e nodes go away if the device goes away. I
> don't know whether it can make that guarantee.
> > (a) might be interesting, but I'd expect the same objections to be
> > raised as for (c). And it seems to me that (b) is just a alternate
> > interface for (a).
> True.
> >
device, and we get stuck on how
to expose the device node. Sigh.
Then we deal with that horse when we have to make him sing. One way or
the other, we're trying to moving forward.
--Andy
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 03:36 +0200, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 11:16 +0200, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:25AM +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
> > > > -BEGIN PGP SI
n't see any safe way to avoid it. The host has to be in control of
what devices can and can not be accessed by the container.
> Seth
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
by the container.
Seth
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0x674627FF| possible
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 03:36 +0200, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 11:16 +0200, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:48:25AM +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One
cantly come into play.
Ah... Admittedly it's not as late as our conversation at LinuxPlumbers
last year in NOLA but... Maybe late at night but I failed to parse the
above.
> Eric
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678
,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0x674627FF| possible worlds. A pessimist is sure
tickle udev
and hotplug in the container with events.
But the loop device is the real ugly duckling here. It's a unique case
of an on-demand device with a shared control device that's not really
hot-plug and not really deterministic enough to be handled purely in
user space. It presents unique cha
control device that's not really
hot-plug and not really deterministic enough to be handled purely in
user space. It presents unique challenges unto itself.
Makes sense to me.
greg k-h
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:52 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 15:42 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > As an aside (probably requiring a new thread) we were wondering about
> > > some type of notifier on the mount call that we could vector into the
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:20 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 21:42 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 15:15 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > PS - Apparently both parallels and Michael independently
> > > > proj
can create those nodes.
>
> So maybe we could get by without the privileged ioctls, as long as it
> was understood that unprivileged containers can't do partitioning. But I
> do think the devtmpfs problem would need to be addressed.
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
> _
...@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:20 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 21:42 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 15:15 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
PS - Apparently both parallels and Michael independently
project devices which are hot-plugged on the host
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:52 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 15:42 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
As an aside (probably requiring a new thread) we were wondering about
some type of notifier on the mount call that we could vector into the
host to perform the action
mplish everything in user
space either.
We've got use cases and we've got problem sets. Don't give into
confirmational bias and automatically discount the use cases that have
been mentioned and then assume there are none. I don't know if Seth's
paths are part of the answer or not. I'm not pr
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 21:00 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:15:27PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:17:31PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > > > Using devtmpfs is one possible
> > > > > soluti
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 21:00 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:15:27PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:17:31PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Using devtmpfs is one possible
solution, and it would have the added benefit of making
that have
been mentioned and then assume there are none. I don't know if Seth's
paths are part of the answer or not. I'm not pro Seth's patches or
against Seth's patches but we've got a need in search of solutions.
thanks,
greg k-h
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061
ces
> isn't going to happen, sorry. Please don't continue down this path.
I was just mentioning that to Serge just a week or so ago reminding him
of what you told all of us face to face back then. We were having a
discussion over loop devices into containers and this topic came up.
&
devices into containers and this topic came up.
greg k-h
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP
state = disabled
> 00:0b PNP0401 ECP printer port
> state = disabled
:
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optim
state = disabled
:
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471
; Mike
> cu
> Adrian
> --
>"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
> of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
> "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
>Pearl
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
Only a promise, Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com
}
> + }
> }
> - }
> }
> #endif
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rasmus([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> A chicken and an egg are lying in bed. The chicken is sm
we answered THAT question...
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possible worlds
gt; counter = .01 * degrees kelvin
Then you are being foolish.
Your sensors are neither accurate to that degree nor are they
reproducible to that degree. What you are describing is jibberish.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of precision.
But that's not what we are talking about here, is it? We're not talking
about a lab grade instrumentation API here, are we? If we are, then
everything changes.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-09
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:43:06PM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> On 06.08 Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Actually, the REAL point I was TRYING to make (and doing a really
> > shabby job of it) is that some of this needs a little dose of reality.
> >
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:43:06PM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
On 06.08 Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Actually, the REAL point I was TRYING to make (and doing a really
shabby job of it) is that some of this needs a little dose of reality.
We don't have sensors that are accurate to 1
, is it? We're not talking
about a lab grade instrumentation API here, are we? If we are, then
everything changes.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9
nor are they
reproducible to that degree. What you are describing is jibberish.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live
egree C?
Looking at most temperature measuring chips today, unless you are
looking at lab-quality high-precision high-accuracy sensors, you are really
talking about a 12 bit sensor (+- a couple of bits) with an accuracy of
not much better than +-1 C.
