The Coverity checker (and Adrian Bunk) spotted an inconsistent
NULL check of port->tty (it's blindly dereferenced later without
the check).
Alan Cox confirmed the check can go.
Signed-off-by: Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Coverity checker (and Adrian Bunk) spotted an inconsistent
NULL check of port-tty (it's blindly dereferenced later without
the check).
Alan Cox confirmed the check can go.
Signed-off-by: Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Linus Torvalds
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'd be happier with warnings about deep indentation (but how do you
> count it? Will people then try to fake things out by using 4-space indents
> and then "deep" indentations will look like just a couple of tabs?)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Linus Torvalds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'd be happier with warnings about deep indentation (but how do you
count it? Will people then try to fake things out by using 4-space indents
and then deep indentations will look like just a couple of tabs?)
I
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Stoffel wrote:
> > I know this is a pedantic comment, but why the heck is it called such
> > a generic term as "Memory Controller" which doesn't give any
> > indication of what it does.
> >
> > Shouldn't it be
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Stoffel wrote:
I know this is a pedantic comment, but why the heck is it called such
a generic term as Memory Controller which doesn't give any
indication of what it does.
Shouldn't it be something like
On Feb 19, 2008 3:25 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:49:15AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The Coverity checker spotted the following inconsequent NULL checking
> > introduced by commit d5f5bcd425b771c0b7ff5a650b2ce061ac8bbb87:
> >
> > <-- snip -->
>
> It's
On Feb 19, 2008 3:25 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:49:15AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The Coverity checker spotted the following inconsequent NULL checking
introduced by commit d5f5bcd425b771c0b7ff5a650b2ce061ac8bbb87:
-- snip --
It's not a real
On Feb 18, 2008 2:56 AM, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a very strange, but fully reproducible, regression with
> 2.6.25-rc1 -rc2. I have an ubuntu 7.10 fully updated.
>
> The first time after boot, when I login to gnome (through gdm)
> the login
On Feb 18, 2008 2:56 AM, Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a very strange, but fully reproducible, regression with
2.6.25-rc1 -rc2. I have an ubuntu 7.10 fully updated.
The first time after boot, when I login to gnome (through gdm)
the login half-fails
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kosaki-san wrote:
> > i prefer another name [!relative].
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> I'll give the name some thought myself.
> I like good names, and this is the right
> time to get this one right.
'Relative map' implies
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kosaki-san wrote:
i prefer another name [!relative].
Any suggestions?
I'll give the name some thought myself.
I like good names, and this is the right
time to get this one right.
'Relative map' implies a constant
On Feb 11, 2008 7:56 AM, Mirco Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
>
> Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
> But I'm pretty sure it is
On Feb 11, 2008 7:56 AM, Mirco Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
Thanks,
Rafael
Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
But I'm pretty sure it is related to that
On Feb 10, 2008 5:47 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All , grabbed using git just moments ago .
>
> make V=1 KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 INSTALL_PATH=/boot clean all install modules_install
>
> ...snip...
> make -f scripts/Makefile.clean obj=sound/usb/usx2y
> make -f
On Feb 10, 2008 9:39 AM, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ray Lee wrote:
> > unsigned int void u64_to_hex(u64 val, unsigned char *buf)
> > {
> > int i;
> > for (i=15; i>=0; i--) {
> > buf[i] = hexchars[ val
On Feb 10, 2008 9:21 AM, Mirco Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
> 2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
> do this in 2.6.24.
>
> I bisected it down to this commit:
>
> commit
On Feb 10, 2008 8:36 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + } else if ((count == 8) && (((long)mem & 7) == 0)) {
> + u64 tmp_ll;
> + if (probe_kernel_address(mem, tmp_ll))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +
On Feb 10, 2008 8:36 AM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+ } else if ((count == 8) (((long)mem 7) == 0)) {
+ u64 tmp_ll;
+ if (probe_kernel_address(mem, tmp_ll))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+
On Feb 10, 2008 9:21 AM, Mirco Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I think I found a regression in 2.6.24-git. After waking up from suspend
2 ram, the fan of my laptop turns constantly at highest speed. It didn't
do this in 2.6.24.
