On 10/27/20 1:22 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2020-10-26 23:53:20 [-0700], Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I get a compilation error (see below)
when trying to do a debug build (building rpm packages for Fedora). 5.9.1 +
rt19...
Builds fine
On 10/21/20 6:14 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2020-10-21 14:53:27 [+0200], To Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v5.9.1-rt18 patch set.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I get a compilation error (see
below) when trying to do a debug build
On 10/27/2017 03:27 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.13.10-rt3 patch set.
Thanks!! Wonderful!
I'm seeing this (old Lenovo T510 running Fedora 26):
[ 54.942022]
[ 54.942023] WARNING:
On 10/27/2017 03:27 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.13.10-rt3 patch set.
Thanks!! Wonderful!
I'm seeing this (old Lenovo T510 running Fedora 26):
[ 54.942022]
[ 54.942023] WARNING:
On 07/25/2015 03:32 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.1.3-rt3 patch set.
...
I've had a few hangs with nothing left behind to debug... but today I
find this:
(NOTE: I'm attaching a file with the details, I don't know if my mailer
will
On 07/25/2015 03:32 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.1.3-rt3 patch set.
...
I've had a few hangs with nothing left behind to debug... but today I
find this:
(NOTE: I'm attaching a file with the details, I don't know if my mailer
will
On 06/09/2015 03:05 PM, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
09.06.2015 19:45, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano пишет:
This is still happening, about once a day. John Dulaney help me set up a
crash kernel dump (thanks!) so now I have a kernel core dump for this
one,
Asus,Fedora,CGROUPS, iptables,snd_ac97,radeon
On 05/28/2015 06:56 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Oh well. Second time the machine hangs in two days in the same way
(otherwise very stable running 3.18.x-rty)
(this is a bumblebee + bbswitch graphics laptop - argh, if I had known
better...)
May 28 18:49:21 localhost kernel
On 05/28/2015 06:56 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Oh well. Second time the machine hangs in two days in the same way
(otherwise very stable running 3.18.x-rty)
(this is a bumblebee + bbswitch graphics laptop - argh, if I had known
better...)
May 28 18:49:21 localhost kernel
On 06/09/2015 03:05 PM, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
09.06.2015 19:45, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano пишет:
This is still happening, about once a day. John Dulaney help me set up a
crash kernel dump (thanks!) so now I have a kernel core dump for this
one,
Asus,Fedora,CGROUPS, iptables,snd_ac97,radeon
On 05/26/2015 12:41 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 05/26/2015 08:43 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 11:19:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:48:02 -0500
Clark Williams wrote:
Change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_NORT
Do we have a WARN_ON_NORT? I see
On 05/26/2015 12:41 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 05/26/2015 08:43 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 11:19:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:48:02 -0500
Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
Change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_NORT
On 05/26/2015 08:43 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 11:19:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:48:02 -0500
Clark Williams wrote:
Change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_NORT
Do we have a WARN_ON_NORT? I see a WARN_ON_NONRT, but not a
WARN_ON_NORT. Does this compile?
On 05/26/2015 08:43 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 11:19:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:48:02 -0500
Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
Change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_NORT
Do we have a WARN_ON_NORT? I see a WARN_ON_NONRT, but
On 05/19/2015 02:39 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.0.4-rt1 patch set.
Great!!
Changes since v3.18.13-rt10
- Rebase to v4.0.
- David Hildenbrand's series of decouple of preempt_disable from
pagefault_disable is part of the series.
On 05/19/2015 02:39 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.0.4-rt1 patch set.
Great!!
Changes since v3.18.13-rt10
- Rebase to v4.0.
- David Hildenbrand's series of decouple of preempt_disable from
pagefault_disable is part of the series.
On 05/02/2014 04:37 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano | 2014-04-26 11:29:04 [-0700]:
Saw this a moment ago (3.14.1 + rt1, Fedora 19 laptop - I think I
have seen something similar in 3.12.x-r):
Yes, you did: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/163
You did not test I've
On 05/02/2014 04:37 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano | 2014-04-26 11:29:04 [-0700]:
Saw this a moment ago (3.14.1 + rt1, Fedora 19 laptop - I think I
have seen something similar in 3.12.x-r):
Yes, you did: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/163
You did not test I've
On 04/11/2014 11:57 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.14-rt1 patch setty).
