Re: Oracle 8I & Kernel 2.4.3 : Sane ?

8.1.6) on 2.4.2 since the day it was released. No problems whatsoever. I'd recommend consulting the Oracle docs as to what is screwed with your rollback segments. I highly doubt this is Linux's fault. - -- Stephen Clouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Programmer, IQ Coordinator Project Lead

Re: Oracle 8I Kernel 2.4.3 : Sane ?

) on 2.4.2 since the day it was released. No problems whatsoever. I'd recommend consulting the Oracle docs as to what is screwed with your rollback segments. I highly doubt this is Linux's fault. - -- Stephen Clouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Programmer, IQ Coordinator Project Lead The IQ Group, Inc

Re: Bug in the file attributes ?

his is a bug. You have failed to RTFM. There is no bug here. http://www.linuxdoc.org/FAQ/Linux-FAQ/x1955.html#AEN2242 - -- Stephen Clouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Programmer, IQ Coordinator Project Lead The IQ Group, Inc. <http://www.theiqgroup.com/> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Bug in the file attributes ?

. You have failed to RTFM. There is no bug here. http://www.linuxdoc.org/FAQ/Linux-FAQ/x1955.html#AEN2242 - -- Stephen Clouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Programmer, IQ Coordinator Project Lead The IQ Group, Inc. http://www.theiqgroup.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

s threads. (And what happens when the master process *is* the target?) - -- Stephen Clouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Programmer, IQ Coordinator Project Lead The IQ Group, Inc. <http://www.theiqgroup.com/> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBOr2XDgOGqGs0PadnE

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

happens when the master process *is* the target?) - -- Stephen Clouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Programmer, IQ Coordinator Project Lead The IQ Group, Inc. http://www.theiqgroup.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBOr2XDgOGqGs0PadnEQK0rACfQELDid11+m90bS/DrGyrsHW45ZEAn19G

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

e routine) and decides it needs just a pinch more memory than what's available -- ick. 2.2.x doesn't appear to enforce new memory allocation with a sniper rifle -- the new process just suffers a pleasant ("Out of memory!") or violent (SIGSEGV) death. - -- Stephen Clouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

day getting intimate with the backup files, since SIGKILLing random Oracle processes, as you might have guessed, has a tendency to rape the entire database. It would be nice to give immunity to certain uids, or better yet, just turn the damn thing off entirely. I've already hacked that in...errr, out.

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

ing random Oracle processes, as you might have guessed, has a tendency to rape the entire database. It would be nice to give immunity to certain uids, or better yet, just turn the damn thing off entirely. I've already hacked that in...errr, out. - -- Stephen Clouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Prog

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

) and decides it needs just a pinch more memory than what's available -- ick. 2.2.x doesn't appear to enforce new memory allocation with a sniper rifle -- the new process just suffers a pleasant ("Out of memory!") or violent (SIGSEGV) death. - -- Stephen Clouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Prog

2.4.0 oops bdflush

We have a development SMP machine which runs a myriad of server applications for our development purposes -- Apache, Oracle, several others. Under 2.4.0 the machine locks up, seemingly at random. Usually it simply stops responding without fanfare -- you can, oddly enough, switch consoles with

2.4.0 oops bdflush

We have a development SMP machine which runs a myriad of server applications for our development purposes -- Apache, Oracle, several others. Under 2.4.0 the machine locks up, seemingly at random. Usually it simply stops responding without fanfare -- you can, oddly enough, switch consoles with