Hi Linus,
Can you please pull the XFS update from the tag below? You will get
a merge conflict against fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c - I committed "xfs: fix
type confusion in xfs_ioc_swapext" with an additional comment to
explain why such a unique test was being done in the ioctl code.
As for the rest of
Hi Linus,
Can you please pull the XFS update from the tag below? You will get
a merge conflict against fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c - I committed "xfs: fix
type confusion in xfs_ioc_swapext" with an additional comment to
explain why such a unique test was being done in the ioctl code.
As for the rest of
Hi Linus,
Can you please pull the changes from the tag below? This is the
second update for XFS that I mentioned in the original pull request
last week. It contains a revert for a suspend regression in 4.4 and
a fix for a long standing log recovery issue that has been further
exposed by all the
Hi Linus,
Can you please pull the changes from the tag below? This is the
second update for XFS that I mentioned in the original pull request
last week. It contains a revert for a suspend regression in 4.4 and
a fix for a long standing log recovery issue that has been further
exposed by all the
Hi Linus,
Can you please pull the fixes from the tag below? It's a little
larger than I'd like late in the release cycle, but all the fixes
are for regressions introduced in the 4.1-rc1 merge, or are needed
back in -stable kernels fairly quickly as they are filesystem
corruption or userspace
Hi Linus,
Can you please pull the fixes from the tag below? It's a little
larger than I'd like late in the release cycle, but all the fixes
are for regressions introduced in the 4.1-rc1 merge, or are needed
back in -stable kernels fairly quickly as they are filesystem
corruption or userspace
Hey Linus,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:12:09PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
>Please pull this xfs update for 3.14. This is to allow logical sector
> sized
>direct io on advanced format disks.
Could you pick this up for -rc2?
Thanks,
Ben
> The following changes since commit
Hey Linus,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:12:09PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
Please pull this xfs update for 3.14. This is to allow logical sector
sized
direct io on advanced format disks.
Could you pick this up for -rc2?
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit
Hi Linus,
Please pull this xfs update for 3.14. This is to allow logical sector sized
direct io on advanced format disks.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit bf3964c188d686424ff7b69a45941851b9f437f0:
Merge branch 'xfs-extent-list-locking-fixes' into for-next
Hi Linus,
Please pull this xfs update for 3.14. This is to allow logical sector sized
direct io on advanced format disks.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit bf3964c188d686424ff7b69a45941851b9f437f0:
Merge branch 'xfs-extent-list-locking-fixes' into for-next
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.13-rc1. It's kind of a random
assortment. There is more rearrangement to make libxfs sync with the
kernel, the differences between v2 and v3 were abstracted into an ops
vector, xfs_inactive was reworked, along with the preallocation and hole
punch
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.13-rc1. It's kind of a random
assortment. There is more rearrangement to make libxfs sync with the
kernel, the differences between v2 and v3 were abstracted into an ops
vector, xfs_inactive was reworked, along with the preallocation and hole
punch
Hi Linus,
Please pull a few more XFS updates for 3.11-rc1.
Here are a fix for xfs_fsr, a cleanup in bulkstat, a cleanup in
xfs_open_by_handle, updated mount options documentation, a cleanup in
xfs_bmapi_write, a fix for the size of dquot log reservations, a fix
for sgid
Hi Linus,
Please pull a few more XFS updates for 3.11-rc1.
Here are a fix for xfs_fsr, a cleanup in bulkstat, a cleanup in
xfs_open_by_handle, updated mount options documentation, a cleanup in
xfs_bmapi_write, a fix for the size of dquot log reservations, a fix
for sgid
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.11-rc1. This includes several bugfixes,
part of the work for project quotas and group quotas to be used together,
performance improvements for inode creation/deletion, buffer readahead, and
bulkstat, implementation of the inode change
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.11-rc1. This includes several bugfixes,
part of the work for project quotas and group quotas to be used together,
performance improvements for inode creation/deletion, buffer readahead, and
bulkstat, implementation of the inode change
Hi Linus,
Please pull these fixes for XFS. These fixes remove shouty warnings which
spam system logs, align dir/attr structures with CRCs correctly, set the
block number on the new child block during a btree root split correctly, and
the last one disables verifiers as a temporary
Hi Linus,
Please pull these fixes for XFS. These fixes remove shouty warnings which
spam system logs, align dir/attr structures with CRCs correctly, set the
block number on the new child block during a btree root split correctly, and
the last one disables verifiers as a temporary
Hi Linus,
Please pull these updates for XFS. Here are several fixes for
filesystems with CRC support turned on: fixes for quota, remote
attributes, and recovery. There is also some feature work related to
CRCs: the implementation of CRCs for the inode unlinked lists,
disabling noattr2/attr2
Hi Linus,
Please pull these updates for XFS. Here are several fixes for
filesystems with CRC support turned on: fixes for quota, remote
attributes, and recovery. There is also some feature work related to
CRCs: the implementation of CRCs for the inode unlinked lists,
disabling noattr2/attr2
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.9-rc1. Here there are
primarily fixes for regressions and bugs, but there are a few cleanups
too. There are fixes for compound buffers, quota asserts, dir v2 block
compaction, mount behavior, use-after-free with AIO, swap extents, an
unmount
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.9-rc1. Here there are
primarily fixes for regressions and bugs, but there are a few cleanups
too. There are fixes for compound buffers, quota asserts, dir v2 block
compaction, mount behavior, use-after-free with AIO, swap extents, an
unmount
Hi Linus,
Please pull these fixes for XFS. Here are fixes for returning
EFSCORRUPTED on probe of a non-xfs filesystem, the stack switch in
xfs_bmapi_allocate, a crash in _xfs_buf_find, speculative
preallocation as the filesystem nears ENOSPC, an unmount hang, a race
with AIO, and
Hi Linus,
Please pull these fixes for XFS. Here are fixes for returning
EFSCORRUPTED on probe of a non-xfs filesystem, the stack switch in
xfs_bmapi_allocate, a crash in _xfs_buf_find, speculative
preallocation as the filesystem nears ENOSPC, an unmount hang, a race
with AIO, and
Hi Linus,
Please pull these fixes for XFS. There are fixes for compound
buffers, a fix for quotas, and a fix for dirv2 corruption introduced
in the 3.8 merge window.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit a49f0d1ea3ec94fc7cf33a7c36a16343b74bd565:
Linux 3.8-rc1
Hi Linus,
Please pull these fixes for XFS. There are fixes for compound
buffers, a fix for quotas, and a fix for dirv2 corruption introduced
in the 3.8 merge window.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit a49f0d1ea3ec94fc7cf33a7c36a16343b74bd565:
Linux 3.8-rc1
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.8-rc1. There is plenty going on, including
the cleanup of xfssyncd, metadata verifiers, CRC infrastructure for the log,
tracking of inodes with speculative allocation, a cleanup of xfs_fs_subr.c,
fixes for XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE, and important fix
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.8-rc1. There is plenty going on, including
the cleanup of xfssyncd, metadata verifiers, CRC infrastructure for the log,
tracking of inodes with speculative allocation, a cleanup of xfs_fs_subr.c,
fixes for XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE, and important fix
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 3 bug fixes for XFS. This includes a fix for attribute
corruption, a fix for error handling in xfs_vm_writepage, and a fix for
reference counts on xfs_bufs.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit 6ce377afd1755eae5c93410ca9a1121dfead7b87:
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 3 bug fixes for XFS. This includes a fix for attribute
corruption, a fix for error handling in xfs_vm_writepage, and a fix for
reference counts on xfs_bufs.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit 6ce377afd1755eae5c93410ca9a1121dfead7b87:
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 10 bug fixes for XFS. They include a fix for deadlock on
allocation group freelist buffers, a fix for corruption on log replay, a fix
for growfs, and a few more to boot.
Erm... this is for 3.7-rc5, please. Sorry for the dup.
Thanks,
Ben
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 10 bug fixes for XFS. They include a fix for deadlock on
allocation group freelist buffers, a fix for corruption on log replay, a fix
for growfs, and a few more to boot.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 10 bug fixes for XFS. They include a fix for deadlock on
allocation group freelist buffers, a fix for corruption on log replay, a fix
for growfs, and a few more to boot.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 10 bug fixes for XFS. They include a fix for deadlock on
allocation group freelist buffers, a fix for corruption on log replay, a fix
for growfs, and a few more to boot.
Erm... this is for 3.7-rc5, please. Sorry for the dup.
