On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> >There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issues
On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be ma
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> > > There are 13 patches in this se
On 10/03/2013 01:15 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Khalid Aziz wrote...
Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo
the patch and send another one for the next round.
FYI, after patching mm/swap.c accordingly, all the 3.0 and 3.4
configurations I use do build. Some boot tes
Khalid Aziz wrote...
> Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo
> the patch and send another one for the next round.
FYI, after patching mm/swap.c accordingly, all the 3.0 and 3.4
configurations I use do build. Some boot tests will follow, I'll
follow up only if I see un
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any i
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:04:25PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:12:47AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 08:56 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> >
> > Greg, please apply the patch Christoph had included in his earlier post.
> >
> > Ben, this will apply to 3.2 as well.
> >
>
> Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I w
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:35:35AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 06:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> >Guenter Roeck wrote...
> >
> >>On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> >
> >>Heads up: I am getting
On 10/03/2013 08:56 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote:
Greg, please apply the patch Christoph had included in his earlier post.
Ben, this will apply to 3.2 as well.
Better yet, just pull this patch from stable from now. I will redo the
patch and send another one for the next round.
Thanks,
Khalid
--
On 10/03/2013 08:41 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Khalid Aziz wrote...
Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with
CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many
multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from
linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my con
Khalid Aziz wrote...
> Thanks for tracking this down. I had not tried a configuration with
> CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE not set. In my config, I was getting many
> multiple definition errors for bunch of other defines from
> linux/hugetlb.h. I will look at my config again but chances are I
> had somethin
On 10/03/2013 06:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Guenter Roeck wrote...
On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds.
mm/built-in.o: In function `__pu
On 10/03/2013 05:47 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Guenter Roeck wrote...
On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds.
mm/built-in.o: In function `__pu
Guenter Roeck wrote...
> On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds.
>
> mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page':
> slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c):
On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be ma
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013.
Anything receive
17 matches
Mail list logo
