On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:48:40AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Does your .config file have CONFIG_APM=y? Otherwise, that's your problem
> right there (since your old laptop doesn't appear to have ACPI.)
no CONFIG_APM and yes, this is my problem.
A very hard way to figure this out,
and too
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:48:40AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Does your .config file have CONFIG_APM=y? Otherwise, that's your problem
right there (since your old laptop doesn't appear to have ACPI.)
no CONFIG_APM and yes, this is my problem.
A very hard way to figure this out,
and too
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:07:21PM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
>
> Now I try the things written in
> http://marc.info/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have dumped a memory region which is my understanding what you want
to see. The difference between the good and the bad case is only
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
>
> I start again with a fresh tree and better controlled experiments.
now the result of bisection seems to be consistent.
The last good commit is
f2d98ae63dc64dedb00499289e13a50677f771f9 Linker script for the n
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:30:33AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Both are bad.
> > Two different systems and two different bisections.
> > I sent the last step of each.
>
> >>> $ git bisect good
> >&g
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:11:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the latest kernel does not power off my old laptop.
> >
> > 2.6.22 succeeded
> > 2.6.23-rc8 failed
> >
> > $ git bisect
Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:05:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the latest kernel does not power off my system.
> >
> > 2.6.2
Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:05:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my system.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:11:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my old laptop.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:30:33AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.
$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
I start again with a fresh tree and better controlled experiments.
now the result of bisection seems to be consistent.
The last good commit is
f2d98ae63dc64dedb00499289e13a50677f771f9 Linker script for the new x86 setup
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:07:21PM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Now I try the things written in
http://marc.info/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have dumped a memory region which is my understanding what you want
to see. The difference between the good and the bad case is only
the patch
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my old laptop.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and main routine for
new x86 setup code
Which more info is needed?
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my system.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2] ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling
of Sx states.
Which more info is needed?
Wolfgang
-
To
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my system.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2] ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling
of Sx states.
Which more info is needed?
Wolfgang
-
To
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my old laptop.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and main routine for
new x86 setup code
Which more info is needed?
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:18:54AM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:41:41AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > I am prepared to do tweaks to your small patch, but I need your help.
> > My own blindly experiments failed miserably.
>
> I don't think th
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:18:54AM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:41:41AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
I am prepared to do tweaks to your small patch, but I need your help.
My own blindly experiments failed miserably.
I don't think that patch did anything wrong
Hello Ivan,
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:12:15PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:47:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:56PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > > Output from kernel with CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG could be useful.
> &
Hello Ivan,
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:12:15PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:47:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:56PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Output from kernel with CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG could be useful.
Linux version 2.6.21
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:56PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Sorry
> > for detecting this 2 year old regression so late.
> >
> > 2.6.13 or later is bad.
> > 2.6.12 is good,
> >
> > "git bisect" worked fine an
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:56PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Sorry
for detecting this 2 year old regression so late.
2.6.13 or later is bad.
2.6.12 is good,
git bisect worked fine and points to the attached patch.
The patch is pretty small. The problem
Sorry
for detecting this 2 year old regression so late.
2.6.13 or later is bad.
2.6.12 is good,
"git bisect" worked fine and points to the attached patch.
The patch is pretty small. The problem seemed to be dependant
on the PCI-architecture of these particular systems.
Tried this on two machines
Sorry
for detecting this 2 year old regression so late.
2.6.13 or later is bad.
2.6.12 is good,
git bisect worked fine and points to the attached patch.
The patch is pretty small. The problem seemed to be dependant
on the PCI-architecture of these particular systems.
Tried this on two machines
r 24, 2007 at 11:32:53AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:18:19PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:48:47PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > > > This email lists some known regressions i
, please trim the Cc when
answering.
Subject: gammu no longer works
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/20/84
Submitter : Wolfgang Erig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : unknown
I've asked for more information about this, and so far am
Cc when answering.
> >
> >
> > Subject: gammu no longer works
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/20/84
> > Submitter : Wolfgang Erig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Status : unknown
>
> I've asked for more information about this, and so far
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/20/84
Submitter : Wolfgang Erig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : unknown
I've asked for more information about this, and so far am not sure it's
a real problem.
It is a real problem for me.
I tried this on 2 different boxes with the same behaviour.
No sync
Hello Greg,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 10:47:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:58:53AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a regression with 2.6.21-rc7-g80d74d51.
> > The utility "gammu" to talk to my mobile does not wor
Hello Greg,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 10:47:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:58:53AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Hello,
I have a regression with 2.6.21-rc7-g80d74d51.
The utility gammu to talk to my mobile does not work anymore.
With 2.6.20 gammu runs fine
Hello,
I have a regression with 2.6.21-rc7-g80d74d51.
The utility "gammu" to talk to my mobile does not work anymore.
With 2.6.20 gammu runs fine.
Distribution is the latest Debian/testing
Wolfgang
$ gammu --backup backup
Press Ctrl+C to break...
I/O possible
$ uname -a
Linux max
Hello,
I have a regression with 2.6.21-rc7-g80d74d51.
The utility gammu to talk to my mobile does not work anymore.
With 2.6.20 gammu runs fine.
Distribution is the latest Debian/testing
Wolfgang
$ gammu --backup backup
Press Ctrl+C to break...
I/O possible
$ uname -a
Linux max
32 matches
Mail list logo
