.Jorge Nerin wrote:
> Hello, today I got an Oops in 2.4.4-ac6, X crashed and gdm restarted,
> my system is a dual 2x200MMX, 96Mb, Voodoo 3 2000pci XFree 4.0.3, no drm.
>
In reply to myself I must add this series of Oopses and invalid operands
to my mail, also on 2.4.4.-ac6.
T
.Jorge Nerin wrote:
Hello, today I got an Oops in 2.4.4-ac6, X crashed and gdm restarted,
my system is a dual 2x200MMX, 96Mb, Voodoo 3 2000pci XFree 4.0.3, no drm.
In reply to myself I must add this series of Oopses and invalid operands
to my mail, also on 2.4.4.-ac6.
The system was runing
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
>> Short version:
>> Under very heavy thrashing (about four hours) the system either lockups
>> or OOM handler kills a task even when there is swap space left.
>
>
> First of all,
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Jorge Nerin wrote:
Short version:
Under very heavy thrashing (about four hours) the system either lockups
or OOM handler kills a task even when there is swap space left.
First of all, please try to reproduce the problem with 2.4.5-pre1
there is a race in the swap handling in SMP, and that the OOM
doesn't take into account the swap space left sometimes.
I don't know what to try next, suggestions?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
there is a race in the swap handling in SMP, and that the OOM
doesn't take into account the swap space left sometimes.
I don't know what to try next, suggestions?
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
The way each program handles multiple conections is up to the program,
for example apache 1.3 and below does a fork(), mozilla does a
pthread_create(), BOA does a select() in only one process, and apache
2.0 and up does both a fork() and pthread_create().
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
multiple conections is up to the program,
for example apache 1.3 and below does a fork(), mozilla does a
pthread_create(), BOA does a select() in only one process, and apache
2.0 and up does both a fork() and pthread_create().
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Guest section DW wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:33:34PM +0200, Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
>
>> Hello, good work with 2.4.x, but I miss one thing. in early 2.3.x the MS
>> keys, you know, two flags and one "properties" key worked as navigation
>> keys in
ey put you on the last console you where before.
This was very useful when working in the console, I use the console
sometimes, and I miss these feature.
Is there a plan to put back these keys to work, or there was a problem
of some kind and this feature got dropped?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL P
VT I still see the contents of the first VT that I
switched from X.
Thanks for your patience.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at ht
ey put you on the last console you where before.
This was very useful when working in the console, I use the console
sometimes, and I miss these feature.
Is there a plan to put back these keys to work, or there was a problem
of some kind and this feature got dropped?
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED
still see the contents of the first VT that I
switched from X.
Thanks for your patience.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
Guest section DW wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:33:34PM +0200, Jorge Nerin wrote:
Hello, good work with 2.4.x, but I miss one thing. in early 2.3.x the MS
keys, you know, two flags and one "properties" key worked as navigation
keys in the console.
The flags get you to
dmsg+0/784]
[sock_sendmsg+129/164]
[unix_stream_sendmsg+0/784] [sock_readv_writev+140/152]
[sock_writev+54/64] [do_readv_writev+387/596] [sys_writev+65/84]
[system_call+55/64]
Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 0c 90 8d 74 26 00 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d 83 c4 0c c3
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
]
[unix_stream_sendmsg+0/784] [sock_readv_writev+140/152]
[sock_writev+54/64] [do_readv_writev+387/596] [sys_writev+65/84]
[system_call+55/64]
Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 0c 90 8d 74 26 00 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d 83 c4 0c c3
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
time
8:14pm up 4:30, 0 users, load average: 0.19, 0.11, 0.09
but my system works ok, mostly, now I have just upgraded a Realtek 8029
(10Mb) because it gets hung to a Realtek 8139 (100Mb) just to found the
mobo has some kind of busmastering problems, but that's another story.
P.D. And as you sug
.0-testX caused ne2k-pci to hang and remain
hanged until reboot.
