The following changes since commit b284d4d5a6785f8cd07eda2646a95782373cd01e:
Merge tag 'ceph-for-4.17-rc1' of git://github.com/ceph/ceph-client
(2018-04-10 12:25:30 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping.git tags/dma-mapping-4.17-2
for
The following changes since commit b284d4d5a6785f8cd07eda2646a95782373cd01e:
Merge tag 'ceph-for-4.17-rc1' of git://github.com/ceph/ceph-client
(2018-04-10 12:25:30 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping.git tags/dma-mapping-4.17-2
for
From: Fengguang Wu
Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference() and
drm_*_unreference() helpers.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/drm-get-put.cocci
Fixes: 6784ac15bc68 ("drm: Add ASPEED GFX driver")
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
From: Fengguang Wu
Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference() and
drm_*_unreference() helpers.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/drm-get-put.cocci
Fixes: 6784ac15bc68 ("drm: Add ASPEED GFX driver")
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
From: Fengguang Wu
Remove unneeded semicolon.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci
Fixes: 6784ac15bc68 ("drm: Add ASPEED GFX driver")
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
From: Fengguang Wu
Remove unneeded semicolon.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci
Fixes: 6784ac15bc68 ("drm: Add ASPEED GFX driver")
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
aspeed_gfx_drv.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
On 2018-04-02 18:00, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Can,
On 3/2/2018 1:48 PM, Can Guo wrote:
From: Venkat Gopalakrishnan
Qcom ufs controller v3.1.0 supports 2 lanes, add support
to configure 2 lanes during phy initialization.
Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan
On 2018-04-02 18:00, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Can,
On 3/2/2018 1:48 PM, Can Guo wrote:
From: Venkat Gopalakrishnan
Qcom ufs controller v3.1.0 supports 2 lanes, add support
to configure 2 lanes during phy initialization.
Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:29:42PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Fix warnings raised by checker, including:
>
> (*) Warnings raised by unequal comparison for the purposes of sorting,
> where the endianness doesn't matter:
>
> fs/afs/addr_list.c:246:21: warning: restricted __be16 degrades
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:29:42PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Fix warnings raised by checker, including:
>
> (*) Warnings raised by unequal comparison for the purposes of sorting,
> where the endianness doesn't matter:
>
> fs/afs/addr_list.c:246:21: warning: restricted __be16 degrades
Hi, Peng!
On 04/12/2018 05:21 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
Just have a question, is this drm/xen-front stuff orthogonal to xen shared
coprocessor framework for gpu, or are they exclusive?
They are orthogonal
Thanks,
Peng.
Hi, Peng!
On 04/12/2018 05:21 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
Just have a question, is this drm/xen-front stuff orthogonal to xen shared
coprocessor framework for gpu, or are they exclusive?
They are orthogonal
Thanks,
Peng.
On 4/12/2018 6:27 AM, c...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-09 19:28, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Can,
On 3/27/2018 12:48 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Add UFS PHY support to make SDM845 UFS work with common PHY framework.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
On 4/12/2018 6:27 AM, c...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-09 19:28, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Can,
On 3/27/2018 12:48 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Add UFS PHY support to make SDM845 UFS work with common PHY framework.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 130
On 12 April 2018 12:05:03 AM IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.105 release.
>There are 121 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being
On 12 April 2018 12:05:03 AM IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.105 release.
>There are 121 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>let me know.
>
Hi, Linus,
On 三, 2018-04-11 at 17:01 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Zhang Rui
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please pull from
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
> > next
> Pulled, and then immediately unpulled again.
Hi, Linus,
On 三, 2018-04-11 at 17:01 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Zhang Rui
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please pull from
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
> > next
> Pulled, and then immediately unpulled again.
>
> The code causes
Dear James,
Thanks for this mail and sorry for my late response.
2018-02-16 1:55 GMT+08:00 James Morse :
> Hi gengdongjiu, liu jun
>
> On 05/02/18 11:24, gengdongjiu wrote:
[]
>>
>>> Is the emulated SError routed following the routing rules for HCR_EL2.{AMO,
>>>
Dear James,
Thanks for this mail and sorry for my late response.
