On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Lee,
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
> > On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
> >> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
> >
> > "most people" so
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Lee,
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
> > On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>> They are not maintainers
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
> >> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
> >
> > "most people" so
Hello Lee,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
>>> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
>>
>>
On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
>> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
>
> "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be
> Maintainers
[ this time with full Cc: & context preserved ]
Hi,
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 08:24:46 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Since
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 08:24:46 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
Hello Lee,
[removed since we have been discussing the same back and forth]
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> No need for that, I already explained my point of view several times
>> and you just think I'm wrong because I don't agree with you. So let's
>> just agree on
Hello Lee,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hello
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, 28 Oct
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> W dniu 28.10.2015 o 19:14, Lee Jones pisze:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
> >
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello Joe,
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 19:14, Lee Jones pisze:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 18:55, Lee Jones pisze:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
Hello Lee,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Joe,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:24 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:14 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Ah, but wait. get_maintainer.pl *does* assume M means Maintainer
> > > doesn't it?
> >
> > No, it looks at the "S:" line.
>
> Right. Then
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:14 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Ah, but wait. get_maintainer.pl *does* assume M means Maintainer
> > doesn't it?
>
> No, it looks at the "S:" line.
Right. Then assumes because the driver is 'supported' or 'maintained'
that the
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:14 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> Ah, but wait. get_maintainer.pl *does* assume M means Maintainer
> doesn't it?
No, it looks at the "S:" line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> > Hello Joe,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > >> (Lee) think(s) that the difference between
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> (Lee) think(s) that the difference between a maintainer and
> >> a reviewer is if a branch with
Hello Joe,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> (Lee) think(s) that the difference between a maintainer and
>> a reviewer is if a branch with fixes / new features are kept and pull
>> requests sent while I
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> (Lee) think(s) that the difference between a maintainer and
> a reviewer is if a branch with fixes / new features are kept and pull
> requests sent while I think that the difference is the level of
> involvement someone has with
Hello Lee,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>> >> > On Tue,
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > > Since
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> 2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
> >>> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:> >
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
> > > That's not the case at all. All it does is better
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
> > That's not the case at all. All it does is better describe the (very
> > worthy) function you *actually*
On 28.10.2015 18:21, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Lee,
>
(...)
Let me only add something to certain part of your email...
>> But you aren't maintaining the driver i.e. you don't collect patches
>> and *maintain* them on an upstream branch. Granted some of you guys
>> are doing a
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
>
> We do have in fact different tags for each type of involvement so I
> usually answer with a Reviewed-by tag if I review code for a subsystem
> I care but I don't maintainer or answer with an Acked-by tag if I
> review *and
On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
>>> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:> >
> I think you should CC the people, which are changed
Hello Lee,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers
Hi Lee,
On 2015년 10월 28일 00:42, Lee Jones wrote:
> Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
> individuals who are tasked with or volunteer to review code submitted
> to a subsystem or specific file.
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> > > have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers.
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> (Lee) think(s) that the difference between a maintainer and
> >> a reviewer is
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:14 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> Ah, but wait. get_maintainer.pl *does* assume M means Maintainer
> doesn't it?
No, it looks at the "S:" line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
Hello Lee,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Joe,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > > On Wed,
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 19:14, Lee Jones pisze:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> W dniu 28.10.2015 o 19:14, Lee Jones pisze:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> > Hello Joe,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > >> (Lee) think(s) that the
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> (Lee) think(s) that the difference between a maintainer and
> a reviewer is if a branch with fixes / new features are kept and pull
> requests sent while I think that the difference is the level of
> involvement someone has with
Hello Joe,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:53 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> (Lee) think(s) that the difference between a maintainer and
>> a reviewer is if a branch with fixes / new features are kept and pull
>>
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 18:55, Lee Jones pisze:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello Joe,
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:14 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Ah, but wait. get_maintainer.pl *does* assume M means Maintainer
> > doesn't it?
>
> No, it looks at the "S:" line.
Right. Then assumes because the driver is 'supported' or 'maintained'
that the
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:24 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:14 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Ah, but wait. get_maintainer.pl *does* assume M means Maintainer
> > > doesn't it?
> >
> > No, it looks at the "S:" line.
>
> Right. Then
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee
Hello Lee,
[removed since we have been discussing the same back and forth]
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> No need for that, I already explained my point of view several times
>> and you just think I'm wrong because I don't agree with you. So let's
Hello Lee,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> > > have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers.
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
> > > That's not the case at all. All it does is better
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> 2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
> >>> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian
[ this time with full Cc: & context preserved ]
Hi,
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 08:24:46 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Since
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 08:24:46 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
>> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
>
> "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be
> Maintainers
Hello Lee,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
>>> that doesn't seem what most
On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
>>> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:> >
> I think you should CC the people,
Hi Lee,
On 2015년 10월 28일 00:42, Lee Jones wrote:
> Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
> individuals who are tasked with or volunteer to review code submitted
> to a subsystem or specific file.
Hello Lee,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:"
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
>
> We do have in fact different tags for each type of involvement so I
> usually answer with a Reviewed-by tag if I review code for a subsystem
> I care but I don't maintainer or answer with an Acked-by tag if
On 28.10.2015 18:21, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Lee,
>
(...)
Let me only add something to certain part of your email...
>> But you aren't maintaining the driver i.e. you don't collect patches
>> and *maintain* them on an upstream branch. Granted some of you guys
>> are doing a
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
> > That's not the case at all. All it does is better describe the (very
> > worthy) function you *actually*
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones
Hello Lee,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 27 Oct
2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
>
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:> >
> > > I think you should CC the people, which are changed from "M:" to
> > > "R:", though.
> >
> > Yes, makes sense.
> >
> > I'd like to collect some
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> > > have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers.
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> > have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
> > individuals who are tasked with or volunteer
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
> individuals who are tasked with or volunteer to review code submitted
> to a subsystem or
Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
individuals who are tasked with or volunteer to review code submitted
to a subsystem or specific file. However, according to MAINTAINERS
we have 1046 Maintainers
Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
individuals who are tasked with or volunteer to review code submitted
to a subsystem or specific file. However, according to MAINTAINERS
we have 1046 Maintainers
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> > > have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers.
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
> individuals who are tasked with or volunteer to review code submitted
> to a subsystem or
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> > have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
> > individuals who are tasked with or volunteer
2015-10-28 3:44 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches :
>
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:> >
> > > I think you should CC the people, which are changed from "M:" to
> > > "R:", though.
> >
> > Yes, makes sense.
> >
> > I'd
74 matches
Mail list logo