Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, 21:30:15 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> We should be able to talk to the PMIC at 400kHz. No need to talk at
> the slow 100kHz.
>
> As measured by ftrace (with a bunch of extra patches, since cpufreq
> for rk808 hasn't landed yet):
> before this change:
On 11 Sep 2014 12:30, Doug Anderson writes:
> We should be able to talk to the PMIC at 400kHz. No need to talk at
> the slow 100kHz.
>
> As measured by ftrace (with a bunch of extra patches, since cpufreq
> for rk808 hasn't landed yet):
> before this change: cpu0_set_target() => ~500us
>
On 11 Sep 2014 12:30, Doug Anderson writes:
We should be able to talk to the PMIC at 400kHz. No need to talk at
the slow 100kHz.
As measured by ftrace (with a bunch of extra patches, since cpufreq
for rk808 hasn't landed yet):
before this change: cpu0_set_target() = ~500us
after this
Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, 21:30:15 schrieb Doug Anderson:
We should be able to talk to the PMIC at 400kHz. No need to talk at
the slow 100kHz.
As measured by ftrace (with a bunch of extra patches, since cpufreq
for rk808 hasn't landed yet):
before this change: cpu0_set_target() =
We should be able to talk to the PMIC at 400kHz. No need to talk at
the slow 100kHz.
As measured by ftrace (with a bunch of extra patches, since cpufreq
for rk808 hasn't landed yet):
before this change: cpu0_set_target() => ~500us
after this change: cpu0_set_target() => ~300us
We should be able to talk to the PMIC at 400kHz. No need to talk at
the slow 100kHz.
As measured by ftrace (with a bunch of extra patches, since cpufreq
for rk808 hasn't landed yet):
before this change: cpu0_set_target() = ~500us
after this change: cpu0_set_target() = ~300us
Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo