Introduce new Mellanox platform driver to allow access to Mellanox
programmable device register space trough sysfs interface.
The driver purpose is to provide sysfs interface for user space for the
registers essential for system control and monitoring.
The sets of registers for sysfs access are
Introduce new Mellanox platform driver to allow access to Mellanox
programmable device register space trough sysfs interface.
The driver purpose is to provide sysfs interface for user space for the
registers essential for system control and monitoring.
The sets of registers for sysfs access are
-Lechner/drm-tinydrm-new-dirver-for-ILI9341-displays/20180527-182036
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/ili9341.c:128:30: sparse: to
-Lechner/drm-tinydrm-new-dirver-for-ILI9341-displays/20180527-182036
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/ili9341.c:128:30: sparse: to
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> Thus commit f511c0b17b08 "Yes, people use FOLL_FORCE ;)"
>
> Side note, that very sam ecommit f511c0b17b08 is also the explanation for
> why the patch under discussion now seems broken.
>
> People really do
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> Thus commit f511c0b17b08 "Yes, people use FOLL_FORCE ;)"
>
> Side note, that very sam ecommit f511c0b17b08 is also the explanation for
> why the patch under discussion now seems broken.
>
> People really do use "write to /proc/self/mem" as
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 24 May 2018 14:19:18 +0200, Stefan Agner
wrote:
> On 24.05.2018 13:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> >
> > On Thu, 24 May 2018 13:30:14 +0200
> > Benjamin Lindqvist wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >> It seems
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 24 May 2018 14:19:18 +0200, Stefan Agner
wrote:
> On 24.05.2018 13:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> >
> > On Thu, 24 May 2018 13:30:14 +0200
> > Benjamin Lindqvist wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >> It seems to me that a probe similar to what the BootROM
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, 25 May 2018 00:56:23 +0200, Stefan Agner
wrote:
> On 24.05.2018 14:41, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2018 14:23:56 +0200
> > Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 24 May 2018 13:09:53 +0200
> >> Stefan Agner
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, 25 May 2018 00:56:23 +0200, Stefan Agner
wrote:
> On 24.05.2018 14:41, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2018 14:23:56 +0200
> > Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 24 May 2018 13:09:53 +0200
> >> Stefan Agner wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 24.05.2018 10:56, Boris
/drm-tinydrm-new-dirver-for-ILI9341-displays/20180527-182036
config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/g
/drm-tinydrm-new-dirver-for-ILI9341-displays/20180527-182036
config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/g
/drm-tinydrm-new-dirver-for-ILI9341-displays/20180527-182036
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0
reproduce:
wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
/drm-tinydrm-new-dirver-for-ILI9341-displays/20180527-182036
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0
reproduce:
wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
Assign a label to latch1 GPIO device the LEDs hang off, enumerate its
pins for the purpose of indexing gpio_led table, remove hardcoded GPIO
numbers from that table replacing them with invalid GPIO numbers and
remove initialization of incompletely described LED device from
machine_init.
As soon
Before the board level GPIO handling is converted from GPIO numbers to
GPIO descriptors, split late_init() into functional blocks and move
them to separate functions.
While being at it, drop machine type check from late_init() - the
function is now called from the board init_late callback so
Assign a label to latch1 GPIO device the LEDs hang off, enumerate its
pins for the purpose of indexing gpio_led table, remove hardcoded GPIO
numbers from that table replacing them with invalid GPIO numbers and
remove initialization of incompletely described LED device from
machine_init.
As soon
Before the board level GPIO handling is converted from GPIO numbers to
GPIO descriptors, split late_init() into functional blocks and move
them to separate functions.
While being at it, drop machine type check from late_init() - the
function is now called from the board init_late callback so
Hi Abhishek,
On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:51:43 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
wrote:
> This patch does minor code reorganization for raw reads.
