r what it was until I left X windows and tried it from the
console and finally got an error relating to block size.
- Vincent Stemen
>
>
> $ dumpe2fs -h /dev/scd0
> dumpe2fs 1.19, 13-Jul-2000 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> Filesystem volume name:
> Last mounted on:
> Files
the
console and finally got an error relating to block size.
- Vincent Stemen
$ dumpe2fs -h /dev/scd0
dumpe2fs 1.19, 13-Jul-2000 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
Filesystem volume name: none
Last mounted on: not available
Filesystem UUID: 7eb1b040-59f7-11d2-9e35-002018530df2
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 15:17, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 May 2001 01:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 29 May 2001 15:16, Alan Cox wrote:
&
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 15:30, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:
> > The problem is, that's not true. These problems are not slipping
> > through because of lack of testers. As Alan said, the VM problem has
> > been lurking, which means that
Ronald Bultje writes:
> On 30 May 2001 14:58:57 -0500, Vincent Stemen wrote:
> > There was a new 8139too driver added to the the 2.4.5 (I think) kernel
> > which Alan Cox took back out and reverted to the old one in his
> > 2.4.5-ac? versions because it is appar
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 01:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 May 2001 15:16, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > a reasonably stable release until 2.2.12. I do not understand why
> > > > code with such serious reproduc
Ronald Bultje writes:
On 30 May 2001 14:58:57 -0500, Vincent Stemen wrote:
There was a new 8139too driver added to the the 2.4.5 (I think) kernel
which Alan Cox took back out and reverted to the old one in his
2.4.5-ac? versions because it is apparently causing lockups.
Shouldn't
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 15:30, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:
The problem is, that's not true. These problems are not slipping
through because of lack of testers. As Alan said, the VM problem has
been lurking, which means that it was known already
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 15:17, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 01:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 15:16, Alan Cox wrote:
a reasonably stable release until 2.2.12
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 01:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Vincent Stemen wrote:
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 15:16, Alan Cox wrote:
a reasonably stable release until 2.2.12. I do not understand why
code with such serious reproducible problems is being introduced
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 10:37, elko wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2001 11:10, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > It's not a bug. It's a feature. It only breaks systems that are run
> > > w= ith "too
> > > little" swap, and the only difference from 2.2 till now is, that the
> > > de= finition
> > > of "too
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 10:37, elko wrote:
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 11:10, Alan Cox wrote:
It's not a bug. It's a feature. It only breaks systems that are run
w= ith too
little swap, and the only difference from 2.2 till now is, that the
de= finition
of too little changed.
its
On Tuesday 15 May 2001 02:13, Jacky Liu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Mark, I got your point about the dma/udma stuffs. My hdparm setting is
> UDMA w/ MultiSector 16..
>
> I had recompiled my kernel and disabled the FB option but my linux box
> still hanged (another completely freeze) yesterday... Oh
On Tuesday 15 May 2001 02:13, Jacky Liu wrote:
Hi everyone,
Mark, I got your point about the dma/udma stuffs. My hdparm setting is
UDMA w/ MultiSector 16..
I had recompiled my kernel and disabled the FB option but my linux box
still hanged (another completely freeze) yesterday... Oh well..
t could be related
to the compiler change? If nobody has considered that, I just thought
I would bring the possibility to your attention.
- Vincent Stemen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majord
thought
I would bring the possibility to your attention.
- Vincent Stemen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 22:57, Jacky Liu wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to post a question regarding to a problem of unknown freeze of
> my linux firewall/gateway.
>
> Here is the hardware configuration of my machine:
>
> AMD K-6 233 MHz
> 2theMax P-55 VP3 mobo
> 64Mb RAM in a single module
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 22:57, Jacky Liu wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to post a question regarding to a problem of unknown freeze of
my linux firewall/gateway.
Here is the hardware configuration of my machine:
AMD K-6 233 MHz
2theMax P-55 VP3 mobo
64Mb RAM in a single module (PC-100)
18 matches
Mail list logo
