Re: [PATCH 06/14] perf tools: show NMI overhead

2016-11-24 Thread Andi Kleen
> how about we display the overhead information same way the main perf output: > > CPUNMI NMI timeMTX MTX time SB SB time > ... . . .. > 6 27 111379 0 0 57 90045 > > > would be just matter of

Re: [PATCH 06/14] perf tools: show NMI overhead

2016-11-24 Thread Andi Kleen
> how about we display the overhead information same way the main perf output: > > CPUNMI NMI timeMTX MTX time SB SB time > ... . . .. > 6 27 111379 0 0 57 90045 > > > would be just matter of

Getting at gpio- and pinctrl-devices as a consumer

2016-11-24 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2016-11-24 20:52, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Yes, I never liked that include, but I don't know how to get >> from struct gpio_desc * to the relevant struct device * >> without it... > > Looks to me like we should ask the GPIO maintainers if they are willing > to export this value? I am probably

Getting at gpio- and pinctrl-devices as a consumer

2016-11-24 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2016-11-24 20:52, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Yes, I never liked that include, but I don't know how to get >> from struct gpio_desc * to the relevant struct device * >> without it... > > Looks to me like we should ask the GPIO maintainers if they are willing > to export this value? I am probably

Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: migrate: Change migrate_mode to support combination migration modes.

2016-11-24 Thread Balbir Singh
On 23/11/16 03:25, Zi Yan wrote: > From: Zi Yan > > From: Zi Yan > > No functionality is changed. I think you'd want to say that the modes are no longer exclusive. We can use them as flags in combination? Balbir Singh.

Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: migrate: Change migrate_mode to support combination migration modes.

2016-11-24 Thread Balbir Singh
On 23/11/16 03:25, Zi Yan wrote: > From: Zi Yan > > From: Zi Yan > > No functionality is changed. I think you'd want to say that the modes are no longer exclusive. We can use them as flags in combination? Balbir Singh.

Re: [V4] powerpc: Implement {cmp}xchg for u8 and u16

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:16:45 UTC, xinhui wrote: > From: Pan Xinhui > > Implement xchg{u8,u16}{local,relaxed}, and > cmpxchg{u8,u16}{,local,acquire,relaxed}. > > It works on all ppc. > > remove volatile of first parameter in __cmpxchg_local and __cmpxchg > >

Re: [PATCH -tip v3 3/9] selftests: ftrace: Add --quiet option not to show error logs on screen

2016-11-24 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:44:59 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:13:17 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Since the verbose error logs scrolls out previous test results > > --quiet option suppress to show such message. > > I wonder

Re: [V4] powerpc: Implement {cmp}xchg for u8 and u16

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:16:45 UTC, xinhui wrote: > From: Pan Xinhui > > Implement xchg{u8,u16}{local,relaxed}, and > cmpxchg{u8,u16}{,local,acquire,relaxed}. > > It works on all ppc. > > remove volatile of first parameter in __cmpxchg_local and __cmpxchg > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra

Re: [PATCH -tip v3 3/9] selftests: ftrace: Add --quiet option not to show error logs on screen

2016-11-24 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:44:59 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:13:17 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Since the verbose error logs scrolls out previous test results > > --quiet option suppress to show such message. > > I wonder if -q should be default, and -v be what

Re: [v2, 1/2] powerpc: initial stack protector (-fstack-protector) support

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 10:49:30 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Partialy copied from commit c743f38013aef ("ARM: initial stack protector > (-fstack-protector) support") > > This is the very basic stuff without the changing canary upon > task switch yet. Just the Kconfig option and a constant

Re: [v2, 1/2] powerpc: initial stack protector (-fstack-protector) support

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 10:49:30 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Partialy copied from commit c743f38013aef ("ARM: initial stack protector > (-fstack-protector) support") > > This is the very basic stuff without the changing canary upon > task switch yet. Just the Kconfig option and a constant

