lt;marc.zyng...@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 19/09/17 16:40, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 16:33 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > > On 19/09/17 16:12, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > >
:
> >
> > > On 19/09/17 16:40, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 16:33 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > > On 19/09/17 16:12, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
>
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 16:33 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 19/09/17 16:12, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Fedora rawhide config here.
> > AMD FX-8370E
> >
> > Bisected a problem to:
> > 74def747bcd0 (genirq: Restrict effecti
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 16:33 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 19/09/17 16:12, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Fedora rawhide config here.
> > AMD FX-8370E
> >
> > Bisected a problem to:
> > 74def747bcd0 (genirq: Restrict effecti
Hello,
Fedora rawhide config here.
AMD FX-8370E
Bisected a problem to:
74def747bcd0 (genirq: Restrict effective affinity to interrupts actually using
it)
It seems to be causing stalls, short lived or long lived lockups very shortly
after boot.
Everything becomes jerky.
The only visible
Hello,
Fedora rawhide config here.
AMD FX-8370E
Bisected a problem to:
74def747bcd0 (genirq: Restrict effective affinity to interrupts actually using
it)
It seems to be causing stalls, short lived or long lived lockups very shortly
after boot.
Everything becomes jerky.
The only visible
On Thu-10/01/15-2015 09:55, Mike Galbraith wrote:
.
>
> Bisected and post bisect verified by applying/removing a revert.
>
> Log:
>
> 6ae459bdaaeebc632b16e54dcbabb490c6931d61 is the first bad commit
> commit 6ae459bdaaeebc632b16e54dcbabb490c6931d61
> Author: Pravin B Shelar
> Date: Tue
On Thu-10/01/15-2015 09:55, Mike Galbraith wrote:
.
>
> Bisected and post bisect verified by applying/removing a revert.
>
> Log:
>
> 6ae459bdaaeebc632b16e54dcbabb490c6931d61 is the first bad commit
> commit 6ae459bdaaeebc632b16e54dcbabb490c6931d61
> Author: Pravin B Shelar
On Tue-10/28/14-2014 05:50, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Mon-10/27/14-2014 10:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 25,
all pending
> callbacks. It is therefore required to wait even for those callbacks
> that cannot possibly be invoked. Even if doing so hangs the system.
>
> Given that posting a callback to a no-CBs CPU that does not yet have an
> rcuo kthread can hang rcu_barrier(), It is tempting t
bitterly if it finds CPUs having no rcuo kthread but some
pending callbacks. And when rcu_barrier() does find CPUs having no rcuo
kthread but pending callbacks, as noted earlier, it has no choice but
to hang indefinitely.
Reported-by: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Reported-by: Jay Vosburgh
On Tue-10/28/14-2014 05:50, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Mon-10/27/14-2014 10:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 14:49, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 14:49, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Thu-10/23/14-2014
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > >
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On T
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > > wrote:
>
> [ . .
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
[ . . . ]
Don't get me wrong
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko
On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 01:25:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:53:24PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> >>
On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 01:25:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:53:24PM
30 matches
Mail list logo
