Hi Greg,
On Saturday 10 March 2007 02:22, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:12:04AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry
Hi Greg,
On Saturday 10 March 2007 02:22, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:12:04AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov
On 3/10/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:12:04AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
On 3/10/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:12:04AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Greg,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:12:04AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Greg,
> > > >
> > > > Please consider
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
> > > to using attribute
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
> > to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my
> >
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
> to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my
> input class_device -> device conversion (which is 99% done btw).
Argh, I
Greg,
Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my
input class_device -> device conversion (which is 99% done btw).
I looked through -mm and the latest git and there does not seem to be
any users of
Greg,
Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my
input class_device - device conversion (which is 99% done btw).
I looked through -mm and the latest git and there does not seem to be
any users of
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Greg,
Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my
input class_device - device conversion (which is 99% done btw).
Argh, I never
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Greg,
Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my
input
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Greg,
Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
to using attribute groups which
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:12:04AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Greg,
Please consider applying the patch
14 matches
Mail list logo