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Parallel hugepage migration optimization

2016-11-24 Thread Balbir Singh
On 23/11/16 03:25, Zi Yan wrote: > From: Zi Yan > > Hi all, > > This patchset boosts the hugepage migration throughput and helps THP migration > which is added by Naoya's patches: https://lwn.net/Articles/705879/. > > Motivation > === > >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Parallel hugepage migration optimization

2016-11-24 Thread Balbir Singh
On 23/11/16 03:25, Zi Yan wrote: > From: Zi Yan > > Hi all, > > This patchset boosts the hugepage migration throughput and helps THP migration > which is added by Naoya's patches: https://lwn.net/Articles/705879/. > > Motivation > === > > In x86, 4KB page

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: migrate: Add mode parameter to support additional page copy routines.

2016-11-24 Thread Balbir Singh
On 23/11/16 03:25, Zi Yan wrote: > From: Zi Yan > > From: Zi Yan > > migrate_page_copy() and copy_huge_page() are affected. > > Signed-off-by: Zi Yan > Signed-off-by: Zi Yan > --- > fs/aio.c|

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: migrate: Add mode parameter to support additional page copy routines.

2016-11-24 Thread Balbir Singh
On 23/11/16 03:25, Zi Yan wrote: > From: Zi Yan > > From: Zi Yan > > migrate_page_copy() and copy_huge_page() are affected. > > Signed-off-by: Zi Yan > Signed-off-by: Zi Yan > --- > fs/aio.c| 2 +- > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c| 2 +- > fs/ubifs/file.c | 2 +- >

[mdadm PATCH] Add failfast support.

2016-11-24 Thread NeilBrown
Allow per-device "failfast" flag to be set when creating an array or adding devices to an array. When re-adding a device which had the failfast flag, it can be removed using --nofailfast. failfast status is printed in --detail and --examine output. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown ---

[mdadm PATCH] Add failfast support.

2016-11-24 Thread NeilBrown
Allow per-device "failfast" flag to be set when creating an array or adding devices to an array. When re-adding a device which had the failfast flag, it can be removed using --nofailfast. failfast status is printed in --detail and --examine output. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- Hi Jes, this

Multiple problems with the Linux kernel on an AMD desktop

2016-11-24 Thread Rogério Brito
Dear developers, I have been having problems that are starting to accumulate on my main Desktop and I decided to ask here for help, since I perceive that the majority (not all, of course) of developers are likely to use recent, Intel-based systems for their x86-64 work. My desktop has an AMD

Multiple problems with the Linux kernel on an AMD desktop

2016-11-24 Thread Rogério Brito
Dear developers, I have been having problems that are starting to accumulate on my main Desktop and I decided to ask here for help, since I perceive that the majority (not all, of course) of developers are likely to use recent, Intel-based systems for their x86-64 work. My desktop has an AMD

Re: [PATCH 06/14] perf tools: show NMI overhead

2016-11-24 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:20:13AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:27:21PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:37:04PM +, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:44:44AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 06/14] perf tools: show NMI overhead

2016-11-24 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:20:13AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:27:21PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:37:04PM +, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:44:44AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote: >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

2016-11-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Thiago, On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:02:39 -0200 Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2016, 16:01:51 BRST schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

2016-11-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Thiago, On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:02:39 -0200 Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2016, 16:01:51 BRST schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

2016-11-24 Thread David Howells
James Morris <jmor...@namei.org> wrote: > $ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > keys-fixes-20161124-3 > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124-3 Ummm... Weird. I can see the tag through the web interfa

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

2016-11-24 Thread David Howells
James Morris wrote: > $ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > keys-fixes-20161124-3 > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124-3 Ummm... Weird. I can see the tag through the web interface: http://git.kernel.or

[RFC] pinctrl: imx: use radix trees for groups and functions

2016-11-24 Thread Gary Bisson
This change is inspired from the pinctrl-single architecture. The problem with current implementation is that it isn't possible to add/remove functions and/or groups dynamically. The radix tree offers an easy way to do so. The intent is to offer a follow-up patch later that will enable the use of