Changes since v3.12.15-rt25
- I dropped the sparc64 patches I had in the queue. They did not apply
cleanly, the code in v3.14 changed in the MMU area. Here is where I
On 04/11/2014 11:57 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.14-rt1 patch setty).
Changes since v3.12.15-rt25
- I dropped the sparc64 patches I had in the queue. They did not apply
cleanly, the code in v3.14 changed in the MMU area. Here is where I
On 02/14/2014 02:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 02/14/2014 02:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 02/13/2014 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
[771508.546449] RIP: 0010:[] []
smp_call_function_many+0x2ca/0x330
Can you decode the exact
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
[771508.546449] RIP: 0010:[] []
smp_call_function_many+0x2ca/0x330
Can you decode the exact location inside of smp_call_function_many via
addr2line please ?
Hope this is useful (adding 0x2ce
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
[771508.546449] RIP: 0010:[810dc60a] [810dc60a]
smp_call_function_many+0x2ca/0x330
Can you decode the exact location inside of smp_call_function_many via
addr2line please
On 02/13/2014 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
[771508.546449] RIP: 0010:[810dc60a] [810dc60a]
smp_call_function_many+0x2ca
Hi all,
I'm seeing these BUGs with 3.12.9-rt13 finally caught the messages.
I was getting frozen machines with no traces left behind, this could
possibly be it (see below - I have to retest with rt15)
-- Fernando
[771508.546420] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 23s!
Hi all,
I'm seeing these BUGs with 3.12.9-rt13 finally caught the messages.
I was getting frozen machines with no traces left behind, this could
possibly be it (see below - I have to retest with rt15)
-- Fernando
[771508.546420] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 23s!
Hi all,
Just got this on 3.10.20-rt17, ThinkPad T510 running Fedora 19 (I think
it has happened a few times before). The machine is not completely dead,
the mouse pointer moves around but otherwise display updates and
keyboard response are nil.
-- Fernando
Nov 29 23:17:52
Hi all,
Just got this on 3.10.20-rt17, ThinkPad T510 running Fedora 19 (I think
it has happened a few times before). The machine is not completely dead,
the mouse pointer moves around but otherwise display updates and
keyboard response are nil.
-- Fernando
Nov 29 23:17:52
On 08/23/2013 10:56 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano | 2013-08-23 10:18:08 [-0700]:
Please post a patch when/if you have it so I can retry the build...
Thanks for taking a look at this!
Does this fix your trobule?
Yes, it does, thanks! Builds, installs
On 08/23/2013 12:08 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/23/2013 07:50 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 08/22/2013 11:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
- hwlat improvements by Steven
Known issues:
...
Trying to build I get (in make modules):
ERROR: "__udivdi3" [dr
On 08/23/2013 12:08 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/23/2013 07:50 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 08/22/2013 11:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
- hwlat improvements by Steven
Known issues:
...
Trying to build I get (in make modules):
ERROR: __udivdi3 [drivers/misc
On 08/23/2013 10:56 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano | 2013-08-23 10:18:08 [-0700]:
Please post a patch when/if you have it so I can retry the build...
Thanks for taking a look at this!
Does this fix your trobule?
Yes, it does, thanks! Builds, installs
On 08/22/2013 11:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.9-rt5 patch set.
Thanks!,
Changes since v3.10.9-rt4
- swait fixes from Steven. It fixed the issues with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
where the system suddenly froze and RCU wasn't doing its
On 08/22/2013 11:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.9-rt5 patch set.
