. I might be wrong, but this is how I understand it.
Regards
Nitish Ambastha
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 09:34:08 AM Nitish Ambastha wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
>> wrote:
>> > O
. I might be wrong, but this is how I understand it.
Regards
Nitish Ambastha
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 09:34:08 AM Nitish Ambastha wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
wrote
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 01:38:02 AM Nitish Ambastha wrote:
>> Prevent tight loop for suspend-resume when some
>> devices failed to suspend
>
> This *still* doesn't explain what problem you're *really* trying
if this is reasonable?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Nitish Ambastha wrote:
> Prevent tight loop for suspend-resume when some
> devices failed to suspend
> If some devices failed to suspend, we monitor this
> error in try_to_suspend(). pm_suspend() is already
> an 'int' returning func
do not register for pending events,
this will prevent tight loop for suspend-resume in
suspend abort scenarios due to device suspend failures
Signed-off-by: Nitish Ambastha
---
v2: Rearranged code to make wait entry shared with
existing one as suggested by Pavel Machek
Corrected log
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 01:38:02 AM Nitish Ambastha wrote:
Prevent tight loop for suspend-resume when some
devices failed to suspend
This *still* doesn't explain what problem you're *really* trying to address
do not register for pending events,
this will prevent tight loop for suspend-resume in
suspend abort scenarios due to device suspend failures
Signed-off-by: Nitish Ambastha nitis...@samsung.com
---
v2: Rearranged code to make wait entry shared with
existing one as suggested by Pavel Machek pa
if this is reasonable?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Nitish Ambastha nitis...@samsung.com wrote:
Prevent tight loop for suspend-resume when some
devices failed to suspend
If some devices failed to suspend, we monitor this
error in try_to_suspend(). pm_suspend() is already
an 'int' returning function
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 12:52:43 AM Nitish Ambastha wrote:
> > Hi Rafael
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 12:52:43 AM Nitish Ambastha wrote:
Hi Rafael
Thanks for your feedback
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
wrote:
On Monday, June 29, 2015 09
Hi Rafael
Thanks for your feedback
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, June 29, 2015 09:56:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:24:14 AM Nitish Ambastha wrote:
>> > Prevent tight loop for suspend-resume when some
&
Hi Rafael
Thanks for your feedback
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Monday, June 29, 2015 09:56:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:24:14 AM Nitish Ambastha wrote:
Prevent tight loop for suspend-resume when some
devices
do not register for pending events,
this will prevent tight loop for suspend-resume in
suspend abort scenarios due to device suspend failures
Signed-off-by: Nitish Ambastha
---
v2: Rearranged code to make wait entry shared with
existing one as suggested by Pavel Machek
Corrected log
do not register for pending events,
this will prevent tight loop for suspend-resume in
suspend abort scenarios due to device suspend failures
Signed-off-by: Nitish Ambastha
---
kernel/power/autosleep.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel
do not register for pending events,
this will prevent tight loop for suspend-resume in
suspend abort scenarios due to device suspend failures
Signed-off-by: Nitish Ambastha nitis...@samsung.com
---
v2: Rearranged code to make wait entry shared with
existing one as suggested by Pavel Machek pa
do not register for pending events,
this will prevent tight loop for suspend-resume in
suspend abort scenarios due to device suspend failures
Signed-off-by: Nitish Ambastha nitis...@samsung.com
---
kernel/power/autosleep.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion
16 matches
Mail list logo