[RFC] pinctrl: imx: use radix trees for groups and functions

2016-11-24 Thread Gary Bisson
This change is inspired from the pinctrl-single architecture. The problem with current implementation is that it isn't possible to add/remove functions and/or groups dynamically. The radix tree offers an easy way to do so. The intent is to offer a follow-up patch later that will enable the use of

Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings

2016-11-24 Thread Chanwoo Choi
On 2016년 11월 24일 19:52, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 19:46 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> On 2016년 11월 24일 19:20, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:01 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: This patch just fixes the checkpatch warnings. >>> >>> unrelated trivia: >>> diff

Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings

2016-11-24 Thread Chanwoo Choi
On 2016년 11월 24일 19:52, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 19:46 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> On 2016년 11월 24일 19:20, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:01 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: This patch just fixes the checkpatch warnings. >>> >>> unrelated trivia: >>> diff

Re: Getting at gpio- and pinctrl-devices as a consumer

2016-11-24 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > The background is that the gpio- and pinctrl-based i2c-mux drivers > need to know if the device that is used to control the mux of the > i2c-bus is also sitting on that very same i2c-bus. If it is, the > locking has to be

Re: Getting at gpio- and pinctrl-devices as a consumer

2016-11-24 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > The background is that the gpio- and pinctrl-based i2c-mux drivers > need to know if the device that is used to control the mux of the > i2c-bus is also sitting on that very same i2c-bus. If it is, the > locking has to be different and a bit

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

2016-11-24 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, David Howells wrote: > James Morris <jmor...@namei.org> wrote: > > > $ git pull > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > > keys-fixes-20161124 > > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124 >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

2016-11-24 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, David Howells wrote: > James Morris wrote: > > > $ git pull > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > > keys-fixes-20161124 > > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124 > > I've produced tw

Re: [PATCH 02/14] perf/x86: output NMI overhead

2016-11-24 Thread Namhyung Kim
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:40:21PM +, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > > @@ -1492,8 +1507,10 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(unsigned int cmd, > > struct pt_regs *regs) > > > start_clock = sched_clock(); > > > ret = x86_pmu.handle_irq(regs); > > > finish_clock = sched_clock(); > > > + clock =

Re: [PATCH 02/14] perf/x86: output NMI overhead

2016-11-24 Thread Namhyung Kim
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:40:21PM +, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > > @@ -1492,8 +1507,10 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(unsigned int cmd, > > struct pt_regs *regs) > > > start_clock = sched_clock(); > > > ret = x86_pmu.handle_irq(regs); > > > finish_clock = sched_clock(); > > > + clock =

Re: [PATCH] gpio: tegra186: Add support for T186 GPIO

2016-11-24 Thread Linus Walleij
Mostly it seems we are in understanding here, looking forward to the patches... On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:08:08PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> I don't understand. Userspace should have no concern about the >>

Re: [PATCH] gpio: tegra186: Add support for T186 GPIO

2016-11-24 Thread Linus Walleij
Mostly it seems we are in understanding here, looking forward to the patches... On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:08:08PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> I don't understand. Userspace should have no concern about the >> numberspace. Lines can be

[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: sx150x: sort chips by part number

2016-11-24 Thread Peter Rosin
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.txt | 6 +- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c | 142 ++--- 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: sx150x: sort chips by part number

2016-11-24 Thread Peter Rosin
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.txt | 6 +- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c | 142 ++--- 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 06/14] perf tools: show NMI overhead

2016-11-24 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:27:21PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:37:04PM +, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:44:44AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote: > > > > From: Kan Liang > > > > > > > > Caculate the total

