On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 23/03/14 23:31, anish singh wrote:
>>
>> Many a time i have got a crash and it is difficult
>> to find out the exact function which crashed
>> because the crash stack doesn't show the "real"
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Arend van Spriel ar...@broadcom.com wrote:
On 23/03/14 23:31, anish singh wrote:
Many a time i have got a crash and it is difficult
to find out the exact function which crashed
because the crash stack doesn't show the real
function because gcc inlines many
Many a time i have got a crash and it is difficult
to find out the exact function which crashed
because the crash stack doesn't show the "real"
function because gcc inlines many functions when
ever it desires or when it optimizes for speed.
So i don't want gcc to inline any function instead
just
Many a time i have got a crash and it is difficult
to find out the exact function which crashed
because the crash stack doesn't show the real
function because gcc inlines many functions when
ever it desires or when it optimizes for speed.
So i don't want gcc to inline any function instead
just
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Filipe David Manana
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a list that is manipulated by several threads. Insert, remove
> and iteration are protected by a lock. Is the locking necessary too
> just for checking if the list is empty, i.e., is list_empty()
> atomic/safe to
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a list that is manipulated by several threads. Insert, remove
and iteration are protected by a lock. Is the locking necessary too
just for checking if the list is empty, i.e., is list_empty()
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 07:33 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> On 12/09/2013 10:17 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Concerning the wake up of the cpu: the cpu disabled the irq and
>>> goes to sleep, it is up to the firmware to wake up the cpu when an
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12/10/2013 07:33 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
On 12/09/2013 10:17 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Concerning the wake up of the cpu: the cpu disabled the irq and
goes to sleep, it is up to the firmware to wake up the cpu
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:19 PM, 韩磊 wrote:
> when we delete,add,search,amend the list_head,should we use spinlock
> or rcu in case of conflicit to list_head???
There is no implicit locking when we use 'list' api's.You should explicitly
do that AFAIK.
>
> Thank you!
> --
> To unsubscribe from this
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:19 PM, 韩磊 bonben1...@gmail.com wrote:
when we delete,add,search,amend the list_head,should we use spinlock
or rcu in case of conflicit to list_head???
There is no implicit locking when we use 'list' api's.You should explicitly
do that AFAIK.
Thank you!
--
To
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Steven Rostedt
(by way of Steven Rostedt ) (by way of Steven
Rostedt wrote:
>
> [ Resending, as somehow Claws email, removed the quotes from "H. Peter
> Anvin", and that prevented LKML from receiving this ]
>
> *** NOT FOR INCLUSION ***
>
> What this does
>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
(by way of Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org) (by way of Steven
Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
[ Resending, as somehow Claws email, removed the quotes from H. Peter
Anvin, and that prevented LKML from receiving this ]
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:18:16 -0700
> Shailaja Neelam wrote:
>
>> I am a high school student trying to become familiar with the
>> opensource process and linux kernel. This is my first submission to
>> the ITC mailing list.
>
> Hi Shailaja,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:18:16 -0700
Shailaja Neelam neelamsha...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a high school student trying to become familiar with the
opensource process and linux kernel. This is my first submission to
the
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This macro was invented by Mattias Nilsson for the usecase
> where you want to set a sequence of bits inside a n-bit
> word, while leaving the head and tail of the sequence all
> zeroes. For example:
>
> #include
>
> u16 mask = BITS(4,
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
This macro was invented by Mattias Nilsson for the usecase
where you want to set a sequence of bits inside a n-bit
word, while leaving the head and tail of the sequence all
zeroes. For example:
#include
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> anish singh writes:
>> Hello Rusty,
>>
>> Right now I see so many places in the kernel
>> where we open code binary search implementations
>> such as search_extable implementations.
>>
>> ht
Hello Rusty,
Right now I see so many places in the kernel
where we open code binary search implementations
such as search_extable implementations.
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?a=powerpc;i=search_extable
Would it be ok to replace this with bsearch lib code?
I am not trying to fix any
Hello Rusty,
Right now I see so many places in the kernel
where we open code binary search implementations
such as search_extable implementations.
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?a=powerpc;i=search_extable
Would it be ok to replace this with bsearch lib code?
I am not trying to fix any
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
anish singh anish198519851...@gmail.com writes:
Hello Rusty,
Right now I see so many places in the kernel
where we open code binary search implementations
such as search_extable implementations.
http://lxr.free
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Anish,
>
>> Certain watchdog drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
>> a rate of 0.5s (HZ/2) untill userspace times out.They do this as
>> we can't guarantee that watchdog will be pinged fast enough
>> for all system
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Wim Van Sebroeck w...@iguana.be wrote:
Hi Anish,
Certain watchdog drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
a rate of 0.5s (HZ/2) untill userspace times out.They do this as
we can't guarantee that watchdog will be pinged fast enough
for all system
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 21:33 +0530, anish singh wrote:
>
>> May I know why we zeroed in on 1Hz? Is there any logical reason
>> or just because it is above 0Hz?
