Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 25-05-2007 05:21, Jason Wessel wrote:
There is a problem with the calling cancel_rearming_delayed_work if the
timer was not yet active.
It is possible that the problem exists else where, but I thought I would
ask if this is expected?
" *
On 25-05-2007 05:21, Jason Wessel wrote:
> There is a problem with the calling cancel_rearming_delayed_work if the
> timer was not yet active.
>
> I see this problem when netpoll_cleanup() is called without having done
> any work because it had not processed any packets yet. The problem
>
On 25-05-2007 05:21, Jason Wessel wrote:
There is a problem with the calling cancel_rearming_delayed_work if the
timer was not yet active.
I see this problem when netpoll_cleanup() is called without having done
any work because it had not processed any packets yet. The problem
appears
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 25-05-2007 05:21, Jason Wessel wrote:
There is a problem with the calling cancel_rearming_delayed_work if the
timer was not yet active.
It is possible that the problem exists else where, but I thought I would
ask if this is expected?
*
There is a problem with the calling cancel_rearming_delayed_work if the
timer was not yet active.
I see this problem when netpoll_cleanup() is called without having done
any work because it had not processed any packets yet. The problem
appears to be a result of the loop check
There is a problem with the calling cancel_rearming_delayed_work if the
timer was not yet active.
I see this problem when netpoll_cleanup() is called without having done
any work because it had not processed any packets yet. The problem
appears to be a result of the loop check
6 matches
Mail list logo
