kbuild test robot wrote:
> >> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h:561:9: note: in expansion of macro 'SB_NOEXEC'
> SB_NOEXEC | SB_NOSUID | SB_NODEV)
There's a missing '|' before SB_NOEXEC at the end of the preceding line.
David
kbuild test robot wrote:
> >> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h:561:9: note: in expansion of macro 'SB_NOEXEC'
> SB_NOEXEC | SB_NOSUID | SB_NODEV)
There's a missing '|' before SB_NOEXEC at the end of the preceding line.
David
Hi David,
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.12-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20170609]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi David,
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.12-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20170609]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi David,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20170609]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi David,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20170609]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Jeff Layton wrote:
> I guess you mean stuff like affs_fill_super which does:
>
> sb->s_flags |= MS_NODEV | MS_NOSUID;
>
> It seems like it's doing that too late to be useful.
Actually, after the change, it seems nothing actually tests SB_NOSUID,
SB_NODEV or SB_NOEXEC,
Jeff Layton wrote:
> I guess you mean stuff like affs_fill_super which does:
>
> sb->s_flags |= MS_NODEV | MS_NOSUID;
>
> It seems like it's doing that too late to be useful.
Actually, after the change, it seems nothing actually tests SB_NOSUID,
SB_NODEV or SB_NOEXEC, so those bits should
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 16:01 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Differentiate the MS_* flags passed to mount(2) from the internal flags set
> in the super_block's s_flags. s_flags are now called SB_*, with the names
> and the values for the moment mirroring the MS_* flags that they're
> equivalent to.
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 16:01 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Differentiate the MS_* flags passed to mount(2) from the internal flags set
> in the super_block's s_flags. s_flags are now called SB_*, with the names
> and the values for the moment mirroring the MS_* flags that they're
> equivalent to.
10 matches
Mail list logo