[PATCH v3 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

2016-11-24 Thread Alexis Berlemont
Hi Hemant, Once more thank you for your answer. Sorry for this bug: I tested the patches only on small sample binaries. Now it is tested against the systemtap-enabled libraries libc and libpthread. There were 2 problems: * The one you disclosed: in indirect addressing mode, positive offsets

[PATCH v3 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

2016-11-24 Thread Alexis Berlemont
An sdt probe can be associated with arguments but they were not passed to the user probe tracing interface (uprobe_events); this patch adapts the sdt argument descriptors according to the uprobe input format. As the uprobe parser does not support scaled address mode, perf will skip arguments

Re: [PATCH 06/14] perf tools: show NMI overhead

2016-11-24 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:27:21PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:37:04PM +, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:44:44AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote: > > > > From: Kan Liang > > > > > > > > Caculate the total NMI overhead on each

[PATCH v3 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

2016-11-24 Thread Alexis Berlemont
Hi Hemant, Once more thank you for your answer. Sorry for this bug: I tested the patches only on small sample binaries. Now it is tested against the systemtap-enabled libraries libc and libpthread. There were 2 problems: * The one you disclosed: in indirect addressing mode, positive offsets

[PATCH v3 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string

2016-11-24 Thread Alexis Berlemont
An sdt probe can be associated with arguments but they were not passed to the user probe tracing interface (uprobe_events); this patch adapts the sdt argument descriptors according to the uprobe input format. As the uprobe parser does not support scaled address mode, perf will skip arguments

[PATCH v3 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments

2016-11-24 Thread Alexis Berlemont
During a "perf buildid-cache --add" command, the section ".note.stapsdt" of the "added" binary is scanned in order to list the available SDT markers available in a binary. The parts containing the probes arguments were left unscanned. The whole section is now parsed; the probe arguments are

[PATCH v3 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments

2016-11-24 Thread Alexis Berlemont
During a "perf buildid-cache --add" command, the section ".note.stapsdt" of the "added" binary is scanned in order to list the available SDT markers available in a binary. The parts containing the probes arguments were left unscanned. The whole section is now parsed; the probe arguments are

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

2016-11-24 Thread David Howells
James Morris <jmor...@namei.org> wrote: > $ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > keys-fixes-20161124 > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124 I've produced two further versions of this. Can you look at keys-fixes-

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

2016-11-24 Thread David Howells
James Morris wrote: > $ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git > keys-fixes-20161124 > fatal: Couldn't find remote ref keys-fixes-20161124 I've produced two further versions of this. Can you look at keys-fixes-20161124-3 instead? David

[PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] net: ethernet: slicoss: add slicoss gigabit ethernet driver

2016-11-24 Thread Lino Sanfilippo
Add driver for Alacritech gigabit ethernet cards with SLIC (session-layer interface control) technology. The driver provides basic support without SLIC for the following devices: - Mojave cards (single port PCI Gigabit) both copper and fiber - Oasis cards (single and dual port PCI-x Gigabit)

[PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] net: ethernet: slicoss: add slicoss gigabit ethernet driver

2016-11-24 Thread Lino Sanfilippo
Add driver for Alacritech gigabit ethernet cards with SLIC (session-layer interface control) technology. The driver provides basic support without SLIC for the following devices: - Mojave cards (single port PCI Gigabit) both copper and fiber - Oasis cards (single and dual port PCI-x Gigabit)

Gigabit ethernet driver for Alacritechs SLIC devices

2016-11-24 Thread Lino Sanfilippo
Hi, this is the second version of the slicoss gigabit ethernet driver (which is a rework of the driver from Alacritech which can currently be found under drivers/staging/slicoss). The driver is supposed to support Mojave, Oasis and Kalahari cards, for both copper and fiber. If this code is

[PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add entry for slicoss ethernet driver

2016-11-24 Thread Lino Sanfilippo
Add myself as maintainer for the slicoss ethernet driver. Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo --- MAINTAINERS | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 6781a3f..bb9af28 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -562,6 +562,11

[PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add entry for slicoss ethernet driver

