On 6/26/19 4:47 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> There is a potential integer overflow when int 2 is left shifted
> as this is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic but is being used in
> a context that expects an expression of type s64. Fix this by
> shifting 2ULL to avoid a 32 bit
Am 26.06.2019 16:47, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> There is a potential integer overflow when int 2 is left shifted
> as this is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic but is being used in
> a context that expects an expression of type s64. Fix this by
> shifting 2ULL to avoid a
From: Colin Ian King
There is a potential integer overflow when int 2 is left shifted
as this is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic but is being used in
a context that expects an expression of type s64. Fix this by
shifting 2ULL to avoid a 32 bit overflow.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional
3 matches
Mail list logo