2018-02-16 1:55 GMT+08:00 James Morse :
> Hi gengdongjiu, liu jun
>
> On 05/02/18 11:24, gengdongjiu wrote:
[]
>>
>>> Is the emulated SError routed following the routing rules for HCR_EL2.{AMO,
>>> TGE}?
>>
>> Yes, it
2018-04-12 11:31 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada :
> The property of the legacy mode for the eMMC PHY turned out to
> be worng. Some eMMC devices are unstable due to the set-up/hold
> timing violation. Correct the delay value.
Reminder for myself:
Fix a type worng ->
2018-04-12 11:31 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada :
> The property of the legacy mode for the eMMC PHY turned out to
> be worng. Some eMMC devices are unstable due to the set-up/hold
> timing violation. Correct the delay value.
Reminder for myself:
Fix a type worng -> wrong
--
Best Regards
Hi Jia-Ju,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on ide/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.16 next-20180411]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
Hi Jia-Ju,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on ide/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.16 next-20180411]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
From: Dave Gerlach
Some hwmods will not properly assert signals to the PRCM after a
context loss if no driver is present which leads to issues with suspend.
This can be caused by the SYSCONFIG register not being programmed
correctly by default or a softreset being needed before
From: Dave Gerlach
After an RTC+DDR cycle we lose sram context so emif pm functions present
in sram are lost. We can check if the first byte of the original
code in DDR contains the same first byte as the code in sram, and if
they do not match we know we have lost context and
From: Dave Gerlach
Some hwmods will not properly assert signals to the PRCM after a
context loss if no driver is present which leads to issues with suspend.
This can be caused by the SYSCONFIG register not being programmed
correctly by default or a softreset being needed before the module will
From: Dave Gerlach
After an RTC+DDR cycle we lose sram context so emif pm functions present
in sram are lost. We can check if the first byte of the original
code in DDR contains the same first byte as the code in sram, and if
they do not match we know we have lost context and must recopy the
From: Russ Dill
The powerdomain control registers are stored in the WKUP powerdomain on
AM33XX/AM43XX, which is lost on RTC-only suspend and also hibernate. This
adds context save and restore functions for those registers.
Sometimes the powerdomain state does not need to
From: Russ Dill
The powerdomain control registers are stored in the WKUP powerdomain on
AM33XX/AM43XX, which is lost on RTC-only suspend and also hibernate. This
adds context save and restore functions for those registers.
Sometimes the powerdomain state does not need to change,
perhaps we only
From: Russ Dill
This adds a pair of context save/restore functions to save/restore the
state of a set of pinctrl registers. This simplifies some of the AM33XX
PM code as some of the pinctrl registers are lost when the per power
domain loses power. The pincrtl code can
From: Russ Dill
This adds a pair of context save/restore functions to save/restore the
state of a set of pinctrl registers. This simplifies some of the AM33XX
PM code as some of the pinctrl registers are lost when the per power
domain loses power. The pincrtl code can perform the necessary
From: Russ Dill
It isn't much of a win, and with hibernation, everything loses context.
So Drop the concept of certain power domains not being able to lose
context.
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
From: Russ Dill
These registers are part of the wkup domain and are lost during RTC only
suspend and also hibernation, so storing/restoring their state is
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
From: Russ Dill
It isn't much of a win, and with hibernation, everything loses context.
So Drop the concept of certain power domains not being able to lose
context.
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 41
From: Russ Dill
These registers are part of the wkup domain and are lost during RTC only
suspend and also hibernation, so storing/restoring their state is
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c | 84
Add the save and restore for clksrc as part of suspend and resume
so that it saves the counter value and restores. This is needed in
modes like rtc+ddr in self-refresh not doing this stalls the time.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 37
Add the save and restore for clksrc as part of suspend and resume
so that it saves the counter value and restores. This is needed in
modes like rtc+ddr in self-refresh not doing this stalls the time.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 37
From: Dave Gerlach
When the RTC lock and unlock functions were introduced it was likely
assumed that they would always be called from irq enabled context, hence
the use of local_irq_disable/enable. This is no longer true as the
RTC+DDR path makes a late call during the suspend
From: Dave Gerlach
Commit 2dc983c565e0 ("gpio/omap: cleanup prepare_for_idle and
resume_after_idle") introduces omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle and
omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle to properly configure gpios that are used
as wake sources. When entering off mode,
From: Dave Gerlach
Commit 2dc983c565e0 ("gpio/omap: cleanup prepare_for_idle and
resume_after_idle") introduces omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle and
omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle to properly configure gpios that are used
as wake sources. When entering off mode, omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle
can set a
From: Dave Gerlach
When the RTC lock and unlock functions were introduced it was likely
assumed that they would always be called from irq enabled context, hence
the use of local_irq_disable/enable. This is no longer true as the
RTC+DDR path makes a late call during the suspend path after irqs
From: Dave Gerlach
There are two registers on am43x needed for IO daisy chain wake to work
properly, however currently after an RTC+DDR cycle they are lost. We
must take care to save and restore these before and after entering RTC
mode otherwise IO daisy chain wake will stop
From: Russ Dill
It isn't much of a win, and with hibernation, everything loses context.