2016-11-24 Thread Lino Sanfilippo
Add myself as maintainer for the slicoss ethernet driver. Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo --- MAINTAINERS | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 6781a3f..bb9af28 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -562,6 +562,11 @@ T: git

Gigabit ethernet driver for Alacritechs SLIC devices

2016-11-24 Thread Lino Sanfilippo
Hi, this is the second version of the slicoss gigabit ethernet driver (which is a rework of the driver from Alacritech which can currently be found under drivers/staging/slicoss). The driver is supposed to support Mojave, Oasis and Kalahari cards, for both copper and fiber. If this code is

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/31] 4.4.35-stable review

2016-11-24 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/24/2016 06:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.35 release. There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/31] 4.4.35-stable review

2016-11-24 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/24/2016 06:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.35 release. There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add bug tracking system location entry type

2016-11-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Following the kernel Bugzilla discussion during the Kernel Summit (https://lwn.net/Articles/705245/), add bug tracking system location entry type (B) to MAINTAINERS and populate it for several subsystems known to be using the kernel BZ actively

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add bug tracking system location entry type

2016-11-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Following the kernel Bugzilla discussion during the Kernel Summit (https://lwn.net/Articles/705245/), add bug tracking system location entry type (B) to MAINTAINERS and populate it for several subsystems known to be using the kernel BZ actively (and add the upstream BZ

Re: [PATCH RFC] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even more magic

2016-11-24 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) (mtk.manpa...@gmail.com): > Hi Serge, > > On 11/19/2016 04:17 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Root in a user ns cannot be trusted to write a traditional > > security.capability xattr. If it were allowed to do so, then any > > unprivileged user on the host could

Re: [PATCH RFC] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even more magic

2016-11-24 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) (mtk.manpa...@gmail.com): > Hi Serge, > > On 11/19/2016 04:17 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Root in a user ns cannot be trusted to write a traditional > > security.capability xattr. If it were allowed to do so, then any > > unprivileged user on the host could

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include namespaces related info

2016-11-24 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Hari, [auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core] [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include namespaces related info

2016-11-24 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Hari, [auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core] [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc6] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

[PATCH] locking-selftest: Fix output since KERN_CONT changes

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Ellerman
Since the KERN_CONT changes the locking-selftest output is messed up, eg: | spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |

[PATCH] locking-selftest: Fix output since KERN_CONT changes

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Ellerman
Since the KERN_CONT changes the locking-selftest output is messed up, eg: | spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

2016-11-24 Thread James Morris
e free in X.509 error handling. > > The patches can be found here also: > > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=keys-fixes > > Tagged thusly: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] KEYS: Fixes

2016-11-24 Thread James Morris
e free in X.509 error handling. > > The patches can be found here also: > > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=keys-fixes > > Tagged thusly: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git >

RE: [char-misc-next] mei: request async autosuspend at the end of enumeration

2016-11-24 Thread Winkler, Tomas
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:10:49PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > Cc: # 4.4+ > > > > Looks like git send-email is not able to parse this address correctly > > though this is suggested format by Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. > > Create wrong address If

RE: [char-misc-next] mei: request async autosuspend at the end of enumeration

2016-11-24 Thread Winkler, Tomas
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:10:49PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > Cc: # 4.4+ > > > > Looks like git send-email is not able to parse this address correctly > > though this is suggested format by Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. > > Create wrong address If git parsers is used :

Re: [PATCH] stmmac ethernet: remove cut & paste code

2016-11-24 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 22:44 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2016-11-24 12:05:25, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 12:05 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Remove duplicate code from _tx routines. > > > > trivia: > > > > > diff --git

Re: [PATCH] stmmac ethernet: remove cut & paste code

2016-11-24 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 22:44 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2016-11-24 12:05:25, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 12:05 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Remove duplicate code from _tx routines. > > > > trivia: > > > > > diff --git

hey!

