This patch simply uses the changes introduced in previous patches and migrates
apollo, ltlk, audptr, decext, spkout and dectlk. Migrations are straightforward
function pointer updates.
Signed-off by: Okash Khawaja
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault
This changes the above five synths to TTY-based comms. They were chosen as a
first pass because their serial comms are straightforward, i.e. they don't use
serial input and don't do internal port knocking.
Signed-off-by: Okash Khawaja
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault
This patch simply uses the changes introduced in previous patches and migrates
apollo, ltlk, audptr, decext, spkout and dectlk. Migrations are straightforward
function pointer updates.
Signed-off by: Okash Khawaja
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault
Index:
This changes the above five synths to TTY-based comms. They were chosen as a
first pass because their serial comms are straightforward, i.e. they don't use
serial input and don't do internal port knocking.
Signed-off-by: Okash Khawaja
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault
Index:
This adds spk_ttyio.c file. It contains a set of functions which implement
those methods in spk_synth struct which relate to sending bytes out using
serial comms. Implementations in this file perform the same function but
using TTY subsystem instead. Currently synths access serial ports, directly
This patchset migrates all external synths from using raw serial i/o to
using tty-based comms. The synths not migrated are internal ones -
plugged directly into motherboard, communicating over ISA etc. It's
important to note that these patches access TTY from inside kernel.
Here is the summary of
This adds spk_ttyio.c file. It contains a set of functions which implement
those methods in spk_synth struct which relate to sending bytes out using
serial comms. Implementations in this file perform the same function but
using TTY subsystem instead. Currently synths access serial ports, directly
This patchset migrates all external synths from using raw serial i/o to
using tty-based comms. The synths not migrated are internal ones -
plugged directly into motherboard, communicating over ISA etc. It's
important to note that these patches access TTY from inside kernel.
Here is the summary of
On Mon, 15 May 2017 08:19:28 +
"Cheng, Collins" wrote:
> Hi Williamson,
>
> We cannot assume BIOS supports SR-IOV, actually only newer server motherboard
> BIOS supports SR-IOV. Normal desktop motherboard BIOS or older server
> motherboard BIOS doesn't support
On Mon, 15 May 2017 08:19:28 +
"Cheng, Collins" wrote:
> Hi Williamson,
>
> We cannot assume BIOS supports SR-IOV, actually only newer server motherboard
> BIOS supports SR-IOV. Normal desktop motherboard BIOS or older server
> motherboard BIOS doesn't support SR-IOV. This issue would
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> People reported kernel panic occurs during system boots up with mem boot
> option.
> After checking code, several problems are found about memmap= and mem= in
> boot stage
> kaslr.
>
> *) In commit f28442497b5c ("x86/boot:
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> People reported kernel panic occurs during system boots up with mem boot
> option.
> After checking code, several problems are found about memmap= and mem= in
> boot stage
> kaslr.
>
> *) In commit f28442497b5c ("x86/boot: Fix KASLR and
On 15/05/17 18:43, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 15/05/17 11:00, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Hi Suzuki,
So I don't think this change is wrong, but I wonder if it's sufficient.
For example, I can see that this function is called from
On 15/05/17 18:43, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 15/05/17 11:00, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Hi Suzuki,
So I don't think this change is wrong, but I wonder if it's sufficient.
For example, I can see that this function is called from
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hoist the libnvdimm helper as an inline helper to linux/uuid.h
> using an auxiliary const variable uuid_null in lib/uuid.c.
>
> [hch: also add the guid variant. Both do the same but I'd like
> to keep casts to a minimum]
>
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hoist the libnvdimm helper as an inline helper to linux/uuid.h
> using an auxiliary const variable uuid_null in lib/uuid.c.
