Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It also adds PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO to the flags which it didn't
> without the patch.
As an experiment I modified 2.6.20.4 to _only_ remove that value from
the combined value for the flags and it did not help in any noticeable
way. I can reliably boot and operate the
Greg KH wrote:
> Kevin, does 2.6.21-rc4 work properly for you?
No, it seems to exhibit the same behavior. However, I should note that
this laptop is not 100% stable under any kernel release anyway... in
text console mode it frequently locks up tight (although not with the
NVidia closed-source
I just upgraded from 2.6.20.2 to 2.6.20.4 on my Compaq V6000 laptop,
which has an NVidia core chipset. It has the MCP51 and uses it for PATA
and SATA.
Booting the 2.6.20.4 kernel causes two messages (and a kernel lockup)
like this:
:00:0d.0: cannot adjust BAR0 (not I/O)
:00:0d.0: cannot
I just upgraded from 2.6.20.2 to 2.6.20.4 on my Compaq V6000 laptop,
which has an NVidia core chipset. It has the MCP51 and uses it for PATA
and SATA.
Booting the 2.6.20.4 kernel causes two messages (and a kernel lockup)
like this:
:00:0d.0: cannot adjust BAR0 (not I/O)
:00:0d.0: cannot
Greg KH wrote:
Kevin, does 2.6.21-rc4 work properly for you?
No, it seems to exhibit the same behavior. However, I should note that
this laptop is not 100% stable under any kernel release anyway... in
text console mode it frequently locks up tight (although not with the
NVidia closed-source
Adrian Bunk wrote:
It also adds PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO to the flags which it didn't
without the patch.
As an experiment I modified 2.6.20.4 to _only_ remove that value from
the combined value for the flags and it did not help in any noticeable
way. I can reliably boot and operate the
Andrew Morton wrote:
- cachefs is a bit stuck because it's a ton of complex code and afs is
the only user of it. Wiring it up to NFS would help.
Yes, please! I have an application for CacheFS between an NFS client and
server (all Linux) very soon :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Andrew Morton wrote:
- cachefs is a bit stuck because it's a ton of complex code and afs is
the only user of it. Wiring it up to NFS would help.
Yes, please! I have an application for CacheFS between an NFS client and
server (all Linux) very soon :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
It's not too bad as you just hardlink most of the trees to their parent.
Yes, and disk space is cheap.
I think there is a setting to have them checked out for editing automatically.
Yes there is, plus most decent editors are SCCS-aware and will prompt
for a checkout when
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
It's not too bad as you just hardlink most of the trees to their parent.
Yes, and disk space is cheap.
I think there is a setting to have them checked out for editing automatically.
Yes there is, plus most decent editors are SCCS-aware and will prompt
for a checkout when
I upgraded two machines here from 2.4.7-pre6 to 2.4.7-pre7 yesterday
afternoon.
The first machine I upgraded, my workstation, is a 1GHz Athlon on a VIA
KT133 (not A) motherboard using a NetGear FA312TX network card. This machine
has always run Linux just fine. After this upgrade, telnetting to
I upgraded two machines here from 2.4.7-pre6 to 2.4.7-pre7 yesterday
afternoon.
The first machine I upgraded, my workstation, is a 1GHz Athlon on a VIA
KT133 (not A) motherboard using a NetGear FA312TX network card. This machine
has always run Linux just fine. After this upgrade, telnetting to
Recompile your VTUND daemon with the new kernel headers (and also updated to
2.5 vtund, it has some small patches) and you will be fine.
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Mack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 1:02 AM
Recompile your VTUND daemon with the new kernel headers (and also updated to
2.5 vtund, it has some small patches) and you will be fine.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 1:02 AM
Subject:
I've got two machines here running 2.4.5-ac6 with Chris Mason's posted 2.4.5
Reiserfs/knfsd patch, plus the small 2.4.5 NFS client patch posted last week
as well. Even with all of this, I still have NFS weirdness.
>From the client, I can mount and read pretty much anything I like from the
I've got two machines here running 2.4.5-ac6 with Chris Mason's posted 2.4.5
Reiserfs/knfsd patch, plus the small 2.4.5 NFS client patch posted last week
as well. Even with all of this, I still have NFS weirdness.
From the client, I can mount and read pretty much anything I like from the
server.
I'm getting ready to make some changes to the ide-floppy driver (to support
dynamic media change notification), and after spending a few days reviewing
most of the IDE driver code (ide, ide-disk, ide-cd, ide-floppy and
ide-probe), I think I've got a good handle on what needs to be done.
However,
I'm getting ready to make some changes to the ide-floppy driver (to support
dynamic media change notification), and after spending a few days reviewing
most of the IDE driver code (ide, ide-disk, ide-cd, ide-floppy and
ide-probe), I think I've got a good handle on what needs to be done.
However,
18 matches
Mail list logo