Thanks,
Ben
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.7-rc1. inode32/64 mount options have been
remountable, and there are SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA enhancements. I believe you
have already merged all of the bug fixes.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.7-rc1. inode32/64 mount options have been
remountable, and there are SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA enhancements. I believe you
have already merged all of the bug fixes.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 2 bugfixes for XFS. There is a fix for crashes on unmount
and a fix for a race when discarding xfs_bufs.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit a672e1be30d5bc848cd0067c55ed29b2015b7c17:
xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 2 bugfixes for XFS. There is a fix for crashes on unmount
and a fix for a race when discarding xfs_bufs.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit a672e1be30d5bc848cd0067c55ed29b2015b7c17:
xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 2 bugfixes and a regression fix for XFS. Here we have a
fix for a possible overlow in trim code, a fix for an uninitialised
variable, and a fix for a regression in the v3.6-rc1 XFS merge.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit
Hi Linus,
Please pull these 2 bugfixes and a regression fix for XFS. Here we have a
fix for a possible overlow in trim code, a fix for an uninitialised
variable, and a fix for a regression in the v3.6-rc1 XFS merge.
Thanks,
Ben
The following changes since commit
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.6-rc1. There are numerous cleanups and
several bugfixes. Here are the highlights:
* Discontiguous directory buffer support
* Inode allocator refactoring
* Removal of the IO lock in inode reclaim
* Implementation of
Hi Linus,
Please pull these XFS updates for 3.6-rc1. There are numerous cleanups and
several bugfixes. Here are the highlights:
* Discontiguous directory buffer support
* Inode allocator refactoring
* Removal of the IO lock in inode reclaim
* Implementation of
Hi Linus,
Please pull these regression fixes for XFS. Here we have a fix for a cursor
leak, a fix for a performance regression, a fix for recursion in
xfs_buf_iorequest which causes stack overflows, and a fix for error handling
in xfs_buf_iodone callbacks.
Thanks,
Ben
The
Hi Linus,
Please pull these regression fixes for XFS. Here we have a fix for a cursor
leak, a fix for a performance regression, a fix for recursion in
xfs_buf_iorequest which causes stack overflows, and a fix for error handling
in xfs_buf_iodone callbacks.
Thanks,
Ben
The
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/xfs_bit.c | 103 ++
fs/xfs/xfs_bit.h | 27 ++---
fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 19
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/xfs_bit.c | 103 ++
fs/xfs/xfs_bit.h | 27 ++---
fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 19
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Remove empty file fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6.
Already in the upstream kernel...
That's funny - I didn't see this change come through. Oh well... thanks.
commit 1803f3389b7ac9ed33ea561b3b94e22e2864a95d
Author: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Remove empty file fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6.
Already in the upstream kernel...
commit 1803f3389b7ac9ed33ea561b3b94e22e2864a95d
Author: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Feb 20 19:55:09 2008 -0800
Remove empty file remnants that were left in the
please ignore this request - sent the wrong file, see next pull request...
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6
through these commits:
commit
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile | 118 -
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 | 117
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile | 118 -
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 | 117
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6
through these commits:
commit
please ignore this request - sent the wrong file, see next pull request...
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Remove empty file fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6.
Already in the upstream kernel...
commit 1803f3389b7ac9ed33ea561b3b94e22e2864a95d
Author: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Feb 20 19:55:09 2008 -0800
Remove empty file remnants that were left in the
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Remove empty file fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6.
Already in the upstream kernel...
That's funny - I didn't see this change come through. Oh well... thanks.
commit 1803f3389b7ac9ed33ea561b3b94e22e2864a95d
Author: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile | 118 -
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 | 117
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>
> This will update the following files:
>
> fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
> fs/xfs/Makefile | 118
> -
> fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 | 117
>
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile | 118
-
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 | 117
3
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile | 118 -
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 | 117
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile | 118 -
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 | 117
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Kbuild |6 --
fs/xfs/Makefile | 118 -
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 | 117
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 |1 -
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/spin.h| 45 ---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c| 43 ++-
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/Makefile-linux-2.6 |1 -
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/spin.h| 45 ---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c| 43 ++-
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c | 16 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
through these commits:
commit
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c | 16 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
through these commits:
commit
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c |1 +
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c |4 +---
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
through these commits:
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c |1 +
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c |4 +---
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
through these commits:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:19:04PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:59:11PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > > Please pull from the for-linus branch:
> > > git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, David Chinner wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:59:11PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > Please pull from the for-linus branch:
> > git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
>
> Linus, please don't pull this yet. A problem has been found in
> the
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:59:11PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> Please pull from the for-linus branch:
> git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
Linus, please don't pull this yet. A problem has been found in
the dirent fix, and we've just fixed another mknod related
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:59:11PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
Linus, please don't pull this yet. A problem has been found in
the dirent fix, and we've just fixed another mknod related
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:59:11PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
Linus, please don't pull this yet. A problem has been found in
the dirent fix,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:19:04PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 05:59:11PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
Linus,
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c |4 ++--
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c |6 ++
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c |2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c|
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c |4 ++--
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c |6 ++
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c |2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c|
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c | 37 +---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c| 124
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c | 37 +---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c| 124
Hi Linus,
A couple of Christoph patches for XFS ...
