Peter Osterlund wrote:
> if (data & 0x40) sermouse->count = 0;
> + else if (sermouse->count == 0) return;
if (data & 0x40)
sermouse->count = 0;
else
if (sermouse->count == 0)
return;
?
Would have been a good time
Peter Osterlund wrote:
if (data 0x40) sermouse-count = 0;
+ else if (sermouse-count == 0) return;
if (data 0x40)
sermouse-count = 0;
else
if (sermouse-count == 0)
return;
?
Would have been a good time to
On Thursday 15 March 2007 15:16, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> If bytes get lost in the communication with a serial mouse using the
> MS protocol, the kernel driver could do a better job getting back in
> sync. The first byte in a packet has bit 6 set, and no other bytes
> have that bit set. Therefore,
If bytes get lost in the communication with a serial mouse using the
MS protocol, the kernel driver could do a better job getting back in
sync. The first byte in a packet has bit 6 set, and no other bytes
have that bit set. Therefore, if a byte is received with bit 6 cleared
when the driver thinks
If bytes get lost in the communication with a serial mouse using the
MS protocol, the kernel driver could do a better job getting back in
sync. The first byte in a packet has bit 6 set, and no other bytes
have that bit set. Therefore, if a byte is received with bit 6 cleared
when the driver thinks
On Thursday 15 March 2007 15:16, Peter Osterlund wrote:
If bytes get lost in the communication with a serial mouse using the
MS protocol, the kernel driver could do a better job getting back in
sync. The first byte in a packet has bit 6 set, and no other bytes
have that bit set. Therefore, if
6 matches
Mail list logo
