On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>>> > Please use subject lines
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>>> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
>> > makes it easier for people to identify
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
>> > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
>
>>
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
> > > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
>
> > The
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
> > > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
>
> > The
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
> > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> The point is that ASOC should be ASoC? Ther aren't many
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
> > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> The point is that ASOC should be ASoC? Ther aren't many
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:33:52PM +0530, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> > Remove unneeded error handling on the result of a call to
> > platform_get_resource when the value is passed to
> > devm_ioremap_resource.
>
> Please use subject lines matching the
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:33:52PM +0530, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> > Remove unneeded error handling on the result of a call to
> > platform_get_resource when the value is passed to
> > devm_ioremap_resource.
>
> Please use subject lines matching the
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:33:52PM +0530, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> Remove unneeded error handling on the result of a call to
> platform_get_resource when the value is passed to
> devm_ioremap_resource.
Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
makes it easier for
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:33:52PM +0530, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> Remove unneeded error handling on the result of a call to
> platform_get_resource when the value is passed to
> devm_ioremap_resource.
Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
makes it easier for
Remove unneeded error handling on the result of a call to
platform_get_resource when the value is passed to
devm_ioremap_resource.
The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
//
@@
expression pdev,res,n,e,e1;
expression ret != 0;
identifier l;
@@
- res =
Remove unneeded error handling on the result of a call to
platform_get_resource when the value is passed to
devm_ioremap_resource.
The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
//
@@
expression pdev,res,n,e,e1;
expression ret != 0;
identifier l;
@@
- res =
14 matches
Mail list logo