>> >
>
> We had to keep a tick. What numbe
Thanks Paul & Steve for replying.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:47:31AM +0530, anish singh wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 21:51 +0530, anish singh wrote:
&g
Thanks Paul Steve for replying.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:47:31AM +0530, anish singh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 21:51 +0530, anish
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 21:33 +0530, anish singh wrote:
May I know why we zeroed in on 1Hz? Is there any logical reason
or just because it is above 0Hz?
We had to keep a tick. What number would you have picked
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 21:51 +0530, anish singh wrote:
>
>> > The concept behind full dynamic ticks is very easy. When you set a given
>> > CPU(s) to dynamic tick, when it only has a single task scheduled on th
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:20 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
>
>> I don't know enough about how full dynticks work to even present a
>> solution. But currently I was working with the Red Hat performance team
>> to enhance perf to help our
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:20 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
I don't know enough about how full dynticks work to even present a
solution. But currently I was working with the Red Hat performance team
to enhance perf to help
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 21:51 +0530, anish singh wrote:
The concept behind full dynamic ticks is very easy. When you set a given
CPU(s) to dynamic tick, when it only has a single task scheduled on that
CPU
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
>
> Added an API of_extcon_get_extcon_dev() to be used by drivers to get
> extcon device in the case of dt boot (this can be used instead of
> extcon_get_extcon_dev()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Chanwoo Choi cw00.c...@samsung.com wrote:
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
Added an API of_extcon_get_extcon_dev() to be used by drivers to get
extcon device in the case of dt boot (this can be used instead of
extcon_get_extcon_dev()).
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
Least I can do is to say "Thanks".
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:46:36PM +0530, anish singh wrote:
>> Probably a trivial question.I was wondering why this particular requirement
>> exists in the first place.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 02:11:59PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 06/03/13 02:39, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 11:39:41PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +void __init
>> >>
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 02:11:59PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 06/03/13 02:39, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 11:39:41PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
+}
+
+void __init
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
Least I can do is to say Thanks.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:46:36PM +0530, anish singh wrote:
Probably a trivial question.I was wondering why this particular requirement
exists in the first place.I looked
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, PINTU KUMAR wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to submit my first patch.
> But I have some confusion about the /scripts/checkpatch.pl errors.
>
> After correcting some checkpatch errors, when I run checkpatch.pl, it showed
> me 0 errors.
> But when I create patches are
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, PINTU KUMAR pintu_agar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to submit my first patch.
But I have some confusion about the /scripts/checkpatch.pl errors.
After correcting some checkpatch errors, when I run checkpatch.pl, it showed
me 0 errors.
But when I
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:30:01AM +0530, anish singh wrote:
>> Hello Wim Van,
>> Can you look into below?
>>
> Please be patient. Wim tends to be busy.
Sorry, I will wait.
>
> Guenter
>
>> On W
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:30:01AM +0530, anish singh wrote:
Hello Wim Van,
Can you look into below?
Please be patient. Wim tends to be busy.
Sorry, I will wait.
Guenter
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:39 AM, anish singh
Hello Wim Van,
Can you look into below?
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:39 AM, anish singh wrote:
> Hello Wim Van Sabroeck,
> Can I get your inputs on this?
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, anish singh
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>&
Hello Wim Van,
Can you look into below?
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:39 AM, anish singh anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Wim Van Sabroeck,
Can I get your inputs on this?
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, anish singh anish198519851...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:55 AM
Hello Wim Van Sabroeck,
Can I get your inputs on this?
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, anish singh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:23:04PM +0530, anish singh wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Guenter Roeck w
Hello Wim Van Sabroeck,
Can I get your inputs on this?
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, anish singh anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:23:04PM +0530, anish singh wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:57
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:23:04PM +0530, anish singh wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:43:07PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:
>> >> Certain watchdog drive
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:43:07PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:
>> Certain watchdog drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
>> a rate of 0.5s (HZ/2) untill userspace times out.They do this as
>> we can't guarantee that watchdog will
any inputs?
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:56 PM, anish singh wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:43 PM, anish kumar
> wrote:
>> Certain watchdog drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
>> a rate of 0.5s (HZ/2) untill userspace times out.They do this as
>> we can't
any inputs?
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:56 PM, anish singh anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:43 PM, anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
wrote:
Certain watchdog drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
a rate of 0.5s (HZ/2) untill userspace times out.They
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:43:07PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:
Certain watchdog drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
a rate of 0.5s (HZ/2) untill userspace times out.They do this as
we can't guarantee that
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:23:04PM +0530, anish singh wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:43:07PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:
Certain watchdog drivers
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:43 PM, anish kumar wrote:
> Certain watchdog drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
> a rate of 0.5s (HZ/2) untill userspace times out.They do this as
> we can't guarantee that watchdog will be pinged fast enough
> for all system loads, especially if timeout
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:43 PM, anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
Certain watchdog drivers use a timer to keep kicking the watchdog at
a rate of 0.5s (HZ/2) untill userspace times out.They do this as
we can't guarantee that watchdog will be pinged fast enough
for all system loads,
Hi Guenter,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:59:28PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
>> Hi Guenter,
>>
>> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:10:53AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:25:54PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck
Hi Guenter,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:59:28PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:10:53AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:25:54PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Thanks for the fast and helpful reply.
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:53:10 +0530, anish singh wrote:
>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> > Jean Delvare writes:
>> &
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Jean Delvare writes:
>> Hi Greg, Rusty,
>>
>> I have a question related to /sys/module and can't seem to find the
>> answer by myself so I hope you can explain.
>>
>> I noticed that /sys/module contains more than /proc/modules. At first I
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org writes:
Hi Greg, Rusty,
I have a question related to /sys/module and can't seem to find the
answer by myself so I hope you can explain.
I noticed that /sys/module contains more than
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
Hi Rusty,
Thanks for the fast and helpful reply.
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:53:10 +0530, anish singh wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org writes
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> If none of the channels are supported, index is 0.
> Also ensure to return error code instead of 0 in goto second_mem_fail path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
Acked-by: anish kumar
I think anton would have already picked up.
> ---
>
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Axel Lin axel@ingics.com wrote:
If none of the channels are supported, index is 0.
Also ensure to return error code instead of 0 in goto second_mem_fail path.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@ingics.com
Acked-by: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
I
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:40 PM, anish singh
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> At Mon, 27 May 2013 17:26:22 +0530,
>>> anish singh wrote:
>>>>
>>>
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 27 May 2013 17:26:22 +0530,
> anish singh wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> > Generally there are only two drivers which don't need uevent to
>> > handle firmware loa
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Generally there are only two drivers which don't need uevent to
> handle firmware loading, so don't cache these firmwares during
Sorry but this statement confuses me i.e. "drivers which don't need
uevent to handle firmware loading". Does this
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Generally there are only two drivers which don't need uevent to
handle firmware loading, so don't cache these firmwares during
Sorry but this statement confuses me i.e. drivers which don't need
uevent to handle firmware
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
At Mon, 27 May 2013 17:26:22 +0530,
anish singh wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Generally there are only two drivers which don't need uevent to
handle firmware loading, so
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:40 PM, anish singh
anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
At Mon, 27 May 2013 17:26:22 +0530,
anish singh wrote:
On Mon, May 27
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Anish, Mylène,
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:52:40 +0530, anish singh wrote:
>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Mylene Josserand
>> wrote:
>> > I have read that this function "i2c_smbus_write_byte_dat
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Mylene Josserand
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I am learning how i2c is working and I read that, to write in an i2c
> register, I need to use the function "i2c_smbus_write_byte_data".
Only in case your device is smbus compliant.
> I wanted to know how the message are
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Mylene Josserand
mylene.josser...@navocap.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am learning how i2c is working and I read that, to write in an i2c
register, I need to use the function i2c_smbus_write_byte_data.
Only in case your device is smbus compliant.
I wanted to know
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
Hi Anish, Mylène,
On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:52:40 +0530, anish singh wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Mylene Josserand
mylene.josser...@navocap.com wrote:
I have read that this function i2c_smbus_write_byte_data
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 23 May 2013 10:06:56 +0200,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>
>> At Thu, 23 May 2013 15:45:32 +0800,
>> Ming Lei wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
>> > > > On 05/21/2013 04:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>> > >
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
At Thu, 23 May 2013 10:06:56 +0200,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 23 May 2013 15:45:32 +0800,
Ming Lei wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/21/2013 04:03 PM, Dave Jones
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 11:04 AM, anish singh wrote:
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Frederic Weisbecker
>> wrote:
>>> When the watchdog code is boot-disabled by the user, for example
>>> through the 'nmi_w
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 05/21/2013 11:04 AM, anish singh wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
wrote:
When the watchdog code is boot-disabled by the user, for example
through
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> When the watchdog code is boot-disabled by the user, for example
> through the 'nmi_watchdog=0' boot option, the setup() callback of
> the watchdog kthread requests to park the task, and that until the
> user later re-enables the
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
When the watchdog code is boot-disabled by the user, for example
through the 'nmi_watchdog=0' boot option, the setup() callback of
the watchdog kthread requests to park the task, and that until the
user later
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Chanho Min wrote:
> In bitmap_find_free_region, If we skip the all-ones words and find bits
> in a not-all-ones word, we can improve performance of it.
