Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-18 Thread Tony Borras
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:10:58 +0200 "Jesper Juhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > file: patch-2.4.34.3.bz2 has the corruption at line 213: > > goto errout > > > > That is where that came from, when I patched my 2.4.34 to > > arrive at 2.4.34.5, before applying the 2.4.35.rc5 patch! > > > That

Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-18 Thread Tony Borras
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200 Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Tony, > > [ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's > very easy to > miss a thread ] > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote: > > O

Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-18 Thread Tony Borras
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200 Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tony, [ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's very easy to miss a thread ] On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote: On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200 Willy Tarreau

Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-18 Thread Tony Borras
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:10:58 +0200 Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: file: patch-2.4.34.3.bz2 has the corruption at line 213: goto errout That is where that came from, when I patched my 2.4.34 to arrive at 2.4.34.5, before applying the 2.4.35.rc5 patch! That sounds wrong. To the

Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-17 Thread Tony Borras
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200 Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > could you please report what the problem was, in case it's not > fixed yet ? Ok, reproduced error at ./net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c line 436 changed label: errout -> err_inval then it builds fine!

Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-17 Thread Tony Borras
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200 Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:30:47PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote: > > I did get the current 'pre' set of 2.4.35 (circa early > > June) patches and applied to 2.4.34.5. After fixing

Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-17 Thread Tony Borras
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200 Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tony, On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:30:47PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote: I did get the current 'pre' set of 2.4.35 (circa early June) patches and applied to 2.4.34.5. After fixing a goto mislable in one

Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-17 Thread Tony Borras
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200 Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: could you please report what the problem was, in case it's not fixed yet ? Ok, reproduced error at ./net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c line 436 changed label: errout - err_inval then it builds fine! started

Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-16 Thread Tony Borras
to expect an abandonded tree, in which case I will fly with this 2.4.35 build or should wait for its eventual release. Thanks Greg! Tony Borras There are 10 types of people in this world, those that read binary and those who don't! -- __ __ _ I N C. http://www.sysdev.org

Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

2007-07-16 Thread Tony Borras
to expect an abandonded tree, in which case I will fly with this 2.4.35 build or should wait for its eventual release. Thanks Greg! Tony Borras There are 10 types of people in this world, those that read binary and those who don't! -- __ __ _ I N C. http://www.sysdev.org