> Currently the raw read is required for complete page but for
> subsequent patches related with erased codeword bit flips
> detection, only
Hi Abhishek,
On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:51:43 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
wrote:
> This patch does minor code reorganization for raw reads.
> Currently the raw read is required for complete page but for
> subsequent patches related with erased codeword bit flips
> detection, only few CW should be read.
Just keep it same with u_int64_t defined in mkfs/f2fs_format.c, and
c.start_sector * c.sector_size
may be u32 overflow, so add (u_int64_t) before c.start_sector *
c.sector_size and change the target
value zone_align_start_offset to (u_int64_t).
On 2018/5/26 19:27, Junling Zheng wrote:
No neet
Just keep it same with u_int64_t defined in mkfs/f2fs_format.c, and
c.start_sector * c.sector_size
may be u32 overflow, so add (u_int64_t) before c.start_sector *
c.sector_size and change the target
value zone_align_start_offset to (u_int64_t).
On 2018/5/26 19:27, Junling Zheng wrote:
No neet
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
Signed-off-by: Sankalp Negi
---
drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
Signed-off-by: Sankalp Negi
---
drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c
There is a difference between error messages in iptables and
iptables-compat:
#sudo iptables-compat -D INPUT 4
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
#sudo iptables -D INPUT 4
iptables: Index of deletion too big.
Now, will show same error message.
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal
There is a difference between error messages in iptables and
iptables-compat:
#sudo iptables-compat -D INPUT 4
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
#sudo iptables -D INPUT 4
iptables: Index of deletion too big.
Now, will show same error message.
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal
---
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:16:24AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 25-05-18 08:17:15, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:43:41PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > +FS/IO code then simply calls the appropriate save function right at the
> > > +layer where a lock taken
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:16:24AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 25-05-18 08:17:15, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:43:41PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > +FS/IO code then simply calls the appropriate save function right at the
> > > +layer where a lock taken
On 27 May 2018 at 10:37, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
wrote:
>> > One more question again, if we are sure that non-blocking variants
>> > will _always_ be called in atomic context, then, we got it covered.
>> > Because, in
>> > set_variable() and query_variable_info()
On 27 May 2018 at 10:37, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
wrote:
>> > One more question again, if we are sure that non-blocking variants
>> > will _always_ be called in atomic context, then, we got it covered.
>> > Because, in
>> > set_variable() and query_variable_info() (both blocking and
>> >
/ASoC-AMD-make-channel-1-dma-as-circular/20180527-170008
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
for-next
config: i386-randconfig-s0-201821 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.4.0-9) 6.4.0 20171026
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux
/ASoC-AMD-make-channel-1-dma-as-circular/20180527-170008
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
for-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-x014-201821 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build
/ASoC-AMD-make-channel-1-dma-as-circular/20180527-170008
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
for-next
config: i386-randconfig-s0-201821 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.4.0-9) 6.4.0 20171026
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux
/ASoC-AMD-make-channel-1-dma-as-circular/20180527-170008
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
for-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-x014-201821 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build
Hello.
It was discovered during strace development that struct bpf_map_info and
struct bpf_prog_info now have different layouts of i386/compat and x86_64.
Since it's already broken and bpf syscall has no separate compat (as
far as I can see), and the affecting change was introduced recently (in
Use __aligned_u64 instead of __u64 everywhere in the UAPI header,
similarly to v4.17-rc1~94^2~58^2 "RDMA: Change all uapi headers to use
__aligned_u64 instead of __u64".
This commit doesn't change structure layouts, but imposes additional
alignment requirements on struct bpf_stack_build_id,
Recent introduction of netns_dev/netns_ino to bpf_map_info/bpf_prog info
has broken compat, as offsets of these fields are different in 32-bit
and 64-bit ABIs. One fix (other than implementing compat support in
syscall in order to handle this discrepancy) is to use __aligned_u64
instead of __u64
Hello.
It was discovered during strace development that struct bpf_map_info and
struct bpf_prog_info now have different layouts of i386/compat and x86_64.
