Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: add write booster feature support

Hi Stanley, On 6/24/20, Stanley Chu wrote: > Hi Steev, > > On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 20:10 -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: >> On 6/23/20 1:51 AM, Kyuho Choi wrote: >> > Hi Avri, >> > >> > On 6/23/20, Avri Altman wrote: >> >>> AFAI

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: add write booster feature support

Hi Steev, Thanks for share log!. On 6/24/20, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: > > On 6/23/20 1:51 AM, Kyuho Choi wrote: >> Hi Avri, >> >> On 6/23/20, Avri Altman wrote: >>>> AFAIK, this device are ufs 2.1. It's not support writebooster. >>

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: add write booster feature support

e occured in ufshcd_wb_config/ctrl. BR, Kyuho Choi

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: add write booster feature support

Hi Rob, On 6/22/20, Rob Clark wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 12:58 AM Bjorn Andersson > wrote: >> >> On Sun 21 Jun 00:40 PDT 2020, Avri Altman wrote: >> >> > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 3:00 PM Asutosh Das >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > The write performance of TLC NAND is

Re: [PATCH 4.19 009/118] scsi: ufs: Fix hynix ufs bug with quirk on hi36xx SoC

Hi Greg, About Hinyx's "hB8aL1" ufs device. For support Kirin AP series, they are need to apply below VS_DebugSaveConfigTime expand patch. On 12/12/18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > > -- > > [

Re: [PATCH 1/9] scsi: ufs: Allowing power mode change

Hi Asutosh, I've simple question in below. On 2/21/18, Asutosh Das wrote: > From: Yaniv Gardi > > Due to M-PHY issues, moving from HS to any other mode or gear or > even Hibern8 causes some un-predicted behavior of the device. > This patch fixes

Re: [PATCH 1/9] scsi: ufs: Allowing power mode change

Hi Asutosh, I've simple question in below. On 2/21/18, Asutosh Das wrote: > From: Yaniv Gardi > > Due to M-PHY issues, moving from HS to any other mode or gear or > even Hibern8 causes some un-predicted behavior of the device. > This patch fixes this issues. > > Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi >

Re: UFS utilities

e there. >> > Sometimes customers tend to use user space tool to do some configuration. > And especially, for example the UFS FFU. > As i knew, in case of FFU, it's possible to support by sg_write_buffer. >>good luck! >> > Thanks ! >>greg k-h > > //Bean Huo > > WBR, Kyuho Choi

Re: UFS utilities

ometimes customers tend to use user space tool to do some configuration. > And especially, for example the UFS FFU. > As i knew, in case of FFU, it's possible to support by sg_write_buffer. >>good luck! >> > Thanks ! >>greg k-h > > //Bean Huo > > WBR, Kyuho Choi

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: ufshcd: Enable no_write_same for scsi host

shcd.c > @@ -6515,6 +6515,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template > ufshcd_driver_template = { > .can_queue = UFSHCD_CAN_QUEUE, > .max_host_blocked = 1, > .track_queue_depth = 1, > + .no_write_same = 1, > }; > > static int ufshcd_config_vreg_load(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg > *vreg, > -- > 2.15.0 > > WBR, Kyuho Choi

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: ufshcd: Enable no_write_same for scsi host

> ufshcd_driver_template = { > .can_queue = UFSHCD_CAN_QUEUE, > .max_host_blocked = 1, > .track_queue_depth = 1, > + .no_write_same = 1, > }; > > static int ufshcd_config_vreg_load(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg > *vreg, > -- > 2.15.0 > > WBR, Kyuho Choi

Re: UFS RPMB

As i know, SECURITY PROTOCOL IN/OUT are support RPMB access for UFS. On 12/14/14, Tomas Winkler wrote: > Hi, sorry fore a newbie question. > What is the current interface for accessing rpmb LUN in a UFS devices. > For emmc one need to issue a raw mmc ioctl command MMC_IOC_CMD. > > Thanks >

Re: UFS RPMB

As i know, SECURITY PROTOCOL IN/OUT are support RPMB access for UFS. On 12/14/14, Tomas Winkler tom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, sorry fore a newbie question. What is the current interface for accessing rpmb LUN in a UFS devices. For emmc one need to issue a raw mmc ioctl command MMC_IOC_CMD.