I bisected it down to this commit:
commit
On Feb 10, 2008 9:39 AM, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ray Lee wrote:
unsigned int void u64_to_hex(u64 val, unsigned char *buf)
{
int i;
for (i=15; i=0; i--) {
buf[i] = hexchars[ val 0x0f ];
val = 4
On Feb 10, 2008 5:47 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All , grabbed using git just moments ago .
make V=1 KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 INSTALL_PATH=/boot clean all install modules_install
...snip...
make -f scripts/Makefile.clean obj=sound/usb/usx2y
make -f
On Feb 9, 2008 1:51 PM, Kok, Auke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin Rogge wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 February 2008 11:07:26 Martin Rogge wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am not so familiar with the various mailing lists and missed out on
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] the first time. Please cc me on any
>
2008/2/9 Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Feb 9, 2008 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:35:07AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> > > + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_s
On Feb 9, 2008 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:35:07AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> > + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_s >> 12) & 0xf];
> > + *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_s >> 8) & 0xf];
> > +
On Feb 9, 2008 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:35:07AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+ *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_s 12) 0xf];
+ *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_s 8) 0xf];
+ *buf++ =
2008/2/9 Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 9, 2008 9:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:35:07AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+ *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_s 12) 0xf];
+ *buf++ = hexchars[(tmp_s 8
On Feb 9, 2008 1:51 PM, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Rogge wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008 11:07:26 Martin Rogge wrote:
Hi,
I am not so familiar with the various mailing lists and missed out on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the first time. Please cc me on any
replies.
I am
On Feb 7, 2008 5:19 PM, Carlos Corbacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 08 February 2008 00:12:24 Ray Lee wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Carlos Corbacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 07 February 2008 23:33:54 Ray Lee wrote:
> > > &
On Feb 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Carlos Corbacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 February 2008 23:33:54 Ray Lee wrote:
> > Do you have list of hardware/platforms that require this feature to
> > get the hardware to work? (acer abc123, tcm1100 xyz)
>
> I have a ver
On Feb 7, 2008 3:18 PM, Carlos Corbacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for the Kconfig - I'm open to suggestions.
While the kconfig text is supposed to say 'what' something is, the
more valuable piece of information it provides is *why* one would want
to enable it.
Do you have list of
On Feb 7, 2008 3:18 PM, Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the Kconfig - I'm open to suggestions.
While the kconfig text is supposed to say 'what' something is, the
more valuable piece of information it provides is *why* one would want
to enable it.
Do you have list of
On Feb 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2008 23:33:54 Ray Lee wrote:
Do you have list of hardware/platforms that require this feature to
get the hardware to work? (acer abc123, tcm1100 xyz)
I have a very long list of Acer laptops
On Feb 7, 2008 5:19 PM, Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 February 2008 00:12:24 Ray Lee wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2008 23:33:54 Ray Lee wrote:
Do you have list of hardware/platforms that require
On Jan 31, 2008 4:42 PM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quiz: on a booted system, how do you tell 32bit from 64bit kernel?
Uhm, is this a trick question? What's wrong with uname(2)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Jan 31, 2008 4:42 PM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quiz: on a booted system, how do you tell 32bit from 64bit kernel?
Uhm, is this a trick question? What's wrong with uname(2)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Jan 25, 2008 3:32 AM, Asbjorn Sannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experiencing unpredictable results with the following test
> without other processes running (exception is udev, I believe):
> cd /usr/src/test
> tar -jxf ../linux-2.6.22.12
> cp ../working-config
On Jan 25, 2008 3:32 AM, Asbjorn Sannes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing unpredictable results with the following test
without other processes running (exception is udev, I believe):
cd /usr/src/test
tar -jxf ../linux-2.6.22.12
cp ../working-config linux-2.6.22.12/.config
cd
On Jan 22, 2008 1:04 PM, Manuel Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ray Lee wrote:
> > (Please always do a reply-to-all for this email list.)
>
> Currently I don't have a SMTP server configured. As soon as my system is
> trustworthy, again, I'll do that.
Oy. Just know th
(Please always do a reply-to-all for this email list.)
On Jan 22, 2008 12:40 PM, Manuel Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > If your IDE interface is complaining about BadCRC errors, then it's
> > complaining about hardware problems (bad cable, etc.)
>
> The cable already
(Please always do a reply-to-all for this email list.)
On Jan 22, 2008 12:40 PM, Manuel Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
If your IDE interface is complaining about BadCRC errors, then it's
complaining about hardware problems (bad cable, etc.)