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c| 38 -
From: Russ Dill
It isn't much of a win, and with hibernation, everything loses context.
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c| 38 -
include/linux/platform_data/gpio-omap.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 14
From: Dave Gerlach
There are two registers on am43x needed for IO daisy chain wake to work
properly, however currently after an RTC+DDR cycle they are lost. We
must take care to save and restore these before and after entering RTC
mode otherwise IO daisy chain wake will stop working from
From: Russ Dill
This is used to support suspend modes like RTC-only and hibernate where
the state of the registers controlling clockdomains is lost.
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
From: Tero Kristo
These registers are part of the wkup domain and are lost during RTC only
suspend and also hibernation, so storing/restoring their state is
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
From: Russ Dill
This is used to support suspend modes like RTC-only and hibernate where
the state of the registers controlling clockdomains is lost.
Signed-off-by: Russ Dill
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c | 46
From: Tero Kristo
These registers are part of the wkup domain and are lost during RTC only
suspend and also hibernation, so storing/restoring their state is
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c | 94
RTC plus DDR in self-refresh is power a saving mode where in the entire
system including the different voltage rails from PMIC are shutdown except
the ones feeding on to RTC and DDR. DDR is kept in self-refresh hence the
contents are preserved. RTC ALARM2 is connected to PMIC_EN line once
we the
From: Russ Dill
This is used to support suspend modes like RTC-only and hibernate where
the state of these registers is lost.
After the PRCM loses context in the case of an RTC+DDR cycle omap_hwmod
attempts to return all hwmods to their previous state, however certain
hwmods
RTC plus DDR in self-refresh is power a saving mode where in the entire
system including the different voltage rails from PMIC are shutdown except
the ones feeding on to RTC and DDR. DDR is kept in self-refresh hence the
contents are preserved. RTC ALARM2 is connected to PMIC_EN line once
we the
From: Russ Dill
This is used to support suspend modes like RTC-only and hibernate where
the state of these registers is lost.
After the PRCM loses context in the case of an RTC+DDR cycle omap_hwmod
attempts to return all hwmods to their previous state, however certain
hwmods cannot just be
On 04/11/2018 07:51 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
On 4/11/2018 5:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/11/2018 02:59 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Thanks a lot for sharing your time. Please see my inline answers.
On 4/10/2018 3:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:32:11AM
AFS series posted by dhowells depended upon lookup_one_len()
rework; now that prereq is in the mainline, that series had been
rebased on top of it and got some exposure and testing...
The following changes since commit fd3b36d275660c905da9900b078eea341847d5e4:
Merge branch 'work.namei'
AFS series posted by dhowells depended upon lookup_one_len()
rework; now that prereq is in the mainline, that series had been
rebased on top of it and got some exposure and testing...
The following changes since commit fd3b36d275660c905da9900b078eea341847d5e4:
Merge branch 'work.namei'
On 04/11/2018 07:51 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
On 4/11/2018 5:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/11/2018 02:59 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Thanks a lot for sharing your time. Please see my inline answers.
