Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-25 Thread pr-tracker-bot
The pull request you sent on Sat, 24 Oct 2020 21:34:47 +0200: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wtarreau/prandom.git > tags/20201024-v4-5.10 has been merged into torvalds/linux.git: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/91f28da8c9a054286d6917ce191349455c479478 Thank you! --

[GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Linus, I've addressed the build issues when CONFIG_RANDOM32_SELFTEST is enabled, and also added a self-test for the new code (last patch of the series). As I previously questionned, I finally replaced this_cpu_read(noise) with raw_cpu_read(noise) as it it's pointless to deal with interrupts

Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-21 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 02:41:06PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 14:35 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 2:20 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > > While secure solutions are useful, I really wonder if > > > "George Spelvin" is a real person. > > > > It's not his

Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 2:20 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > While secure solutions are useful, I really wonder if > "George Spelvin" is a real person. It's not his real name, no, but he's a real person. I do have his real name from years ago when I needed to confirm his identity for sign-offs (I

Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 14:35 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 2:20 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > While secure solutions are useful, I really wonder if > > "George Spelvin" is a real person. > > It's not his real name, no, but he's a real person. > > I do have his real name from

Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 13:52 -0700, Marc Plumb wrote: > As one of the participants, I mostly backed off when Spelvin seemed to > be more aggressively driving a secure solution. While secure solutions are useful, I really wonder if "George Spelvin" is a real person.

Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-21 Thread Marc Plumb
As one of the participants, I mostly backed off when Spelvin seemed to be more aggressively driving a secure solution. I still think that this is an important change, both to fix the original network vulnerability and to avoid harming dev/random while doing it. I greatly appreciate your time

Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Linus, On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:08:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:26 PM Amit Klein wrote: > > > > Quick question: is this patch still planned for inclusion in 5.10-rc1? > > It doesn't even build for me, so no. It clearly hasn't been in > linux-next or

Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:26 PM Amit Klein wrote: > > Quick question: is this patch still planned for inclusion in 5.10-rc1? It doesn't even build for me, so no. It clearly hasn't been in linux-next or anything like that. Hint: grep for prandom_seed_early. Linus

[GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10

2020-10-12 Thread Willy Tarreau
Linus, Given that nobody objected to this patchset since last update on prandom32 a month ago, I'm sending you the refreshed one for 5.10. The following changes since commit bbf5c979011a099af5dc76498918ed7df445635b: Linux 5.9 (2020-10-11 14:15:50 -0700) are available in the Git repository