On 01/17/2018 07:33 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi, Woody,
On 01/16/2018 10:39 PM, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Thomas, the same way my DRM patch has disappeared:
Date
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:50:57 -0800
From Sinclair Yeh <>
Subject Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
This looks okay
On 01/17/2018 07:33 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi, Woody,
On 01/16/2018 10:39 PM, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Thomas, the same way my DRM patch has disappeared:
Date
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:50:57 -0800
From Sinclair Yeh <>
Subject Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
This looks okay
Hi, Woody,
On 01/16/2018 10:39 PM, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Thomas, the same way my DRM patch has disappeared:
Date
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:50:57 -0800
From Sinclair Yeh <>
Subject Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
This looks okay to me.
Since this is a core DRM patch I think
Hi, Woody,
On 01/16/2018 10:39 PM, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Thomas, the same way my DRM patch has disappeared:
Date
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:50:57 -0800
From Sinclair Yeh <>
Subject Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
This looks okay to me.
Since this is a core DRM patch I think
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi, Arnd,
>
> Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in
> drm-next. My bad.
No worries.
> Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window?
The patch isn't urgent, it's
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi, Arnd,
>
> Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in
> drm-next. My bad.
No worries.
> Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window?
The patch isn't urgent, it's fine to wait until after
Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi, Arnd,
Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in
drm-next. My bad.
Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window?
/Thomas
On 01/16/2018 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct
Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi, Arnd,
Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in
drm-next. My bad.
Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window?
/Thomas
On 01/16/2018 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct
Hi, Arnd,
Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in
drm-next. My bad.
Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window?
/Thomas
On 01/16/2018 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct drm_vmw_event_fence) and
Hi, Arnd,
Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in
drm-next. My bad.
Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window?
/Thomas
On 01/16/2018 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct drm_vmw_event_fence) and
DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct drm_vmw_event_fence) and
DRM_EVENT_VBLANK (struct drm_event_vblank) pass timestamps in 32-bit
seconds/microseconds format.
As of commit c61eef726a78 ("drm: add support for monotonic vblank
timestamps"), other DRM drivers use monotonic times for
DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct drm_vmw_event_fence) and
DRM_EVENT_VBLANK (struct drm_event_vblank) pass timestamps in 32-bit
seconds/microseconds format.
As of commit c61eef726a78 ("drm: add support for monotonic vblank
timestamps"), other DRM drivers use monotonic times for
12 matches
Mail list logo