On 4/10/2018 3:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:32:11AM
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.18 destined stuff to your linux-next included
trees until after v4.17-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20180411:
The parisc-hd tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1143
1201 files changed, 42273 insertions(+), 23285
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.18 destined stuff to your linux-next included
trees until after v4.17-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20180411:
The parisc-hd tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1143
1201 files changed, 42273 insertions(+), 23285
Hi Amelie,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.16]
[cannot apply to next-20180411]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https
Hi Amelie,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.16]
[cannot apply to next-20180411]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:24 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> (*) CONFIG_LOCK_DOWN_KERNEL
>
> This makes lockdown available and applies it to all the points that
> need to be locked down if the mode is set. Lockdown mode can be
> enabled by providing:
>
>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:24 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> (*) CONFIG_LOCK_DOWN_KERNEL
>
> This makes lockdown available and applies it to all the points that
> need to be locked down if the mode is set. Lockdown mode can be
> enabled by providing:
>
> lockdown=1
By doing
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:09:16PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> > Why not just disable debugfs entirely? This half-hearted way to sorta
>> > lock it down is odd, it is meant to not be there
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:09:16PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> > Why not just disable debugfs entirely? This half-hearted way to sorta
>> > lock it down is odd, it is meant to not be there at all, nothing in your
>> >
On 4/11/2018 5:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/11/2018 02:59 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Thanks a lot for sharing your time. Please see my inline answers.
On 4/10/2018 3:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:32:11AM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds PECI
On 4/11/2018 5:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/11/2018 02:59 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Thanks a lot for sharing your time. Please see my inline answers.
On 4/10/2018 3:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:32:11AM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds PECI
When Linux runs as a guest VM in Hyper-V and Hyper-V adds the virtual PCI
bus to the guest, Hyper-V always provides unique PCI domain.
commit 4a9b0933bdfc ("PCI: hv: Use device serial number as PCI domain")
overrode unique domain with the serial number of the first device added to
the virtual PCI
When Linux runs as a guest VM in Hyper-V and Hyper-V adds the virtual PCI
bus to the guest, Hyper-V always provides unique PCI domain.
commit 4a9b0933bdfc ("PCI: hv: Use device serial number as PCI domain")
overrode unique domain with the serial number of the first device added to
the virtual PCI
The property of the legacy mode for the eMMC PHY turned out to
be worng. Some eMMC devices are unstable due to the set-up/hold
timing violation. Correct the delay value.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld11.dtsi | 2 +-
The property of the legacy mode for the eMMC PHY turned out to
be worng. Some eMMC devices are unstable due to the set-up/hold
timing violation. Correct the delay value.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld11.dtsi | 2 +-
On 12/04/2018 09:48, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
b53_switch_reset_gpio() is never called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at b53_switch_reset_gpio() is:
[1] b53_switch_reset_gpio() <- b53_switch_reset() <-
b53_reset_switch() <- b53_setup()
b53_switch_reset_gpio() is set as ".setup" in
On 12/04/2018 09:48, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
b53_switch_reset_gpio() is never called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at b53_switch_reset_gpio() is:
[1] b53_switch_reset_gpio() <- b53_switch_reset() <-
b53_reset_switch() <- b53_setup()
b53_switch_reset_gpio() is set as ".setup" in
On 2018/4/12 10:21, arvindY wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2018 07:00 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/12 0:16, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 23:39 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
de4x5_hw_init() is only called by
On 2018/4/12 10:21, arvindY wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2018 07:00 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/12 0:16, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 23:39 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
de4x5_hw_init() is only called by
On 4/10/2018 9:02 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs from the kernel
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621) to eventually turn on -Wvla.
> The test already pre-allocates some buffers with kmalloc so turn
> the two VLAs in to pre-allocated kmalloc buffers.
>
>
On 4/10/2018 9:02 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs from the kernel
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621) to eventually turn on -Wvla.
> The test already pre-allocates some buffers with kmalloc so turn
> the two VLAs in to pre-allocated kmalloc buffers.
>
>
On Thursday 12 April 2018 07:00 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/12 0:16, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 23:39 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
de4x5_hw_init() is only called by de4x5_pci_probe(), which is only
set as ".probe" in
Hi Oleksandr,
Just have a question, is this drm/xen-front stuff orthogonal to xen shared
coprocessor framework for gpu, or are they exclusive?
Thanks,
Peng.
