Re: [LKP] Re: [hugetlbfs] c0d0381ade: vm-scalability.throughput -33.4% regression

2020-10-13 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 10/13/2020 11:01 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote: On 10/12/20 6:59 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 10/13/2020 1:40 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote: On 10/11/20 10:29 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: Hi Mike, I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost the same as 34ae204f1851. Do

Re: [LKP] Re: [hugetlbfs] c0d0381ade: vm-scalability.throughput -33.4% regression

2020-10-12 Thread Mike Kravetz
On 10/12/20 6:59 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 10/13/2020 1:40 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote: >> On 10/11/20 10:29 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost >>> the same as 34ae204f1851. Do you have time to look at it?

Re: [LKP] Re: [hugetlbfs] c0d0381ade: vm-scalability.throughput -33.4% regression

2020-10-12 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 10/13/2020 1:40 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote: On 10/11/20 10:29 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: Hi Mike, I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost the same as 34ae204f1851. Do you have time to look at it? Thanks. Thank you for testing. Just curious, did you apply

Re: [LKP] Re: [hugetlbfs] c0d0381ade: vm-scalability.throughput -33.4% regression

2020-10-12 Thread Mike Kravetz
On 10/11/20 10:29 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > Hi Mike, > >I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost the > same as 34ae204f1851. Do you have time to look at it? Thanks. > Thank you for testing. Just curious, did you apply the series in this thread or just test

Re: [LKP] Re: [hugetlbfs] c0d0381ade: vm-scalability.throughput -33.4% regression

2020-10-11 Thread Xing Zhengjun
Hi Mike, I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost the same as 34ae204f1851. Do you have time to look at it? Thanks. =

Re: [LKP] Re: [hugetlbfs] c0d0381ade: vm-scalability.throughput -33.4% regression

2020-08-21 Thread Mike Kravetz
On 8/21/20 2:02 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: > Would you be willing to test this series on top of 34ae204f1851? I will need > to rebase the series to take the changes made by 34ae204f1851 into account. Actually, the series in this thread will apply/run cleanly on top of 34ae204f1851. No need to

Re: [LKP] Re: [hugetlbfs] c0d0381ade: vm-scalability.throughput -33.4% regression

2020-08-21 Thread Mike Kravetz
On 8/21/20 1:39 AM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 6/26/2020 5:33 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote: >> On 6/22/20 3:01 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: >>> On 6/21/20 5:55 PM, kernel test robot wrote: Greeting, FYI, we noticed a -33.4% regression of vm-scalability.throughput due to commit:

Re: [LKP] Re: [hugetlbfs] c0d0381ade: vm-scalability.throughput -33.4% regression

2020-08-21 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 6/26/2020 5:33 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote: On 6/22/20 3:01 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: On 6/21/20 5:55 PM, kernel test robot wrote: Greeting, FYI, we noticed a -33.4% regression of vm-scalability.throughput due to commit: commit: c0d0381ade79885c04a04c303284b040616b116e ("hugetlbfs: use