On Sunday, 25 March 2007 17:10, Maxim wrote:
> On Sunday 25 March 2007 14:13:07 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:40, Maxim wrote:
> > > On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On
On Sunday 25 March 2007 14:13:07 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:40, Maxim wrote:
> > On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
On Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:40, Maxim wrote:
> On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
> > > > > On
On Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:40, Maxim wrote:
On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22
On Sunday 25 March 2007 14:13:07 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:40, Maxim wrote:
On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On
On Sunday, 25 March 2007 17:10, Maxim wrote:
On Sunday 25 March 2007 14:13:07 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:40, Maxim wrote:
On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22
On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday 23 March 2007 16:42:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On
On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
> > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
> > > >
On Friday, 23 March 2007 00:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
> > > > > On
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 08:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:23:39 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 05:51, David Chinner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:23:39 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 March 2007 05:51, David Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > I think this is the XFS problem with freezable workqueues.
> > >
> > >
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 05:51, David Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > I think this is the XFS problem with freezable workqueues.
> >
> > Maxim, please try to apply the appended patch and see if it helps.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Rafael
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 05:51, David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I think this is the XFS problem with freezable workqueues.
Maxim, please try to apply the appended patch and see if it helps.
Greetings,
Rafael
---
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:23:39 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 05:51, David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I think this is the XFS problem with freezable workqueues.
Maxim, please try to
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 08:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:23:39 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 05:51, David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I think this is the XFS
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> I think this is the XFS problem with freezable workqueues.
>
> Maxim, please try to apply the appended patch and see if it helps.
>
> Greetings,
> Rafael
>
>
> ---
> Since freezable workqueues are broken in 2.6.21-rc
>
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:14:05 Maxim wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007 23:22:40 Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:40 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on
> > > my system.
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:47:05 Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 22:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Do you know exactly which mutex was being waited on and where it was
> > > taken? If you can say that, it would be much more helpful.
>
> Yeah, me too, but
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:53:54 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
> > > > > On
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
> > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 22:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Do you know exactly which mutex was being waited on and where it was
> > taken? If you can say that, it would be much more helpful.
Yeah, me too, but assuming too much sometimes bites me :)
> I think this is the XFS problem
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:39:24 Maxim wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
> > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > >
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > > Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:09:54 Maxim wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore
> > > > on my system.
> > > >
> > > > I did a
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:14:05 Maxim wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007 23:22:40 Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:40 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on
> > > my system.
On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
> > system.
> >
> > I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
> >
> > e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM:
Hi!
> Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
> system.
>
> I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
>
> e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM: Change code
> ordering in main.c
>
On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 22:22, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:40 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
> > system.
> >
> > I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:40 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
> system.
>
> I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
>
> e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM: Change
Hi,
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
system.
I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM: Change code
ordering in main.c
ed746e3b18f4df18afa3763155972c5835f284c5 - [PATCH]
Hi,
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
system.
I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM: Change code
ordering in main.c
ed746e3b18f4df18afa3763155972c5835f284c5 - [PATCH]
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:40 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
system.
I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM: Change code
On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 22:22, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:40 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
system.
I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
Hi!
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
system.
I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM: Change code
ordering in main.c
ed746e3b18f4df18afa3763155972c5835f284c5 -
On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my
system.
I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM: Change code
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:14:05 Maxim wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 23:22:40 Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:40 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on
my system.
I did a
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:09:54 Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore
on my system.
I did a git-bisect and found that
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:39:24 Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Starting
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 22:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Do you know exactly which mutex was being waited on and where it was
taken? If you can say that, it would be much more helpful.
Yeah, me too, but assuming too much sometimes bites me :)
I think this is the XFS problem with
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Starting
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:53:54 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:39, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:24:25 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 00:09, Maxim wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:39:02 you wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:47:05 Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 22:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Do you know exactly which mutex was being waited on and where it was
taken? If you can say that, it would be much more helpful.
Yeah, me too, but assuming too
On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:14:05 Maxim wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 23:22:40 Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:40 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on
my system.
I did a
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:38:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I think this is the XFS problem with freezable workqueues.
Maxim, please try to apply the appended patch and see if it helps.
Greetings,
Rafael
---
Since freezable workqueues are broken in 2.6.21-rc
(cf.
48 matches
Mail list logo