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 0/1] drm/xen-front: Add support for Xen PV
> display frontend
>
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On Thursday 12 April 2018 07:00 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/4/12 0:16, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 23:39 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
de4x5_hw_init() is never called in atomic context.
de4x5_hw_init() is only called by de4x5_pci_probe(), which is only
set as ".probe" in
Hi Oleksandr,
Just have a question, is this drm/xen-front stuff orthogonal to xen shared
coprocessor framework for gpu, or are they exclusive?
Thanks,
Peng.
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 0/1] drm/xen-front: Add support for Xen PV
> display frontend
>
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
>
On 4/11/2018 4:52 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
On 11 April 2018 at 04:02, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds PECI bus/adapter node of AST24xx/AST25xx into
aspeed-g4 and aspeed-g5.
The patches to the device trees get merged by the ASPEED maintainer
(me). Once you
On 4/11/2018 4:52 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
On 11 April 2018 at 04:02, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds PECI bus/adapter node of AST24xx/AST25xx into
aspeed-g4 and aspeed-g5.
The patches to the device trees get merged by the ASPEED maintainer
(me). Once you have the bindings reviewed you
For LD20, the bit 5 of the offset 0x200c turned out to be a USB3
reset. The hardware document says it is the GIO reset despite LD20
has no GIO bus, confusingly.
Also, fix confusing comments for PXs3.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
For LD20, the bit 5 of the offset 0x200c turned out to be a USB3
reset. The hardware document says it is the GIO reset despite LD20
has no GIO bus, confusingly.
Also, fix confusing comments for PXs3.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c | 6 +++---
1 file
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which does not sleep for allocation.
On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which does not sleep for allocation.
Hi Joel,
On 4/11/2018 4:52 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
On 11 April 2018 at 04:02, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds a dt-bindings document of PECI adapter driver for Aspeed
We try to capitalise ASPEED.
Got it. Will capitalize all Aspeed words.
AST24xx/25xx
Hi Joel,
On 4/11/2018 4:52 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
On 11 April 2018 at 04:02, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds a dt-bindings document of PECI adapter driver for Aspeed
We try to capitalise ASPEED.
Got it. Will capitalize all Aspeed words.
AST24xx/25xx SoCs.
---
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:57:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:56:44PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Although all flavors of RCU are annotated correctly with lockdep
> > annotations as recursive read locks, the 'check' parameter for their
> > calls to lock_acquire()
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:57:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:56:44PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Although all flavors of RCU are annotated correctly with lockdep
> > annotations as recursive read locks, the 'check' parameter for their
> > calls to lock_acquire()
Hi Joel,
On 4/11/2018 4:52 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
Hi Jae,
On 11 April 2018 at 04:02, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds documents of generic PECI bus, adapter and client drivers.
Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo
Reviewed-by: Haiyue
Hi Joel,
On 4/11/2018 4:52 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
Hi Jae,
On 11 April 2018 at 04:02, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds documents of generic PECI bus, adapter and client drivers.
Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo
Reviewed-by: Haiyue Wang
Reviewed-by: James Feist
Reviewed-by: Vernon Mauery
Hello Joel,
Thanks for sharing your time. Please see my answers inline.
On 4/11/2018 4:51 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
Hello Jae,
On 11 April 2018 at 04:02, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds PECI adapter driver implementation for Aspeed
AST24xx/AST25xx.
The
Hello Joel,
Thanks for sharing your time. Please see my answers inline.
On 4/11/2018 4:51 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
Hello Jae,
On 11 April 2018 at 04:02, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
This commit adds PECI adapter driver implementation for Aspeed
AST24xx/AST25xx.
The driver is looking good!
It looks
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:29:40PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:31:09 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:07:52PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > ---
> > > It's not clear to me what the specific intent
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:29:40PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:31:09 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:07:52PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > ---
> > > It's not clear to me what the specific intent of the original commit
Hi Vivek,
On 2018/4/11 13:15, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Yisheng,
>
>
> On 4/11/2018 6:52 AM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> On 2018/4/10 21:14, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> Hi Yisheng,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I think we missed your question here.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:12 PM Yisheng Xie
Hi Vivek,
On 2018/4/11 13:15, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Yisheng,
>
>
> On 4/11/2018 6:52 AM, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> On 2018/4/10 21:14, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> Hi Yisheng,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I think we missed your question here.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:12 PM Yisheng Xie
1 - 100 of 2946 matches
Mail list logo