2016-11-24 Thread Brown Baby
I just wanna be your friend if you can reply me back, Call me Monica.

hey!

2016-11-24 Thread Brown Baby
I just wanna be your friend if you can reply me back, Call me Monica.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data

2016-11-24 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 24.11.2016 17:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910, > but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a > configuration with only a910: > > arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error:

Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data

2016-11-24 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 24.11.2016 17:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910, > but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a > configuration with only a910: > > arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error:

[PATCH] dt-bindings: document how to setup rockchip timers as clocksource

2016-11-24 Thread Alexander Kochetkov
The patch describes how to setup rockchip timers in device tree so they can be used as clocksource. I'm going to implement this feature. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kochetkov --- .../bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt | 35 +++- 1 file changed,

[PATCH] dt-bindings: document how to setup rockchip timers as clocksource

2016-11-24 Thread Alexander Kochetkov
The patch describes how to setup rockchip timers in device tree so they can be used as clocksource. I'm going to implement this feature. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kochetkov --- .../bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt | 35 +++- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1

[PATCH] staging: most: Eliminate symbolic permissions usage

2016-11-24 Thread Jason Litzinger
Fix checkpatch warnings regarding the use of symbolic permissions. Where the MOST_CHANNEL_ATTR macro is used, convert to octal permissions over symbolic. Where _ATTR is used directly, replace with _ATTR_RW/_ATTR_WO and update the show/store function names appropriately. Signed-off-by: Jason

[PATCH] staging: most: Eliminate symbolic permissions usage

2016-11-24 Thread Jason Litzinger
Fix checkpatch warnings regarding the use of symbolic permissions. Where the MOST_CHANNEL_ATTR macro is used, convert to octal permissions over symbolic. Where _ATTR is used directly, replace with _ATTR_RW/_ATTR_WO and update the show/store function names appropriately. Signed-off-by: Jason

[PATCH] dt-bindings: clarify compatible field usage for rockchip timers

2016-11-24 Thread Alexander Kochetkov
rk3036 dtsi file already use compatible field as "rockchip,rk3036-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer". The patch clearly shows how that filed should be used on other chips. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kochetkov --- .../bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt | 12

[PATCH] dt-bindings: clarify compatible field usage for rockchip timers

2016-11-24 Thread Alexander Kochetkov
rk3036 dtsi file already use compatible field as "rockchip,rk3036-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer". The patch clearly shows how that filed should be used on other chips. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kochetkov --- .../bindings/timer/rockchip,rk-timer.txt | 12 +--- 1 file

Re: [PATCH] stmmac ethernet: remove cut & paste code

2016-11-24 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2016-11-24 12:05:25, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 12:05 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Remove duplicate code from _tx routines. > > trivia: > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > [] > >

Re: [PATCH] stmmac ethernet: remove cut & paste code

2016-11-24 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2016-11-24 12:05:25, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 12:05 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Remove duplicate code from _tx routines. > > trivia: > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > [] > >

[PATCH v3] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: update mux with gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep

2016-11-24 Thread Peter Rosin
If the gpio controller supports it and the gpio lines are concentrated to one gpio chip, the mux controller pins will get updated simultaneously. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 18 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4

[PATCH v3] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: update mux with gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep

2016-11-24 Thread Peter Rosin
If the gpio controller supports it and the gpio lines are concentrated to one gpio chip, the mux controller pins will get updated simultaneously. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 18 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Hi! v2 ->

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: sunxi: add support for Orange Pi Zero board

2016-11-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:23:49AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On 23/11/16 07:57, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:24:20AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> Orange Pi Zero is a board that came with the new Allwinner H2+ SoC. > >> > >> Add a device tree file for

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: sunxi: add support for Orange Pi Zero board

2016-11-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:23:49AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On 23/11/16 07:57, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:24:20AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> Orange Pi Zero is a board that came with the new Allwinner H2+ SoC. > >> > >> Add a device tree file for