System: Mb Gigabyte 586dx, 2x200MMX, 96Mb RAM,
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
586dx, 2x200MMX, 96Mb RAM,
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
> Linux version 2.4.0-test11-ac4 (root@ummagumma) (gcc
> version 2.95.3 19991030 (prerelease)) #1 Wed Dec 27
> 03:15:22 EST 2000
Try to compile with kgcc or egcs, gcc 2.95 is not a recommended
compiler, as it's know to miscompile somethings.
Search Makefile for HOSTCC
version 2.95.3 19991030 (prerelease)) #1 Wed Dec 27
03:15:22 EST 2000
Try to compile with kgcc or egcs, gcc 2.95 is not a recommended
compiler, as it's know to miscompile somethings.
Search Makefile for HOSTCC and CC and chage it if needed.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
roblem with my NIC : it has its MAC address set to
> 00:00:00:00:00:00 by default and I have to force it to its real MAC
> address specified in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0.
>
> I hope this report might be of any use for you (and for me ;-)
> Thanx
>
> -- Nono
&g
timed out, and something in the console about lost irq?
I can't reproduce it with a uniprocesor kernel, and I have a 3c503 card
wich uses the 8390 module, so I suppose that the problem it's not in the
8390, and it seems to be smp related.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this
.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
Thanks, I put it 2.4 because in the original doc it didn't say anything
about it, and I don't use a 2.2 kernel since a long time.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "
,
Geert
Thanks, I put it 2.4 because in the original doc it didn't say anything
about it, and I don't use a 2.2 kernel since a long time.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Are you sure you have enabled virtual terminal and console support in
character devices, and vga text console in console drivers?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
in console drivers?
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
but I'm not sure about this
fact.
The [un]compression mechanism could be a kernel thread calling a
userspace program (gzip, bzip2, definable) doing the actual
decompresion.
Don't know, just thoughts.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Don't know, just thoughts.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
> > Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and
>I have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have
>been told in lk, so I submit this i
@@
--
/proc/sys Terrehon Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>October 7 1999
Bodo Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+2.4.x update Jorge Nerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@@
--
/proc/sys Terrehon Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED]October 7 1999
Bodo Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+2.4.x update Jorge Nerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] November 14 2000
Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and
I have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have
been told in lk, so I submit this in order to include
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > Jorge Nerin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> > > file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> > > files in /
Jorge Nerin wrote:
Jorge Nerin wrote:
Jorge Nerin wrote:
Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/PID, new
files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn. It's
far
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> > file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> > files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_e
lock btrl $0x0,0x4(%eax)
Code; c01a66d1
11: 8d 4c 24 00 lea0x0(%esp,1),%ecx
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
mov0x350(%edi),%eax
Code; c01a66cb sock_wait_for_wmem+73/f4
b: f0 0f ba 70 04 00 lock btrl $0x0,0x4(%eax)
Code; c01a66d1 sock_wait_for_wmem+79/f4
11: 8d 4c 24 00 lea0x0(%esp,1),%ecx
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list
Jorge Nerin wrote:
Jorge Nerin wrote:
Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/PID, new
files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn. It's
far from complete, but it's
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn. It's
> far from complete, but it's a start
_ecn, if you want to talk to this sites. For more
info
+you could read RFC2481.
tcp_retrans_collapse
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
this sites. For more
info
+you could read RFC2481.
tcp_retrans_collapse
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Jorge Nerin wrote:
Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/PID, new
files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn. It's
far from complete, but it's a start point.
Well, netscape
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Well, I have tried it with 2.4.0-test10, both SMP and non-SMP, and the
> > > result is a little confusing.
> > >
> > > Under SMP a ping -s 5 -f other_host takes
Jorge Nerin wrote:
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Well, I have tried it with 2.4.0-test10, both SMP and non-SMP, and the
result is a little confusing.
Under SMP a ping -s 5 -f other_host takes down the network access
with no messages (ne2k-pci), and no possibility of being
previous msg it gave me BUG()s very early in the
tests, and I still had network access.
