Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-03-03 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 03/04/2014 02:00 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 03/02/2014 08:49 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-03-03 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/02/2014 08:49 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is > still minimal with no display option and USB requiring external power. > > A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses are hardcoded > to match the static values

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-03-03 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/02/2014 08:49 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses are hardcoded to match the static values the

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-03-03 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 03/04/2014 02:00 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 03/02/2014 08:49 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-03-02 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 03/03/2014 12:49 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses are hardcoded to match the static values the

[PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-03-02 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses are hardcoded to match the static values the bootloader is known to use. This allows booting from an

[PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-03-02 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses are hardcoded to match the static values the bootloader is known to use. This allows booting from an

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-03-02 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 03/03/2014 12:49 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses are hardcoded to match the static values the

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-26 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 02/26/2014 05:52 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On 02/25/2014 06:52 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 02/25/2014 03:13 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > +/* Wifi */ > +sdhci@7800 { > +status = "okay"; > +bus-width = <4>; > +broken-cd;

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-26 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 02/26/2014 05:52 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/25/2014 06:52 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:13 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: +/* Wifi */ +sdhci@7800 { +status = okay; +bus-width = 4; +broken-cd; +keep-power-in-suspend; +

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 02/26/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/25/2014 09:58 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/26/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Stephen Warren
On 02/25/2014 09:58 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On 02/26/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 02/26/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 02/25/2014 06:52 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:13 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: +/* Wifi */ +sdhci@7800 { +status = "okay"; +bus-width = <4>; +broken-cd; +keep-power-in-suspend; +cap-sdio-irq; Is non-removable better than

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Stephen Warren
On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is >>> still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy >>> to

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 02/25/2014 03:13 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> >>> +/* Wifi */ >>> +sdhci@7800 { >>> +status = "okay"; >>> +bus-width = <4>; >>> +broken-cd; >>> +keep-power-in-suspend; >>> +cap-sdio-irq; >> >> Is non-removable better than broken-cd, or are

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 02/25/2014 03:13 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: +/* Wifi */ +sdhci@7800 { +status = okay; +bus-width = 4; +broken-cd; +keep-power-in-suspend; +cap-sdio-irq; Is non-removable better than broken-cd, or are they entirely unrelated?

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Stephen Warren
On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy to get to

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 02/25/2014 06:52 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:13 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: +/* Wifi */ +sdhci@7800 { +status = okay; +bus-width = 4; +broken-cd; +keep-power-in-suspend; +cap-sdio-irq; Is non-removable better than

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 02/26/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Stephen Warren
On 02/25/2014 09:58 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/26/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-25 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 02/26/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/25/2014 09:58 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/26/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-24 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy to get to work) and USB requiring external power. You could add

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-24 Thread Stephen Warren
On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is > still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy > to get to work) and USB requiring external power. You could add a simple-framebuffer node for now, I think?

[PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-24 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy to get to work) and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses are hardcoded to match the static values the

[PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-24 Thread Alexandre Courbot
Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy to get to work) and USB requiring external power. A default kernel command-line as well as initrd addresses are hardcoded to match the static values the

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-24 Thread Stephen Warren
On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy to get to work) and USB requiring external power. You could add a simple-framebuffer node for now, I think?

Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add device tree for SHIELD

2014-02-24 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy to get to work) and USB requiring external power. You could add