On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:07:52PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:37:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
> > a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
> > has lead some
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:37:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
> a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
> has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers,
> which loses
Hello!
The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers,
which loses the self-documenting advantages of rcu_assign_pointer()
This patch uses
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:37:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers,
which loses the
Hello!
The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers,
which loses the self-documenting advantages of rcu_assign_pointer()
This patch uses
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:07:52PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:37:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
has lead some to avoid
6 matches
Mail list logo