >> --- >> drivers/tty/vt/consolemap.c |6 ++ >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff

Re: [RFC] driver-core: Remove dummy 'platform_bus'

2012-11-21 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:44:31PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty > directory to put platform devices into. However, it really doesn't make > sense to segregate all the platform devices into a sub directory when > typically

Re: Streamlining Developer's Certificate of Origin, Signed-off-by tag

2012-11-21 Thread Alan Cox
> > If you have a single master official copy and a link then you break all > > that and you'd have to have everyones consensus and planning to change a > > word of it. > > Ah so keep the original in place to let references to the original in > whatever way those may exist to keep pointing but

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >