Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-09 Thread Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:37:32PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote: > > Well, the real problem is that (at least Voodoo3) DRI didn't work _before_ > > with the "latest" test and pre kernels, and X < 4.0.2 (unless there was some > > combination I didn't manage to find) even

Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-09 Thread Alan Olsen
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, J Sloan wrote: > This is a little OT for linux-kernel, but I'll take a swing at it > since I'm running 2.4 and Xfree 4 with a voodoo 3. > > After upgrading to Red Hat 7.0, I noticed 3D screensavers > and Quake 3 Arena were dog slow - in the end, I basically > had to make

Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-09 Thread Alan Olsen
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, J Sloan wrote: This is a little OT for linux-kernel, but I'll take a swing at it since I'm running 2.4 and Xfree 4 with a voodoo 3. After upgrading to Red Hat 7.0, I noticed 3D screensavers and Quake 3 Arena were dog slow - in the end, I basically had to make sure the

Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-09 Thread Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:37:32PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote: Well, the real problem is that (at least Voodoo3) DRI didn't work _before_ with the "latest" test and pre kernels, and X 4.0.2 (unless there was some combination I didn't manage to find) even if it was

Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread J Sloan
Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:56:05PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > > > In my case, that meant nuking mesa from my system and > > letting Linux use what was left, which got me back the good > > accelerated performance - you may choose a less drastic > > option. I don't

Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:56:05PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > In my case, that meant nuking mesa from my system and > letting Linux use what was left, which got me back the good > accelerated performance - you may choose a less drastic > option. I don't see any breakage from the absence of mesa.

[OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread J Sloan
This is a little OT for linux-kernel, but I'll take a swing at it since I'm running 2.4 and Xfree 4 with a voodoo 3. After upgrading to Red Hat 7.0, I noticed 3D screensavers and Quake 3 Arena were dog slow - in the end, I basically had to make sure the mesa libs didn't get found before the real

[OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread J Sloan
This is a little OT for linux-kernel, but I'll take a swing at it since I'm running 2.4 and Xfree 4 with a voodoo 3. After upgrading to Red Hat 7.0, I noticed 3D screensavers and Quake 3 Arena were dog slow - in the end, I basically had to make sure the mesa libs didn't get found before the real

Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:56:05PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: In my case, that meant nuking mesa from my system and letting Linux use what was left, which got me back the good accelerated performance - you may choose a less drastic option. I don't see any breakage from the absence of mesa. Well,

Re: [OT]: DRI doesn't work on 2.4.0 but does on prerelease-ac5

2001-01-08 Thread J Sloan
Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:56:05PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: In my case, that meant nuking mesa from my system and letting Linux use what was left, which got me back the good accelerated performance - you may choose a less drastic option. I don't see any