Re: drm: fix vmwgfx boot warning WAS Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-17 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 01/17/2018 07:33 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: Hi, Woody, On 01/16/2018 10:39 PM, Woody Suwalski wrote: Thomas, the same way my DRM patch has disappeared: Date Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:50:57 -0800 From Sinclair Yeh <> Subject Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning This looks okay

Re: drm: fix vmwgfx boot warning WAS Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-17 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 01/17/2018 07:33 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: Hi, Woody, On 01/16/2018 10:39 PM, Woody Suwalski wrote: Thomas, the same way my DRM patch has disappeared: Date Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:50:57 -0800 From Sinclair Yeh <> Subject Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning This looks okay

drm: fix vmwgfx boot warning WAS Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Woody, On 01/16/2018 10:39 PM, Woody Suwalski wrote: Thomas, the same way my DRM patch has disappeared: Date Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:50:57 -0800 From Sinclair Yeh <> Subject Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning This looks okay to me. Since this is a core DRM patch I think

drm: fix vmwgfx boot warning WAS Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Woody, On 01/16/2018 10:39 PM, Woody Suwalski wrote: Thomas, the same way my DRM patch has disappeared: Date Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:50:57 -0800 From Sinclair Yeh <> Subject Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning This looks okay to me. Since this is a core DRM patch I think

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Hi, Arnd, > > Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in > drm-next. My bad. No worries. > Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window? The patch isn't urgent, it's

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Hi, Arnd, > > Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in > drm-next. My bad. No worries. > Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window? The patch isn't urgent, it's fine to wait until after

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Woody Suwalski
Thomas Hellstrom wrote: Hi, Arnd, Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in drm-next. My bad. Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window? /Thomas On 01/16/2018 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Woody Suwalski
Thomas Hellstrom wrote: Hi, Arnd, Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in drm-next. My bad. Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window? /Thomas On 01/16/2018 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Arnd, Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in drm-next. My bad. Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window? /Thomas On 01/16/2018 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct drm_vmw_event_fence) and

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Arnd, Sinclair's on paternal leave and I thought this patch was already in drm-next. My bad. Dave, is it too late to pull this in for the next merge window? /Thomas On 01/16/2018 06:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct drm_vmw_event_fence) and

[PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct drm_vmw_event_fence) and DRM_EVENT_VBLANK (struct drm_event_vblank) pass timestamps in 32-bit seconds/microseconds format. As of commit c61eef726a78 ("drm: add support for monotonic vblank timestamps"), other DRM drivers use monotonic times for

[PATCH] [RESEND] vmwgfx: use monotonic event timestamps

2018-01-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
DRM_VMW_EVENT_FENCE_SIGNALED (struct drm_vmw_event_fence) and DRM_EVENT_VBLANK (struct drm_event_vblank) pass timestamps in 32-bit seconds/microseconds format. As of commit c61eef726a78 ("drm: add support for monotonic vblank timestamps"), other DRM drivers use monotonic times for