A fid one for nfs exports which akpm is waiting for.
Thanks.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_export.c |6
Hi Linus,
A couple of Christoph patches for XFS ...
A fid one for nfs exports which akpm is waiting for.
Thanks.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_export.c |6
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:36:58 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Please pull from the for-linus branch:
> > git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
> >
> > These include
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Please pull from the for-linus branch:
> git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
>
> These include changes we have had scheduled for 2.6.24.
> In particular they include Christoph's (hch's)
Hi Linus,
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
These include changes we have had scheduled for 2.6.24.
In particular they include Christoph's (hch's) behavior removal patches.
--Tim
This will update the following files:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Hi Linus,
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
These include changes we have had scheduled for 2.6.24.
In particular they include Christoph's (hch's) behavior
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:36:58 +0100
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Hi Linus,
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
These include changes we have
Hi Linus,
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
These include changes we have had scheduled for 2.6.24.
In particular they include Christoph's (hch's) behavior removal patches.
--Tim
This will update the following files:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Lachlan's description:
This fix is for a problem that has been in XFS since day one.
[XFS] Avoid replaying inode buffer initialisation log items if on-disk
version is newer.
...
Why wasn't this in the commit logs?
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
>
> Lachlan's description:
> This fix is for a problem that has been in XFS since day one.
> [XFS] Avoid replaying inode buffer initialisation log items if on-disk
> version is newer.
...
Why wasn't this in the commit logs? Now it just
Hi Linus,
A problem has been found for the XFS commit
b394e43e995d08821588a22561c6a71a63b4ff27
and it needs to be reverted.
It has the potential for worse corruption than what it is meant to fix.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git
Hi Linus,
A problem has been found for the XFS commit
b394e43e995d08821588a22561c6a71a63b4ff27
and it needs to be reverted.
It has the potential for worse corruption than what it is meant to fix.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Lachlan's description:
This fix is for a problem that has been in XFS since day one.
[XFS] Avoid replaying inode buffer initialisation log items if on-disk
version is newer.
...
Why wasn't this in the commit logs? Now it just says it
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Lachlan's description:
This fix is for a problem that has been in XFS since day one.
[XFS] Avoid replaying inode buffer initialisation log items if on-disk
version is newer.
...
Why wasn't this in the commit logs?
Hi Linus,
A couple of small fixes.
One for harmless sparse warnings and one which can prevent
crashes on 32 bit boxes using filestreams.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
Hi Linus,
A couple of small fixes.
One for harmless sparse warnings and one which can prevent
crashes on 32 bit boxes using filestreams.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
Hi Linus,
A couple of fixes for potential fs corruption.
And one fix to ensure that xfs_mru_cache is not
doing anything unless the cache has active objects.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following
Hi Linus,
A couple of fixes for potential fs corruption.
And one fix to ensure that xfs_mru_cache is not
doing anything unless the cache has active objects.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
>
> The window between pulling in and applying changes was obviously
> large enough for Nick's changes to get in.
Don't worry.
Basically, merging is my job, and I happily do it. If I hit something that
makes me nervous enough, I'll just push back
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
Ok, this got some conflicts with Nick's VM fault patches, but I fixed them
up since they looked trivial, and pushed out the
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
>
> Please pull from the for-linus branch:
> git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
Ok, this got some conflicts with Nick's VM fault patches, but I fixed them
up since they looked trivial, and pushed out the result. Please do
Hi Linus,
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/buffer.c | 47 +++
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c | 16 ++
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