>
> [hch: also add the guid variant. Both do the same but I'd like
> to keep casts to a minimum]
>
> The common
Hi Eric,
> Eric Anholt hat am 15. Mai 2017 um 19:35 geschrieben:
>
>
> From: Phil Elwell
>
> If a clock has the prediv flag set, both the integer and fractional
> parts must be scaled when calculating the resulting frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil
Hi Eric,
> Eric Anholt hat am 15. Mai 2017 um 19:35 geschrieben:
>
>
> From: Phil Elwell
>
> If a clock has the prediv flag set, both the integer and fractional
> parts must be scaled when calculating the resulting frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
>
On 12 May 2017 at 12:53, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 20:36:03 +0200
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof"
On 12 May 2017 at 12:53, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 20:36:03 +0200
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39:08AM -0700, Josh Zimmerman wrote:
> (Continuing thread from patch v1)
> > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:43:11PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > > The TPM class has some common shutdown code that must be executed
> > > > > for all drivers. This adds some needed
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39:08AM -0700, Josh Zimmerman wrote:
> (Continuing thread from patch v1)
> > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:43:11PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > > The TPM class has some common shutdown code that must be executed
> > > > > for all drivers. This adds some needed
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:12:44PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The writeback error handling test requires that you put the journal on a
> separate device. This allows us to use dmerror to simulate data
> writeback failure, without affecting the journal.
>
> xfs already has infrastructure for this
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:12:44PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The writeback error handling test requires that you put the journal on a
> separate device. This allows us to use dmerror to simulate data
> writeback failure, without affecting the journal.
>
> xfs already has infrastructure for this
On 12 May 2017 at 12:52, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 20:30:42 +0200
>
> Delete a character in this description for a condition check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
On 12 May 2017 at 12:52, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 20:30:42 +0200
>
> Delete a character in this description for a condition check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
On 12 May 2017 at 12:51, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 20:23:43 +0200
>
> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>
> This issue was detected by using the
On Mon, 15 May 2017 03:36:50 +
"Chen, Xiaoguang" wrote:
> Hi Alex and Gerd,
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> >Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 12:38 AM
> >To: Gerd Hoffmann
> >Cc: Chen,
On 12 May 2017 at 12:51, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 20:23:43 +0200
>
> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Link:
>
On Mon, 15 May 2017 03:36:50 +
"Chen, Xiaoguang" wrote:
> Hi Alex and Gerd,
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> >Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 12:38 AM
> >To: Gerd Hoffmann
> >Cc: Chen, Xiaoguang ; Tian, Kevin
> >;
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 15/05/17 11:00, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >Hi Suzuki,
> >
> >On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 03:17:52PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>We yield the kvm->mmu_lock occassionaly while performing an operation
> >>(e.g, unmap or
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 15/05/17 11:00, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >Hi Suzuki,
> >
> >On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 03:17:52PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>We yield the kvm->mmu_lock occassionaly while performing an operation
> >>(e.g, unmap or
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Manfred Spraul
wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On 05/09/2017 12:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> This changes the struct + trailing data pattern to using a void * so that
>> the end of sem_array is found without possibly indexing past the end which
>>
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Manfred Spraul
wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On 05/09/2017 12:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> This changes the struct + trailing data pattern to using a void * so that
>> the end of sem_array is found without possibly indexing past the end which
>> can upset some static
(Continuing thread from patch v1)
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:43:11PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > The TPM class has some common shutdown code that must be executed
> > > > for all drivers. This adds some needed functionality for that
> > >
> > > The issue with this is, that on some
(Continuing thread from patch v1)
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:43:11PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > The TPM class has some common shutdown code that must be executed
> > > > for all drivers. This adds some needed functionality for that
> > >
> > > The issue with this is, that on some
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 09:22 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall
>> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 22:54:23 +0800 (SGT)
>>
>>> Device node iterators put the previous value of the index variable, so an
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 09:22 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall
>> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 22:54:23 +0800 (SGT)
>>
>>> Device node iterators put the previous value of the index variable, so an
>>> explicit put causes a double put.
>>
The TPM class has some common shutdown code that must be executed for
all drivers. This adds some needed functionality for that.
Usage example: 'tpm: Issue a TPM2_Shutdown for TPM2 devices.'
(see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9724919/ for v2).
Signed-off-by: Josh Zimmerman
From: Phil Elwell
If a clock has the prediv flag set, both the integer and fractional
parts must be scaled when calculating the resulting frequency.
Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
---
While this is a bugfix,
The TPM class has some common shutdown code that must be executed for
all drivers. This adds some needed functionality for that.
Usage example: 'tpm: Issue a TPM2_Shutdown for TPM2 devices.'
(see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9724919/ for v2).
Signed-off-by: Josh Zimmerman
-
v2: Add
From: Phil Elwell
If a clock has the prediv flag set, both the integer and fractional
parts must be scaled when calculating the resulting frequency.
Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
---
While this is a bugfix, I haven't put a "Fixes:" line in here to get
it automatically
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:51:36 -0700
> Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> This ReSTifies everything under Documentation/security/, and reorganizes
>> some of it (mainly the LSMs) under /admin-guide/ per Jon's
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:51:36 -0700
> Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> This ReSTifies everything under Documentation/security/, and reorganizes
>> some of it (mainly the LSMs) under /admin-guide/ per Jon's request. Since
>> /security/ is already
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 07:13:57PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Sure I can. Would this trigger a v8 of my series? I was hoping v7 series
> could be merged and then start doing incremental work on top of it. Does
> it make sense?
I guess that's tip guys' call.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 07:13:57PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Sure I can. Would this trigger a v8 of my series? I was hoping v7 series
> could be merged and then start doing incremental work on top of it. Does
> it make sense?
I guess that's tip guys' call.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE
This patch refactor code to first load all firmware blobs
and then update modem proc to authenticate and boot fw.
Also make a trivial change in a error log.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 25 -
1
This patch refactor code to first load all firmware blobs
and then update modem proc to authenticate and boot fw.
Also make a trivial change in a error log.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 25 -
1 file changed, 12
On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:51:36 -0700
Kees Cook wrote:
> This ReSTifies everything under Documentation/security/, and reorganizes
> some of it (mainly the LSMs) under /admin-guide/ per Jon's request. Since
> /security/ is already being indexed under the kernel development
On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:51:36 -0700
Kees Cook wrote:
> This ReSTifies everything under Documentation/security/, and reorganizes
> some of it (mainly the LSMs) under /admin-guide/ per Jon's request. Since
> /security/ is already being indexed under the kernel development portion
> of the sphinx
This patch add support for mss boot on msm8996. Major
changes include making appropriate change for executing
mss reset sequence, adding private data initialization etc.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
---
.../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt | 4
This patch add support for mss boot on msm8996. Major
changes include making appropriate change for executing
mss reset sequence, adding private data initialization etc.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
---
.../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt | 4 +-
This patch does following
1- Adds new scm call which helps in stage two translation of a memory
region
so that multi proc mem access sharing can be achieved on armv8 and
later.
2- Enable mss remoteproc on msm8996
This patchset is based on tip of linux-next.
Avaneesh
MSS proc on msm8996 can not access fw loaded region without stage
second translation of memory pages where mpss image are loaded.
This patch to enable mss boot on msm8996 add these secure monitor
calls to switch ownership between apps and modem.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
This patch does following
1- Adds new scm call which helps in stage two translation of a memory
region
so that multi proc mem access sharing can be achieved on armv8 and
later.
2- Enable mss remoteproc on msm8996
This patchset is based on tip of linux-next.
Avaneesh
MSS proc on msm8996 can not access fw loaded region without stage
second translation of memory pages where mpss image are loaded.
This patch to enable mss boot on msm8996 add these secure monitor
calls to switch ownership between apps and modem.
Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
---
Two different processors on a SOC need to share memory during loading.
So memory access between them need to be synchronized, which is done
via level two memory mapping by secure layer.
This patch provide interface for making secure monitor call for access
sharing or access right transfer between
Two different processors on a SOC need to share memory during loading.
So memory access between them need to be synchronized, which is done
via level two memory mapping by secure layer.
This patch provide interface for making secure monitor call for access
sharing or access right transfer between
Hi Guenter,
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Selecting PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS without PM results in the following build
> errors, seen when building sparc32:allmodconfig.
>
> drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'genpd_queue_power_off_work':
>
Hi Guenter,
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Selecting PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS without PM results in the following build
> errors, seen when building sparc32:allmodconfig.
>
> drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'genpd_queue_power_off_work':
>
Mali-DP display processors are able to write the composition result to a
memory buffer via the SE.
Add entry points in the HAL for enabling/disabling this feature, and
implement support for it on DP650 and DP550. DP500 acts differently and
so is omitted from this change.
Changes since v3:
- Fix
Mali-DP display processors are able to write the composition result to a
memory buffer via the SE.
Add entry points in the HAL for enabling/disabling this feature, and
implement support for it on DP650 and DP550. DP500 acts differently and
so is omitted from this change.
