Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

2007-09-26 Thread Jonathan Campbell
Heh, well of course I vigoursly checked System.map. On my x86 and amd64 systems it removes them all. What a stupid question :-p Nope. I expect(ed) you to do that, i.e., make sure that the patch does that the description says that it does. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

2007-09-26 Thread Jonathan Campbell
Sorry about that. That's the reason I send them as attachments. Any suggestions for someone like myself using Mozilla Thunderbird? Damaged as the patch is, I was able to apply it by using 'patch -l' (ignore whitespace) + some fuzz. Not something that Linus or Andrew would or should do. I built

Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

2007-09-26 Thread Jonathan Campbell
Here is the DMI patch again, written against linux-2.6.23-rc8, with some of the #ifdef CONFIG_DMI's removed and moved to include/linux/dmi.h. Putting them there in the way I've done ensures that you don't have to put #ifdef CONFIG_DMI around each dmi_check_machine() and that you don't have to

Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

2007-09-26 Thread Jonathan Campbell
Here is the DMI patch again, written against linux-2.6.23-rc8, with some of the #ifdef CONFIG_DMI's removed and moved to include/linux/dmi.h. Putting them there in the way I've done ensures that you don't have to put #ifdef CONFIG_DMI around each dmi_check_machine() and that you don't have to

Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

2007-09-26 Thread Jonathan Campbell
Sorry about that. That's the reason I send them as attachments. Any suggestions for someone like myself using Mozilla Thunderbird? Damaged as the patch is, I was able to apply it by using 'patch -l' (ignore whitespace) + some fuzz. Not something that Linus or Andrew would or should do. I built

Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

2007-09-26 Thread Jonathan Campbell
Heh, well of course I vigoursly checked System.map. On my x86 and amd64 systems it removes them all. What a stupid question :-p Nope. I expect(ed) you to do that, i.e., make sure that the patch does that the description says that it does. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

2007-09-24 Thread Jonathan Campbell
Sorry for the long delay, been very busy since I last posted the 386 kernel patches back in July. Now that I have more free time I remade the patches in a cleaner manner, broken down into smaller patches, with fewer #ifdefs all over the place. most #ifdefs are in the include/asm-i386 headers

[PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

2007-09-24 Thread Jonathan Campbell
Sorry for the long delay, been very busy since I last posted the 386 kernel patches back in July. Now that I have more free time I remade the patches in a cleaner manner, broken down into smaller patches, with fewer #ifdefs all over the place. most #ifdefs are in the include/asm-i386 headers