Thanks!,
Changes since v3.10.9-rt4
- swait fixes from Steven. It fixed the issues with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
where the system suddenly froze and RCU wasn't doing its
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says that it is wrong to use
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says that it is wrong to use
On 08/16/2013 12:01 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/15/2013 09:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:42:55 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set
On 08/16/2013 12:01 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/15/2013 09:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:42:55 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote:
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
I'm getting this when trying to build:
drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'cached_dev_write_complete':
drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1008:2: error: implicit
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
I'm getting this when trying to build:
drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'cached_dev_write_complete':
drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1008:2: error: implicit
On 11/15/2012 10:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
not announced update release to 3.6.6.
Got this:
net
On 11/15/2012 10:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
not announced update release to 3.6.6.
Got this:
net
On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
not announced update release to 3.6.6.
Got this:
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c: In function 'nfc_llcp_register_device':
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c:1185:24: error: expected
On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
not announced update release to 3.6.6.
Got this:
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c: In function 'nfc_llcp_register_device':
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c:1185:24: error: expected
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ingo... back to testing.
> > > History:
> > &
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo... back to testing.
> > History:
> >
> > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications.
> > 2.6.24-r
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... back to testing.
History:
2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... back to testing.
History:
2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications.
2.6.24-rt1: same so far.
Why: Jack keeps printing
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > &
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it doesn't still getting delay and xrun messages galore
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun" messages galore.
> >
> > Attached: configuration and dmesg output boo
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ingo, I was about to post about timer problems in 2.6.23.9+rt12 when I
> > saw this. Would this be related / should I test / will this solve
> > eve
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus, please pull the latest x86 git tree from:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git
>
> This contains 3 x86/hrtimer/hpet/ACPI fixes from Thomas: the ACPI fix
> has been ACK-ed by Venki. Build and
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Linus, please pull the latest x86 git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git
This contains 3 x86/hrtimer/hpet/ACPI fixes from Thomas: the ACPI fix
has been ACK-ed by Venki. Build and boot
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo, I was about to post about timer problems in 2.6.23.9+rt12 when I
saw this. Would this be related / should I test / will this solve
everything? :-)
What I'm seeing is jack
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it doesn't still getting delay and xrun messages galore.
Attached: configuration and dmesg output booting with idle=poll,
reconfirmed that that makes the delay and xrun
> I'll try rt12...
>
> Same problems in rt12, getting lots of "delay of xxx usecs exceeds
> estimated spare time of ; restart" in jackd (on my T61 Lenovo laptop
> running fc7). Does not happen with 2.6.22.10 + rt9. This is both with
> the internal snd-hda-intel card and a pcmcia rme hdsp
I'll try rt12...
Same problems in rt12, getting lots of delay of xxx usecs exceeds
estimated spare time of ; restart in jackd (on my T61 Lenovo laptop
running fc7). Does not happen with 2.6.22.10 + rt9. This is both with
the internal snd-hda-intel card and a pcmcia rme hdsp multiface.
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 17:02 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> Hi Ingo... any hope of an updated realtime patch for 2.6.22.14? I'm
> having problems with 2.6.23.1 + rt11 (I spent the morning rediffing
> agains 2.6.23.9 and just _now_ pressed reload in my browser and there it
>
Hi Ingo... any hope of an updated realtime patch for 2.6.22.14? I'm
having problems with 2.6.23.1 + rt11 (I spent the morning rediffing
agains 2.6.23.9 and just _now_ pressed reload in my browser and there it
is..., rt12 for 2.6.23.9!, argh! :-) and wanted to compare with 2.6.22.x
and the latest I
Hi Ingo... any hope of an updated realtime patch for 2.6.22.14? I'm
having problems with 2.6.23.1 + rt11 (I spent the morning rediffing
agains 2.6.23.9 and just _now_ pressed reload in my browser and there it
is..., rt12 for 2.6.23.9!, argh! :-) and wanted to compare with 2.6.22.x
and the latest I
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 17:02 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... any hope of an updated realtime patch for 2.6.22.14? I'm
having problems with 2.6.23.1 + rt11 (I spent the morning rediffing
agains 2.6.23.9 and just _now_ pressed reload in my browser and there it
is..., rt12
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 12:55 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:42 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:12 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > &g
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:42 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:12 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from some of my Planet CCRMA users (which
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:42 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:12 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from some of my Planet CCRMA users (which
I confirmed) that the latest
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 12:55 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:42 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:12 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from
Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from some of my Planet CCRMA users (which
I confirmed) that the latest rt kernel I released has broken suspend
(tested on fc6 & fc7, stock Fedora kernel works fine - the rt
configuration files are virtual clones as far as possible of the
standard Fedora kernel config
Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from some of my Planet CCRMA users (which
I confirmed) that the latest rt kernel I released has broken suspend
(tested on fc6 fc7, stock Fedora kernel works fine - the rt
configuration files are virtual clones as far as possible of the
standard Fedora kernel config
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo, I'm forwading this report from a Planet CCRMA user, this is
> > happening to him with 2.6.21.6-rt21...