Changes since v3:
- Fix
Hi,
This series introduces support for Mali DP's memory writeback engine
using the generic writeback connector support introduced in the
"[PATCH v5 0/2] drm: Introduce writeback connectors" series [1]
This version updates the Mali DP code to remove the bespoke encoder used
with the
Hi,
This series introduces support for Mali DP's memory writeback engine
using the generic writeback connector support introduced in the
"[PATCH v5 0/2] drm: Introduce writeback connectors" series [1]
This version updates the Mali DP code to remove the bespoke encoder used
with the
From: Brian Starkey
Mali-DP has a memory writeback engine which can be used to write the
composition result to a memory buffer. Expose this functionality as a
DRM writeback connector on supported hardware.
Changes since v1:
Daniel Vetter:
- Don't require a modeset when
From: Brian Starkey
Mali-DP has a memory writeback engine which can be used to write the
composition result to a memory buffer. Expose this functionality as a
DRM writeback connector on supported hardware.
Changes since v1:
Daniel Vetter:
- Don't require a modeset when writeback routing
From: Brian Starkey
Add a layer bit for the SE memory-write, and add it to the pixel format
matrix for DP550/DP650.
Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey
[rebased and fixed conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Mihail Atanassov
Signed-off-by:
From: Brian Starkey
Add a layer bit for the SE memory-write, and add it to the pixel format
matrix for DP550/DP650.
Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey
[rebased and fixed conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Mihail Atanassov
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
---
drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c | 28
Em Mon, 15 May 2017 13:49:19 +0200
Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:29:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 May 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > The intention is to aid readability. Making comments worse so that some
>
Em Mon, 15 May 2017 13:49:19 +0200
Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:29:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 May 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > The intention is to aid readability. Making comments worse so that some
> > > retarded script can generate better
On Sun, 14 May 2017 01:01:01 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> Handle a NULL glob properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao
> ---
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
On Sun, 14 May 2017 01:01:01 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> Handle a NULL glob properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao
> ---
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index
Hi,
This is v5 of the writeback connector series. Boris Brezillon thought
that having to explicitly instantiate an encoder when using
drm_writeback_connector
is a bit too cumbersome, so I'm pushing out this version where we embed
a virtual encoder inside drm_writeback_connector in order to
On Mon, 15 May 2017 09:17:25 +1000 (AEST)
James Morris wrote:
> On Sat, 13 May 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > These fixes were needed to parse lsm_hooks.h kernel-doc. More work is
> > needed, but this is the first step.
> >
> > Cc: Casey Schaufler
> >
Hi,
This is v5 of the writeback connector series. Boris Brezillon thought
that having to explicitly instantiate an encoder when using
drm_writeback_connector
is a bit too cumbersome, so I'm pushing out this version where we embed
a virtual encoder inside drm_writeback_connector in order to
On Mon, 15 May 2017 09:17:25 +1000 (AEST)
James Morris wrote:
> On Sat, 13 May 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > These fixes were needed to parse lsm_hooks.h kernel-doc. More work is
> > needed, but this is the first step.
> >
> > Cc: Casey Schaufler
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
>
> Should
From: Brian Starkey
Writeback connectors represent writeback engines which can write the
CRTC output to a memory framebuffer. Add a writeback connector type and
related support functions.
Drivers should initialize a writeback connector with
drm_writeback_connector_init()
From: Brian Starkey
Writeback connectors represent writeback engines which can write the
CRTC output to a memory framebuffer. Add a writeback connector type and
related support functions.
Drivers should initialize a writeback connector with
drm_writeback_connector_init() which takes care of
From: Brian Starkey
Add the WRITEBACK_OUT_FENCE_PTR property to writeback connectors, to
enable userspace to get a fence which will signal once the writeback is
complete. It is not allowed to request an out-fence without a
framebuffer attached to the connector.
A timeline
From: Brian Starkey
Add the WRITEBACK_OUT_FENCE_PTR property to writeback connectors, to
enable userspace to get a fence which will signal once the writeback is
complete. It is not allowed to request an out-fence without a
framebuffer attached to the connector.
A timeline is added to
ipc has two management structures that exist for every id:
- struct kern_ipc_perm, it contains e.g. the permissions.
- struct ipc_rcu, it contains the rcu head for rcu handling and
the refcount.
The patch merges both structures.