>
> For example, If bitmap_find_free_region() is called with order=0, First,
> It scans bitmap array by the
Hello Vijay,
Below I will try my best to answer.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Vijay Dixit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to the Kernel-Mailing list. I am not subscribed at the moment
> and would really appreciate it, if I can be CC'd for all the
> reply/responses for my question.
>
>
> I
Hello Vijay,
Below I will try my best to answer.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Vijay Dixit thelonejo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am new to the Kernel-Mailing list. I am not subscribed at the moment
and would really appreciate it, if I can be CC'd for all the
reply/responses for my
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:02:47PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> 2013/3/12 Paul E. McKenney :
>> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:03:23PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Paul E. McKenney
>> >> wrote:
>>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:02:47PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2013/3/12 Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:03:23PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at
ACK or NACK this patch please.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:33 AM, anish singh
wrote:
> ping
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:41 PM, anish kumar
> wrote:
>> __clocksource_register_scale() currently returns int but it should
>> return void as there are no error paths in
ACK or NACK this patch please.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:33 AM, anish singh
anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
ping
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:41 PM, anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
wrote:
__clocksource_register_scale() currently returns int but it should
return void
ping
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:41 PM, anish kumar wrote:
> __clocksource_register_scale() currently returns int but it should
> return void as there are no error paths in that function.
> Making it void would help some amount of code to be removed at various
> places.
>
>
ping
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:41 PM, anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
__clocksource_register_scale() currently returns int but it should
return void as there are no error paths in that function.
Making it void would help some amount of code to be removed at various
places.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:44:09PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:
>> From: anish kumar
>>
>> This watchdog_disabled flag is bit of cryptic.Howerver it's usefullnes is
>> multifold.
>> Uses are:
>> 1. Check if smpboot_register_percpu_thread
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:44:09PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
This watchdog_disabled flag is bit of cryptic.Howerver it's usefullnes is
multifold.
Uses are:
1. Check if
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:02:17AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, 송은봉 wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I've been debugging the abnormal operation of i2c on octeon.
>> > If a process is terminated by signal in the middle of i2c
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:02:17AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, 송은봉 wrote:
I've been debugging the abnormal operation of i2c on octeon.
If a process is terminated by signal in the middle of i2c
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:06 PM, anish singh
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Dan Carpenter
> wrote:
>> There is a forever loop calling iio_channel_release() because the
>> "chan < " part of the "chan < ARRAY_SIZE()" is missing. This is in
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
> There is a forever loop calling iio_channel_release() because the
> "chan < " part of the "chan < ARRAY_SIZE()" is missing. This is in both
> the error handling on probe and also in the remove function.
>
> The other thing is that it's
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Dan Carpenter
dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote:
There is a forever loop calling iio_channel_release() because the
chan part of the chan ARRAY_SIZE() is missing. This is in both
the error handling on probe and also in the remove function.
The other thing is
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:06 PM, anish singh
anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Dan Carpenter
dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote:
There is a forever loop calling iio_channel_release() because the
chan part of the chan ARRAY_SIZE() is missing. This is in both
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:52:10 +0800, Haojian Zhuang
> wrote:
>> On 12 February 2013 07:10, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:57:57 +0800
>> > Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> >
>> >> do_initcalls() could call all driver
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * anish singh wrote:
>
>> Is the below patch picked up?
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:31 PM, anish kumar
>> wrote:
>> > From: anish kumar
>> >
>> > This watch
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* anish singh anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the below patch picked up?
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:31 PM, anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
wrote:
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:52:10 +0800, Haojian Zhuang
haojian.zhu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12 February 2013 07:10, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:57:57 +0800
Haojian Zhuang
Is the below patch picked up?
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:31 PM, anish kumar wrote:
> From: anish kumar
>
> This watchdog_disabled flag is bit of cryptic.Howerver it's usefullnes is
> multifold.
> Uses are:
> 1. Check if smpboot_register_percpu_thread function passed.
> 2. Makes sure that user
Is the below patch picked up?
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:31 PM, anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com wrote:
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
This watchdog_disabled flag is bit of cryptic.Howerver it's usefullnes is
multifold.
Uses are:
1. Check if
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Li, Fei wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu [mailto:isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:30 PM
>> To: Li, Fei
>> Cc: r...@sisk.pl; a...@linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>>
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
