Re: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-19 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:54:44PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:04 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski [...] > > Good catch, I've forgotten to check whether all the recent ring_init > > patches have gone through cc:

Re: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:04 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 04:03:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > >> > >>

Re: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:04 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski herton.krzesin...@canonical.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 04:03:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

Re: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-19 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:54:44PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:04 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski [...] Good catch, I've forgotten to check whether all the recent ring_init patches have gone through cc: stable.

Re: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 04:03:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> >> -- >> >> From: Daniel Vetter >> >> commit

Re: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski herton.krzesin...@canonical.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 04:03:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Daniel Vetter

Re: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-17 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 04:03:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Daniel Vetter > > commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 upstream. > > We may only start to set up the new

Re: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-17 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 04:03:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 upstream. We may only start to set

[ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Daniel Vetter commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 upstream. We may only start to set up the new register values after having confirmed that the ring is truely off. Otherwise the hw

[ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

2012-08-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 upstream. We may only start to set up the new register values after having confirmed that the ring is truely