On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:28:35 +0100
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-23 12:31]:
> > > I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add
> > > anything but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd
> > > rather
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:39:17 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-23 12:31]:
> > I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add
> > anything but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd
> > rather have a new, rough driver
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:39:17 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-23 12:31]:
I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add
anything but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd
rather have a new, rough driver that might
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:28:35 +0100
Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-23 12:31]:
I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add
anything but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd
rather have a new, rough
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-23 12:31]:
> I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add
> anything but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd
> rather have a new, rough driver that might work, than no driver at
> all, and it's not like it can
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-23 12:31]:
>
> > I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add
> > anything but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd
> > rather have
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-23 12:31]:
I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add
anything but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd
rather have a new, rough
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-23 12:31]:
I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add
anything but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd
rather have a new, rough driver that might work, than no driver at
all, and it's not like it can cause a
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 18:31 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:13:33AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> >> Jeff Garzik (1):
> >> mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
> > [...]
> >> drivers/scsi/mvsas.c| 2981
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:31:02 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the original
author of mvsas, but...
Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:13:33AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
Jeff Garzik (1):
mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
[...]
drivers/scsi/mvsas.c| 2981
I just noticed that the file permissions on that
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:13:33AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> Jeff Garzik (1):
> mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
[...]
> drivers/scsi/mvsas.c| 2981
>
I just noticed that the file permissions on that file are 755 in
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 12:31 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the
> > original
> > author of mvsas, but...
> >
> > Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
>
> I'm personally
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:31:02 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the
> > original
> > author of mvsas, but...
> >
> > Should we be adding new drivers
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the original
> author of mvsas, but...
>
> Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add anything
but itself (ie no
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On the net driver side of things, I have a few new net drivers that I
have queued for 2.6.26, because they did not make the merge window. This
is inconsistent with your apparently policy.
s/apparently/apparent/
Sometimes my fingers don't type the words that come out of my
James Bottomley wrote:
This is the latest crop of bug fixes plus one new driver: mvsas. We're
[...]
Jeff Garzik (1):
mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
[...]
Ke Wei (1):
mvsas: convert from rough draft to working driver
I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot
This is the latest crop of bug fixes plus one new driver: mvsas. We're
still in the throes of trying to fix aic94xx/libsas error handling, so
the fix here isn't complete (but it is much better than before).
The patch is available here:
This is the latest crop of bug fixes plus one new driver: mvsas. We're
still in the throes of trying to fix aic94xx/libsas error handling, so
the fix here isn't complete (but it is much better than before).
The patch is available here:
James Bottomley wrote:
This is the latest crop of bug fixes plus one new driver: mvsas. We're
[...]
Jeff Garzik (1):
mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
[...]
Ke Wei (1):
mvsas: convert from rough draft to working driver
I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On the net driver side of things, I have a few new net drivers that I
have queued for 2.6.26, because they did not make the merge window. This
is inconsistent with your apparently policy.
s/apparently/apparent/
Sometimes my fingers don't type the words that come out of my
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the original
author of mvsas, but...
Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add anything
but itself (ie no
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:31:02 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the
original
author of mvsas, but...
Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
I'm
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 12:31 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the
original
author of mvsas, but...
Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
I'm personally of the opinion
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:13:33AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
Jeff Garzik (1):
mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
[...]
drivers/scsi/mvsas.c| 2981
I just noticed that the file permissions on that file are 755 in
Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:13:33AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
Jeff Garzik (1):
mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
[...]
drivers/scsi/mvsas.c| 2981
I just noticed that the file permissions on that
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:31:02 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the original
author of mvsas, but...
Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 18:31 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:13:33AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
Jeff Garzik (1):
mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
[...]
drivers/scsi/mvsas.c| 2981
28 matches
Mail list logo