Since it's already broken and bpf syscall has no separate compat (as
far as I can see), and the affecting change was introduced recently (in
Use __aligned_u64 instead of __u64 everywhere in the UAPI header,
similarly to v4.17-rc1~94^2~58^2 "RDMA: Change all uapi headers to use
__aligned_u64 instead of __u64".
This commit doesn't change structure layouts, but imposes additional
alignment requirements on struct bpf_stack_build_id,
Recent introduction of netns_dev/netns_ino to bpf_map_info/bpf_prog info
has broken compat, as offsets of these fields are different in 32-bit
and 64-bit ABIs. One fix (other than implementing compat support in
syscall in order to handle this discrepancy) is to use __aligned_u64
instead of __u64
The kernel IR decoders (drivers/media/rc/ir-*-decoder.c) support the most
widely used IR protocols, but there are many protocols which are not
supported[1]. For example, the lirc-remotes[2] repo has over 2700 remotes,
many of which are not supported by rc-core. There is a "long tail" of
Add support for BPF_PROG_LIRC_MODE2. This type of BPF program can call
rc_keydown() to reported decoded IR scancodes, or rc_repeat() to report
that the last key should be repeated.
The bpf program can be attached to using the bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH) syscall;
the target_fd must be the /dev/lircN
The kernel IR decoders (drivers/media/rc/ir-*-decoder.c) support the most
widely used IR protocols, but there are many protocols which are not
supported[1]. For example, the lirc-remotes[2] repo has over 2700 remotes,
many of which are not supported by rc-core. There is a "long tail" of
Add support for BPF_PROG_LIRC_MODE2. This type of BPF program can call
rc_keydown() to reported decoded IR scancodes, or rc_repeat() to report
that the last key should be repeated.
The bpf program can be attached to using the bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH) syscall;
the target_fd must be the /dev/lircN
This is simple test over rc-loopback.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song
Signed-off-by: Sean Young
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 +
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h| 53 -
tools/include/uapi/linux/lirc.h | 217
This is simple test over rc-loopback.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song
Signed-off-by: Sean Young
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 1 +
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h| 53 -
tools/include/uapi/linux/lirc.h | 217 ++
This makes is it possible for bpf prog detach to return -ENOENT.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song
Signed-off-by: Sean Young
---
kernel/bpf/core.c| 11 +--
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
This makes is it possible for bpf prog detach to return -ENOENT.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song
Signed-off-by: Sean Young
---
kernel/bpf/core.c| 11 +--
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c
Al Viro 于2018年5月27日周日 上午1:12写道:
> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:33:40AM +0800, Lei Chen wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I'm insteresting in how hard link and denry lookup work and their
> > implementation.
> >
> > I know that this interface tries to connect an inode to a
Al Viro 于2018年5月27日周日 上午1:12写道:
> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:33:40AM +0800, Lei Chen wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I'm insteresting in how hard link and denry lookup work and their
> > implementation.
> >
> > I know that this interface tries to connect an inode to a dentry, but
> > why does it
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> In the case consumer device is runtime resumed, while the link to the
> supplier is removed, the earlier call to pm_runtime_get_sync() made from
> rpm_get_suppliers() does not get properly balanced with a corresponding
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> In the case consumer device is runtime resumed, while the link to the
> supplier is removed, the earlier call to pm_runtime_get_sync() made from
> rpm_get_suppliers() does not get properly balanced with a corresponding
> call to
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Patrick Bellasi
wrote:
> Since the refactoring introduced by:
>
>commit 8f111bc357aa ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support")
>
> we aggregate FAIR utilization only if this class has runnable tasks.
> This was mainly due to
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Patrick Bellasi
wrote:
> Since the refactoring introduced by:
>
>commit 8f111bc357aa ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support")
>
> we aggregate FAIR utilization only if this class has runnable tasks.