The cable already has been
On Jan 22, 2008 1:04 PM, Manuel Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ray Lee wrote:
(Please always do a reply-to-all for this email list.)
Currently I don't have a SMTP server configured. As soon as my system is
trustworthy, again, I'll do that.
Oy. Just know that without CC:ing people, I'm
On Jan 19, 2008 7:44 AM, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are driving a motherboard port so use a 2uS explicit delay at this
> point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
>
On Jan 19, 2008 7:44 AM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are driving a motherboard port so use a 2uS explicit delay at this
point.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
On Jan 14, 2008 7:28 AM, Renato S. Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ray Lee escreveu:
> > On Jan 12, 2008 10:03 AM, Renato S. Yamane wrote:
> >> I can't use updatedb in Debian Etch (stable) using customized Kernel
> >> 2.6.22.9-cfs-v22.
> >>
> >
On Jan 14, 2008 7:28 AM, Renato S. Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ray Lee escreveu:
On Jan 12, 2008 10:03 AM, Renato S. Yamane wrote:
I can't use updatedb in Debian Etch (stable) using customized Kernel
2.6.22.9-cfs-v22.
When I ran updatedb, after ~1 minute my system hangs and caps
On Jan 12, 2008 10:03 AM, Renato S. Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I can't use updatedb in Debian Etch (stable) using customized Kernel
> 2.6.22.9-cfs-v22.
>
> When I ran updatedb, after ~1 minute my system hangs and "caps lock" LED
> is blinking. No log is registered.
Please switch
On Jan 12, 2008 10:03 AM, Renato S. Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can't use updatedb in Debian Etch (stable) using customized Kernel
2.6.22.9-cfs-v22.
When I ran updatedb, after ~1 minute my system hangs and caps lock LED
is blinking. No log is registered.
Please switch out of X11
On Jan 10, 2008 9:24 AM, Chris Friesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a recent userspace app change, we've started seeing packets being
> dropped by the ethernet hardware (e1000, NAPI is enabled). The
> error/dropped/fifo counts are going up in ethtool:
(These are perhaps too obvious, but I
On Dec 26, 2007 7:21 AM, Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - if (jiffies - ent->last_usage < timeout)
> + if (time_before(jiffies, ent->last_usage + timeout))
I don't think this is a safe change? subtraction is always safe (if
you think about it as 'distance'),
On Dec 26, 2007 7:21 AM, Julia Lawall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if (jiffies - ent-last_usage timeout)
+ if (time_before(jiffies, ent-last_usage + timeout))
I don't think this is a safe change? subtraction is always safe (if
you think about it as 'distance'),
On Dec 21, 2007 7:38 AM, Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Occasionally all my apache2 processes hang in "D" process status where they
> are
> no longer responsible to SIGKILL which makes the server almost un-rebootable.
> The processes usually vanish after about 15-30min.
On Dec 21, 2007 7:38 AM, Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Occasionally all my apache2 processes hang in D process status where they
are
no longer responsible to SIGKILL which makes the server almost un-rebootable.
The processes usually vanish after about 15-30min.
I know
On Dec 17, 2007 10:10 AM, Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:05:35 -0800
> "Ray Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 17, 2007 9:55 AM, Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - mid =
On Dec 17, 2007 9:55 AM, Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - mid = (last - first) / 2 + first;
> + while (low <= high) {
> + mid = (low + high) / 2;
I think you just introduced a bug. Think about what happens if
low=high=MAX_LONG/2 + 1.
--
To unsubscribe
On Dec 17, 2007 9:55 AM, Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- mid = (last - first) / 2 + first;
+ while (low = high) {
+ mid = (low + high) / 2;
I think you just introduced a bug. Think about what happens if
low=high=MAX_LONG/2 + 1.
--
To unsubscribe from
On Dec 17, 2007 10:10 AM, Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:05:35 -0800
Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 9:55 AM, Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- mid = (last - first) / 2 + first;
+ while (low = high
On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
> it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd
> whe
On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd
when I did a make oldconfig, I
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> >> tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
> >> fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.
On Dec 14, 2007 12:13 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ray, I _do_ want to understand what is going on in your machine.
> I _have_ to understand it. But I currently do not understand how the
> quoted patch could fix modprobe of b43 or rfkill. I'd simply call that
> impossible.
Then
On Dec 14, 2007 11:38 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 December 2007 20:25:39 Ray Lee wrote:
> > > I'm sorry. The patch that _you_ quoted fixes a blinking LED
> > > and nothing else.
> >
> > Well, you're wrong. Sorry, b
On Dec 14, 2007 11:05 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 December 2007 19:45:02 Ray Lee wrote:
> > > > One problem related to b43 source code, patch exists, has yet to be
> > > > merged upstream.
> > >
> > > Yeah. A p
On Dec 14, 2007 10:11 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now I'm going to go off, sit in the sun, sip some coffee, and think
> > happy thoughts of kittens playing with yarn for a while.
>
> ok, and given the
I've run out of time to donate to the kernel today, so I'll keep this short.
On Dec 14, 2007 10:22 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you have a PCI device probing works as follows:
> > > The PCI table is in ssb. So as soon as your kernel detects the PCI device
> > > it will
On Dec 14, 2007 8:49 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 December 2007 17:06:39 Ray Lee wrote:
> > Hi all. Perhaps I can inject some facts into this?
> >
> > On Dec 14, 2007 5:08 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Dec 14, 2007 8:59 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What if you want to compile your own kernel? Well, then you are on
> your own anyway. You have to track kernel changes anyway.
I'm trying to help you test your code before it goes out to the
unsuspecting masses. Do you think I
On Dec 14, 2007 8:27 AM, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 6:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agreed. As a b43legacy maintainer, I'd be happy to know if Ingo
> > suggests other ways to smooth out the transition. I haven't read
> > pro
On Dec 14, 2007 6:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. As a b43legacy maintainer, I'd be happy to know if Ingo
> suggests other ways to smooth out the transition. I haven't read
> proposals yet.
This isn't rocket science guys. Put a file in somewhere in your tree
called
Hi all. Perhaps I can inject some facts into this?
On Dec 14, 2007 5:08 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This user did get the following messages in dmesg:
> > >
> > > b43err(dev->wl, "Firmware file \"%s\" not found "
> > >"or load failed.\n", path);
> > > b43err(wl,
Hi all. Perhaps I can inject some facts into this?
On Dec 14, 2007 5:08 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This user did get the following messages in dmesg:
b43err(dev-wl, Firmware file \%s\ not found
or load failed.\n, path);
b43err(wl, You must go to
On Dec 14, 2007 6:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. As a b43legacy maintainer, I'd be happy to know if Ingo
suggests other ways to smooth out the transition. I haven't read
proposals yet.
This isn't rocket science guys. Put a file in somewhere in your tree
called ReleaseAnnouncement or
On Dec 14, 2007 8:27 AM, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 6:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. As a b43legacy maintainer, I'd be happy to know if Ingo
suggests other ways to smooth out the transition. I haven't read
proposals yet.
This isn't rocket science guys. Put
On Dec 14, 2007 8:59 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if you want to compile your own kernel? Well, then you are on
your own anyway. You have to track kernel changes anyway.
I'm trying to help you test your code before it goes out to the
unsuspecting masses. Do you think I do
On Dec 14, 2007 10:11 AM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm going to go off, sit in the sun, sip some coffee, and think
happy thoughts of kittens playing with yarn for a while.
ok, and given the time-shift and apparent season-shift i'll sit
On Dec 14, 2007 8:49 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 December 2007 17:06:39 Ray Lee wrote:
Hi all. Perhaps I can inject some facts into this?
On Dec 14, 2007 5:08 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This user did get the following messages in dmesg
I've run out of time to donate to the kernel today, so I'll keep this short.
On Dec 14, 2007 10:22 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have a PCI device probing works as follows:
The PCI table is in ssb. So as soon as your kernel detects the PCI device
it will load ssb.
On Dec 14, 2007 11:05 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 December 2007 19:45:02 Ray Lee wrote:
One problem related to b43 source code, patch exists, has yet to be
merged upstream.
Yeah. A problem preventing a LED from blinking.
That's a real regression
On Dec 14, 2007 11:38 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 December 2007 20:25:39 Ray Lee wrote:
I'm sorry. The patch that _you_ quoted fixes a blinking LED
and nothing else.
Well, you're wrong. Sorry, but that's just the way it is. See below.
It does _not_ fix
On Dec 14, 2007 12:13 PM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ray, I _do_ want to understand what is going on in your machine.
I _have_ to understand it. But I currently do not understand how the
quoted patch could fix modprobe of b43 or rfkill. I'd simply call that
impossible.
Then
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
(-rc5) doesn't show any
tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
(-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
I'll check current tip on the weekend when I'll have the luxury to
have my main system down long
On Dec 13, 2007 4:43 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 December 2007 01:05:00 Ray Lee wrote:
> > Okay, I had to modprobe rfkill-input and rfkill by hand, didn't
> > realize that. Hopefully that'll be automatic soon. Regardless, upon
> > doing
On Dec 13, 2007 5:45 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007 02:17:16 Ray Lee wrote:
> > Uhm, hijacking the thread a bit here, but which driver is supposed to
> > be supporting my 4309? Neither b43 nor b43legacy found my wireless,
> >
On Dec 13, 2007 5:45 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 13 December 2007 02:17:16 Ray Lee wrote:
Uhm, hijacking the thread a bit here, but which driver is supposed to
be supporting my 4309? Neither b43 nor b43legacy found my wireless,
and I'm not seeing its PCI ID
On Dec 13, 2007 4:43 PM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 December 2007 01:05:00 Ray Lee wrote:
Okay, I had to modprobe rfkill-input and rfkill by hand, didn't
realize that. Hopefully that'll be automatic soon. Regardless, upon
doing so, and loading ssb and b43, it sees
tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
(-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
I'll check current tip on the weekend when I'll have the luxury to
have my main system down long
On Dec 12, 2007 4:48 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This driver is scheduled for removal, so I'd not touch it anymore
> to avoid the possibility to introduce a lastminute regression.
> The new drivers (b43 and b43legacy) have this fixed (in a different
> way by completely removing
On Dec 12, 2007 4:48 PM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This driver is scheduled for removal, so I'd not touch it anymore
to avoid the possibility to introduce a lastminute regression.
The new drivers (b43 and b43legacy) have this fixed (in a different
way by completely removing it).
On Dec 11, 2007 11:46 AM, Phillip Susi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> > Note that even paranoid applicatons should not be using /dev/random
> > for session keys; again, /dev/random isn't magic, and entropy isn't
> > unlimited. Instead, such an application should pull 16 bytes
On Dec 11, 2007 11:46 AM, Phillip Susi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theodore Tso wrote:
Note that even paranoid applicatons should not be using /dev/random
for session keys; again, /dev/random isn't magic, and entropy isn't
unlimited. Instead, such an application should pull 16 bytes or so,
On Dec 9, 2007 2:01 PM, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Btw, Alan, that "math" is total and utter BULLSH*T, and you should know
> > that.
>
> To blindly argue regressions are critical is sometimes (as in this case)
> to argue that "this freeway is no longer compatible with a horse and
>
On Dec 8, 2007 4:25 AM, Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to
> everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a "Process 9246 detached",
> nothing else is printed or written in the log.
You could try an ltrace instead, and see if
On Dec 8, 2007 4:25 AM, Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to
everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a Process 9246 detached,
nothing else is printed or written in the log.
You could try an ltrace instead, and see if it's one
On Dec 9, 2007 2:01 PM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, Alan, that math is total and utter BULLSH*T, and you should know
that.
To blindly argue regressions are critical is sometimes (as in this case)
to argue that this freeway is no longer compatible with a horse and
cart means the
On Dec 7, 2007 10:32 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2007 12:59 PM, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 2, 2007 2:07 PM, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks. To sum up this longish thread:
> > &g
On Dec 2, 2007 2:07 PM, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. To sum up this longish thread:
>
> - Mark seems to be able to reproduce the problem quite easily; I was not
> successful reproducing this no matter how hard I tried, and I also
> didn't receive any similar bugreports from
On Dec 2, 2007 2:07 PM, Jiri Kosina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. To sum up this longish thread:
- Mark seems to be able to reproduce the problem quite easily; I was not
successful reproducing this no matter how hard I tried, and I also
didn't receive any similar bugreports from anyone
On Dec 7, 2007 10:32 AM, Dmitry Torokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 12:59 PM, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 2:07 PM, Jiri Kosina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. To sum up this longish thread:
- Mark seems to be able to reproduce the problem quite easily
(Why hasn't anyone been cc:ing Matt on this?)
On Dec 4, 2007 8:18 AM, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:41:25PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> > While debugging Exim4's GnuTLS interface, I recently found out that
> > reading from /dev/urandom depletes entropy as
1 - 100 of 430 matches
Mail list logo