Add the tenths if you want
of magnitude. IOW... Both are silly
and meaningless to this case. One is out of range in magnitude and one
is out of the range of accuracy.
> -mirabilos
> --
> C:\>debug
> -e100 EA F0 FF 00 F0
> -g
> --->Enjoy!
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 |
of the range of accuracy.
-mirabilos
--
C:\debug
-e100 EA F0 FF 00 F0
-g
---Enjoy!
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we
) with an accuracy of
not much better than +-1 C.
Add the tenths if you want to be silly but returning hundreths
is just meaningless jibberish.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw
erver.
This would be a good thing for those of us involved in investigating
these sorts of things. :-/
> I have changed all the passwords on the server, so what's there is no
> big deal. This server was public FTP and web/email, so nothing really
> super "confidential" on it.
he version of Bind they broke
in through to prevent further compromise. There will be a security
advisory out on these worms, probably later this week.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittse
. There will be a security
advisory out on these worms, probably later this week.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live
changed all the passwords on the server, so what's there is no
big deal. This server was public FTP and web/email, so nothing really
super confidential on it.
Jeff
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932
gt; --
> Live long and prosper
> - Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumonks.org/
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 |
right up. Now I know they work,
stock, right out of the box, and I can order a bunch more for the lab
I'm working with.
Thanks a lot
Fabbione
--
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumonks.org/
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield
ev and ended up with missing symbols.
> --
> Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fgouget.free.fr/
> 1 + e ^ ( i * pi ) = 0
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 |
/
1 + e ^ ( i * pi ) = 0
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possible worlds
oken and then become complacent. Sites that do that are
what we call "Warez" sites. :-/
> Gerhard
> --
> Gerhard Mack
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985
nt. Sites that do that are
what we call "Warez" sites. :-/
Gerhard
--
Gerhard Mack
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 12:00:03PM -0600, Gregory S. Youngblood wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 09:15:08PM -0800, Ben Ford wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, they make excellent mice. The mouse wheel
s of whatever
it's on to perform it's function. The old optical mice just used two
different colors of LED's (red and IR) and a special pad. This would
actually have to scan and track the surface below it. Don't know that
I've seen anyone do that before.
> -b
Mike
--
Michael H. Wa
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 12:00:03PM -0600, Gregory S. Youngblood wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 09:15:08PM -0800, Ben Ford wrote:
On the other hand, they make excellent mice. The mouse wheel and
the new optical mice are truly
into the public form from
> where it came.
Well... Yeah... Of course, Andre. Can you see how that stiffles
his innovation.
> Regards,
Later!
> Andre Hedrick
> Linux ATA Development
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Ma
t? You bet'cha they are taking advantage of the fact that people want it.
They would be damn fools in business if they didn't take advantage of that.
And that means supporting it. It's to their advantage to support it and
they see it. You must have a really bizzare idea of what support means...
> BS
e software and
I buy open source software. The only difference is the presence of the
sources. So what. Tell me how that makes those products less innovative?
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932
public
> >relations problem instead of a software and quality issue.
> >
> >I have also seen cases where problems were buried in development because
> >"no one will find out and if they do, we will just blame Microsoft".
> >
> >I understand your desire to make mo
rocess.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Note to AOL users: for a quick shortcut to reply
Alan Olsen| to my mail, just hit the ctrl, alt and del keys.
"In the future, everything will have its 15 minutes of blame."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
those products less innovative?
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possibl
pport it and
they see it. You must have a really bizzare idea of what support means...
BSDI is distributing FreeBSD now. They havent done anything useful to
support it. They are just cashing in on it.
And your point is???
DB
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 |
ards,
Later!
Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA Development
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
re was inovation for you.
> -Dan
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possible w
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:50:04AM +, Aaron Denney wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, wait a minute. CNAME -> CNAME is a "must not".
> Cite the RFC please. 1034 says
> # Domain names in RRs which point a
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:11:39PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> >
> > > Please explain how there is any different between an CNAME or MX pointing
> > > to an A record in a different SOA versus an MX pointing to a CNAME
> &g
ns on it (that at least one
pair is local). That is the very fine distinction that makes up the
"not quite" in the "almost" above and the difference between the "should
not" vs the "must not" in the specifications. You basically can't qualify
it by say
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:47:17PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:58:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > By author:Gerhard Mack <[EM
al lookup for the CNAME. If you have a lot of MX records
and not all the servers are "up" that can add up to a significant
increase in DNS traffic.
> -hpa
> --
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
> "Unix gives you enough rope t
; that can add up to a significant
increase in DNS traffic.