If someone has a better sugestion as a nic stress tool I can try it, but
now I only have two ways of reaching this limits, ping -f of big
packets, and sometimes (only 4 or 5) during a copy of a large file o
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > So I think that it could be a little window near sock_wait_for_wmem that
> > could be SMP insecure wich is affecting me.
> >
> > The code of sock_wait_for_wmem in 2.4.0-test10 is this:
> >
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok, I reported it several times, but it gets ignored. I have a Realtek
> > 8029 (ne2k-pci), and with both drivers ne and ne2k-pci I can easily get
> > it stuck by doing a ping -f to a host in the local
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Jorge Nerin wrote:
Ok, I reported it several times, but it gets ignored. I have a Realtek
8029 (ne2k-pci), and with both drivers ne and ne2k-pci I can easily get
it stuck by doing a ping -f to a host in the local net, and sometimes it
happens doing copies
eded to restore net access.
System is dual 2x200mmx 96Mb ide discs no interrupts shared, and as far
as I can remember all kernel from 2.2.x, 2.3.x up to 2.4.0-testx exhibit
this problem.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
ide discs no interrupts shared, and as far
as I can remember all kernel from 2.2.x, 2.3.x up to 2.4.0-testx exhibit
this problem.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
ts or gets the maximum socket receive buffer in
bytes. The default value is set by the rmem_default
sysctl and the maximum allowed value is set by the
rmem_max sysctl.
rmem_max defaults to 65535 perhaps you could try to increase this and
then use setsockop
lue is set by the rmem_default
sysctl and the maximum allowed value is set by the
rmem_max sysctl.
rmem_max defaults to 65535 perhaps you could try to increase this and
then use setsockopt in your receiving program.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this
ed to lockup the dual
machine by doing ifconfig up & down and insmod & rmmod, mostly because
the lack of documentation.
Thanks.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
at sometimes hungs, it
stops working, nothing in the logs, no more interrupts, no respond to
either ip or arp.
ifdown & ifup don't solve it, neither rmmod insmod (ne2k-pci, 8390), and
BTW a 3c503 in the same machine continues to work ok (8390 based also).
So, a silent drop off the net and no other so
interrupts, no respond to
either ip or arp.
ifdown ifup don't solve it, neither rmmod insmod (ne2k-pci, 8390), and
BTW a 3c503 in the same machine continues to work ok (8390 based also).
So, a silent drop off the net and no other solution than a reboot.
--
dwmw2
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Navaho Technologies Ltd. Tel: +44-870-7034015
Well I do have a 486dx2 (66Mhz-24Mb RAM) Root RAID 0 using three disks,
and as far as I can see there are no spikes and the box runs smoothly.
Perhaps it's a cron job or some daemon.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTE
-870-7034015
Well I do have a 486dx2 (66Mhz-24Mb RAM) Root RAID 0 using three disks,
and as far as I can see there are no spikes and the box runs smoothly.
Perhaps it's a cron job or some daemon.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
0 e7 21 c0 00 cmpb $0x0,0xc021e790
Code; c01df3ba
10: f3 90 repz nop
Code; c01df3bc
12: 7e f5 jle9 <_EIP+0x9> c01df3b3
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
sometime ago that this question or something
similar has been answered, but the infamous truncate but bit some of my
mailboxes and I can't find it.
I think that this can be done without even using the original tree, only
using the patches, but I cant find a way.
Thanks.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTEC
sometime ago that this question or something
similar has been answered, but the infamous truncate but bit some of my
mailboxes and I can't find it.
I think that this can be done without even using the original tree, only
using the patches, but I cant find a way.
Thanks.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED
or processes in zombie state or D state. If you can't kill them
perhaps you will need to reboot.
If it increases slowly it could be another thing, but if it increases
suddenly at a fixed time it could be a cron job.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubs
.
If it increases slowly it could be another thing, but if it increases
suddenly at a fixed time it could be a cron job.
--
Jorge Nerin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
63 matches
Mail list logo