> This was mainly due to avoid the risk to stay on
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> FFS (firmware-first) handling through APEI seems to have developed a
> policy to panic() on any fatal errors. This policy is completely
> independent of the non-FFS case. It is also inconsistent with how the
>
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> FFS (firmware-first) handling through APEI seems to have developed a
> policy to panic() on any fatal errors. This policy is completely
> independent of the non-FFS case. It is also inconsistent with how the
> native error handlers, a
On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:34:23 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We can't call regmap_irq_get_virq() unless the regmap-irq support
> is enabled:
>
> drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.o: In function `sun4i_irq_init':
> sun4i-gpadc-iio.c:(.text+0x59c): undefined reference to
On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:34:23 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We can't call regmap_irq_get_virq() unless the regmap-irq support
> is enabled:
>
> drivers/iio/adc/sun4i-gpadc-iio.o: In function `sun4i_irq_init':
> sun4i-gpadc-iio.c:(.text+0x59c): undefined reference to `regmap_irq_get_virq'
>
> I
The dump_header does not print the memcg's name when the system
oom happened, so users cannot locate the certain container which
contains the task that has been killed by the oom killer.
I follow the advices of David Rientjes and Michal Hocko, and refactor
part of the oom report in a backwards
The dump_header does not print the memcg's name when the system
oom happened, so users cannot locate the certain container which
contains the task that has been killed by the oom killer.
I follow the advices of David Rientjes and Michal Hocko, and refactor
part of the oom report in a backwards
On Thu, 24 May 2018 16:37:58 -0400
William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> This patch adds several register and bit defines to help improve the
> clarity of the code by cleaning up magic numbers throughout the driver
> source code.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray
On Thu, 24 May 2018 16:37:58 -0400
William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> This patch adds several register and bit defines to help improve the
> clarity of the code by cleaning up magic numbers throughout the driver
> source code.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray
Hi William
I'd prefer a
On Thu, 24 May 2018 16:37:46 -0400
William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> The reset flags operation is selected by bit 2 in the "Reset and Load
> Signals Decoders" register, not bit 1.
>
> Fixes: 28e5d3bb0325 ("iio: 104-quad-8: Add IIO support for the ACCES
> 104-QUAD-8")
>
On Thu, 24 May 2018 16:37:46 -0400
William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> The reset flags operation is selected by bit 2 in the "Reset and Load
> Signals Decoders" register, not bit 1.
>
> Fixes: 28e5d3bb0325 ("iio: 104-quad-8: Add IIO support for the ACCES
> 104-QUAD-8")
> Signed-off-by: William
Le 26/05/2018 à 20:27, Paul Menzel a écrit :
Dear Christophe,
Am 26.05.2018 um 18:02 schrieb christophe leroy:
Le 26/05/2018 à 06:35, Paul Menzel a écrit :
Building the configuration created with `make tinyconfig` on the
Power 8 system IBM S822LC with Ubuntu 18.04 fails with the error
Le 26/05/2018 à 20:27, Paul Menzel a écrit :
Dear Christophe,
Am 26.05.2018 um 18:02 schrieb christophe leroy:
Le 26/05/2018 à 06:35, Paul Menzel a écrit :
Building the configuration created with `make tinyconfig` on the
Power 8 system IBM S822LC with Ubuntu 18.04 fails with the error
2018-05-25 21:21 GMT+09:00 Abhishek Sahu :
> Use the NAND core helper function nand_ecc_choose_conf to tune
> the ECC parameters instead of the function locally defined.
>
> CC: Masahiro Yamada
You can replace the CC with my
Acked-by:
2018-05-25 21:21 GMT+09:00 Abhishek Sahu :
> Use the NAND core helper function nand_ecc_choose_conf to tune
> the ECC parameters instead of the function locally defined.
