On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:55:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:48:24PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Even every module has loaded onto same addresses, some modules can be
> > changed and reloaded.
>
> Can you rephrase the above statement?
>
> You mean
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:55:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:48:24PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Even every module has loaded onto same addresses, some modules can be
> > changed and reloaded.
>
> Can you rephrase the above statement?
>
> You mean
Em Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:48:24PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Even every module has loaded onto same addresses, some modules can be
> changed and reloaded.
Can you rephrase the above statement?
You mean even if a module is reloaded at the same address it can have a
different symtab and thus
Em Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:48:24PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Even every module has loaded onto same addresses, some modules can be
> changed and reloaded.
Can you rephrase the above statement?
You mean even if a module is reloaded at the same address it can have a
different symtab and thus
Even every module has loaded onto same addresses, some modules can be
changed and reloaded. In that case it needs to access to the old module
in the build-id cache.
Cc: Adrian Hunter
Cc: Wang Nan
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim
Even every module has loaded onto same addresses, some modules can be
changed and reloaded. In that case it needs to access to the old module
in the build-id cache.
Cc: Adrian Hunter
Cc: Wang Nan
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim
---
tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 45
6 matches
Mail list logo