Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan wrote:
>
> > Do you really have worker threads? In my reading of the patch it seems
> > that the wtd is serviced by keventd. [...]
>
> i think worker threads (or any 'helper' threads) should be avoided. It can
> be done
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan wrote:
> Do you really have worker threads? In my reading of the patch it seems
> that the wtd is serviced by keventd. [...]
i think worker threads (or any 'helper' threads) should be avoided. It can
be done without any extra process context, and
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan wrote:
Do you really have worker threads? In my reading of the patch it seems
that the wtd is serviced by keventd. [...]
i think worker threads (or any 'helper' threads) should be avoided. It can
be done without any extra process context, and it
Ingo Molnar wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan wrote:
Do you really have worker threads? In my reading of the patch it seems
that the wtd is serviced by keventd. [...]
i think worker threads (or any 'helper' threads) should be avoided. It can
be done without any
4 matches
Mail list logo