>
> thanks!
Thanks for the patch!
L
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo, I'm forwading this report from a Planet CCRMA user, this is
happening to him with 2.6.21.6-rt21...
thanks!
Thanks for the patch!
Looks like it fixed the problem Matt
Hi Ingo, I'm forwading this report from a Planet CCRMA user, this is
happening to him with 2.6.21.6-rt21...
-- Fernando
Forwarded Message
From: Matt Barber
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PlanetCCRMA] atl1 driver; sleeping function
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:09:58 -0400
Hello,
Hi Ingo, I'm forwading this report from a Planet CCRMA user, this is
happening to him with 2.6.21.6-rt21...
-- Fernando
Forwarded Message
From: Matt Barber
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PlanetCCRMA] atl1 driver; sleeping function
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:09:58 -0400
Hello,
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > apparently you caught that 3 seconds window where the .23-rc1-rt1
> > > release script moved old patches into the older/ directory :-)
> >
&g
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:05 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:34 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Ru
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:34 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Rui Nuno Capela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe I was too quick, but `make all` on is failing here:
> >
> > do
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rui Nuno Capela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe I was too quick, but `make all` on is failing here:
>
> does -rt6 work better?
Hmmm, -rt6 seems to be gone... was about to download it and it
dissapeared.
-- Fernando
-
To
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I was too quick, but `make all` on is failing here:
does -rt6 work better?
Hmmm, -rt6 seems to be gone... was about to download it and it
dissapeared.
-- Fernando
-
To unsubscribe
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:34 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I was too quick, but `make all` on is failing here:
does -rt6 work better?
Hmmm, -rt6 seems to be gone
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:05 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:34 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apparently you caught that 3 seconds window where the .23-rc1-rt1
release script moved old patches into the older/ directory :-)
Yup, good timing... :-) Hard to do again...
(BTW
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus, Christoph,
>
> recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
>
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
> Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
Just curious, are the crashes even possible in 2.6.22.1? (I see
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Linus, Christoph,
recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
Just curious, are the crashes even possible in 2.6.22.1? (I see the
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:18 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > does lockdep pinpoint anything?
> >
> > Lots of stuff, and at the end the lock report for the problem.
> > Hopefully some of this will h
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:18 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does lockdep pinpoint anything?
Lots of stuff, and at the end the lock report for the problem.
Hopefully some of this will help... I have attached the whole bootup
sequence
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > &g
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > &g
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
> > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
> > st
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
> > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
> > st
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
stock fedora 7 kernel - and both seem
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
stock fedora 7 kernel - and both seem
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:22 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> we are pleased to announce the v2.6.22.1-rt3 kernel
>
> Attention!
>
> Ingo is off for a long weekend and therefor the download location for
> this release is:
>
> http://www.tglx.de/projects/preempt-rt/2.6.22.1
>
> more info
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:22 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
we are pleased to announce the v2.6.22.1-rt3 kernel
Attention!
Ingo is off for a long weekend and therefor the download location for
this release is:
http://www.tglx.de/projects/preempt-rt/2.6.22.1
more info about the -rt
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 15:36 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 11:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Changes since 2.6.21.5-rt18:
> > > > >
> > > > > -
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 11:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Changes since 2.6.21.5-rt18:
> > > >
> > > > - Fixed a nasty and hard to track down slowness / boot problem on SMP
> > > >
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
