This patch makes all the changes suggested by Christopher, with the
exception of the suggestion to use the sched_flags field versus a new
member to the spu_context struct to signal the need to "notify already
active". I don't have the sched_flags change in my 2.6.20-rc1 tree. I
can send
This patch makes all the changes suggested by Christopher, with the
exception of the suggestion to use the sched_flags field versus a new
member to the spu_context struct to signal the need to notify already
active. I don't have the sched_flags change in my 2.6.20-rc1 tree. I
can send
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:56:12AM -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> I haven't seen that the scheduler patch series got applied yet. This
> Cell spu task notification patch is a pre-req for OProfile development
> to support profiling SPUs. When the scheduler patch gets applied to a
> kernel
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:56:12AM -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
I haven't seen that the scheduler patch series got applied yet. This
Cell spu task notification patch is a pre-req for OProfile development
to support profiling SPUs. When the scheduler patch gets applied to a
kernel
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-arnd1+patches/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
===
---
linux-2.6.19-rc6-arnd1+patches.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
2006-12-04 10:56:04.730698720
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-arnd1+patches/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
===
---
linux-2.6.19-rc6-arnd1+patches.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
2006-12-04 10:56:04.730698720
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-arnd1+patches/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
===
---
linux-2.6.19-rc6-arnd1+patches.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
2006-12-04 10:56:04.730698720 -0600
+++
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-arnd1+patches/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
===
---
linux-2.6.19-rc6-arnd1+patches.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
2006-12-04 10:56:04.730698720 -0600
+++
8 matches
Mail list logo
