On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 13:19 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 10:25 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > Also, that "Later kernels" thing has already arrived. I believe it was
> > > > implemented in
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 13:19 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 10:25 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > Also, that "Later kernels" thing has already arrived. I believe it was
> > > implemented in 2.6.35.
> >
> > How does the kernel currently c
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 10:25 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Also, that "Later kernels" thing has already arrived. I believe it was
> > implemented in 2.6.35.
>
> How does the kernel currently call the disconnect method? I can't yet
> say for sure, and it se
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 10:25 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Also, that "Later kernels" thing has already arrived. I believe it was
> implemented in 2.6.35.
How does the kernel currently call the disconnect method? I can't yet
say for sure, and it seems silly to send a v2 dropping those lines
without
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> CONFIG_USB_PERSIST was removed in v2.6.26. Remove a reference to it from
> Documentation. That reference was a bit odd to begin with.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
> ---
> "[...] under certain circumstances [...]"? Is that about
> USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME?
CONFIG_USB_PERSIST was removed in v2.6.26. Remove a reference to it from
Documentation. That reference was a bit odd to begin with.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
"[...] under certain circumstances [...]"? Is that about
USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME? Anyhow, I feel this paragraph needs more work,
but tha
6 matches
Mail list logo