>
> CC: Masahiro Yamada
You can replace the CC with my
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada
> Acked-by: Miquel Raynal
>
On 2018-05-25 16:51, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> We think the best way is to keep LCD on DDR Ports 2 and 3 (8th and 9th
> slaves), to have maximum bandwidth and to use DMA on DDR port 1 for NAND
> (7th slave).
Exactly how do I accomplish that?
I can see how I can move the LCD between slave DDR port 2
On 2018-05-25 16:51, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> We think the best way is to keep LCD on DDR Ports 2 and 3 (8th and 9th
> slaves), to have maximum bandwidth and to use DMA on DDR port 1 for NAND
> (7th slave).
Exactly how do I accomplish that?
I can see how I can move the LCD between slave DDR port 2
On Wed May 23 18, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:30:32PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
On Mon Mar 26 18, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> commands, migrate tpm2_shutdown() to use it. In addition, removed
On Wed May 23 18, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:30:32PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
On Mon Mar 26 18, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> commands, migrate tpm2_shutdown() to use it. In addition, removed
Hi Linus,
Please pull a little more Kbuild fixes for v4.17
Thanks.
The following changes since commit 75bc37fefc4471e718ba8e651aa74673d4e0a9eb:
Linux 4.17-rc4 (2018-05-06 16:57:38 -1000)
are available in the git repository at:
Hi Linus,
Please pull a little more Kbuild fixes for v4.17
Thanks.
The following changes since commit 75bc37fefc4471e718ba8e651aa74673d4e0a9eb:
Linux 4.17-rc4 (2018-05-06 16:57:38 -1000)
are available in the git repository at:
> > One more question again, if we are sure that non-blocking variants
> > will _always_ be called in atomic context, then, we got it covered.
> > Because, in
> > set_variable() and query_variable_info() (both blocking and
> > non-blocking) we check for in_atomic() and if so, we don't use
> > One more question again, if we are sure that non-blocking variants
> > will _always_ be called in atomic context, then, we got it covered.
> > Because, in
> > set_variable() and query_variable_info() (both blocking and
> > non-blocking) we check for in_atomic() and if so, we don't use
Hi Matti,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
From: kbuild test robot
drivers/clk/clk-bd71837.c:145:6-11: No need to set .owner here. The core will
do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
Fixes: 0e03c7b6a3c7 ("clk:
Hi Matti,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
From: kbuild test robot
drivers/clk/clk-bd71837.c:145:6-11: No need to set .owner here. The core will
do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
Fixes: 0e03c7b6a3c7 ("clk: bd71837: Build ROHM
On 27 May 2018 at 07:32, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
wrote:
>> > Assume some user requested to execute some non-blocking variant of
>> > efi_rts and the kernel hasn't called efi_call_virt() yet, but was
>> > scheduled out. IOW, even though user requests for non-blocking
On 27 May 2018 at 07:32, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
wrote:
>> > Assume some user requested to execute some non-blocking variant of
>> > efi_rts and the kernel hasn't called efi_call_virt() yet, but was
>> > scheduled out. IOW, even though user requests for non-blocking efi call, we
>> might still
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:30:46AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/24/18 10:53 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:45:48AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patchset brings multipage bvec into block layer:
> >
> > patch series looks sane to me. goddamn that's a
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:30:46AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/24/18 10:53 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:45:48AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patchset brings multipage bvec into block layer:
> >
> > patch series looks sane to me. goddamn that's a
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 07:48:47AM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:56:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:33:59PM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson
> >
> > I can't take
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 07:48:47AM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:56:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:33:59PM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson
> >
> > I can't take patches without any changelog
-Wangtao/cpufreq-reinitialize-new-policy-min-max-when-writing-scaling_-max-min-_freq/20180527-132510
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git
linux-next
config: i386-randconfig-x079-201821 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce
-Wangtao/cpufreq-reinitialize-new-policy-min-max-when-writing-scaling_-max-min-_freq/20180527-132510
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git
linux-next
config: i386-randconfig-x079-201821 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce
301 - 388 of 388 matches
Mail list logo