As a bonus, we may save one cacheline, because both structures are
ipc has two management structures that exist for every id:
- struct kern_ipc_perm, it contains e.g. the permissions.
- struct ipc_rcu, it contains the rcu head for rcu handling and
the refcount.
The patch merges both structures.
As a bonus, we may save one cacheline, because both structures are
sem_ctime is initialized to the semget() time and then updated at every
semctl() that changes the array.
Thus it does not represent the time of the last change.
Especially, semop() calls are only stored in sem_otime, not in sem_ctime.
This is already described in ipc/sem.c, I just overlooked
sem_ctime is initialized to the semget() time and then updated at every
semctl() that changes the array.
Thus it does not represent the time of the last change.
Especially, semop() calls are only stored in sem_otime, not in sem_ctime.
This is already described in ipc/sem.c, I just overlooked
sma->sem_base is initialized with
sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) [1];
The current code has four problems:
- There is an unnecessary pointer dereference - sem_base is not needed.
- Alignment for struct sem only works by chance.
- The current code causes false positive for static code
sma->sem_base is initialized with
sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) [1];
The current code has four problems:
- There is an unnecessary pointer dereference - sem_base is not needed.
- Alignment for struct sem only works by chance.
- The current code causes false positive for static code
Hi all,
could you check the following three patches?
As explained, I try to combine the changes for static analyzers and for
the randstruct gcc plugin with cleanups.
0001-ipc-sem.c-remove-sem_base-embed-struct-sem.patch:
sem_base is not needed. Instead of improving the casts,
Hi all,
could you check the following three patches?
As explained, I try to combine the changes for static analyzers and for
the randstruct gcc plugin with cleanups.
0001-ipc-sem.c-remove-sem_base-embed-struct-sem.patch:
sem_base is not needed. Instead of improving the casts,
Came across these and noticed that it doesn't appear anything has
happened with them. The set looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke
Jason
---
Now instead of four in the eights place /
you’ve got three, ‘Cause you added one /
(That is to say, eight) to the two,
Came across these and noticed that it doesn't appear anything has
happened with them. The set looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Jason Gerecke
Jason
---
Now instead of four in the eights place /
you’ve got three, ‘Cause you added one /
(That is to say, eight) to the two, /
But you can’t take
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 19:09:03 +0200
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Link:
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 19:09:03 +0200
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Link:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/LCJ16-Refactor_Strings-WSang_0.pdf
From: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
The greybus-dev mailing list is a members-only list and is
moderated for non-subscribers.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
---
MAINTAINERS |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-next-2
From: Randy Dunlap
The greybus-dev mailing list is a members-only list and is
moderated for non-subscribers.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap
---
MAINTAINERS |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-next-20170515.orig/MAINTAINERS
+++ linux-next-20170515/MAINTAINERS
Failing to do so meant that we got a resume() callback on first use of
the device, so we would leak the bin BO that we allocated during
probe.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Fixes: 553c942f8b2c ("drm/vc4: Allow using more than 256MB of CMA memory.")
---
Failing to do so meant that we got a resume() callback on first use of
the device, so we would leak the bin BO that we allocated during
probe.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
Fixes: 553c942f8b2c ("drm/vc4: Allow using more than 256MB of CMA memory.")
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_v3d.c | 1 +
1 file
On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:09:12 +0200
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > mtd: adjust kernel-docs to avoid Sphinx/kerneldoc warnings
>
> Not sure how you plan to merge these changes, but if it goes through
> a single tree I'll probably need an immutable topic branch,
Hi,
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Wei-Ning Huang wrote:
> From: Wei-Ning Huang
>
> Some EC chip has larger flash sector size which requires longer erase
> time. During erase the CPU is usually stalled and can't even respond to
> interrupts. We
On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:09:12 +0200
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > mtd: adjust kernel-docs to avoid Sphinx/kerneldoc warnings
>
> Not sure how you plan to merge these changes, but if it goes through
> a single tree I'll probably need an immutable topic branch, because I
> plan to change a few
Hi,
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Wei-Ning Huang wrote:
> From: Wei-Ning Huang
>
> Some EC chip has larger flash sector size which requires longer erase
> time. During erase the CPU is usually stalled and can't even respond to
> interrupts. We sleep a while to block any EC command from
601 - 700 of 1985 matches
Mail list logo