-hpa
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at work, [EMAIL PROTECTED] in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770)
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:47:17PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:58:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Gerhard Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.
that makes up the
"not quite" in the "almost" above and the difference between the "should
not" vs the "must not" in the specifications. You basically can't qualify
it by saying "you can do this, but only if one pair is in the same SOA".
-hpa
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:11:39PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
Please explain how there is any different between an CNAME or MX pointing
to an A record in a different SOA versus an MX pointing to a CNAME
pointing to an A record where at leas
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:50:04AM +, Aaron Denney wrote:
Michael H. Warfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, wait a minute. CNAME - CNAME is a "must not".
Cite the RFC please. 1034 says
# Domain names in RRs which point at another name should always point at
# the pr
> to waste.Belfast, Northern Ireland
> --
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770
or maybe congestion with extreme
prejudice... :-)
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key:
... :-)
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possible worlds. A pessimist
---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 4
e back from a posting
> you make to linux-kernel, please dont' report it to us here
> at vger.kernel.org, we know about it.
> Later,
> David S. Miller
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 4
g
you make to linux-kernel, please dont' report it to us here
at vger.kernel.org, we know about it.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.
Damn... So much for typing too fast... Screwed it up...
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 07:59:47PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:55:51PM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> > Sorry to bother you. I'm trying to find where you upl
great.
> Thanks,
> David D.W. Downey
[...]
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0
nfirmed that, first hand, myself (I currently have the ISA bridge in
operation) on the 2.2 kernels. The ISA bridge also works on the 2.4
kernels but I have not retested the PCI bridge on 2.4. The Lucent
people claim that the Linux pcmcia people are aware of the problem.
Mike
--
Michael H.
nt to remove sleep_on() and friends in 2.5.
And friends meaning "interruptible_sleep_on"? Great... I've
got a driver with about a half a dozen of them. Point me at the Doco
to fix please?
> --
> dwmw2
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 |
3-1828)
> the galaxy. [taken from: David Brin - Sundiver]
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes w
David Brin - Sundiver]
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possi
() and friends in 2.5.
And friends meaning "interruptible_sleep_on"? Great... I've
got a driver with about a half a dozen of them. Point me at the Doco
to fix please?
--
dwmw2
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard)
currently have the ISA bridge in
operation) on the 2.2 kernels. The ISA bridge also works on the 2.4
kernels but I have not retested the PCI bridge on 2.4. The Lucent
people claim that the Linux pcmcia people are aware of the problem.
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132
[...]
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possible worlds. A pessimist is sure
Damn... So much for typing too fast... Screwed it up...
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 07:59:47PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:55:51PM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote:
Hi Linus,
Sorry to bother you. I'm trying to find where you uploaded
linux-2.4.1
8 E2 A0 15 99 62 9A 00 (_)/ (_) 88 EC A3 EE 2D 1C 15 68
> Stuart Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.fireplug.net604-461-7532
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/m
] www.fireplug.net604-461-7532
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possible
rently support over 100 domains on my servers
(my partner runs a hosting service).
> Regards,
> Nauman Ansari
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9
pport over 100 domains on my servers
(my partner runs a hosting service).
Regards,
Nauman Ansari
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist b
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:30:14PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:22:28PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > I already run several sugarplum sites with teergrubes. I also use
> > various blackhole lists and take other action against spam
icies.
In most cases, I have a hard time coming up with rules strict enough
to adhere to those policies while still keeping the mail flowing. The
owners of those sites have a right to dictate those policies. Not
the senders.
> Matt
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:27:45PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:16:15PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > 99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
> > numbering .com or .net. The .org is frowned upon in
; > domain. I get far less SPAM now! I cannot express how much I loathe
> > SPAM! I have taken this one in particular out just for you :-) I
> > am the only one at my company really active on the internet..
> > apologies Johnny O
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (7
s how much I loathe
SPAM! I have taken this one in particular out just for you :-) I
am the only one at my company really active on the internet..
apologies Johnny O
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:27:45PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:16:15PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
numbering .com or .net. The .org is frowned upon in China - the TLD of
protestors
a hard time coming up with rules strict enough
to adhere to those policies while still keeping the mail flowing. The
owners of those sites have a right to dictate those policies. Not
the senders.
Matt
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:30:14PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:22:28PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
I already run several sugarplum sites with teergrubes. I also use
various blackhole lists and take other action against spammers, including
blocking
ED]
> Thanks, and sorry for any disturbance!
> --
> Kind Regards,
> Timothy A. DeWees
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkm
disturbance!
--
Kind Regards,
Timothy A. DeWees
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
