Nope ?
Then what you say about this patch:
http://landley.net/hg/aboriginal/rev/086e1ff5dd19 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please r
Do you have this hardware ? And did you test this ?
How can you cc stable without an Tested by somebody else ?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Mark Einon wrote:
> Fix two reported bugs, caused by et131x_adapter->phydev->addr being accessed
> before it is initialised, by:
>
> - letting et131x_m
Wow MZ ? EXE for MSDOS and Windows ???
After more research, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable
[quote]PE is a modified version of the Unix COFF (Common Object File
Format).[/quote]
How can anyone be sure that Microsoft will not sue about this ?
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Vive
This sounds like an an math problem ( for Donald Knuth :) )
You need to think out of the box, present the problem right is just
the fist step and an big one.
Then you need to come with an formal algorithm to solve it, then proof it.
Next step is to code that algorithm and verify that is working in
Can you help debian people (on the testing realm) to test this on all
architectures ?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
>>
>>
>> The util-linux release v2.25 is available at
>>
>>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.25
>>
>> Feedback and bug
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Benjamin Valentin
wrote:
> Am Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:42:05 -0700
> schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman :
>
>> For staging drivers I need a maintainer that is going to take the time
>> to shephard it into the core kernel tree. See other TODO files for
>> how that person is def
Why do not use div_u64() ?
[quote]unsigned 64bit divide with 32bit divisor
This is the most common 64bit divide and should be used if possible,
as many 32bit archs can optimize this variant better than a full 64bit
divide.
[/quote]
> - ep->credit += timespec_to_ns(&delta) / NSEC_PE
Sarah Sharp: ok, the obvious: there are trolls, and some of them got to you.
They are and will try to make you a troll also. ( the evil come to you
with "good" intentions )
My advice: stick to technical problems.
You are used to start an flamewar.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Sarah Sharp
wr
The relevant maintainers do not get a copy of this.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> JFYI, when comparing v3.10-rc5 to v3.10-rc4[3], the summaries are:
>> - build errors: +19/-10
>> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/
Regresions:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_310_f2fs&num=3
The most notable one is PostgreSQL pgbench v8.4.11
Transactions per second: 3032 in kernel 3.9
down to 832 in kernel 3.10-rc1
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> I've rebased one o
Linus, will you help to the project ?
Talk to Linaro guys.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:46 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:47 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > IIRC Windows support for kmvtool is work in progress - some
>> >
[quote]the ultimate goal being to make this new socket family
hypervisor-neutral[/quote]
That was from vmware.
If somebody will make something generic, to please xen, kvm, vmware,
and others in an 15 to 20 years time...
Then a tool like this will be accepted ?
Linus, you know this tool was only fo
ping ?
Rob, if nobody thake your patches then you must ping it to relevant
maintainers to be included in next.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote:
> Before 2.6.25 building Linux never required perl. This patch series removes
> the requirement from basic kernel builds (tested on i686, x86_64,
Joe, read lkml and decide after that.
I fully apove the pathch.
Reviewed-by: Anca Emanuel
Review-requested-by: Joe Perches
Comments:
You have 3 kernels to maintain as stable, plus drivers, plus etc.
If somebody post something without reading the docs, and you have to
repeat to them the same
Spark mantainer ?
"To make this mail fit in the lkml limit, I deleted
- 3996 lines about __mcount_loc on sparc64"
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> JFYI, when comparing v3.8-rc3 to v3.8-rc2[3], the summaries are:
>>
Hi Linus,
An early prototype of this:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Specs/flash-file-system-prototype
Are you still testing it ?
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> I'm seeing that f2fs has not been merged yet.
> Could you give me any notice for th
Oh, you need more testing with ARM Nexus 7 ?
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Anca Emanuel wrote:
> Do will see this in Raring ?
> And when ?
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:27 PM, James Hunt wrote:
>> Summary of changes:
>>
>> * Improved re-exec performance.
>>
Do will see this in Raring ?
And when ?
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:27 PM, James Hunt wrote:
> Summary of changes:
>
> * Improved re-exec performance.
> * Minor logger fixes for unflushed data.
> * Handle re-exec scenario when requested from within a chroot.
> * Minor serialisation data format chan
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Looks like CONFIG_NUMA=y exposes explosions. I just noticed that none
> of the machines which are in my basic set of test systems have that
> enabled.
>
> /me goes to do some homework
Try
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/6b187d0
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:42 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Anca Emanuel wrote:
>
>> I have the same problem.
>> Reverting
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/957f822a0ab95e88b146638bad6209bbc315bedd
>> solves the problem for me.
>>
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in
> v3.6[1] compared to v3.5[2].
>
> To make this mail fit in the lkml limit, I deleted
> - 6008 lines about __mcount_loc on sparc64
>
> Summarized:
> - build errors:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
> Where can we get a powertop-2.1? I searched google and found
> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/status/powertop/powertop.git
> is null now.
https://01.org/powertop/
https://01.org/powertop/sites/default/files/downloads/powertop-2.1.tar.gz
22 matches
Mail list logo