Re: [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] ext4: add compatibility flag check

2016-11-24 Thread Fabian Frederick
> On 24 November 2016 at 21:39 Al Viro wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:47:41PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote: > > data=journal mount option should disable O_DIRECT access > > (See Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt) but open operations > > using

Re: [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] ext4: add compatibility flag check

2016-11-24 Thread Fabian Frederick
> On 24 November 2016 at 21:39 Al Viro wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:47:41PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote: > > data=journal mount option should disable O_DIRECT access > > (See Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt) but open operations > > using O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_DIRECT|O_SYNC have no

RFC: documentation of the autogroup feature [v2]

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Mike, I reworked the text on autogroups, and in the process learned something/have another question. Could you tell me if anything in the below needs fixing/improving, and also let me know about the FIXME? Thanks, Michael The autogroup feature Since Linux 2.6.38, the kernel

RFC: documentation of the autogroup feature [v2]

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Mike, I reworked the text on autogroups, and in the process learned something/have another question. Could you tell me if anything in the below needs fixing/improving, and also let me know about the FIXME? Thanks, Michael The autogroup feature Since Linux 2.6.38, the kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: sunxi: enable SDIO Wi-Fi on Orange Pi Zero

2016-11-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:25:57PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> _pio { > >> @@ -111,6 +148,11 @@ > >> pins = "PL10"; > >> function = "gpio_out"; > >> }; > >> + > >> + wifi_pwrseq_pin_opi0: wifi_pwrseq_pin@0 { > >> + allwinner,pins = "PL7"; > >>

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: sunxi: enable SDIO Wi-Fi on Orange Pi Zero

2016-11-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:25:57PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> _pio { > >> @@ -111,6 +148,11 @@ > >> pins = "PL10"; > >> function = "gpio_out"; > >> }; > >> + > >> + wifi_pwrseq_pin_opi0: wifi_pwrseq_pin@0 { > >> + allwinner,pins = "PL7"; > >>

Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses.

2016-11-24 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >> I'm debugging strange delays during transmit in stmmac driver. They > >> seem to be present in 4.4 kernel (and older kernels, too). Workload is > >> burst of udp packets being sent, pause, burst of udp packets, ... ... > > 4.9-rc6 still has the delays. With the > > > > #define

Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses.

2016-11-24 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >> I'm debugging strange delays during transmit in stmmac driver. They > >> seem to be present in 4.4 kernel (and older kernels, too). Workload is > >> burst of udp packets being sent, pause, burst of udp packets, ... ... > > 4.9-rc6 still has the delays. With the > > > > #define

[PATCH 0/3] sx150x update - bugfix, cleanup, last 4 chips

2016-11-24 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! Yet another sx150x update, only the first is critical. Cheers, Peter Peter Rosin (3): pinctrl: sx150x: use correct registers for reg_sense (sx1502 and sx1508) pinctrl: sx150x: sort chips by part number pinctrl: sx150x: add support for sx1501, sx1504, sx1505 and sx1507

[PATCH 0/3] sx150x update - bugfix, cleanup, last 4 chips

2016-11-24 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! Yet another sx150x update, only the first is critical. Cheers, Peter Peter Rosin (3): pinctrl: sx150x: use correct registers for reg_sense (sx1502 and sx1508) pinctrl: sx150x: sort chips by part number pinctrl: sx150x: add support for sx1501, sx1504, sx1505 and sx1507

Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis

2016-11-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Lv Zheng wrote: > This reverts commit 00c611def8748a0a1cf1d31842e49b42dfdb3de1. It would be good to say why it is now OK to revert it. Thanks, Rafael

Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] ACPI 2.0 / AML: Improve module level execution by moving the If/Else/While execution to per-table basis

2016-11-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Lv Zheng wrote: > This reverts commit 00c611def8748a0a1cf1d31842e49b42dfdb3de1. It would be good to say why it is now OK to revert it. Thanks, Rafael

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >